There are a thousand examples that could be used to show the rot caused by the invidious tenets of socialism in our sports these days. The most illustrative, in my opinion, is that of IndyCar. For the first 75 years of the Indianapolis 500, the race and the supporting series were based on a free-market-style “run what you brung” model, resulting in a rich and storied tradition. Stories of turbine cars, diesels, close finishes, and 1000 HP rocketships on wheels echo through from the past. Before NASCAR, the various iterations of Indycar (CART, USAC, AAA, etc.) were king in the United States. Until the late 90s, IndyCar was a half-step behind Formula 1 for international popularity.
Today, IndyCar is circling the drain. They had a race in Phoenix last weekend with 7,000 attendees and a few hundred thousand, at most, watching on TV. Why such a precipitous drop from rivaling F1 to now being on the brink of failure? Beyond the basic ineptitude and competitive failures that doom any venture, the problem can be summed up in one word: socialism.
In the early 90s, CART (as IndyCar was called at the time) was king. Names like Unser, Andretti, and Foyt were touring North America, racing custom built race cars in front of packed stands. The Indy 500 would have 350k+ on hand for the annual culmination of a monthslong celebration of speed. Most years, certain qualifying days would have well over 100k people on hand. In 1994, the fastest qualifying speed was a hair over 228 MPH. Today, almost 25 years later, the cars do the same speed, the crowds are down and the hallowed Month of May has become a week and a half.
Then, in response to escalating costs and a perceived shift away from the small-town American dirt track racers to foreign racers in the F1 minor leagues, the owners of the Indianapolis Motor Speedway started the IRL, which based its operating model on a top-down financing of the racing efforts of smaller teams. There are a bunch of other factors in the decadal decline of IndyCar, including a split into two series, series-wide emphasis on safety over speed, and the rise of NASCAR, but the biggest factor was the susceptibility to the allure of socialism.
In the attempt to contain costs and attract smaller teams, the IRL and, later, IndyCar continued with two core principles that will sound familiar to all of you who are versed in the language of the socialist. First, IndyCar established a phonebook’s worth of technical regulations meant to curtail engineering costs. This resulted in the last 10+ years being run with a single allowable chassis each year. They have allowed limited competition in the engine, suspension, and aerodynamics, but the days of building your own mousetrap are over. Second, IndyCar established what’s called the “Leader’s Circle,” which is an alternative to the traditional purse system. Instead of the winner getting a zillion dollars and last place going home with a pittance, anybody who runs a certain percentage of the annual schedule is paid a salary for each full-time race car run, and winners are given a nominal sum as a prize.
As can be easily predicted by those of us familiar with the stories of Soviet Russia, Venezuela, Cuba, and North Korea, IndyCar has been suffering from poor racing, fewer teams, fewer race cars, and an utter collapse of the fanbase. Besides a single day per year burning off 75 years of tradition, American Open-Wheel Racing is on life support. Of course, these are “bad economic times” and “motorsports is on a decline” and “we can’t afford competition.” The excuses have been flying since 1996 when they first headed down this path. Every half-hearted, feeble attempt to introduce a market influence is quickly undone. The toe in the water is withdrawn as soon as they realize it’s wet.
The path to success is simple and quite obvious. Undoing 25 years of stupid will hurt, but, as Venezuela is figuring out right now, the pain is inevitable. IndyCar will wither into nothing unless it reintroduces the competitive spirit of the free market into the sport. The excuses of the boot-lickers in the sport are all based on some nugget of truth, but IndyCar isn’t failing because motorsports are unpopular or because the economy is bad. IndyCar is failing because socialism is more than just painful to live under, it’s also painful to watch.
It’s sad to see such a great tradition go down in flame, but these days even our sports act as a cautionary tale against socialism and all its variants.
I was at the race in Phoenix this year. It sucked, bad. A big crash on lap 1 took out most of the top drivers, and after that first place walked away after the second pit. He was almost lapping second place by the end of the race. Definitely not worth the almost $200 I spent total to watch the damn race.
Also, fun fact: I went to high school in Santa Fe with Al Unser Jr’s son.
Why watch when you can participate?
https://www.chumpcar.com/
Cool! And there’s one here!
The entrants so far.
