To begin, I’m as much a lawyer as Charlie Kelly is; I just prefer to focus on beer law instead of bird law. The after effect of the terrible experiment in alcohol prohibition in the United States is the cause of most of these bizarre and strange laws. Before prohibition, the peak number of breweries in the US was over 4,100 (1873). While consolidation was already happening previous to the 18th amendment being ratified, once it was passed it started forcing breweries to close. By the time the 21st amendment was ratified, less than 750 breweries remained active. The number of breweries continued to decline as consolidation continued until we reached the nadir of less than 100 breweries in the 1970’s.
Thankfully, Jimmy Carter did something great, and he legalized homebrewing on the national level in 1978 (although it was not legal on the state level in all states until 2013). Once homebrewing became legal, it allowed for experimentation with styles and techniques that led to small independent breweries opening up (at the time called micro-breweries, now referred to as craft beer). It took until 1994 for craft beer to even make up 1% of the US market in volume. Two years later, the US had over 1,000 active breweries, and then it took until 2011 for the US to pass 2,000 active breweries. After that, growth exploded, reaching 3,000 active breweries in 2014 and reaching over 4,100 in 2015 (while now making up 10% of the US market).
If you are unaware, after prohibition a three tier system was put into place to extract taxes and still allow regulation of alcohol production and distribution. These tiers are regulated on the state level, meaning that we have a rare opportunity to look at each of the states, and compare the results of their regulations over the 30 years since small breweries started opening. Thankfully, the Mercatus Center has done this, with a focus on two factors:
- Self-distribution – Allowing breweries to sell their beer directly to retailers instead of going through a distributor
- Beer franchise laws – Which determine when a brewery can terminate their deal with a distributor
The study finds that allowing breweries to self-distribute and to get out of contracts with distributors they are having issue with leads to more breweries and a higher volume of production. This leads to more jobs, more options for consumers, and more taxes for the state (they’ll always take their cut).
It’s a common refrain that drugs should be legalized and treated like alcohol. If we want to regulate drugs like alcohol, the study by the Mercatus Center shows us that we should have less regulation if we want people to have more options. These options do not always need to be for stronger and more potent items. Two of the current fads in the craft beer world are session beers and sour beers. Both of which are generally lower in alcohol than your average beer.
Of course, we’ll also want to try to avoid some of the more terrible laws that exist currently in some states. People are generally used to the alcohol laws in their state: they know if they have to go to a special store to buy some things, or if they need to make sure to stock up on Saturday; however, they generally don’t know the laws in the states around them. These laws vary wildly state to state, with some states being relatively good (California and Oregon come to mind) and some states just bad (Utah and Pennsylvania, I’m looking at you)
Some of the more bizarre laws from the more moderate locations include:
- Georgia is just this year passing a law that will allow breweries to sell directly to visitors. Note, not just beer to-go, but beer in general. Currently you need to purchase a “tour” that will come with samples of beer and sometimes a “gift” you can take home with you.
- Minnesota allows to-go sales at breweries, at least until they get too big (section 4.2), where too big is 250,000 barrels (barrels are 31 fl. gallons) of beer a year.
- Montana allows breweries to sell a maximum of 48 oz. of beer to a patron per day if their production is between 100-10,000 barrels.
- All containers of beer sold must have the federal government warning on them. Even kegs, which are generally not visible to the public.
- To show that the breweries aren’t always the good guys: Indiana, which forbids beer sales on Sundays, allows an exception for breweries.
Thankfully, in this area things are getting better. In doing the research for this, I ran across several laws that have already been repealed/updated. Last year included quite a few sweeping changes to alcohol laws through the states. Almost every one of those laws was opposed by the various groups who had profited by the regulations that were in place (liquor stores, distributors, and AB InBev/SABMiller), and yet the changes continue. It helps that craft beer is still a growing industry. In my home state of Ohio, there are currently 57 active applications for new brewery licenses, and there have been only a handful of breweries that closed their doors in the past year.
If you’re interested in keeping up with the current laws and changes that are being proposed the Brewers Association is a good start, as is your local brewery.
Now I’m thirsty.
Same here.
Everyone hide your kids!
He said thirsty, not *thirsty*.
