Thursday Morning Links

Happy Close-Enough-to-Friday

Climate models warming twice as fast as reality.

Sex on a motorcycle at speed? Lots of people want to die having sex, but having your scrotum ablated off should be optional.

As if NYPD cops need their commissioner to tell them to ignore the law.

…And the best part is, he’s learning!

Sploosh!
….He’s learning

Comments

359 responses to “Thursday Morning Links”

  1. Grumbletarian

    I SEE NOTHING!

    ~Sgt. Schultz

    1. Drake

      Where?

      1. bacon-magic

        Avatars are awesome.

  2. The Fusionist

    Very minimalist. A profound commentary on the vapidity of the “news” today and on the societal…whatever.

    1. Old Man With Candy

      Our Guest Commentator today was John Cage.

      1. Scruffy Nerfherder

        grrrrrrr…… I hate that pompous ass.

        1. Slammer

          He’s no Phillip Glass, that’s for sure

  3. Old Man With Candy

    These seem… sparse.

    1. Brett L

      Sorry. I thought it was scheduled for 7:30. My bad. At least it has someone else’s name on it.

      1. leonadasiv

        This never would have happened if Robby were in charge of links….. Mostly cause the links would never come.

        1. Old Man With Candy

          Here, the links come whether someone writes them or not. We’re a very modern organization.

    1. Scruffy Nerfherder

      I think people — you know, this is colored by John McCain’s disagreement with President Trump. It all is. Everything that he says about the president is colored by his own personal dispute he has got running with President Trump. And it should be taken with a grain of salt because John McCain is the guy that has advocated for war everywhere. He would bankrupt the nation. And actually we’re very lucky John McCain is not in charge because I think we would be in perpetual war.

      Boom, headshot

      1. John Titor

        because I think we would be in perpetual war.

        How is this different then right now?

        1. Scruffy Nerfherder

          Point taken. Personally, I would drag out photos of McCain with the Syrian “freedom fighters” that turned out to be with ISIS every time the old coot opened his mouth.

        2. Viking1865

          Meh, the United States is the imperial power/hegemon of the world. The legions are always going to be standing to at some wall or fort at the edges of the empire, or sortieing out past the lines to burn some barbarian village or another. That’s what happens when you’re the country that has assumed responsibility for keeping the sea lanes open and keeping the lid on the pot.

          I’m not saying we should be doing that, but we are doing that. Brushfire wars are just the cost of being the great power. If McCain had won in 2008, we would have been in a major conflict with somebody during his term. Major as in “more Americans will die in combat over the course of the war then will die in Chicago.”

          1. John Titor

            I’m just quibbling over the idea that perpetual war isn’t already the ‘neutral’ state of the modern United States, I’m sure if McCain had been in power by now there’d be a collection of half-failing Middle Eastern states, including Libya and Syria, being propped up by American dollars and troops.

          2. Suthenboy

            So they were right when they said if we voted for McCain we would end up perpetually at war in more places than any time since WWII.

          3. GSL in E

            I know. Thank God that didn’t happen.

    2. The Fusionist

      And John McCain is once again the truth-telling maverick.

      And Trump is committing *obvious* violations of the Constitution’s Emoluments Clause.

      And Sen. Paul is like one of Josef Stalin’s lackeys.

      Very credible and responsible piece of reporting.

      1. bacon-magic

        Jonathan Chait is Adam Lanza

    3. Grumbletarian

      Every authoritarian requires spineless lackeys who will attack his dissidents.

      This wholly unironic line of text has been brought to you by Jonathan Chait.

      1. leonadasiv

        Well that makes the whole thing make sense.

      2. leonadasiv

        I don’t want to read it because it’s chait, but it’s his argument that because Rand is very willing to work with Trump, he’s a lacky? I mean I thought the seasNS vote was bad, but other than that what has Rand done?

        1. leonadasiv

          * Sessions …Stupid mobile phone.

        2. Scruffy Nerfherder

          His argument is that since Rand doesn’t want to tie up the new administration in investigations in its first month and allow it to put forth legislation, he’s an authoritarian lackey.

          1. leonadasiv

            I’d be pleased that liberals now agree that a tied up government is best, but I know they don’t think that. They only want a government that is composed of their people to function.

        3. Volren

          It’s the Tony argument – if you’re not frothing at the mouth and screaming about how terrible Trump is, clearly your lips are attached to his ass regardless of how supportive you actually are.

      3. Suthenboy

        I almost pissed my pants when I read that.

    4. Suthenboy

      Johnathan Chait, reliable stooge for the left.

      “The Republican Party has largely decided to cover for Donald Trump’s massive corruption, grotesque lies, and manifest unfitness for office. But few of them have gone quite so far, or quite so cravenly, as Rand Paul.”

      Trump gathers the press for the express purpose of scolding them about their unfitness for their job, for their mendacity and their extreme bias. The response is “He thinks he can tell people what to think. That’s out job!”, “Did Trump visit slavery because you know he said white people, not black people built this country. I heard him say that.” and now this. Tip of the iceberg. The mendacity is just breathtaking. Outside of proggie enclaves nobody is buying their shit. Trump couldn’t hire better operatives than these morons.

      Never interfere with an enemy while he’s in the process of destroying himself.

  4. Scruffy Nerfherder

    How meta.

  5. Scruffy Nerfherder

    Extra points for using “ablated scrotum”

    1. Slammer

      +1 Goregrind song title

    2. Where’s Groovus when we need him?

      1. Swiss Servator

        I dunno – I am curled up on the floor, wincing in pain at the very thought. I am not sure Doc could help right now.

        1. Gustave Lytton

          Switzy’s in the fetal position! Now’s our chance to make puns without narrow gazes!

    3. Bobarian LMD

      A point here though, if you are having Sex on a motorcycle at speed you are very likely made up of 100% scrotum.

  6. Grumbletarian

    Climate models warming twice as fast as reality.

    Mother Gaia just hasn’t gotten the memo from the scientists who know what’s really going on.

    1. Slammer

      Someone needs to shoot her the TPS report memo

      1. Swiss Servator

        That would be great.

      2. GSL in E

        She has people skills. She is good at dealing with people.

  7. The Fusionist

    Hey, there’s links now!

    1. UnCivilServant

      I most strenuously object.

    2. Old Man With Candy

      We threw Brett into a cold shower, walked him around, and stuffed him with black coffee.

      1. UnCivilServant

        Why? None of those would actually have sobered him up.

        1. Bobarian LMD

          Silly UCS… those are what we call “euphemisms”.

          And nothing will sober Brett up.

      2. Slammer

        Get him down to Da Nang for his mission right away

  8. Brett L

    I’m totally sober, dude.

    A New Mexico woman who confidently performed a cartwheel for officers during a field sobriety test was nonetheless arrested on suspicion of driving while intoxicated last week.

    1. Slammer

      Was she wearing a kilt?

      1. UnCivilServant

        It’s only a kilt if she identifies as male.

      2. Ha! If they’d have given me a FST that day, I’d have blown off the charts.

    2. Lachowsky

      Field sobriety tests are nothing but an opportunity for offices to collect evidence against you. Passing one won’t exculpate you and failing one will help convict you. A polite “Fuck You, I’m not jumping through your hoops” is the only rational response to an officers request for you to perform a field sobriety test.

      1. Vhyrus

        Is this a scene on ‘how to get your ass kicked by the police part 2’?

        1. Lachowsky

          I said Polite.

          1. Vhyrus

            I don’t care if you hang a handwritten note and a bouquet of flowers around a puppy’s neck and hand it to him, telling a cop you’re not going to do what he just asked you to do is the surest way of finding out how a nightstick feels up your ass.

  9. My hero

    Anti-Trump protesters at the University of Washington were firmly reminded that their shouting -in a library – was not appreciated.

    About two dozen social justice warriors gathered in the normally quiet zone, a couple students wielding megaphones, and began to chant ‘Who’s got the power?’ ‘We’ve got the power!’ ‘What kind of power?’ ‘Equal power!’