Unfortunately, I think the Triumph is a little overmatched…
You’d be surprised how well a smaller under-powered car can do. The fast cars tend to stop for fuel more often, and are frequently unreliable. There have been several wins this year by Miatas and Hondas.
Lol. Even with my mods, the VPI is still only 150!
RUN IT! You will have an absolute blast. I’ve been doing this for a few years now and can’t get enough.
The idea that installing a roll cage and fire suppression on a car is within the average person’s budget is a bit on the ‘let them eat cake’ side isn’t it?
Also, my WRX is already 100 points above the limit, so yeah…
You can get a roll cage installed for a couple of grand. A fire bottle with 4 nozzles is another $500. Split that among 4 teammates and you’ll soon be having more fun than you thought possible.
Great, so I need money AND friends?! This is worse than summer camp!
I used to go to dirt track races when I was a kid. My dad’s cousin, a farmer, built his bitchin’ Camaro in the barn and hauled it to the track on Friday nights. I got to hang out in the pit area experience the specticle the way God intended.
It was glorious.
I’m bored with technological wonders driven by rich kids. In fact, the only racing that even interests me any more is rallying, because it still maintains that spirit of ‘holy shit, I’m gonna die!’
And that’s just the spectators.
Nice article, your grouchness!
*waves money at spelling faerie*
Rally is still the one true king of motorsports in my world. It is the reason I drive subarus exclusively (not counting the shitbird jetta I currently drive for… reasons not at all having to do with me breaking my subaru).
Fix it, ffs. What year Jetta?
One does not simply ‘fix’ blown headgaskets. The shop has me scheduled for June 12th.
Its a 2015 jetta. More or less a shitbox, but it has a good stereo. I plan on putting a few mods on it to get it up to speed (literally).
One does not simply ‘fix’ blown headgaskets.
Bummer. That’s not a cheap one. Any collateral damage?
We have a 2007 5 speed that my kid drives. I really like it.
Not that I can tell. My radiator failed catastrophically while I was on the freeway and I didn’t notice it for a few minutes. I thought I had dodged a bullet but a few weeks after I changed the radiator I noticed it was overheating. It still runs and drives but it’s just going to get worse so I said screw it and it’s currently sitting in my moms driveway waiting to get fixed.
You sure it’s not just the water pump? They (the legacys and outbacks) are kinda notorious for that.
100% sure. They found hyrdocarbons in the coolant. That only happens with a blown gasket.
Tru dat.
it’s currently sitting in my moms driveway waiting to get fixed.
You’re having your mom do the work?
It’s odd, I bought an old Audi A4 last week for Teenage Borderline Libertarian Shitlord Son to drive in a couple months time, and I’d forgotten just how much fun I’d had totaling a Quattro back on the Brecon Beacons leg of an amateur-league rally in the mid 80’s, back when I didn’t value my health anywhere near as highly as I do now.
There wasn’t a lot I could do to get back into the sport after grounding the thing at about 60 and ripping the whole transmission off, from gearbox to rear diff. I’d forgotten just how much I’d loved doing that shit.
Did you wind up with Kenny Rogers and your bratty siblings?
And here I thought it was because Tom Cruise left it for Nascar before he hooked up with Nicole Kidman?
That was back when ESPN had fantastic race coverage.
ESPN wasn’t always the SocJus channel?
Pretty sure their racing headlines this year are all going to revolve around Danica Patric (Brave or Problematic) and why there aren’t more women drivers?
I don’t get spectating at sports.
Your lawn, get off it?
True for me. As I get older I find myself less interested in watching sports. I’ve just been finding other things to do with the 2-3 hours or so that a sports event takes up. I still find time to watch various playoffs of the Chicago teams and some Bears games. Starts weeping.
I prefer to listen to games on the radio and multitask on the computer.
Oh, you want to laugh at regular Americans from your box at the opera?
Opera is equally baffling.
I think it’s passivity of spectating.
I write instead of reading books. I do read when I’m ins places like a laundromat where I have to be present to manage events, but not active at that moment.
I play video games instead of watching movies or television. Even internet videos are used as background noise for other activities. If I’m not involved in what’s going on, I’m not interested.
Opera makes sense in the context of the era it was most popular.
I enjoy it more when I make up the lines in my head.
“What do you want for DIIIIIIINNNNNNNNNER?