Street justice
http://abc6onyourside.com/news/local/cincinnati-driver-killed-after-hitting-4-year-old-boy
So, let your toddlers play in the middle of the street unsupervised and if someone hits them you get to shoot them.
Can we nuke it from orbit yet?
Well, it is Ohio.
The BAC while driving laws seem to be getting worse. MADD is basically today’s equivalent of the WCTU.
Yeah, Columbus definitely has a pretty good brew scene getting going. I’m a big fan of Zauber’s in Grandview which specializes in Belguim style brews which are my favorite. Local pubs getting in on the scene offering lots of local beers which is great. I was in Knoxville a few years back and found a cool little hole in the wall (walked in and people were wearing Viking hats, and the owner was cooking up old school Hungarian goulash) with some Tennessee craft beers on tap, but it sounded to me like they were not able to sell out of state craft beer. I’m not sure if that was in general, or specific to their license.
Columbus has just started to jump into the craft world in Ohio. I’m really interested to see what BrewDog does down there. I’m a shareholder, and probably going to back their campaign to pick up a couple of nights at the hotel they’re looking at putting in.
Has anyone here tried commenting in the old neighborhood over the last few weeks? It’s like they don’t want people commenting. They may as well just shut down commenting at this point. I’m done even trying. I just tried telling them that in the comments and was unable to.
Nope.
I’ve tried a couple of times. Lots of squirrel activity. I managed to get through once or twice.
I just did for the first time in weeks. No issues, but I’ve been hearing their shit is fucked up from quite a few folks.
And they talk like a fag? Kick ass!
I gave up yesterday.
The last two times I went over and tried to comment, the comment reloaded to a white page. If they were deliberately trying to kill their comments, they probably couldn’t do a better job.
I used to get that 10% of the time, I now get it 75% of the time. Screw that.
90% of their commenters, people who wrote better than their staff, gave them the finger and walked off and started their own site. Their efforts to court the progs fell flat. I noticed the comments here regularly are over 100 and sometimes 5 X that much. TSTSNBN is lucky to have more than 50 on some of their formerly most popular articles. Hell, my goofy articles topped 250 comments.
They fucked up bigly.
Cant blame them for letting the squirrels take over.
Sorta OT:
Prohibition didn’t end because politicians realized the folly of outlawing victim-less crimes or were convinced by reason and argument. It ended because so many people were breaking the law that it was embarrassing to them. They don’t mention this much in history class, but it turns out that the best way to get rid of a stupid law is to break it. It was outlaws who got the ball rolling on ending slavery. Hell, it was outlaws who got the ball rolling on this *country*.
It is really depressing the number of people who think laws are magic spells. When I argue about this, I like to ask people if they always drive the speed limit. Of course, they don’t. So I say the way you feel about the speed limit is the way I feel about nearly every law. I don’t break them for the hell of it, but also don’t feel guilty about bending or breaking them because most laws are either too strict or shouldn’t exist in the first place. Most laws are not about protecting the lives and property of everyone equally. They are meant to expand the interest of one group at the expense of another or to hassle an unpopular group.
I’ve never seen it stated directly, but I suspect the authoritarian thought process is like this: they put strict laws in place knowing they will be broken, but in the hope that the target behavior will be reduced. They would say it’s better to ban X and have 5% less X than to have the same amount of X. What they forget is that yeah, they might get 5% less X but also get 10% more of Y or Z, which might be even worse. There are no solutions. There are only trade-offs.
In Venezuela, inflation is out of control because the govt is printing money like crazy. But instead of stopping that and cutting spending, they make another law which outlaws raising prices. Now everyone has to wait in long lines for everything, if they can get it at all, and what is gotten is immediately sold on the black market for a higher price.
Earth to morons! They tried this in Rome *1,700 years ago*! It didn’t work then either.
How can so many people be so stupid at the same time? Is there anything I’ve written here that a 12 year old couldn’t understand? My best guess is this: 2 kinds of people go into politics. About 95% of them are vain people who are to stupid to make an honest living. Their only talent is riling people up and trading favors. The other 5% are people with actual jobs who only go into politics because they are tired of all the bullshit and want to stop it. People mind their own business when it is worth minding, as Eric Hoffer said.
Anyway, that’s my rant for today.
That 5% estimate?
WAY too high.
