I’m going to break one of my own rules established when I began this review column and provide a review for a new, mainstream blockbuster film. In a broad sense, I’m doing this simply because I can; admin power is not worth having unless it is wielded capriciously. But in a much more focused sense, I’m doing this because this film falls firmly in my wheelhouse. It is an American kaiju eiga, and there are damned few bigger fans of this genre in the world than your intrepid author.
I hope that it is not too much of a letdown when I tell you that even as someone radically predisposed to enjoying this sort of film, I found Kong: Skull Island to be an unsatisfying experience. Let’s delve a little into what brought this film about, and see where things went wrong.
This movie is a direct result of the existence of Marvel Comics. More specifically, the new Hollywood craze of “shared universe” largely instituted by the success of the Marvel films, beginning with 2008’s Iron Man. Shared universes existed previously, of course, mostly in linear sequels which often only obliquely referenced the events of prior films in the series. Perhaps the most famous and successful shared universe pre-Marvel was the Star Wars franchise. However, Marvel took it to an entirely new level, with cross-over cameos, and explicit tie-ins canonically linking each movie into a specific place and event sequence in the universe, and where actions in each film had direct repercussions upon the subsequent films in other lines (Agent Smith’s capture of the Tesseract in the first Captain America story having a direct influence not only on the first Avengers movie, but also creating the overarching story of the hunt for the Infinity Gems/Stones, as they are called in the comics and film series, respectively). This level of cross-promotional bonanza was unheard of before the wild success enjoyed by Marvel, and other studios have been scrambling to catch up ever since (and mostly failing – suck it, Warner Bros.!). Even one of the previews for this film is for another franchise-starter for a shared universe, The Mummy. Universal is hoping to rehash all their classic monsters in new, gritty films in which the monsters will all presumably eventually work together. This will lead to a steaming pile of crap, OR possibly be one of the greatest movies ever made.
Never ones to pass up an opportunity to copy something else more successful, studio after studio began planning sessions on which properties they could franchise into endless streams of summer blockbusters in shared universes. In 2010, Legendary Entertainment had acquired the rights from Toho Co. for a big-budget American Godzilla film. This led to the Gareth Edwards 2014 film, titled simply, Godzilla. I thought it was very well done, but I’ll not say more lest you heathens receive two reviews for the price of one.
After the success of that film, in which Legendary partnered with Warner Bros. for financing and distribution, some bright bulb thought to check and see if WB had or could secure the rights to our own homegrown giant monster, King Kong. Sure enough, they did, and Shared Universe Mania did the rest.
However, you can’t simply launch straight into a two-marquee monster mash-up without the mortar of the shared universe structure, which in the industry is called universe building. A more prosaic term might be “let’s see how many of these cash-grabs we can shit out before having to get to the main event”. And so Kong: Skull Island was born in their small, fevered minds.
Our story takes place in 1973. Fancy-pants cryptozoologist (fun fact: Microsoft Office does not recognize that as a real word, just like it isn’t a real job) John Goodman has discovered a new island in the South Pacific, where he believes be dragons. He fakes an interest in cartography and securing any unknown natural resources of this island before the Soviets can get their red claws on it, and manages to convince the gub’mint to provide him with an Air Cav escort led by regular-pants Samuel L. Jackson. Jackson is an officer who is bitter over America’s seeming defeat in the Vietnam War, and looking for one last mission to find meaning in an otherwise meaningless age.
With Too Tall and Snake Shit in tow (damn, wrong movie), along with stock issue anti-war journalist Brie Larson, and drunken burned out former SAS devastatingly handsome devil-may-care mercenary Tom Hiddleston, the stage is set. Upon flying over Skull Island on an investigatory bombing run (yes, I meant what I typed: it’s part of a geological survey cover story so preposterous I don’t want to spoil it for you), the entire force is knocked out of the sky by Kong. The remainder of the film is the story of groups of survivors trying to make their way to a pre-planned rendezvous with a resupply mission from the cargo ship they arrived in. Jackson wants to kill Kong to avenge his dead soldiers, whereas the civilians are only worried about getting the hell off the island. Various giant beasties make their usually violent appearances, and we meet the taciturn natives of the island, who have taken in stranded World War II fighter pilot John C. Reilly.