“HOT dogs I want HOT dogs…”
Waiting for the cute blonde to leave the laundromat to get a coffee so you can smell her panties is not “managing events”. Just sayin.
Yeah, gotta say this is my general attitude as well. Don’t watch much TV and I find watching sports a massive bore. (Is driving a car in a circle really considered a sport? I think of physical activity when I think of sports, not sitting in a car driving).
I consider driving a car at close to 200 mph inches from other cars for 3 hours a physical activity. If you’ve ever seen an in-car camera view, you can see they are getting quite a workout.
The real question is, why the hell do ESPN and Fox Sports show poker tournaments?
…my daily commute.
must be nice, /LA freeway driver
Bowling, why the hell is that a spectator sport?
Usually with spectator sports you are watching borderline gods do things a mortal human could never hope to do. With Bowling, yeah go to any lanes in the country and there’ll be a dozen or more regular league bowlers capable of winning tour events and 2 or 3 carrying an average that would put them in the top 25 bowlers in the PBA.
The difference between a pro bowler and an amateur bowler is the pro is willing to spend a significant chunk of his own money to join the tour in hopes of landing a sponsorship (the only real way to make money on the PBA tour) .
Bowling, why the hell is that a spectator sport?</i?
You don't find this interesting?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AQnphc6qeNs
I’m disappointed this wasn’t your example.
I’m disappointed in both of you.
If I could drive an indycar instead of watch it I would. Alas, they only allow top men in those things apparently.
What’s not to get? I enjoy playing basketball, football, and golf at my level, and watching people who are really, really good at those things is a real treat.
I get most sports. Car sports, I don’t get.
I get it. Not for everyone, but this is pretty damn cool.
1980s?
1988. Fucking Finns can drive, can’t they?
I actually made that guess from the look of the film stock and the cars… then it popped up at the end.
Funny thing is I’ve seen people pretend driving with similar arm movements for smooth coast down a city road…
I remember Teemu Selanne saying one time that he wasn’t nearly as big a celebrity in Finland as he was in the US and Canada because rally drivers are the really big stars over there.
Fucking tree huggers had to ruin pikes peak by paving it. At least I got to see it live one time before that happened.
They paved Pike’s Peak? WTF?!
In 2011.
What in the world for?
F*cking Bullshit, that place is spooky, even in a regular car touristing,
B
The problem is essentially money. In engineering efforts the group that is willing to spend the most money (or enough) will take the performance title.
If a single team dominates the particular sport, fans will leave, there is no point to watch an event where group X always wins. Therefore we get the myriad of rules that are attempts to curtail the effect of disparate levels of funding. (which just displaces the effort it doesn’t fix it)
Once established, professional sporting event runners have shown that close scoring, “will they win?.. will there be an upset? stay tuned!” brings in the most revenue and largest fanbases. Their goal is to always have a close race, to have the lead swap multiple times.. etc.. In racing, you have the arbitrary limits, single brand tire rules, CC limits, restrictors, no computers, claiming rules etc. Other sports have the salary cap, draft schedules etc to attempt leveling the field, all to make it hard for that one money loaded team to dominate.
At least we can say that being in these sports is voluntary, a sports commune if you will, and not political socialism.
While you are correct that a close match is infinitely more exciting, where you are wrong (at least for indycar) is that these rules actually contribute to a close race. As I stated above, I was at the race in Phoenix, and it was a total washout. There was absolutely no drama, barely any passing/battling for places, even the pits were boring. The most exciting thing that happened was the old drunk getting into a fight with the guy that asked him to put out his cigarette. Part of that had to do with a big crash that took out 4 or 5 cars, but if 4 cars out of 20 are able to control the whole race then you probably have a bigger problem.
Yes, that is what is killing Indy & F1. The rules that they have decided to use basically make the competitive part of the race qualification for poll position, and then a sprint for the first corner. After that the race is done because the technology leveling doesn’t allow for passing, it is what will be their demise. They stopped using slick tires to attempt to mitigate the 1st corner limit, but it will keep coming back.
Now, compare that to Nascar where they made limitations in the brake size, and suspension geometry + restrictors, and body limits. Drafting, the shallow corners and those crappy (relative to engineering capabilities) brakes make for the continuous lead changes..
Can the other race groups figure out rules that would put the outcome arbitrarily in contention without ruining the character of the type of racing?.. don’t know.