I also think may also have had to do with a larger percentage of the movers and shakers living downtown where the prohibition-related violence was. Shootings in the hood, so what. Shootings a block from my brownstone, this needs to end now.
The need for the taxes from alcohol also played a role.
“Legal”ization of marijuana in California features a proposed zero tolerance standard for THC-in-the-body for people under the age of 21.
So if you have long hair and smoked marijuana a year ago, you will test positive on the roadside test and will have your driving “privilege” suspended.
Isn’t “legal”ization great?
Combining stupid beer laws and licking authoritarian boots, let’s not forget the bartenders in Minnesoda who got a felony for serving non-licensed beer to willing customers.
Those quotes certainly deserve a hearty “fuck off slaver”.
I think you are being too harsh.
Do you want us Minnesodans to die in droves like all the people in Wisconsin who are being poisoned by those evil capitalists at New Glarus? The only way to prevent that is to accept large checks from those bastards.
As a buyer, I’m pretty sure that a “level playing field for sellers” means I’m going to take it up the ass.
No; we want you to die from falling zinc panels. You can pay for the funerals with the revenues from electronic pull-tabs.
Something similar happened in Pennsylvania several years ago. IIRC, the state licensing organization had incorrectly documented several names and labels, then raided bars selling the items and confiscated them.
KNEEL BEFORE ZOD!
“the best way to get rid of a stupid law is to break it. It was outlaws who got the ball rolling on ending slavery. Hell, it was outlaws who got the ball rolling on this *country*.
It is really depressing the number of people who think laws are magic spells.”
There is the thesis for an excellent article. I eagerly await publication of…uh….Sunshine Laws Dont Make the Sun Shine’ by Derpetologist. I dunno, I cant think of anything clever for a title right now.
Currently In my second day of CERT training. I would not trust some of these people to put an ice pack on me and they’re trying to train them to do emergency triage and first aid. Kill me now.
But once they have their certificates, they’ll be “experts”.
Oh, and fuck Cindy McCain and her husband.
What did they do now?
You mean they haven’t done enough?
So just a random fuck them? That’s cool, I’m down with that. Fuck Cindy and John McCain.
She owns beer distributorships. A lot.
Oh ya. They have AZ pretty much locked down on beer distribution don’t they?
Yes she does. Inherited from her pappy. And basically bankrolled Sen Senile McCrashyCrash from ever needing to look for a real job to put food on the table.
Fuck you Cindy.
Anyone heard of a red pill libertarian? This guy is running as one. Intrresting derpy read
http://larsonfordelegate.com/wiki/Main_Page
What i meant to post
http://www.blessedlittleblog.com/drawing-lines/#comments
So you were trying to make a point about butter?
I dont know what point i was trying to make, i just wanted in on the linking
The mental gymnastics these people go to connecting trump to someone he’said never met and never mentioned is truly incredible.
I don’t even know what about half of that garbage means (and I’m pretty bright)
Well, I think he found the quickest way to ensure no one will give him any airtime anywhere.
It’s very confusing to read. Guys being pregnant?
Intersectionality comes to classical liberalism. It had to happen eventually.
I don’t see why libertarians wouldn’t and couldn’t criticize 3rd wave feminism, SJWs, but for lulz I read some of the twaddle he’s pitching.
I guess if you believe that your voting bloc is predominantly disenchanted losers, that kind of proposal ain’t going to hurt you much. He concedes that he’s not fullblown:
… which he thinks is “alt-right libertarianism”.
*sigh* So many links, all self-referential. Serious Jeffrey Tucker fanboism and an apparent hard-on for Murray Rothbard. It’s ideological cassoulet with a slab of “race realism” slathered on top.
The whole schtick looks like early stage Scientology, where all the citations refer to all the guy’s other online resources.
Another excuse for cops to go fishing for drugs. And another opportunity for a cop citizen interaction to go south.
http://abc6onyourside.com/news/local/bill-would-make-smoking-inside-cars-with-kids-illegal
Already illegal in California. I remember snickering to myself when that came up on the drivers license test
I found out about these laws, which are apparently very common already in Europe etc.. Jesus Christ they are totalitarian.
OT: can’t find the picture, but it was of a door sign at some USAF base 50 or 60 years ago and some puzzled guy looking at it.