    But just as the momentum is getting louder, a lone voice calling ‘Hey, hey … hey!’ interrupts the protest. Everyone quiets down as the camera dramatically pans to a young man in a dark-blue buttoned up shirt and glasses.

    ‘This is library!’ he scolds them.

    Tolerance and equal power in action:

    …a few feebly call out insults, including one woman who seems to ask if he’s going to go back to Beijing.

    1. Grumbletarian

      He’s using his asian privilege to man-shush these sisters oppressed by the patriarchy! Or something. Might have to sprinkle in a few more SJW buzzwords.

      1. mr simple

        *checks grievance hierarchy cheat sheet*

        Female over male, black or other non-whites over Asian: yes, I think you’re right.

    2. John Titor

      “THIS IS LIBRARY” is basically applicable to my entire university experience, and this was before the trendy social justice protests. Students need to learn the library isn’t where you hang out and to shut the fuck up.

    3. Slammer

      Correction: Ribrary

      1. ChipsnSalsa

        Good thing Swiss is on the floor writhing in pain.

      2. Swiss Servator

        *narrows gaze*

        I got better.

    4. Scruffy Nerfherder

      Asian dude – studying to create new pharmaceutical compounds to prevent cancer.

      White chicks – listening to themselves bleat and patting each other on the back for it

      1. Mad Scientist

        He didn’t create that!

        1. Zero Sum Game

          You’re such a Wankel. 😀

          1. Seguin

            I’m sorry, did you just microaggress against an Epitrochoidal-American?

            DAFUQ?

    5. Lachowsky

      ‘Who’s got the power?’ ‘We’ve got the power!’ ‘What kind of power?’ ‘Equal power!’

      Just how the fuck do you have the power If the power is eqaul. Wouldn’t that mean that everyone has the power.

      Someone needs to hire a better slogan writer.

    6. Suthenboy

      “…one woman who seems to ask if he’s going to go back to Beijing.”

      Equal power, huh? How far away from the mask can they get? Pretty soon they will be back to goose-stepping and openly espousing white superiority.

    7. Gustave Lytton

      Funny how Trump is the one who’s supposedly anti-foreigner.

      InFocus better watch out, they’re getting a lot of competition in the projection business.

  10. John Titor

    Stealing from Derp’s links, but the title of this Slate article is just too good: It’s Time to Give Up on Facts. Or at least to temporarily lay them down in favor of a more useful weapon: emotions.

    You’ll hate it because we liberals tend to pride ourselves on caring about evidence, science, and accuracy. Being factually right, or at least grounded in reality, is something we value, something meaningful to our self-concept.

    Self awareness seems to be a secondary goal.

    I also love that for some reason he feels the need to constantly reference internet culture from over a decade ago.

    1. UnCivilServant

      Self awareness seems to be a secondary goalAbandoned All together.

      I think this is closer to reality.

    2. Slammer

      Let’s all go back to being 3 year olds

      1. RBS

        That is an insult to most three year olds. At least they usually ask “why?” (repeatedly, until you want to scream).

        1. bacon-magic

          Why?

          1. BuSab Agent

            Because I said so.

          2. bacon-magic

            But…why?(just smack me and get this over with)

          3. mr simple

            Don’t push your weird fetishes on me.

          4. BuSab Agent

            *Smack*

          5. •SLAP•

            Did IFH get the memo to come over here?

    3. leonadasiv

      I thought they were trying this strategy? Gosh this means that it can only get worse…

      1. Suthenboy

        Yep. This is nothing new for them. All they are doing is tossing away the mask. I am glad to see it.

    4. Grumbletarian

      It’s time to put our scholarly spectacles down and have a nice long tantrum.

      1. Scruffy Nerfherder

        For some reason, the condescending attitude and unwillingness to address faults with our argumentation isn’t convincing anyone. Time to stamp our feet instead.

    5. Chipwooder

      At least they’re finally being honest with themselves.

    6. Suthenboy

      The idiot left really is impossible to parody.

    7. This Machine

      “A more useful weapon,” huh?

      How telling. That they see facts as weapons, and not as truths used to orient themselves in the workings of the world, speaks volumes to their worldview. So of course, if emotions become a more useful cudgel to bludgeon one’s ideological enemies, and especially if facts no longer serve that purpose, then (to them) it’s time to abandon truth and appeal directly to emotion. Fucking disgusting.

      Remember, lads, the Law is not a shining fortress on a hill. To the Left, the Law is a sword with which to cut one’s enemies.

    8. GSL in E

      You’ll hate it because we liberals tend to pride ourselves on caring about evidence, science, and accuracy. Being factually right, or at least grounded in reality, is something we value, something meaningful to our self-concept.

      Awesome. So, the post-election rioting, the insistence that the US was being taken over by neo-Nazis, and interpreting the election result as the work of a conspiracy involving the Russian government, the FBI, and Facebook … that was what you folks consider “grounded in reality”?

      1. UnCivilServant

        To be fair, they never said which reality.

  11. Not my hero

    There is an employee at my organization that is 100% pro bicycle and 100% anti-combustion engine. He is very vocal about it, and everyone, including myself is generally supportive of his choices and knows him as that dedicated life choice kind of guy. Most days, he bikes to work as you would expect.

    The issues seem to come up when I request that he travels for work. There is another office in another city, and it requires him to bike for hours to get there. We deal with hardware equipment, so it is not something that is very easily for him to “remote” help, and he is the subject expert of this device. He pushes back very aggressively to have me find another plan, in which I genuinely cannot find one. I’ve offered to give him a lift on days that both he and I are going to the same field office, but he declines as it is against his personal morals, and then does indeed cycle the long distance. I get the feeling he has blamed me personally for this chore, as I often get the cold shoulder from him now. He has started to play the victim card around work and I believe people are starting to turn sour against me for making him travel.

    Recently, I have informed him that he needs to travel to another State on business. He seemed angry and snarkily stated about how he has to make it a week long biking trip to get there.

    How can I ease this situation? On the one hand, I don’t want to be that “evil” guy forcing him to go against his beliefs, but I need him to perform his job and travel. I also don’t want to lose him as an employee. Is there a compromise that can be made?

    1. Scruffy Nerfherder

      Is there a compromise that can be made?

      Have him train his replacement and then can his ass. This ain’t rocket science.

    2. Slammer

      Accidentally run him over

      1. leonadasiv

        Definitely the funniest solution.

        1. Vhyrus

          Not to mention the poetic justice. GTA MUTHAFUCKA!

    3. UnCivilServant

      Simple “Get on that plane or you’re fired” then fire him when he refuses.

      1. leonadasiv

        Remind him that Jets don’t use combustion engines, they use Jet engines.

        1. Vhyrus

          As an engineer, I want to choke you right now.

          1. leonadasiv

            *acts like the joke was intentional*

          2. MikeT86

            I mean, it’s not like we name a section “the combuster” or anything.

            It’s Diffuser and combuster.

          3. This Machine

            +1 Suck Squeeze Bang Blow

          4. westernsloper

            A couple years ago, I was walking across the tarmac to board a plane. Twin turbo-prop many airlines fly into the smaller airports. The young lady in front of me was complaining loudly to someone on her phone about the size of the plane. Then she said, “It doesn’t even have engines, it has propellers!”

        2. MikeT86

          “it’s got a high bypass ratio, get the fuck on the plane, or in the line for unemployment.”

    4. Grumbletarian

      If travel was part of his job description when he was hired, tell him he can bike to another job with another company if he refuses. If this is a new part of his job duties, methinks a pay raise is in order, and he can choose to accept his new role or not.

      1. Rhywun

        Sounds fair to me to treat it like any other religious accommodation.

      2. Gustave Lytton

        Job duties aren’t fixed at hiring. He doesn’t want to perform his assigned duties (new or old), there’s the door.

        The big problem is accommodating this idiot all along. Biking for hours to go to a nearby office? Ridiculous and opens up the company to liability while he’s biking. That his coworkers or his boss don’t think he’s insane is telling.

        1. Rhywun

          opens up the company to liability while he’s biking

          That doesn’t make any more sense than making the company liable for car crashes for employees who drive to work.