Doesn’t seem to be hurting European league soccer, where – barring the occasional oddity – basically nobody outside the perennial top 3 or 4 teams has any realistic chance of winning. Or if you’re in Germany or Italy, top 1.
Cars are not green. Unregulated cars doubly so. I bet you wann bring back cock fighting and competitive seal clubbing. You monster.
*hefts club*
I’m ready!
To be fair, uncompetitive seal clubbing would be pretty uninteresting.
Other than the pure enjoyment of seeing a seal clubbed to death, of course.
^^^To be fair, leftist ninnies basically equate athletic competition with baby seal clubbing.
“People win and lose based on their own merit? The horror….the horror….the horror”
—Your average prog
I know I’m a third-rate philosopher, a fifth-rate economist and a hundredth-rate debater.
I’m trying to work up to second-rate author.
The next time you level up, just put most of your points towards your writing skill.
The ranks just keep getting more expensive to buy.
Where was the socialist part again? I missed it
all the rules you mentioned seemed like things they imposed to cut costs in order to keep race teams participating.
that’s not socialism, that’s just a different way of approaching risk-reward so that people will come to play.
per Vhyrus remark =
its exactly the opposite; it prevents 1-2 teams from dominating the sport, and limits the bankruptcy risk for participants.
by the way = every sport does this. NFL, NBA, MLB. they cap spending and they distribute bennies to losers to ensure franchises stay in the league.
You may not like it, but there’s nothing stopping investors from pouring billions into some alternative ‘winner takes all’ sport, where the team in the largest advertising market wins the championship every year.
The reason they don’t is because artificially-enforced competition is what audiences find entertaining. its not socialist at all – its pursuit of profitability above pursuit of some sporting-ideal.
Yeah. When I read the title, I thought it was a story of the government nationalizing the firm. Because that’s, you know, the definition of socialism.
A private entity adopting short-sighted egalitarian rules isn’t socialism. It just has some symptoms in common with socialism, such as the incentive problem and technological stagnation.
AKA soccer in Europe. Though even so there are small efforts at evening things out such as parachute payments to teams that drop out of the league – but nothing on the scale seen in the American leagues.
I think the socialism comes in when they try to level the playing field artificially, which stifles innovation and competition.
While I wholly accept your argument regarding racing, it’s hard to argue that similar things (e.g. the salary cap and free agency) haven’t done a great deal to make other sports like the NFL more interesting, at least to my mind.
I do think it’s fascinating that even WITH those constraints some teams have built longstanding dynasties (Patriots, Steelers et al.) while others STILL remain bottom feeders (Browns) in spite of an NFL structure desgined to promote parity.
Anybody have thoughts as to why that is? Why/How do some teams in sports perinnially seem to snatch a dumpsterfire from the jaws of mediocrity? Is it ownership? Management? Bad Drafting? Is the opposite evidence of Bill Belicheck conspiring with the Russians?
PS: Dallas is going to win it all this year. How bout them Cowboys? 😉
Some of it is that certain teams just go over the cap and pay the luxury tax See: New York Yankees
P.S. Fuck. The. Cowboys.
^^^”P.S. Fuck. The. Cowboys.”
As someone is around other Cowboys fans a lot, I can’t argue with the fact that we are, collectively, a gigantic bunch of douchenozzles.
…But T least we’ve never booed Santa Claus ?
I’m not actually a Phillies fan. I just happen to share a name with one of them. I’m a Niners and Twins fan.
*hangs head in shame and remembers past glory
Not a Philly fan! That’s a relief! ?
In all seriousness, I have no doubt that that Lynch and Shannahan will have the Niners on the rebound sooner rather than later. Y’all just killed it in the draft!
Yeah, things are looking up. The draft did go well. And ditching Kaepernick gave me the warm and fuzzies.
“PS: Dallas is going to win it all this year. How bout them Cowboys?”
I’ll have three of whatever he’s drinking.
Dude let me have my fantasy: Cowboys fans telling themselves that “this is our year” while knowing in our heart of hearts we will likely get bounced in the first round of the playoffs is what being a Cowboys fan is all about.
It’s like our version of the socialist dream of the workers revolution always being right around the corner that keeps us going.
Cognitive Dissonance FTW
Well they got rid of Romo, so that’s a start. He couldn’t win a playoff game if his life depended on it.