It read:
COMMANDER (the guy’s job)
LIEUTENANT (his rank)
COLONEL
SARGENT (his last name)
PRIVATE (as in not public)
I larfed.
Hey, I have been all those ranks (Commander aside, I was Army)!
But AT THE SAME TIME?
yeah, good luck with that.
beer distributors are some of the most politically-connected and powerful crony-businesses in america. they’re basically what the teamsters used to be = truck drivers with political claws.
NC couldnt get the self distribution cap raised bc the head of legislative committee is a distributor or a close member of the family. I am sure the same guy heads the committee this session
Wow. That sounds crooked as fuck. One would think they would have to recuse themselves from such decisions if they or family had a stake in it.
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
The beer distributors in most of the states are terrible, I remember reading there’s at least one state that allows for sales to go at breweries, but the breweries still need to pay the distributors their cut. Thankfully, the laws are changing, and rapidly.
file under: mental gymnastics
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2017/03/globe-mail-columnist-london-jihadi-not-muslim-extremists-often-come-from-christian-families
He stuck the landing, but I give it a 10 anyway.
So he was not a true muslim.. but was he a true scotsman?
CA Dems propose free tuition funded by tax on millionaires
Ah, this might be my clown college education talking, but won’t this law cause millionaires to the leave the state as well as crowd colleges with people who shouldn’t be there? To even greater degree than exists already?
This is probably going to get me the death stare around here but I’m actually okay with this, only because it’s targeted at people with exceptionally high incomes. Of course this should only kick in if the individual’s net income is above 1 million, cause a 1 million income turns into a 500000 income after taxes. I also think you should be able to choose what degrees you will fund. If I were rolling in it I’d have no problem funding a few new engineers but fuck that gender studies cunt.
But seriously, if you made 10 million after taxes would you really have a problem taking 100 grand off the top to pay for a few degrees? Scott Adams actually suggested this very idea not too long ago on his blog.
This is as good a place as many to post a reply to the land tax idea.
Whatever you tax, you get less* of: yachts, income, sales, millionaires, imports etc.
If you tax owning land or improving land, less land will be owned or improved. That in my view is bad.
My questions to people who think the govt is so wonderful are why they need to be forced to pay and why don’t they give as much as they can. It’s just crabs in a bucket as far as I can tell. “Who do you think you are trying to be richer than me?”
No amount of taxes will ever be enough to pay for all the things the govt could do. Wants are unlimited, resources are not.
In short: cut spending, repeal laws
*grammar Nazis will no doubt castigate me for not using “fewer” to refer to countable items
I absolutely agree that taxing millionaires would reduce the number of millionaires, but the tradeoff would be more debt free college graduates, which would theoretically create new millionaires. Obviously the numbers would have to work out but a few less millionaires on exchange for a significant number of college graduates would be a positive net outcome.
I am very much against wealth redistribution but higher education is one place I fail the purity test.
I am very much against wealth redistribution but higher education is one place I fail the purity test.
Ok, I will say it. Fuck off slaver! Seriously though, it is possible to go to college and not come out with a quarter of a million in debt. If someone is stupid enough to accrue that much debt for an education, that is on them.
Yikes
I think it’s a horrible idea but as it’s California, I have a hard time getting worked up about it.
Next tax year, your “income” in California would amazingly be $999,999.
That’s fine and totally within their right, and if borderline people want to work a little less or exercise more loopholes to get out of it then power to them, but no one is going to go from a 5 million yearly income to a 900k one to avoid a 1% tax.
Depends on how you make your income. If that’s a corporation paying you, it’s a bit more difficult to do, but working one day a week is always an option, which deprives the state of half a million per million you earn.
But if you’re an entrepreneur, there are LOTS of things you can do – even if moving out of state is off the table. That kind of tax really gets high net worths upset, because it’s worse even than a Pigouvian tax. It’s not even trying to ‘nudge’ your behavior, it’s outright punishment.
Added to which, go look at the size of endowments colleges are carrying, *especially* Californian ones. There’s a great case to be made that effective colleges really are capable of (almost) standing on their own two feet.
If they’re that good, let their alumni show their appreciation for their exceptional education by giving the next guy a leg up on the ladder.
Or use their endowments to fund the loans that students need to take out to attend college. For bonus points, college endowment loans don’t attract capital gains tax on the interest the students repay, so the colleges can make serious money as long as they get to recover their loans.