          1. Gustave Lytton

            Traveling between offices would be on the clock (he starts at one work location and then travels to another), versus normal commuting which isn’t.

          2. Rhywun

            Fair enough. The quote wasn’t clear on that.

          3. R C Dean

            I’d be willing to bet that riding a bike through city traffic is more likely to result in a workers’ comp injury claim than driving a car.

            How he commutes is his own business. How he travels on the company clock is the company’s business. The mistake was ever allowing him to travel by bike during company time.

        2. Grumbletarian

          Job duties aren’t fixed at hiring. He doesn’t want to perform his assigned duties (new or old), there’s the door.

          Job duties may change over time, but if you’re going to come up to me and start adding things I’m supposed to do for your company and not offer additional compensation for doing so, I’ll quickly tell you to find someone else with the same level of experience in your company that I have and walk out the door. Like I said, if Johnny Bicycle knew all along that he would be asked to travel out of state from time to time as part of his job, then he can suck it up because he was under no illusions that he wouldn’t be asked to go out of state. But if Cave Johnson just dropped that in his lap one day, then Cave should be dropping some extra money into his pocket at the same time, or Cave can find someone else, or take the trip himself.

    5. Pope Jimbo

      Can he not afford a Prius (or rent one) for his long travel trips?

      1. UnCivilServant

        The cyclist is not doing this out of principle, but insanity.

        1. John Titor

          Exactly. He assumes it’s an environmentalist thing. When really it could be one of those nutters who think they’re allergic to EM radiation or something.

          1. Glitterstorm

            Yeah what the hell. Hybrids and used EVs are cheap as hell. Like set up a solar powered charge station you ass and be done with it. I swear there’s two categories of these people: conservationists and environmentalists. The latter lacks initiative and self reliance. Disgusting!

    6. Tundra

      Bicycles are for children. Fire him and hire someone who drives the new Camaro.

      1. Bobarian LMD

        Great car, but I like to be able to see out my car. Rear and side visibility is terrible. Like almost as bad as a Bradley CFV.

    7. Suthenboy

      “One of the people that works for me is an insufferable asshole. I am firing his ass. While I am at it I am going to write my own pink slip.”

      Fixed.

    8. BuSab Agent

      Stick him on his bike, tie the bike to a car , and drive him. Added bonus is that when he arrives he’ll have Robby Soave’s hair style.

      1. John Titor

        In RPG character designers it’s listed as “Wind-swept and majestic”.

    9. JaimeRoberto

      Where does this guy think that the electricity that likely powers the company’s devices comes from? How does he heat or cool his home? Maybe not from an ICE, but there most likely is some kind of combustion going on. What a dick.

  12. Rent-seeking. Not just for Louisiana funeral homes (emphasis mine):

    New York State Department of Financial Services cybersecurity regulations for financial institutions and insurance companies will take effect on March 1, 2017. The regulations require institutions to have a CISO, use multifactor authentication, and report breaches within 72 hours. Organizations must also develop a cybersecurity program and a written incident response plan. While the regulations take effect on March 1, organizations have 180 days to come into compliance, and there are longer grace periods for certain provisions.

    [Editor Comments]

    [Williams] The requirement for a documented incident response plan is an excellent step for increasing security as is the requirement to have a CISO. However, where’s the requirement to have a third party penetration test. I understand the value of using internal teams for continuous vulnerability assessment. But periodic third party security helps avoid the group think that often takes hold of internal teams.

    1. Derp, I guess bolding doesn’t work for emphasis when blockquotes are already bolded.

      This part: However, where’s the requirement to have a third party penetration test. I understand the value of using internal teams for continuous vulnerability assessment.

      1. Dammit where’s my edit button. I’m gonna turn Catholic with all these self-replies.

        1. UnCivilServant

          We don’t need no stinkin’ edit buttons.

          1. Swiss Servator

            The correct attitude to take.

      2. Lafe Long

        Derp, I guess bolding doesn’t work for emphasis when blockquotes are already bolded.

        I’ve been messing around with trshmnstr’s Monocle to address things like this.

        The problem with doing that is that when he adds stuff and updates Monocle, my changes will be lost.
        So I’ve set up my own script to take care of some things that Monocle doesn’t do (yet):

        1) Opens all external links in new tabs
        2) Unbolds the blockquotes so you can use strong and em inside them.
        3) Makes all youtube links red… so I can tell that they’re videos before clicking on them. Hopefully trsh will implement inline youtubes in Monocle at some point (like in Reasonable).

        I had also made all links orange for Gilmore at one point, but took that out.

        I’m currently running it with Monocle with no problems.

        It’s here. If anyone is interested

        1. LT_Fish

          Soooo, I’m completely illiterate when it comes to coding stuff like this. I’m running firefox with a couple add-ins – already installed Tampermonkey…but where do I install the monocle codes I’ve been seeing here?

    2. Swiss Servator

      I am already living this dream nightmare. NYS has just kicked a vast number of small and medium sized businesses in the yarbles, and I am sure they don’t care.

      1. The timeline is a bit crazy. At least if it were being phased in a bit more slowly there’d be more opportunity for a market to develop in not-so-great but relatively inexpensive compliance products, as there is for PCI.

  13. Warty

    Happy Close-Enough-to-Friday

    Not nearly close enough.

    1. John Titor

      You have spawn, you don’t get days off.

    2. UnCivilServant

      What’s the significance of Friday?

      1. Lachowsky

        It’s the day that reminds you that you have to work all weekend.

      2. Chipwooder

        Well, without him, Robinson Crusoe wouldn’t have had anyone to talk to.

      3. Certified Public Asshat

        Even over here, you find no joy in food or time off.

        1. UnCivilServant

          Time off? What new spore of madness is this?

    3. Slammer

      Listen to the new Immolation, dude. It’s good

  14. Pope Jimbo

    Minnesoda Tourist Tip:

    In addition to crazy eyes, make sure to check for tattoos when deciding whether or not to bring a gal back to your room.

    Don’t stick it in crazy (or inked).

    1. Brett L

      Such brave. Much fierce. Now everyone will know that they stand with RBG!

    2. Tundra

      *researches tattoo removal opportunities*

    3. BuSab Agent

      Also avoid aposematic hair coloration.

    4. bacon-magic

      They should get that tattoo as a tramp stamp so there cis-hetero shit lord master has a target to hit.

    5. Max Coins

      It saves a lot of research time when people label themselves. I’m all for it.

      1. MikeS

        You know who else thought it was a good idea to label people?

        1. Swiss Servator

          mynamebadges.com?

        2. Max Coins

          Abbe normal?

        3. DOOMco

          SJW’s?

        4. BuSab Agent

          Convention organizers?

  15. Scruffy Nerfherder

    Obama is still saving us

    Top lawyers who helped the Obama White House craft and hold to rules of conduct believe President Donald Trump and his staff will break ethics norms meant to guard against politicization of the government — and they’ve formed a new group to prepare, and fight.

    1. leonadasiv

      Um, concerning politicization of government,I have bad news for them about their former boss…

      1. JaimeRoberto

        That’s just a phrase that means “Those guys are doing something I don’t like”.

  16. Thymirus

    Salutations, comrades. I’ve finally made time to mingle with you. Since last week, I’ve been reading the various contributions to this website as time permits, and I haven’t found a single article yet which hasn’t impressed me, from the analytical to the philosophical. This was a superb idea.

    Are forums still being considered to complement the primary site? I offered to establish them, but with the obviously competent developers behind Glibertarians.com, I doubt my unremarkable skills are necessary.

    Our former home’s articles remain lackluster at their best, and cataclysmically retarded at their worst. My residual attachment to Reason is dissipating.

    Is it possible to imbed images into our posts here?

    1. John Titor

      Judging by his profile pic I think Thymirus may be the personification of the collective MURICAN superego.

      1. Swiss Servator

        If I could, I would make the National Anthem play every time you clicked on his avatar.

        1. Thymirus

          I stand whenever I hear it. 🙂

          1. BuSab Agent

            It is important to avoid DVT.