It’s a hell of a cast. Legendary obviously was willing to spend All Of The Money to make this thing work. The problems, though, begin to surface early.
First, I honestly thought that Goodman and Reilly turned in the only worthwhile performances in this film, and even then barely. The characters are written so thinly that they all come across as clichéd archetypes, from the Handsomely Brooding Very Serious Hiddleston to Jackson’s bitter war vet, played by the actor shockingly against type as a loud badass angry black man. Reilly is genuinely funny as the comic relief, though there’s nothing in his performance that you haven’t seen before, so if you weren’t a fan of him in Talladega Nights or Step Brothers, there won’t be much for you here.
Director Jordan Vogt-Roberts seems to be aware of the paucity of actual artistic effort going into this movie, and we’re introduced to the titular giant ape extremely early in the film. I suppose he knows why people are coming to see this movie, and it isn’t just to find out it was a fucking sled from his fucking childhood (I still get angry thinking about that, at random times throughout the day). His only other full-length efforts prior to this were the indy film The Kings of Summer, and 49-minute runtime made-for-tv movie Cocked. Being given the keys to the kingdom on such a large production so early in one’s career paid off handsomely with an at-the-time still relatively unknown Gareth Edwards and Godzilla (Gareth got that job on the really quite good indy alien invasion film, Monsters, before using his kaiju success to then land the plum directorial job for Rogue One), but here Vogt-Roberts’s fails to bring life to an already torpid script.
The effects, always of paramount concern in a film such as this, are passable. It is, of course, a CGI crap-fest, but since that is the future of all film, I suppose I have to rein in my old man frustration and forever bury my man-crushes for the masters of the practical. If the names Tom Savini, Rick Baker, and Rob Bottin mean nothing to you, you are a sad, deprived little person.
There are call-backs to Jurassic Park (Mr. Jackson tells his men to, “Hold on to your butts!”), the original King Kong Vs. Godzilla (giant octopus fight scene), and universe building with the 2014 Godzilla. The secretive government-sponsored Monarch Corporation is a prime player, and Godzilla-related past events shown in the earlier film are referenced again in this one.
Already announced: the next film to be released will be Godzilla: King of the Monsters (2019), followed by Godzilla vs. Kong (2020). Hold on to your butts.
Ultimately I rate Kong: Skull Island 12 Bags of Cat Food out of a possible 20.
Them dinos ain’t as thicc as the dino on Thursday Afternoon Links. It’s Thursday, needz moar thicc dinos.
That this movie came out now instead of on the 28th of May is a crime.
God, I’m gonna have to write a review when Monster Dong: Dong Island; An XXX Parody comes out, aren’t I?
Is that dong cut?
I’m envisioning an adaptation of the Epic of Gilgamesh with King Dong being Enkidu, the wild man tamed by a sacred ho. So uncut, but I guess the Gilgamesh stand-in could be cut.
*mulls over script*
Huh, googled king kong xxx parody and the results were a pornhub video of an itty bitty blonde with moderately large tits being used as a fleshlight by a very burly man.
Not my cup of tea, but only 40 seconds, so two thumbs way up.
My all time favorite porn parody has to be Pirates of the Caribbean. That was some fine work there.
The budget was amazing, too.
MEN(dot)com has done a bunch of gay porn parodies including a star wars one, which I keep meaning to watch. They’re apparently pretty funny and they put a lot of effort into them.
….
….
did it not get a porn-parody *NAME*? i thought that was the whole point.
e.g. “Bi-mates of the Gayribbean”?
*in high-school/college there was a modified version of the drinking game “asshole” which involved forcing someone to come up with an acceptable porn-title version of any movie currently showing in theaters. It was fun.
also, seriously, what was the Pirates porn-parody called? asking for a friend.
“People Pretending to be Pirates Fucking Each Other”
“People Pretending to be Pirates Pretending to Fuck Each Other”
FTFY
Also “Ass-pirates of the Carribean” starring a bunch of sexy well-endowed Barbadians is a fine enough title.
Shit, I’d meant to say that the punny titles had fallen out of favor hence a lot of “Star Wars: An XXX Parody” titles and then the Also sentence. I need more coffee.
not with me they haven’t. i can’t get enough of them.