And let’s face it, who’s going to be more likely to repay the student loan? a STEM graduate or a Black Studies & Juggling graduate?
I like that a lot. It would also put colleges on the hook for giving loans to abject morons or for passing out degrees which have no earning potential.
And Sallie Mae dies out in CA.
We could only wish.
All that would happen is that millionaires would count their money differently so that they are all less than millionaires who still have access to the same amount of money. The tax will bring in nothing. The pols will finagle the tax until the middle class on down are paying for it and the list of eligible recipients would expand to illegals. It would be nothing but a giant fucking for the taxpayers and one more leap down Venezuela Avenue for California.
I say go for it.
^This. There is no way this doesn’t soon become a tax on everybody. All that “free” money is going to be poured into more “vice presidents of diversity” and the schools will go back to the state hat in hand.
Why do you hate me? Seriously, I’ve told my wife I am out of here not too long after the kids graduate college. We get in state tuition, so that’s about a $25k savings every year.
I told her I’ll miss her if she decides to stay.
I don’t give two shits AF, I just want someone to party with in Nashville, TN.
…as long as they don’t annoy me AF with their social/political views.
As an ex-Memphian I was going to point out that Nashvilleans are horrible people. You fucks are always outsmarting Memphians in the legislature and getting the lion’s share of the tax revenue (you have more people than the Knoxvilleans, so you simply out vote them).
But then you said you didn’t want to hear about social/political views, so I will stop ranting.
Instead I’ll just taunt you with the fact that Memphis has better food and better music (and I like country music, but love the delta blues).
Wife and I may be in the area on Aug 21st.
If your orphans have a few extra smoked monocles, we could hook up?
I’ll be in the same area. I wanted to go to Jackson Hole for the show, but Mrs. Shpip likes Nashville, so…
Patterson House and Corsair by day, with a side trip to White House for the eclipse.
Head on up to bowling green and you can sit on porch with me and we can yell at the kids to stay off my lawn. Its fun
random tip
I’ve found that one great way to help remember new words in a foreign language is to match it with a gesture. This works especially well for more abstract ideas. For example, when I learned how to say “friction” in the language I’m studying, I rubbed my hands together. If I ever have trouble remembering the word, I just rub my hands together and presto! I got it.
The most important thing is to realize that the goal is to communicate, not sound like a native. Once you make peace with the fact that you will never sound like a native, you are free to just speak.
random fact
Many languages used by hunter gatherers have no words for numbers larger than two. The numbering system is: none, one, two, many. However, they can count in roundabout ways. For example, if a speaker wanted to say “I caught five fish” he’d say “I caught fish from my thumb to my pinky.” Or if he wanted to say “10 coconuts” he’d say “two hands of coconuts.”
It was a real big leap to treat numbers as a separate idea from things to be counted or measured.
“I made friction on my fish from my thumb to my pinky today.”
So euphemism.
My problem will always be comprehending what other people say. I overthink it, too-actively try to parse every bit and then how they fit together, and fall behind (‘retard’) very easily and quickly. I think I’m just incapable of it altogether. I wonder if this apparent inability is related to my inability to understand e.g. many song lyrics, even in English, while most other people do so effortlessly. I’m just a bit dumb and genuinely retarded (delayed in understanding).
So my username is appropriate.
Anyway, I’ve pretty much given up on learning other languages. Sigh.
But yeah, creating various associations for yourself helps spectacularly with memorization. The lecturer for the Michel Thomas–method Russian course said to associate the word for ‘understand’—понимать—with a visualization related to what the word sounds like in English: a pony on a mat. Consequently I’ll never forget that word, whereas I’ve forgotten so many others. (I used to worry that these associations would cause a delay in thinking, like ah you have to take this memory route each time? So I’d forgo making them—and forget the meanings altogether. Even less desirable.)
Better than the Rassias method. Fuck his shirt-rending festering corpse.
Sword-carrying Joker arrested in Virginia, police say
I hope whoever acts as his lawyer dresses up like Harvey Dent.
[raspy Batman voice]
“Dressing up like a comic book villain and it’s not Halloween? That’s a paddlin’.”