      2. Thymirus

        Judging by your reflexively intemperate, antagonistic reactions to American symbolism, I’ll assume you’re a prototypical anti-American, and with the self-destructive inferiority complex common in Canadians of your ilk most assuredly gnawing at the back of your mind, daily life must be a challenge for you.

        Your inveterate hysterics and pugnacity on this subject became tiresome long ago. At the very least, you could have waited for some sort of provocation on my part to become an insolent clown.

        1. John Titor

          Relax friend, I’m just ribbing. Note that I said nothing negative about it.

          But I appreciate the attempts to psychoanalyze me, it’s cheaper than therapy.

        2. bacon-magic

          Red, white, and blue flags are ok. Red and white flags with maple leafs are ok. White flags are for the French.

        3. Swiss Servator

          Francis, lighten up.

        4. darius404

          Can’t tell if serious.

          1. Slammer

            Does that eagle look like a comedian?

    2. Old Man With Candy

      IMG tags work for embedding external content as long as it comes from an https site.

      Re: forums, SP and I have both admin-ed forums in the past, ranging from medium size to pretty large. Wayyyyy too much work considering that we’re doing this for fun, not money.

      1. Thymirus

        There’s no question that they’re pain in the ass. Regardless, thanks for the website.

      2. The Elite Elite

        “we’re doing this for fun, not money”

        Fake libertarians confirmed! No true libertarian does anything for free.

        1. UnCivilServant

          It’s a loss-leader in attempt to build market share.

        2. Old Man With Candy

          Actually, the thing you should question is my Jewiness.

    1. UnCivilServant

      Every hash function by definition has fewer possible hashes than there are datasets to hash. Thus it is impossible to design a hash function that cannot be made to collide. It’s just a matter of making it more difficult to accomplish.

      1. Every hash function by definition has fewer possible hashes than there are datasets to hash.

        That much is obvious.

        They are not announcing that they brute forced it until they inevitably came upon a collision. They are announcing that they successfully used some researchers’ proposed method to systematically (drastically) reduce the amount of computation needed to find a collision.

        1. UnCivilServant

          If I somehow implied I was talking about brute force, I appologise.

          I was attempting to illustrate the nature of the red queen’s race in cryptography and data assurance.

          1. My apologies as well. There is a tendency for various edgelord self-proclaimed experts to adopt similar phrasing as you did in saying things that boil down to “psh, collisions are inevitable, they are just making it a bit faster, what’s the big deal, the NSA has unlimited secret supercomputers anyway?”

            This is what the big deal is, albeit that particular attack relied on some Windows quirks, and I don’t know if this particular collision attack against SHA-1 would have still been effective had SHA-1 been in use instead of MD5 (although to my non-cryptographer eye, it looks that way).

    2. leonadasiv

      I thought SHA1 was already being passed out by SHA3?

      1. Scruffy Nerfherder

        I phased out a SHA-T this morning.

        1. Swiss Servator

          *opera applause*

      2. It is, but folks have been dragging their feet just as they did with MD5.

        This is the “OK guys, we told you a few years ago that there was a theoretical technique so you should get things moving, now here’s a practical technique, so please, FFS, get things moving”-post

        1. UnCivilServant

          Did? I know places still using MD5.

          1. I don’t take kindly to your wordplay, but I’m sure we can hash it out eventually

          2. Heh, yeah, true.

            What I like is that many people seem to have gotten the wrong message, and dutifully stopped using MD5 as a nearly useless password hashing function in favor of using SHA-1 as a nearly useless password hashing function.

          3. Gustave Lytton

            Geez. And I thought AA was taking their sweet time phasing out their MD-80s.

        2. leonadasiv

          Wait, MD5 has been phased out? Crap… Um I’ve got to go do something real quick.

  17. The Fusionist

    The Woman’s Center at Yale celebrates the renaming of Calhoun Hall after a pioneering female admiral and math whiz, Grace Hopper:

    “On Saturday, the Yale Women’s Center issued a statement concerning the renaming of Calhoun College to Grace Hopper College. While we are sincerely happy about the decision to rename the college, we are skeptical of the administration’s intentions in renaming the college after a white woman, regardless of Grace Hopper’s GRD ’34 accomplishments as a woman in STEM and in the military. We recognize that white femininity has often been used as a tool to enforce racist and colonialist structures. As such, we hope to explain how this decision constitutes “whitewashing” to the wider Yale community….

    “…There was no recognition of the countless hours black students and students of color have put into the fight against the honoring of a white supremacist in their home. In the process, they sacrificed sleep, homework and mental health….

    ” Changing Calhoun to Hopper did not provide an answer to the demand of students of color: For Yale to recognize its complicity in white supremacy. Thus, the Hopper College renaming is a red herring — it attempts to end the discussion of race and slavery at Yale by replacing a problematic white person with a nonproblematic white person. Given the historical legacy of Calhoun, the administration did a wrong by not naming the college after a black person.”

    1. Scruffy Nerfherder

      By definition, you cannot satisfy these people. Their power is based on “victimhood”. If they accept any compromise then they give up their power.

      1. The Fusionist

        But I appreciate the courage of the students who sacrificed their mental health. It’s like the widow donating her mite, they don’t have much to give, so it’s impressive what little they have, they sacrifice.

    2. Grumbletarian

      IF they’d named it after a black man, they’d complain that it was names after a man.

      If they named it after a black woman, they’d complain that it wasn’t also a LGBTQWERTY individual.

      Fuck ’em. Name it after Robert E. Lee and tell them to go to some other school.

      1. UnCivilServant

        No, Nathan Bedford Forrest College.

        1. John Titor

          That’s Nathan Bedford Forrest III Memorial College to you.

          1. Swiss Servator

            Forrest Gump Skool

          2. Slammer

            Name it whatever they want. But whatever costs associated with the name change goes on the students demanding the name changes bill.

        2. The Fusionist

          Yale buildings are supposed to be named after Yale alumni.

          How about George W. Bush College?

          1. UnCivilServant

            There would be a terrible shortage of worthwhile people to use.

          2. GSL in E

            Problem solved: name it after a fictional Yale alumnus.

            Montgomery C. Burns College

          3. Grumbletarian

            Excellent. :steeples fingers:

          4. Grumbletarian

            Plus, he’s a person of color.

    3. leonadasiv

      I’ve been waiting to post this video

      1. Sour Kraut

        Very good! Recommended to anyone else corpse fucking this thread.

      1. The Fusionist

        Lake Itorlumpit.

  18. Pope Jimbo

    I look forward to the follow up to this story that a) prominently proclaim him innocent and b) announce the charges against his accuser.

    And I am sure I will still be looking forward to those stories for quite some time.

    1. Scruffy Nerfherder

      Don’t stick it in crazy.

      1. John Titor

        Need to consult the Hot-Crazy scale in order to make a ruling.

        1. Juvenile Bluster

          The Hot-Crazy scale doesn’t take into account the parts of the scale where even if she’s an 11, she can still be too crazy to stick it in.

          1. John Titor

            That’s the part of the scale where you have to start thinking about quantum entanglement.

          2. robc

            Sure it does. If she is an 11 but a 14 on the crazy scale, then she is too crazy.

  19. Negroni Please

    the ablative of scrotum is scroto

    1. Scruffy Nerfherder

      -4 wasted years of Latin

      *Virgil’s Aeneid still gives me nightmares*

      1. Negroni Please

        I can handle Virgil. It’s the memories of reading Tacitus that haunt my nightmares. Once upon a time I was a medievalist and Classical Latin can fuck right off. Also wtf Renaissance Humanists? Fucking asshole nerds trying to outdo Cicero with every stupid and pointless sentence.

      2. MikeT86

        Pro-Tip: have borderline photographic memory, memorize translations, pick enough words out, write translation from memory, Ace tests, learn 0 Latin.

        1. Negroni Please

          But what would the point of that be?