I don’t remember. Stand by. This requires accessing one of several hard drives.
It is just called, “Pirates”. A movie by Joone. Ya, fail on the parody title, but I highly recommend it. I give it eight boners out of ten. (an apologies to Gojira for turning his movie review into depravity)
I had no idea the NYT did porn reviews, but they seem to be pretty accurate. The movie has a soft spot in my heart as Janine is in it, and ex-Mrswesternsloper number 2 had the hots for her.
Well, “sex” being suggestive rather than explicit. IIRC it was mostly hot actors and actresses rubbing up on one another.
My friends used to do a porn and fried chicken night in their dorm rooms, and Pirates was one of the films.
Well, “sex” being suggestive rather than explicit.
It is pretty explicit in the version I have.
Maybe I’m not thinking of the same thing. But I’m pretty sure I am. There was no penetration.
I don’t know. Maybe there are two versions. Adam and Eve is usually pretty mild. I got this version from what is passed around on overseas oil and gas exploration crews. The version I have has plenty of penetration. Several orifices in the same person if I remember right.
I just remember noticing after the first couple scenes that it seemed very tame, and for the rest of it I was distracted by the idea that the actors were playacting sex rather than actually having it, and wondering which was more onerous.
“The Curse of the Black Pearl Necklace”
(applause)
Yes. Yes, you are.
I took my four year old to see it because he loves monster movies (especially Godzilla). I thought it was entertaining enough.
We finally watched Shin Godzilla a few weeks ago. Not bad. But not great either.
When my son was a little fella we went to see the Harry Potter movie where the cat was killed and hung on a wall. (I am not sure if I am remembering that right) He didn’t like that, and we had to leave. He was a sensitive sort back then. I don’t even remember what year that was now.
There’s a similar cat in the early Alfred Hitchcock movie Rich and Strange.
Saw it in Tokyo with my wife. Agree with your judgement but there’s someone awesome about watching it there, even if there were absolutely no subtitles other than for the little English subtitles.
Merian C. Cooper, who produced the original King Kong, led an interesting life.
I probably should have linked to this documentary instead….
If the names Tom Savini, Rick Baker, and Rob Bottin mean nothing to you, you are a sad, deprived little person.
Hey now! I am prepared to feel shamed on Manly Mondays, and some Furry Fridays, but Thursday now too?
I take 12 bags of cat food to mean, wait for it to come out on Netflix.
His nose and mouth look like Harry Potter’s owl.
The completely gratuitous swordfight scene added at least three hot tamales to my personal meter. So definitely would watch again, at least my favorite parts. ymmv
gratuitous swordfight scene
So you’re talking about the XXX Parody?
Forty seconds? ha. If there are no tall brooding sweaty men swinging swords in fog, for at least a minute, count me out.
OTA don’t want no 40 second man.
sloopy, is it your wife who’s coded this? Or is it OMWC? Or am I completely mis-remembering this?
puh-LEEZE give us “preview” and “edit” functions, I’m begging you. I don’t care what kind of sick, depraved sex acts you have to do with her to make her agree. That’s a price I’m willing to pay.
Her kink is watching you get sodomized.
Whose isn’t?
My wife. And no. She’s tough, and demands that commenters be as tough as she is and bareback their comments.
I love the kind of reviews which are not only entertaining, they spare you from having to watch the movie. So you read the review and you’re entertained and you’re done with the movie, as well.
Seriously, are there any good movies today? I know that good movies have always been rare, thanks to MST3K I know that bad movies were always with us. But sometimes a good one got through the system.
I know that some of the kids’ movies are still good, but what about the movies for not-kids? (I don’t mean “adult movies”).
You mean the adolescent type of movies? Well, if you like sci-fi, I quite enjoyed Arrival. Rogue One as well, thought it was the first good Star Wars movie since Return of the Jedi.
Seconded on The Arrival.
I tried to watch LaLa Land on an airplane and ended up watching Me Before You on my seat-neighbor’s screen since she had subtitles on.
Ah, I had noticed that one, contrary to my post below – I shall have to check it out.
‘Arrival’, that is.
It isn’t blow you away amazing, but it’s solid and entertaining. It hit the sweet spot that Contact did for the genre.