Some of it is systems. A lot of it is chemistry. Every professional athlete is ‘elite’. There is not a single dude in the NHL, for instance, that isn’t among the top players on the planet. When you get so much talent clustered on one sheet of ice, little things matter. A 1-3-1 forecheck, while boring as shit, can seriously impair fast skating snipers.
Also, some coaches are simply better at deploying their assets and getting the most out of them (chemistry). Just like managers in any business.
Oh, and fuck Dallas.
I wonder how well 1-3-1 would work if they actually played on a real (Olympic sized) rink. Much harder to clog up the middle with all that extra real estate. The players are too big and fast for the current NHL rinks, IMHO.
I actually agree with you, but the revenue in those seats is too expensive to give up.
It is partly ownership, partly luck, but mostly culture.
I mean lets face it, the Patriots wouldn’t have been the Patriots had they not stumbled into one of the 2 or 3 greatest QB’s of all time in the 6th round, and more importantly he’s a guy who cares more about winning than anything else as evidenced by the number of times he voluntarily took a paycut to help the team sign key free agents.
Pay-cuts, shmay-cuts!
Brady’s already got Gisela and the eternal glory of being the greatest quarterback ever. What does he need with money at this point?
Ammirite?
True, but how many of the other all time greats could say the same thing.
Manning never took a paycut
Also true! I do agree that that must have factored into Brady’s teams’ success. Hard to argue when you compare his trophy cabinet to Peyton’s!
Well, Giselle makes more money than him. A lot more. It’s one of the reasons he’s able to take lower salaries than what he’d otherwise deserve/get.
I can’t say throughout the league, but some of it has to do with the local sports market economics.
The example I would give is Philadelphia baseball. They’re in the middle of the 4th largest media market in the country. And the top three markets (NY, LA, Chicago) all have two baseball teams. It makes them one of the most profitable franchises in baseball. It’s a cash machine. Yet, for years, they didn’t spend a brass farthing to field a good team. Because they knew they didn’t have to. People would tune in or show up regardless.
Nerd alert: This is an ongoing thing in pro video gaming (yes, when you get paid multiple thousands of dollars to do something, you are a pro). League of Legends follows this model, where top players are salaried, the game publisher keeps the tight grip on the league they created and tournament prizes are substantial but not overwhelming.
Dota 2 on the other hand is absolutely loose. Valve runs three tournaments a year and outside those, it’s free-for-all (China is a bit more organized). Shit, Valve used to run one event, and not even give a shit about what else was going on – going to three has had a negative effect on larger events elsewhere. But the prizes…oh my goodness, the the prize purse, if you do well…
Traditional fighting games that come from the arcade culture are damn near libertarian. The largest, most prestigious tournament is an open, double elimination bracket that seeds by region (because flying out to play against your neighbor who you play every week doesn’t make anybody happy). If the game allows you to time them out or run an infinite combo or any sort of glitch that doesn’t crash it’s fair game. Sponsored pros elbow to elbow with regular joes in 8am qualification pools. There’s not much money but tournament entry fees go straight into the prize pot.
I’ve been going to the Indy500 every year for the last 21 years. For my dad this will make his 54th. Does anyone else here attend?
I’ve never even been to Indiana. Sorry.
I forgive you.
Late to the party, but yes, I’ve been every year since 1999. although my first was 1995. Also, first post, long time TSTSNBN lurker, but work policy kept me from posting there. Now that I’m laid off, I have the free time to post.
Even later to the party (Mrs Trshmnstr had our baby yesterday morning)
I go on even years. It was a tradeoff with the wife so that she could put our wedding on race day. I was right in front of Rossi when he ran out of gas during his victory lap last year. Also got sprayed with the smoke from Hildebrand stuffing it into the wall in 2011.
I’ll be there for the 102nd, even though it’s gonna be spec. We will have to have a glib meet up!
I do wonder a bit about the comparisons to NFL/NHL/NBA and the salary caps/drafting etc. Those rules are designed to create parity, but a salary cap doesn’t prevent innovation. A football team can start using direct snaps to the running back, institute a Greatest Show on Turf Offense, or put super tall guys at cornerback if they want, and the cap doesn’t prevent them from trying those experiments.