          1) have borderline photographic memory
          2) Learn a living language for real
          3) Profit

  20. Thymirus

    http://www.news4jax.com/news/florida/legislature-looks-to-expand-gun-rights

    Florida Legislature looks to expand gun rights

    The following is a look at gun-related legislation that has been filed by Republicans and Democrats

    Bills filed by Republicans would:

    Allow licensed handgun owners to openly carry their weapons.
    Allow concealed weapons permit holders to carry a gun in non-secure areas of airports.
    Allow concealed weapons permit holders to carry guns at any legislative meeting or committee meeting.
    Allow concealed weapons permit holders to carry guns on state university campuses.
    Allow concealed weapons permit holders to carry guns at county and municipal government meetings.
    Allow concealed weapons permit holders to carry guns at career centers.
    Allow members of the state Cabinet who have concealed weapons permits to carry guns anywhere not prohibited by federal law. Reduce the penalty the violating the current open carry ban from a second degree misdemeanor punishable by up to 60 days in jail and a $500 fine to a non-criminal civil fine of $25.
    Holds business owners who ban guns from their property liable for injuries suffered by a concealed weapon permit holder who is attacked
    Allows concealed weapons permit holders to bring guns to courthouses and temporarily surrender them to security. The courts must keep the weapons in locked storage space.
    Expand the “stand your ground” to give more protection to people using the self-defense claim by placing the burden of proof on prosecutors to prove people charged with assaulting or killing someone else wasn’t acting in self-defense.
    Place on the November ballot a measure asking voters to exempt law enforcement officers from the 72-hour waiting period to buy personal handguns.

    Bills filed by Democrats would:

    Ban semi-automatic assault-type rifles like AR-15s and AK-47 and detachable ammunition magazines that hold more than 7 rounds.
    Bans guns at performance arts centers and theaters.
    Removes exceptions to a law requiring guns in homes occupied by minors be stored in locked boxes or with trigger locks.
    Increases the penalties for displaying concealed weapons in a threatening manner on or near school properties or activities from a third degree felony to a second degree felony. Increases penalties for people who fail to store a gun in a way to prevent access by minors.

    1. Grumbletarian

      Place on the November ballot a measure asking voters to exempt law enforcement officers from the 72-hour waiting period to buy personal handguns

      Nope. Exempt the waiting period for everyone or STFU.

      1. UnCivilServant

        screw that. Have a waiting period for cops, but no wait for citizens.

      2. Lachowsky

        That’s a real problem with gun laws. Just about everyone of them has an exemption for police. The laws get the backing of the police because they are exempted. Cut the exemptions and the laws would lose a significant piece of their support.

        Also, Granting extra rights to cops is egregious. The more the government makes them citizens + , the worse they treat us citizens – .

      3. Thymirus

        Cops and their representatives will always agitate for privileges. It’s part of how they operate. They consider themselves worthy of legal perks unavailable to the average citizen. I doubt they’ll abandon that mentality.

  21. Not an Economist

    Apparently rioting is not the care free fun some people claim it is. There might actually be consequences.

    I really really feel sorry for them …. not.

    1. Scruffy Nerfherder

      To some extent I feel sorry for them because the system and their families have betrayed them by teaching them all the wrong things. Other than that, tough shit.

    2. leonadasiv

      Want to believe that this is fake, and that b there is no one it there that unaware(? Can’t think of the word) of how there actions play out in reality…

      1. Chipwooder

        Yeah, that just feels too ridiculous to be real…..but, then, we live in strange times.

    3. RBS

      Hmmm, an expletive laden tantrum on twitter? These people are always so edgy.

    4. BuSab Agent

      Laws are for peasants!

    1. Scruffy Nerfherder

      At least the link still works.

      1. leonadasiv

        And it hasn’t made every following post a part of the link. Already better than TSTSNBN.

    2. RBS

      Great, now words like vile and outrageous are going to lose all meaning.

      1. DOOMco

        now?
        /tstsnbn

  22. The Fusionist

    JOHN ZOGBY, OPINION
    The Obama Legacy: Our 21st Century Woodrow Wilson

    “I am going to venture that historians will find room in the Top Ten for President Barack Obama. Like John F. Kennedy, he will be remembered for his idealism and eloquence and like Woodrow Wilson, his time in office will be memorialized for its dignity, its vision and for his grand accomplishments. Move over, Andrew Jackson.”

    1. Scruffy Nerfherder

      “eloquence”

      uh… yeah

      1. Chipwooder

        Let me be clear….uhhhh……uhhhhhhhhhhh

        1. UnCivilServant

          I thought “let me be clear” was an unanswered prayer.

          1. This Machine

            Oh, bra-vo, sir. Bravo, indeed.

            I will steal that and use it without attribution.

          2. GSL in E

            *reads “Applause” off the teleprompter*
            *standing applause*

    2. leonadasiv

      Well I don’t like WW either, so I guess it fits.

      1. Rhywun

        Yeah, that’s where I thought it was going based on the headline. Should have known better.

    3. UnCivilServant

      He will be forgotten and consigned to the dustbin of history, as relevent a decade after his departure as William Henry Harrisson is today.

      1. John Titor

        Even Michael Moore thinks that Obama should be remembered as “the first black President, and that’s it.”

        Gives me hope for a mediocre legacy.

    4. John Titor

      like Woodrow Wilson his time in office will be memorialized for its dignity, its vision and for his grand accomplishments

      A reminder to the lurking audience that Wilson’s vision and accomplishments include laying the groundwork for the Second World War and about half of the last century’s foreign policy problems.

      Actively the most destructive foreign policy of any President. He tops my worst list, and I think it will be very hard for a challenger to emerge.

      1. Juvenile Bluster

        And to add a part that a prog might understand: For all the talk of racism, Wilson is easily the most racist (both in thought and in policy) President of the post-Civil War era.

        1. John Titor

          It’s part of the reason his foreign policy sucked so much. At the Paris Conference Wilson shows up and starts redrawing European and Middle Eastern borders based on his idiotic concepts of race and absolutely no understanding of the local cultures, systems or history. He thought the Kurds were degenerate subhumans so just said “fuck it, let the Turks and Arabs kill them all”. Oh, but give the Greeks a bunch of land in Anatolia because they’re Greeks, that won’t have any consequences.

    5. Grumbletarian

      Obama is as eloquent as his teleprompter is functional.

    6. GSL in E

      Um, “grand accomplishments”? Obama was nominated and elected in 2008 for the clear purpose of being the anti-George W. And he utterly failed to overturn any of Bush’s most hated policies, while doubling down on some of them.

      If 2017 me went back to 2009 and told past me that, after 8 years of an Obama White House, the US would still have soldiers fighting in Iraq, that we’d be dropping bombs on a half-dozen other ME countries, that we’d directly contributed to multiple failed states in the region, that the Guantanamo prison would still be open, and that the domestic spying apparatus would be larger and more intrusive … well, 2009 me would find it hard to consider Obama anything other than a disappointment.

      1. Grumbletarian

        BUT BUT UHBSTRUHKSHUNIZM!

  23. Juvenile Bluster

    Has the FBI ever actually caught a real terrorist, or do they just create all the ones they arrest?

    The Department of Justice proudly announced the first FBI terror arrest of the the Trump administration on Tuesday: An elaborate sting operation that snared a 25-year old Missouri man who had no terrorism contacts besides the two undercover FBI agents who paid him to buy hardware supplies they said was for a bomb — and who at one point pulled a knife on him and threatened his family.

    Robert Lorenzo Hester of Columbia, Missouri, didn’t have the $20 he needed to buy the 9-volt batteries, duct tape, and roofing nails his new FBI friends wanted him to get, so they gave him the money. The agents noted in a criminal complaint that Hester, who at one point brought his two small children to a meeting because he didn’t have child care, continued smoking marijuana despite professing to be a devout Muslim.

    One of the social media posts that initially caught the FBI’s attention referred to a group called “The Lion Guard”. Hester told one of the undercover agents the name came from “a cartoon my children watch.”

    But according to the DOJ press release, Hester had plans to conduct an “ISIS-sponsored terrorist attack” on President’s Day that would have resulted in mass casualties had it succeeded.