Alright, I’ll give it a try, but if the alien is someone’s dad, I’m going to be pissed.
The alien wasn’t Jodie Foster’s dad, dummy. It was Matthew McConaughey pulling fifth-dimensional strings from behind a bookshelf.
Heh I liked both of those movies.
I found Mathew McConaughey behind the bookshelf with fifth dimensional strings to be torture.
It was well-directed too, which I liked.
I thought The Arrival was ok but was bugged by the way they did the thing that they did, starting at the start of the movie.
I think that’s a vague enough statement to not count as a spoiler. Also this thread is likely super dead anyway, so no one will read it!
Ahem. Rogue One was the first good Star Wars movie since The Empire Strikes Back.
The first half of ROTJ was fun. And parts of the second half too, barring the stupid Ewoks. Also, the famous LEia outfit, man.
But yes, Rogue One was the best since Empire Strikes Back.
The last good movie I can recall is EX_MACHINA. I’m not much of a theater-goer so I only hear about them by word-of-mouth but yeah I haven’t heard of anything interesting lately.
Ex_Machina was fantastic. I’m going to go ahead and give The Revenant and Spotlight shout outs too, even though they’re more adult type movies.
Also Mad Max: Fury Road if you like entertaining action movies (and not much else.) Oh, and The Martian, even though the book was better, the movie was fun too.
Is anyone else looking forward to Blade Runner 2049? I’m a bit apprehensive but I think if anyone can pull it off, it’s Denis Villeneuve.
Fury Road was sublime. Really, just one of those perfect movies I look forward to rewatching. And you’re right, it wasn’t much else. It did spectacular action exactly right.
I hated Fury Road. Furry Road was a bizarre parody, which I liked better.
The macabre porn parody Furry Roadkill really kinda killed the genre for me.
Wait, there’s a Furry Road? Can I find this and watch this in time for Friday?
Amazon prime. Furry Road.
Correction Furry Fury
Now you tell me… I don’t even want to know what ads I’m gonna start getting.
*burns down google and amazon histories, starts over*
Sorry. It’s only 6 minutes, so you’ll definitely be able to watch it in time for tomorrow
Oh, jeez. I thought you were being silly.
Just did. It’s both wonderful and terrible.
I love Road Warrior so yeah, I should eventually get around to that.
Road Warrior is still the best movie in the franchise, it’s way more balanced than any of the other movies.
The first one was rough. My teen eyes saw it as great; looking back (watching it again)… eh, not so much. Lots of strange plot points and WTF moments. I’d agree with Rhywun.
Note: never saw FURY ROAD.
Fury Road was George Miller finally able to justify over two decades of ideas for amazing car chase scenes into a movie.
How far are we going back? I haven’t been to a theater in several years. One of my go to movies is Chef. That is one I have watched several times, but it is a few years old now.
Seriously? I have almost watched that a bunch of times, but then I figure it’ll be terrible and don’t.
I don’t know whether good movies are getting scarce or my tastes are getting more discriminating as I age, but I very infrequently come across anything I want to see lately. The most recent film I actually watched in the theater was Get Out, and it was a positively spectacular rare treat. I won’t bother with detailing any of it as that’s been beaten to death all over the Internet, but I will say that the the response to it in certain right-leaning political circles has been baffling. Anyway, I highly recommend it.
That’s what I love about RLM’s coverage. Unless they say up front that a movie was spectacular, I’ll just watch Mike and Jay bitch about it for fifty minutes and save my money.
I was a bit dubious through the whole film. Cuz seriously the amount of firepower a Vietnam era airborn cavalry company could have brought to that situation should have wasted every large creature on that island. And that is the closest thing to a compliment you fucking mammals will ever get from me.
❤️ Your Future Reptillian Overlords
It was a mapping mission, though they were pretty well armed for a survey team.
37mm cannon aside, I think the Inverse Square Law would have won, turning these things into a mound of hamburger.
Oh, terrific, thanks a lot, asshole. Now I know it’s all about a giant gorilla.
I watched this entire moving thinking Tom Huddleston was Michael Fastbender. What I’m trying to say is all Brits look alike.
Michael Fastbender is a Kraut-Mick.