Wearing a mask in public is a FELONY. Remember when that word actually meant something? Yeah me neither. That’s fucking pathetic.
It’s Virginia, so I’m guessing this is an anti-Klan law.
Don’t worry, it’s only a class 6 felony:
(f) For Class 6 felonies, a term of imprisonment of not less than one year nor more than five years, or in the discretion of the jury or the court trying the case without a jury, confinement in jail for not more than 12 months and a fine of not more than $2,500, either or both.
For a mask, that’s fuckin’ overkill.
Wonder if they enforce that for other things that cover the face, and hence the identity of the wearer?
Don’t SWATTIES wear masks in public?
Well, and some muslims, of course.
Did the guy actually do anything aside from altering his appearance? How much does one have to alter their appearance? What constitutes a mask?
I guess Comicon in Virginia is a no-go.
New Republic: Al Franken is getting Presidential buzz! (But he should stay in the Senate)
The Democrats would totally be dumb enough to nominate him, wouldn’t they.
Isn’t he good enough, etc?
Do you know how many trunks of ballots would be needed to be “found” to push him across the finish line?
That just means that people like him.
Doggone it.
*throws up in beak*
It is somewhat sad that being a Senator for almost a decade can still leave one “a relative political newcomer” in the eyes of some.
Don’t worry, I’ll only make a couple posts about this story
“A new proposal making its way through the Tennessee legislature calls for digging up the bodies of [President James K.] Polk and his wife, Sarah Childress Polk, both of which have been buried on the grounds of the state Capitol [in Nashville] for more than a century. They would then be relocated to a final resting place at a Polk family home and museum in the small city of Columbia….
“Opponents, including Teresa Elam, 65, a distant relative of Polk’s, are calling it nothing short of macabre, and an unsavory effort to promote tourism in Columbia, a city of 37,000 about 50 miles south of Nashville that is otherwise known for a colorful yearly celebration of its mule-breeding industry….
“Tom Price, the curator of the President James K. Polk Home and Museum in Columbia…acknowledged that it was difficult to get students, even from schools around Columbia, to tour the home because Mr. Jackson’s famous Hermitage is so close by. But he insisted that the proposal to move Polk’s body was not about tourism, as much as it was about honoring a president’s wishes.
““He wanted to be buried at home,” he said, and this was as close as Polk could get.”
Maybe Sarah Polk was hot? And this could be an elaborate caper by these guys.
Props to the Wisconsin school system for teaching those clowns the importance of bringing condoms to a necrophiliac gang bang.
Maybe Sarah Polk was hot?
Ummm… Crusty would.
Stupid phone butchering the stupid HTML.
Look! Pictures! A lot of you sick bastards would.
Also bonus points in this story is the fact that since there was no law against necrophilia on the books in Wisconsin at the time, these guys almost got off (phrasing!) scot free.
See what will happen in your stupid Libertopia? Without laws and regulations, you are gonna end up getting fucked in the ass by creepy twins when you are dead.
Wow, that got weird much quicker than I expected.
*pukes*
Watched an ID show last week where some asshole shot his daughter in law in the back of the head specifically so he could film himself having sex with her dead body. She had two kids. What a POS.
What the hell is wrong with some people? That is some other world sort of sick there.
“Nick said numerous times over the years how he’d love to have sex with a dead body because he wouldn’t want to have a woman to come home to holler at, or complain or nag at him,” Radke was quoted as saying.”
Well, that just sounds like a genius plan.
Minnesota’s got some derpy alcohol laws, but we’re slowly improving. Sunday liquor sales were legalized just the other week.
OT rant: I’m moving out of my apartment because rent went up an insane amount (and it will probably only get worse around here), and ever since I gave my notice management has been giving people tours of my place when I’m at work. Every day I get home from work to a new note on my door, informing me that some stranger will be wandering around my bedroom tomorrow, reminding me that the property owners can do this whenever they damn well want, and promising that they will “try” to give me forewarning “as a courtesy”.
Quite peeved about the whole thing.
Col. want to take bets on when the progs will become amazed that rents have gotten much higher and there is even less housing available to accept as Sect 8 vouchers?
Between that and the proposed new minimum wage laws and paid sick time laws, Minnie is going to be an economic powerhouse.
Are you staying in the city? Or moving out to the burbs?