    News reports breathlessly echoed the government’s depiction of Hester as a foiled would-be terrorist. But the only contact Hester had with ISIS was with the two undercover agents who suggested to him that they had connections with the group. The agents, who were in contact with him for five months, provided him with money and rides home from work as he dealt with the personal fallout of an unrelated arrest stemming from an altercation at a local grocery store.

    1. Grumbletarian

      Well I feel safer!

      Derp.

    2. Lachowsky

      Shit. The Lion Guard. My little boy watches that. I better quit buying Tannerite. I might end up on a list.

  24. Thymirus

    For anybody who’s particularly interested in gun rights: North Dakota and Kentucky are on the way to actually adopting constitutional carry. If they do, that’ll be, what, 13 states in total? It’s looking good.

    1. SugarFree

      Kentucky is halfway there; we’ve always had open carry. And our permitting for concealed carry is already shall issue.

      Constitutional carry would, of course, be preferable. Especially if it did something for our silly knife laws. 3″ and over is considered a “deadly weapon.”

      1. Thymirus

        Limitations on the possession and carry of knives is even more haphazard than firearms regulations. My home state, North Carolina, forbids the concealment of most any sort of blade on one’s person. It also bans residents from carrying stun guns.

        I look forward to the day no government paperwork is needed for personal weaponry, though I’m sure some kind of bullshit exemption/backdoor restriction will be included in any national bill we might get to enact constitutional carry nationwide (if we ever do).

      2. Tundra

        Minnesota is trying, as well. Governor Mumbles McProstate will of course veto it, but at least it’s being considered.

        1. Thymirus

          Wasn’t New Hampshire’s problem until recently its retarded governor and his overeager veto also? Hoplophobes never learn.

          1. Tundra

            Minnesota has always been a reliable blue state (choo-choos! bike lanes!), but we’ve been a shall issue state for awhile now and both the house and senate went R. The gun culture here is pretty strong.

          2. Thymirus

            I hope someone less retarded makes Governor next time in your state. Constitutional carry is long overdue.

          3. MikeS

            Like say…Jesse Ventura?

          4. Tundra

            I voted for Jesse. He was by far the best governor of my lifetime.

          5. Thymirus

            No pain, no gain.

          6. Grumbletarian

            Her veto, but yes.

      3. Chipwooder

        It’s a well known fact that it’s impossible to kill someone with a 2″ blade.

      4. robc

        And the state supremes have actively supported the open carry. They shut down an Owensboro law banning open carry in public parks, for example.

      5. Old Man With Candy

        So when I take my knife set (a mix of Wusthof, Victorinox, Shun, and an anonymous Chinese cleaver) to a kitchen, I’m actually committing a felony? Imagine my surprise.

    2. robc

      Section 1 of KY constitution:


      All men are, by nature, free and equal, and have certain inherent and inalienable rights, among which may be reckoned:

      First: The right of enjoying and defending their lives and liberties.

      Second: The right of worshipping Almighty God according to the dictates of their consciences.

      Third: The right of seeking and pursuing their safety and happiness.

      Fourth: The right of freely communicating their thoughts and opinions.

      Fifth: The right of acquiring and protecting property.

      Sixth: The right of assembling together in a peaceable manner for their common good, and of applying to those invested with the power of government for redress of grievances or other proper purposes, by petition, address or remonstrance.

      Seventh: The right to bear arms in defense of themselves and of the State, subject to the power of the General Assembly to enact laws to prevent persons from carrying concealed weapons.

      1. Thymirus

        That’s a provision to excise, to be sure.

        1. robc

          I assume you mean the part starting with “subject to”, not the part starting with “Seventh”.

          1. Thymirus

            I do. Sorry for the shitty phrasing.

            There’s absolutely no place for exceptions in any enumeration of rights.

      2. R C Dean

        The interesting thing about that “subject to” clause is that I think it rules out any laws on open carry, and arguably even on transport of weapons. They weren’t specifically authorized as exceptions from the right to bear arms, after all, and explicitly listing one exception by implication rules out implied any implied exceptions.

        What’s a little bothersome is the lack of any enumerated right to keep arms. Theoretically, the legislature could outlaw ownership of (certain classes of) weapons.

  25. Juvenile Bluster

    Apparently Alan Colmes is dead. Or maybe not, because he’s still tweeting. Though it’s not like tweeting requires a functional brain (guessing they were scheduled tweets).

  26. TripodKat

    Recovering Reasonoid here, thanks to the people who recommended this site.

  27. Rhywun

    As if NYPD cops need their commissioner to tell them to ignore the law.

    Interesting how they’re confusing “deportation of arrestees” with “rounding up”. My gosh, that couldn’t possibly be deliberate.

  28. Thymirus

    http://www.foxnews.com/world/2017/02/23/swedish-politician-proposes-to-give-employees-paid-time-off-to-have-sex.html

    Swedish politician proposes to give employees paid time off to have sex

    Now this is what you call workplace innovation.

    A Swedish politician is pushing to give employees an hour-long paid break to go home and have sex.

    Per Erik Muskos, a member of the Swedish Social Democrat party, made the proposal during a council meeting in the northern city of Overtornea.

    Mr Muskos said he’s backing the measure because he believes midweek sex breaks will improve wellness and boost childbirth in the northern region he represents.

    “Childbirth should be encouraged,” he told the Stockholm-based newspaper Aftonbladet.

    “When sex is also an excellent form of exercise with documented positive effects on wellbeing, the municipality should kill two birds with one stone and encourage employees to use their fitness hour to go home and have sex with their partner.”

    He said everyday stresses in life can put a strain on relationships, arguing Swedish couples don’t get enough quality together, which makes it difficult for them to express their love.

    “I believe that sex is a scarce commodity in many long relationships. Everyday life is stressful and the children are at home. This could be an opportunity to have their own time.”

    1. The Fusionist

      ““Childbirth should be encouraged,” he told the Stockholm-based newspaper Aftonbladet.”

      What a bigot, we shouldn’t assume sex is associated with childbirth.

      1. Thymirus

        He’s not being inclusive of test tube babies. #LabLivesMatter.

        1. robc

          My daughter agrees.

    2. UnCivilServant

      Swedes already work very few hours, how much more time away from work do they need?

      1. The Fusionist

        In the old days, Swedes got breaks so they could go rape and pillage.

        Wait, raping and pillaging *was* their job.

        1. UnCivilServant

          Pillaging financed the Raping.

          1. Thymirus

            If you’re man enough, you don’t pay for anything. *CATAPHRACT.*

    3. Certified Public Asshat

      If you’re single, does the state assign you with a sexual partner?

      1. Thymirus

        Yes, but in the interests of diversifying the population, you’re compelled to choose exclusively from a pool of refugees, lest the toxic whiteness of Sweden’s population continue unabridged when pregnancy inevitably follows your employer-mandated coitus.

      2. The Other Kevin

        That’s a slippery slope.

        1. Certified Public Asshat

          I like slippery.

        2. MikeS

          That sounds racist

          1. Rhywun

            I like slopes.

    4. Rhywun

      “Fitness hour”?

      You mean, “lunch”?

  29. straffinrun

    Little Pieces From Mises To Address The Feces.

    Deficits are the cause of inflation; deficits have nothing to do with inflation.
    Deficits do not have a crowding-out effect on private investment.
    Tax increases are a cure for deficits.
    Every time the Fed tightens the money supply, interest rates rise (or fall); every time the Fed expands the money supply, interest rates rise (or fall).
    Economists, using charts or high speed computer models, can accurately forecast the future.

    And 5 more myths addressed.

  30. Zero Sum Game

    Arizona Senate votes to seize assets of those who plan, participate in protests that turn violent

    I understand their impulse, but this law is just bad. It increases the perverse incentives to false-flag otherwise peaceful protests in order to shut them down.

    1. Rufus the Monocled

      Seriously, while I think the protests are misguided and not rooted in any real principles, they still have that right. It can hurt people who do protest peacefully.

  31. straffinrun

    Sargon booted from Twitter. Not a fan, but damn, Twitter.