Fassbender, yos. Would. More enthusiastically when he’s a bit scruffy.
I never said he wasn’t handsome.
I was making a quip about the spelling of his name and just using it as an opportunity to link eyecandy
Always liked how well coiffed his hair was.
OT:
Aimed at any of the more legally minded Glibs out there. I filed a FOIA request at my circuit court on tuesday. Arkansas law states that there should be a response within 3 days with either the info I’m after or a reason for the denial of said info. Today was the third day. I would like some advice on where to go from here. If any of you lawyers are out there, I’d like to e mail you a copy of the request I sent and see if maube I did something wrong in the structure of it. any help.would be appreciated.
Back in the mid-nineties I walked into the Pulaski county courthouse Registrar of voters and asked for William Jefferson Clinton’s voter record and his driver’s license record. The old woman behind the counter just snorted and gave it to me. Then I drove over to Garland county for the same purpose. Oddly enough the AST was waiting for me there. They wouldn’t let me in and had a zillion questions for me.
My comment means if what you are after is public record you can probably get away with walking int he appropriate office and getting some drone to just hand you what you want and charge you $1 per page. Unless of course you are digging dirt on a sitting president and they know you are coming.
What is an AST?
I would guess Arkansas State Trooper?
I’m just trying to get video and audio of a police encounter I had last monday. My ultimate goal is to sue the fuckers for violating my civil rights. It’s not the president’s records I’m after, just those of a police dept that probably knows they did wrong and reluctant to provide me evidence of their wrongdoing.
Sounds like you may need a lawyer.
I probably do fus. I was trying to obtain evidence on my own so that i would have something concrete to take to a lawyer. Apparently, the local authorities have no respect for a private citizens request for information that is in line with the law. i don’t know how to counter that. I have about got my wife on board with my crusade. I’m pretty sure she will be ok with me dropping money on a lawyer at this point.
Document everything. But 3 days in government isn’t like a FedEx delivery estimate. Give it a full week and then start by following up in writing on the status of your request.
Yeah… it takes a long time to review the tape and check with the state’s attorney and the police union and the police chief to make sure that they are all OK with releasing the video.
…. er, I mean “it takes a long time to verify that the video exists and the recording equipment didn’t malfunction.”
Destroy All Monsters
Wait a minute. I thought we did this already.
*looks back at main page*
Oh. That’s the afternoon links. I saw the photo of Hulk Hogan about to blow Jabba the Hutt and I thought we were reviewing bizarro porn this week.
It’s been too busy around here and I cant keep up lately. Well, tomorrow and this weekend I will make up for it.
OT: I’m watching the news with my wife. There is a report that someone associated with Bernie madoff commit suicide. The news reported that Bernie ran the biggest ponzie scheme in u.s. history. I laughed when I heard that. My wife asked what is funny. I told her the biggest ponzie scheme in u.s. history is social security.
Its a money-making scam where you pay one person “profits” with money taken as investments from another, but when you do it you say, “Ayyyyyyyyyyy!” and give them a thumbs-up
That’s funny Gil. I’m pretty young though. I pay thousands of dollars into social security every year and I also have no expectation of seeing a dime back from that investment. I would laugh out loud if the whole social security scheme didn’t put me in such a foul mood.
Ponzie is what you get when you cross Fonzie with Potsie.
What’s your opinion on Jackson’s King Kong remake Gojira?
Gail: How many planets are there?
Wayne: Well, what with the Pluto debate, well, give or take, eight planets.
Gail: Only be seven after I destroy Uranus.
BOO, NOT COOL.
Also OT.
arkansas passed campus carry legislation earlier this month. The legislation allowed carry on campus and at sporting events. There is a big push in my state to exempt stadium on an amendment to the bill. The SEC has threatened to disenfranchise Arkansas over the law. There is a lot of hyperbolic talk about how Gun in stadiums OMG!.
My take.
Police carry guns in stadiums already. Concealed carry permit holders commit less violent crime than police. Either keep the cop guns out of the stadium or allow *ccw permit holder to carry.
*a Ccw permit is a violation of my right TKABA.
Interview with Dr. James Fallon. He’s the neuroscientist that discovered he was a borderline psychopath after studying the brains of murderers for years. Lionel is half squirrel, half human so it’s a bit tough to follow, but I enjoyed it.