But Your Holiness, haven’t you heard? The Minnesotan left-wing economic miracle continues, while neighboring Republican states slowly collapse.
I’ll probably move halfway out of Minneapolis, into one of the surrounding cities — Richfield, SLP, somewhere around there. Haven’t really decided yet though, I’m still scouting out places.
Oh, I’ve heard that over and over from various proggies I know. We have a surplus that they are fucking itching to spend on something.
Tundra and I are in Maple Grove. If you were out here, we could probably be featured as the Libertarian Moment. Three libertarians in once city? Preposterous!
That would probably be a record in this state haha. Work’s in Bloomington, so Maple Grove is right out.
Change the locks and tell them they can show the place when you are home. Or, if that won’t fly, get a bunch of satanic symbols and arrange them on the dining table around a dead chicken.
Most likely result of changing the locks: Management would change them back and bill me for it. Otherwise a nice sentiment.
Oh, and obviously I can’t abuse the corpse of a chicken. That’s practically family!
Molecular wire at 5ft 4in across each doorway.
Sinclair chain monofilament
Wow. I can’t imagine why any landlord would be opposed to any of this.
Ima gonna guess that councilwoman Elizabeth Glidden does not live in a Section 8 building.
I don’t know what the laws are where I live, but when I see “Section 8 welcome ” in an ad for an apt, I know to avoid it.
I had a bad experience as a kid when my relatively safe and enjoyable Brooklyn apt complex turned into the same projects my parents and I left almost overnight when it went Section 8.
Why not?
http://hotair.com/archives/2017/03/25/report-andrew-napolitano-thinks-trump-might-put-him-on-the-supreme-court/
Who could blame him?
That one act, if he did it, would make Trump the most libertarian POTUS in … 200 years? I’ll put it this way, if he gets Napolitano on SCOTUS, I’ll vote for him in 2020 and that’s a promise.
I’d vote for him in 2024 and 2028 too, and I’m not even a citizen.
Same here. I would vote early and often. I would even buy a hat or five.
How many times have people from this crowd plugged Napolitano for SC? I know I have a number of times.
I’ve more plugged him for Attorney General, but definitely would be all in favor of putting him on the Supreme Court.
AG would be one administration. SCOTUS is (potentially) a lot longer
Just got back from the local Tap House. I think this is going to become a habit for us on weekends. Little less than a mile walk. Today was beautiful, 76F and partly sunny. Every weekend from 12-5PM is happy hour. They have oysters on half shell for $1 and I’m very surprised with the quality. They’re close enough to the best Blue Point and Chincoteague oysters that we get locally. Ok, not THAT good, but those are typically $30 a dozen, or couple dollars each if you want to take home and shuck yourself. But for $1 they are very good, smallish and lots of brine. Today the happy hour beer was Evolution Craft Brewing Company No. 6 Imperial / Double. I don’t really like IPA at all, but for the happy hour price and the high ABV, 8.5 I think, I left with a nice buzz after … of those.
Sounds like an awesome habit. I’ve been contemplating heading out for a few crafts and a Scooby snack. Maybe a nap first.
Sweet. Good bars in walking distance is awesome.
Within stumbling distance is even better!
That sounds amazing, and man, I could go for some oysters right about now.
There’s no brewery within good walking distance of my house, but there’s a dozen that are in easy cycling distance (3-10 miles one way), and even more for a full day ride (30-40 miles one way). Once the weather breaks here, I’ll be getting my rides in, and enjoying some good craft beer. Glad you were able to find a brew you enjoyed.
In case you don’t know that you can get a dui riding a bicycle, now you do.
Oh, I’m aware, it’s usually a 2-3 then ride back for me. I am also aware that you cannot get a DUI (at least in Ohio) on a unicycle. I should start lessons one day…
I absolutely agree that taxing millionaires would reduce the number of millionaires, but the tradeoff would be more debt free college graduates, which would theoretically create new millionaires.
Assume a can opener.
Can they really raise $2.2BB per year with a 1% tax? Is there really $220BB in personal income over $1MM in CA?
Regardless, that 1% tax will be 2%, 5%, etc. soon enough.
Something came and corpsefucked the shit out of that Land Tax post.
Benj is his handle. He and trashmonster are going at it. He basically shit on everyone (slight exaggeration).