    1. bacon-magic

      Once again, trying to silence people. Twitter is wanting to go under. #profitablecompaniesarestupid

      1. leonadasiv

        Check it, Twitter had never turned a profit, at least as of the list time I checked

      2. Thymirus

        Sociopolitical disagreements hurt progressives’ feelings. Become bold enough in your dissent, and their psychological feebleness becomes apparent. They can’t substantively challenge Sargon’s arguments, and so their reaction is to purge him and his like from their cesspool of enlightenment.

      3. straffinrun

        How many people are now turning to Youtube and podcasts to educate themselves these days? If Twitter thinks that booting people is a winning plan, they deserve to get flattened.

    2. leonadasiv

      Meh Twitter is going south, in the business sense. Jack Dorsey just repurchased a bunch of stock. I don’t think Twitter as we know it will see the next decade, and quite possibly the next year or two.

    3. Volren

      I’ve never understood the use of Twitter. The only types I can imagine benefiting from it are celebrities, people who are extremely good at one-liners, and narcissists who desperately need the world to know what they are doing every minute of every day.

      1. Chipwooder

        The only utility I’ve ever perceived from it is for breaking news stories.

      2. Gustave Lytton

        Twitter is good for getting customer service action from companies that aren’t like Amazon.

      3. GSL in E

        It’s also a good way to find interesting content (a) on more obscure subjects, and (b) from sources you aren’t already familiar with.

        Or, at least that was true before the entire platform was consumed in a fire of shrieking TDS last year. Sort of like another website I used to visit a lot.

    4. Zero Sum Game

      Did he tweet gay porn to someone he didn’t like again? Last time that happened, he was blocked for it.

      I like Sargon’s way of presenting things and don’t always agree with him, but I think he’s an asset to the discourse. And I’m not saying they didn’t block him for purely political reasons, because they may well have. But last time he feigned confusion over why he was blocked when a ToS violation actually did occur.

      1. LT_Fish

        Apparently it’s a faked accusation re: kiddie porn this time – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iJci7QCsrEM&t=406s – includes a demo vid showing how the “evidence” conversation was probably faked.

  32. Thymirus

    http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/02/23/video-appearing-to-show-off-duty-los-angeles-cop-firing-gun-in-scuffle-with-teens-spark-protests.html

    Video appearing to show off-duty Los Angeles cop firing gun in scuffle with teens spark protests

    Protests erupted in Southern California Wednesday night after a video surfaced appearing to show an off-duty LAPD police officer firing his gun during a scuffle with a group of teens.

    Protesters demonstrated outside the officer’s home in Anaheim before taking to the streets, officials said. The rally shut down a major intersection in the city. Anaheim police issued a tactical alert and said they were prepared to make arrests.

    The incident occured on Tuesday. Authorities responded to reports of a fight between a man and several teens. The man was later identified as the police officer and he “discharged his firearm” and detained at least one of them, Sgt. Daron Wyatt, of the Anaheim police department, said.

    Wyatt said that the video “picks up several houses down from where the initial contact was made.” He said the officer in the video had been dealing with teens walking across his lawn for months.

    “Yesterday, he sees the kids walking on the lawn and he says, ‘Hey, guys, please walk on the sidewalk,’” Wyatt told KTTV. He said that prompted a chorus of epithets from some of the teens.

    1. Swiss Servator

      Get off my lawn!

  33. LynchPin1477

    I hope you guys like my new avatar.

    1. Thymirus

      I can’t see it. 😮

      1. tarran

        It’s such an enlightened avatar that only the most pure libertarians can see it. People who aren’t true libertarians cannot perceive it.

          1. tarran

            +1 Tell me about your mother.

      2. LynchPin1477

        It’s a white square.

        1. BuSab Agent

          That’s some fine White Privilege there.

        2. Chipwooder

          Really? Looked more like a white triangle to me

        3. Thymirus

          You got me. I didn’t even think to check.

          *Sucker.*

        4. John Titor

          Join the Anime Girl Master Race Lynch, you know you want to.

  34. Private Chipperbot

    Jack White opening vinyl record pressing plant. Good on him. I think following a fad may not be the greatest business strategy, but I don’t have money to throw around like that. However, I’d fire this guy right away.

    “We’re not competing. Our view is another pressing plant doesn’t create competition, it alleviates backlog.”

    1. Old Man With Candy

      “Alleviates backlog” is exactly the reason i give my wife when I’m in the mood for a blowie.

      1. Thymirus

        “I self-identify as a sex maniac” works with progressive college chicks.

    2. R C Dean

      Yeah, that backlog they are alleviating is the work inventory another company (don’t call it a competitor, though).

    3. Gilmore

      I think following a fad may not be the greatest business strategy,

      Well, as a collector of vinyl records (*but not a buyer of many newly-pressed ones) and occasionally having some made in the past… if its a fad, its a long-growing one. Because its been growing since the late 1990s. Even at the peak of the scratch-DJ-fad of the late 1990s/early 2000s (and that *was* a fad) hardly anyone was cutting new vinyl records except hiphop/dance 12″, and a few indie groups. everything was low-volume and regionally produced/sold @ small boutique record-stores.

      Now, by contrast, they have entire back catalogues of major-label releases being cut on vinyl again. and they’re selling them @ Barnes and Noble & WalMart; that’s not really “faddy” anymore, that’s high-volume retail that involves bulk production and distribution and warehousing and all that shit.

      Basically, if they’re actually printing NEW copies of Dark Side of the Moon (an album so prevalent that diggers would find a dozen used copies in any record store), and new-movie soundtracks, its crossed the line into actual “mainstream market”.

      Whats actually weirder, even, is that the ‘DJ market’ of the late 1990s which i described above… isn’t even around to sustain the ‘fad’ as a kind of cachet-lending base. Everyone who DJ’s now is on Serato or uses CD turntables to control a laptop w/ Traktor, etc. No one uses OG vinyl records. Tho i think there is still a market for DJ vinyl; just, absurdly, that people actually buy that shit then record it into digital form for playing it out. which boggles my mind.

      1. Gilmore

        Sales of vinyl have exploded from 900,000 units in 2006 to 13.1 million in 2016, according to Nielsen data, and vinyl pressing plants have struggled to keep up with the growing demand.

        see, that is pretty remarkable, given it all happened after DJing had gone completely virtual. and 10 steady years of nearly 10% growth isn’t (at least in my experience) typical of fads, which would have a shorter boom-bust cycle.

        I do agree tho that it could easily cut itself in half in short order; i can see a small population of hipsters buying vinyl every year so they can have a few shelves on the wall to impress their friends; but i expect as they grow up its not something they’ll continue to do.

        here’s the other thing =

        Saturday’s opening will feature eight titles pressed on site, including the White Stripes’ first two albums pressed on red vinyl, the Stooges’ debut album on yellow vinyl and 7-inch records from Detroit techno legends Derrick May and Carl Craig on clear vinyl.

        See, if he restricts himself to printing these sort of hipster titles? he’ll have steady business. because i think that the people printing up the aforementioned ‘new copies of Dark Side’…? they will sate demand quickly, but there will probably be a longer-tail permanent demand for things like Ramones and Stooges and MC5 and early hiphop and punk etc. on vinyl that will persist.

        1. Gilmore

          *my guesstimated CAGR was way off; 30%+

          1. Private Chipperbot

            Yeah. Writing ‘fad’ was wrong. I think it’s because of how I picture the stereotypical record collector spinning. That’s pretty steady volume for a long time.

    1. bacon-magic

      Who doen’t like Judge Nap? Anybody? Bueller? Bueller?

      1. Thymirus

        It’d be great if he agreed to write a piece exclusively for Glibertarians.

    2. westernsloper

      That is a good one.

      This is not the government the Framers gave us. But it is one far more dangerous to human freedom than the one from which they seceded in 1776.

      With that cheery thought, I must go do something productive so I can pay taxes to support the Deep State, and it’s Dark Lord John McCain.

  35. bacon-magic

    *doesn’t

  36. Glitterstorm

    I don’t understand how climate models work. I haven’t taken a science or math class in years. So what variables are they not accounting for?