He says = “twitter is for exhibitionists, and facebook is for narcissists”.
I’m wondering what this sort of thing (*H&R->Glib) is for?
Masochists?
I just finished watching a long drunken interview between NORE+ Tribe Called Quest; this is a strange shift of gears.
I’m wondering what this sort of thing (*H&R->Glib) is for?
Exactly what I thought at that exact moment. Just spitballin’ but I wonder if there is actually a lower number of pyschopaths in the libertarian/ancap movement. People may think that a psychopath would prefer a society where they are free to do a lot more things, but at the same time they would lose a lot of the manipulative tools they can exploit in a heavily statist society. Also, it takes a certain lack of selfishness to use your valuable time (opportunity cost) to promote a system that doesn’t carve out a special category for yourself. Autism spectrum? Probably a few of those. Psychopaths? I don’t see them fitting in so much.
If you want a totally unqualified diagnosis, I think many of us may look to outsiders like mild sociopaths.
I’ve found it harder to convince people I’m normal than it is to convince them I’m not sane. *Not sure where I heard that, but it stuck*
Oh fuck. Now I remember. This guy.
“Capitalism at its most ruthless rewards psychopathic behaviour.”
Humanity at its most ruthless rewards psychopathic behavior. Capitalism allows us all to live coequally. We temper psychopathy by giving it fewer outlets to exert itself. Works pretty well when the incentives are arrayed against being a total dickhead. Works pretty fucking poorly when there’s an overarching state that gives fuckheads license to be psychopaths.
I don’t think capitalism is anthropomorphic; people can be ruthless, but its not capitalism that ‘makes’ them exercise ruthlessness.
Was it particularly “capitalistic” to do what Enron did? The most capitalist part of their story is how they were caught engaged in fraud and utterly wiped out
Why do I get the impression that he gladly votes to put the gun of Government to the heads of his fellow Welshmen in order to force them to behave as he sees fit? But it’s “capitalism” that removes compassion?
Fuck him sideways.
I think the “type” is probably (as everyone knows) more like ‘autistic’; low emotional-affect, high-cognitive-functioning, prone to obsessive behaviors.
as for the number of ‘psychopaths’ – the problem with a question like that is that it depends how you define it. because as the doctor himself shows, a person can meet the ‘technical’ requirements for their categorization, but never actually demonstrate any behavioral symptoms typical of the type
(i’m coincidentally listening to the doctor explain this himself while typing)
meaning , you could have the neurological pattern of a psychopath without ever demonstrating any symptomatic behavioral disorder.
I think the place you’d find the highest concentration, in my opinion, would be in the Legal field or politics.
the thing they’ve always said (*or i always heard) was the strongest indicator of psychopathy was how people related to animals as a child. Kids who abused/otherwise couldn’t emotionally develop attachments to animals.
It’s interesting how he takes the time to explain the difference between ethics and morality. Evidently the psychopath (using the term in the meaning they are) can follow the rules, but they aren’t interested at all in morality as a personal discovery. Being a free market advocate means you believe in empathy. You must understand and agree with the feelings of others to fulfill the needs they want. At least to have a sustainable business model.
i think the thing libertarians suffer the most from is something closer to Dunning-Kruger, whereby we just assume that other people would/should naturally prefer less constraints or direction from others, and be more free to choose. that libertarians have trouble conceiving the minds of people who think that any pre-existing order is always preferable to an ‘unknown’, open-ended state of affairs.
I’d suspect libertarians tend to come from family backgrounds with a relatively weak-degree of cohesion. this is just wild speculation obviously, but it just seems to make sense intuitively. Basically, “neither strong-mother, nor strong-father”, and a relatively high-degree of familial independence, where no one places high-expectations on the actions of the other.
Dunning-Kruger is usually used to describe overestimating your ability because you are too stupid to know what you don’t know (iow Not Socrates). I think we overestimate others desire to be free to do what we want, NAP or something like that, but I don’t see how that’s DK. As for the family cohesion, absolutely. People who have experience the destructive nature of governmental policies on their families will a) push for more policies to fix the original policy b) reject the original and further policies precisely because they don’t work c) just muddle through life with a much thought.
its basically the way high-functioning people will assume that most other people must be high-functioning, and so are comfortable with complex and indeterminate environments.
e.g.
maybe i’m misapplying it, but my point was the idea that people likely project their own cognitive biases onto large populations and assume “what will work best” based on that assumption.