    1. Old Man With Candy

      Feedback, mostly. There are positive and negative feedback mechanisms in play, and we don’t have a good handle on their relative contributions and how they interact. We also very well may be ignorant of what all the feedback mechanisms are.

      1. Private Chipperbot

        Heretic! Denier!

        1. Private Chipperbot

          Oh, sorry. I thought you were asking what feedback you get for asking those questions.

      2. Glitterstorm

        Thank you. I know the sun plays a bigger role in our climate than we ever could.

        1. R C Dean

          Its a mildly variable star. Ignoring how the energy/heat source for our climate being variable might affect global temperature always struck me as a “tell” that the CAGW crowd was more political than scientific.

          1. Glitterstorm

            I watched this great special on BBC once and it was str8 fax b. I wish I could find it again. If I do I’ll share it.

        2. Zero Sum Game

          There are innumerable factors that have to be considered. How much carbon dioxide is absorbed by the ocean, how much sunlight is reflected back into space by shiny surfaces (called albedo) like ice cover, how much is used by plants, how much other trace gasses offset the effect (e.g. some volcanic gasses and particles prevent light reaching Earth and cause cooling), etc.

          Climate is a chaotic system in much the same way economics is. Anyone telling you they have a complete picture of either is trying to sell you something. There are broad strokes that can be observed but the climate, just like markets, still have lots of surprises in store for people.

          1. Glitterstorm

            Broad strokes you say?

    2. R C Dean

      So what variables are they not accounting for?

      Most of them? Its supposed to be a chaotic system, subject to innumerable variables.

      1. Glitterstorm

        Oh like the Joker in The Dark Knight

      2. Old Man With Candy

        I don’t think it’s chaotic, at least in a mathematical sense, otherwise our temperature swings wouldn’t be so minor and slow. But it’s certainly complex and at this point poorly modeled and understood.

        Of course, I’m just a dumb scientist.

        1. Glitterstorm

          I don’t know the lore here, what field of study are you?

          1. Thymirus

            Glibertarianology? 😀

        2. Zero Sum Game

          That isn’t really what “chaotic” means, mathematically. And climate definitely qualifies as a chaotic system.

          You can have stable chaotic systems. The economy is another good example of that. Usually it takes pretty large upsets to royally fuck an economy up, such as hyperinflation. Most of the time, left to their own devices, markets stabilize on their own even though the activity itself is highly chaotic.

          Chaotic systems also doesn’t imply innate unpredictability in the colloquial sense of that word either. Certainly the broad strokes can still be generally characterized, the solar cycle being an obvious example.

          I think one of the big problems here is that people conflate the meanings of “random” and “chaotic”, which are similar terms colloquially, but have mathematical definitions that make them distinct from one another. The Mandelbrot set, probably the most famous such example, always produces the exact same answers as long as all the inputs are the same. Changing the inputs produce outputs that aren’t predictable in terms of the tools of mathematical analysis (we refer to such cases as “pathological”).

          Math used by most scientists doesn’t usually delve into pure (or “theoretical”, a term I avoid) mathematics at all. My degree is in pure math, though I haven’t studied chaos theory in depth. Most scientific math is statistical or analytical (calculus). Indeed, a lot of math in climate science is too. There are ways to use tools of linear algebra to represent statistical systems for climate science, that way a chaotic system like climate can be represented in a way that computers can work with. That is a lot of what they do, since they have many coefficients to work with in order to represent as many of the major variables of climate as they can.

          1. Glitterstorm

            This is helpful, thank you.

    3. tarran

      It’s more of a parameterization problem.

      I’ll give you an example. Let’s say you wanted to build a simulation that predicts where all the pieces will end up should two cars collide on a road. Now, the physics of how the pieces interact are pretty well known. You can, given two objects of arbitrary dimensions, density, plasticity, very precisely predict how a collision between them will alter their angular and translational momentum etc.

      But, you have to first figure out how the car will be described in the model. Will it be a few large pieces (i.e. hood, engine, wheels, frame, etc) or are you going to have each nut and bolt be a piece. How accurately will you enter the road into the model. Will it be approximated as a flat piece of concrete, or will you attempt to get the bumps and potholes into the model.

      The more detailed your model, the more parameters it has, the more computational resources needed. Additionally, the more types of interactions you keep track of (i.e. thermal effects, tearing of components, chemical reactions like fuel burning etc), the more complex your equations become which is reflected by an increase of parameters.

      The state of the art climate models are insufficiently parametized.

      “Because of the relatively coarse spatial and temporal resolutions of the models, there are many important processes that occur on scales that are smaller than the model resolution (such as clouds and rainfall; see inset in Figure 1). These subgrid-scale processes are represented using ‘parameterizations.’ Parameterizations of subgrid-scale processes are simple formulas based on observations or derivations from more detailed process models. These parameterizations are ‘calibrated’ or ‘tuned’ to improve the comparison of the climate model outputs against historical observations.

      The actual equations used in the GCM computer codes are only approximations of the physical processes that occur in the climate system. While some of these approximations are highly accurate, others are unavoidably crude. This is because the real processes they represent are either poorly understood or too complex to include in the model given the constraints of the computer system. Of the processes that are most important for climate change, parameterizations related to clouds and precipitation remain the most challenging, and are the greatest source of disagreement among different GCMs.”

      Climate Models for Lawyers: Dr. J Curry

      As a result they are likely getting a bunch of things wrong:

      “What is the source of the discrepancies in ECS among different climate models, and between climate models and observations? In a paper entitled “What are Climate Models Missing?” Stevens and Bony argue that:

      ‘There is now ample evidence that an inadequate representation of clouds and moist convection, or more generally the coupling between atmospheric water and circulation, is the main limitation in current representations of the climate system.’

      What are the implications of these discrepancies in the values of the equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS)? If the ECS is less than 2°C, versus more than 4°C, then the conclusions regarding the causes of 20th century warming and the amount of 21st century warming are substantially different.”

      I encourage everyone to read the linked pdf. It is the most clear exposition on what climate models do, in what domains they are useful, and what their limitations are.

      1. Glitterstorm

        I love based J. Curry.

      2. Zero Sum Game

        This is a good way to look at it. It takes incredible computing power to work with the coefficients we already know about, and even then many have to be discarded when they have minor significance, and there are undoubtedly a lot that climate scientists have yet to characterize.

        The real question is how much a multitude of parameters of minor significance taken together can ultimately have a big effect.

  37. DOOMco

    IDK why this was a suggested video. I also don’t really know whats going on there to warrant such activity.

    1. BuSab Agent

      WTF. Are they giving out free food?

      1. Glitterstorm

        CFA brings the crowds. I don’t go there for lunch anymore, too busy.

      2. DOOMco

        Like Glitter said, the one near me is busy. But it’s never that bad. It must be a special day there.

        1. Glitterstorm

          Probably receipt day or some shit.

  38. The Late P Brooks

    I don’t understand how climate models work.

    1) Arrive at conclusion
    2) Control for variables which contradict conclusion
    3) ????
    4) GOVERNMENT GRANTS

    1. DOOMco

      ^^^^^

  39. Glitterstorm

    My prog coworker sent me this

    As if I give a turkey.

    1. Gilmore

      The way the Left has gone batshit about Russia is basically like the new “911-truther” movement.

    2. DOOMco

      OH NO!

  40. Glitterstorm

    Remember when they laughed Mitt Romney out of the room when he made a similar claim?

  41. Mr. Dyslexic

    Hello everyone!

    I finally had some time to set this thing up and thought I would pop in to drop a HT to those who dedicated their time and effort to make this site possible.

    So thank you!

    I’ll try to participate as much as I can in between gittin’ shit dun at work.

    Peace,
    Bryan

  42. RothbardsBitch1

    Has anyone brought up the seven possibly habitable planets NASA found the other day? Hopefully the inhabitants are more like the avatar aliens then the independence day ones. That way we can colonize one, civilize the natives and finally create Libertopia. Come on Peter Thiel forget seasteadding begin work on a multigenerational starship already.