And there is the full cycle. You become knowledgeable about a topic precisely because you have the humility to learn from others. The standing on the shoulders of giants. After gaining a fair amount of knowledge, you forget that it was the humility that allowed you to gain that knowledge in the first place and then assume people are being obtuse for not understanding what you are explaining. Now you don’t understand what you don’t understand even though you should because you went through the exact process. *Passes Bong*
My point about families wasn’t so much how outside forces affect a person’s family, as much as the infta-familial politics of one’s family influence the way people might eventually project the role of the state.
– people with a high-degree of parental direction/enforcement, where they are basically ‘told what to do on threat of punishment’ (usually by the father), may tend to see a more authoritarian/strong-institution state as ‘normal’ for a healthy society.
-alternatively, the sort of ‘spoiled’, overly-attentive parents who simply try and protect their children/shield them from any consequences…. would see the state in a similar “need-providing” role.
the last category being the “do what you want, I don’t care” parents, who provide help when asked, but don’t always have it to give? might produce libertarians who think other people should be expected to ‘take care of themselves’.
this is obviously just my poor-man’s Freudianism, but is something i think probably *does* have an effect on how people relate to the state. Parenting is (in my non-parenting opinion) some super-powerful secret-sauce that affects almost everything about people.
I don’t think you’re going out on too far of limb with that. FFS, we actually have a “Department of Homeland Security”. From “Mother Russia” to “The Fatherland” the extension of family structure to the state is the norm not the exception. Government is made up of people, not buildings. Family is made up of people not a house. I guess it’s how you were exposed to restrictions on behaviour as child, say, were you disciplined in a consistent and loving manneror was it willy-nilly, violent or simple avoidance. Maslow mixed with Freude?
Ok, which one of you psychopathic misanthropes is Dr. Fallon?
Fallon stated that he is not concerned and believes that his positive experiences in childhood negated any potential genetic vulnerabilities to violence and emotional issues.
Molyneux has a happy.
The only people he psychopathically kills are people who insist on calling him “Jimmy.”
I always knew Jimmy Fallon was a psychopath.
I initially thought the sound was my neighbor sharpening his hedge clippers on a grinding wheel.
my pit bulls fight harder than that. They make more noise too.
A couple years ago I take a call from my girlfriend while at work. She’s hysterical, They’re fighting and I can’t get them off each other, I tried spraying them, there’s so much blood I don’t know what to do. I drive home. Dogs are still going at it. Manhandle the little one off (not the smartest thing to do, but they were already exhausted). Both are caked in blood and dirt, gory mess, girlfriend is hand-to-mouth and sobbing. Get him into the shower, see what the damage is.
A tiny couple lacerations. Eyes are fine. Couple punch-drunk idiot dogs barely scrapping. They still go at it from time to time, but I don’t think their hearts are in it any more. I think they proved to themselves what total pussies they are.
Fuck you, blockquote.
Heh. I figured the easiest thing to do rather than trying to hold the dog under the sink faucet was just to hit him with the shower head.
commodious – FYI – not meant to be rag on you. I get your situation.
Ah fuck it, Im’ma go listen to tunes.
Oops that was almost English. Ah, fuck it. You got what I meant.
My one pit is 100 pounds, the other one is 70. They can do some damage so the moment they start fighting I either dump water on them or I grab them both by their collars and lift up until they can’t breathe. Oxygen deprivation takes the fight right out of them. Then I slowly let them go, and just like that they are friends again. They say goldfish have short attention spans, apparently they’ve never met my dogs.
See, I’d be in trouble if either of these fuckers were their size. One’s a 25lb Boston and the other is a skin-and-bones medium-sized mutt. The Boston instigates the fights, then usually gets his ass kicked. But man can they welter up a good amount of blood.
I think we have a new definition of Boston Strong.
If you ever write a novel, that has to be your opening line.
I thought of John Dies at the End when I read that.
Hedge clippers? Lucky you, lucky neighbor.