The racing rules are more akin to telling a football team “You have to run the ball at least 27 times a game”.
OT: House votes 216-211 to replace one shitty healthcare plan with another shitty healthcare plan, world doomed.
Heard a discussion on MPR this morning about this. The thinking being that a few Repubs let themselves be cajoled into voting for it because they new it would get changed in the Senate and be coming back to the House again anyway.
Massie voted no. Amash voted yes. Should be interesting to read his justification.
Amash! WTF?
I’m not going to count Amash out but it will be interesting to read his justification for his yes vote.
Would love to see if he’s also one of the ones going over to the WH to “celebrate”.
I wonder if the Democrats will learning anything from this experience…
*checks temperature in Hell*
Looks like the Senate may not play along.
TW: autoplay nonsense!
NASCAR is suffering from the same evils of “parity”. I only watch a handful of races each year, if I even remember they’re on. I missed Bristol this spring. I think I watched Daytona, but I certainly don’t remember the race or the outcome. Then they really fucked with the championship and points system. And they forced their drivers to lobotomize their personalities (if they had any to begin with) in the name of good sponsor relations.
Why do people watch NASCAR? The close, side-by-side racing that can’t be offered in open wheels; and the drivers. They want to see rough-and-ready rednecks scrapping with each other on and off the track. It’s so sanitized and noncompetitive now, it’s really not worth it.
As an potential racing spectator, I’m turned off by this safety first, participation trophy kinda bullshit. I want no holds barred, lust for speed, aggressive racing with just a bit of danger or adventure.
It’s why I pretty much only watch the Dakar Rally now.
And NASCAR is dying, and they wonder why. The superspeedways are slowly killing it.
The Bristol night race is the only one I watch because it’s the most chaos you can pack into a 1/2 mile.
If they want to fix the points system, they have to make wins worth a hella lot more so drivers race for wins.
I never understood the allure of oval track racing. It’s boring. It’s dry, white toast.
I watch IndyCar, but I skip the oval races. I’ll probably watch the 500, just for Alonso driving.
NASCAR? Fuck that. I can watch bum fights for that level of drama.
I don’t see where the GOP healthcare plan is shitty.
Here are two bright spots:
1) The individual mandate is dead.
2) They’re cutting Medicaid, an entitlement program.
I keep looking for things not to like about it, and I suppose if I look hard enough I’ll find some.
20 Republicans voted against it. The final vote tally I saw was 217-213. If there were any more freedom in the bill, it wouldn’t have passed.
And we wouldn’t be cutting Medicaid. And we wouldn’t be getting rid of the individual mandate.
Open your eyes! Think for yourselves!
The wicked individual mandate is dead. Not only are they cutting Medicaid, they’re letting states make Medicaid eligibility contingent on work.
I don’t think they’re cutting Medicare; more of a “here’s your money, states. Y’all figure out what to do with this”.
The high-risk pools are going to be a mess and incredibly expensive for the states.
The mandate is dead only in name. Just that instead of paying $ to the state you’ll pay it to the insurance company.
Nothing short of a full repeal without replacement would’ve been good enough. It’s my personal purity test.
I think you’re referring to Medicaid (rather than Medicare), and the bill the House just passed sunsets the ObamaCare Medicaid expansion in 2020–and converts it into a subsidies program so that individuals can but their own private insurance on the private market.
To see why that is soooooooooooooooo vastly superior to Medicaid, see this article here:
https://glibertarians.com/2017/03/why-youre-wrong-about-healthcare/
Suffice it to say, the more people we get off of Medicaid, the less of a distortion they create in the insurance market. Private insurers are presently getting gouged by some 50% in excess of cost (on average) to make up for all the money providers lose treating Medicaid patients.
The solution to our healthcare problems was not to use the coercive power of government to force healthy, young individuals to buy health insurance they won’t use to offset the gouging that private insurers suffer.
The beginning of the solution is to get people off of Medicaid and onto private insurance.
This bill does that. A subsidy to go buy health insurance on the private market isn’t ideal–but it’s a HUGE step in the right direction. I doubt they could get from here to there without going through that stage. This is one of those rare bills that actually addresses the primary cause of our problems.
It’s taking Medicaid and turning it into school vouchers.
School vouchers aren’t the ultimate solution. I’d rather the government got out of public education altogether.
But if they’re going to take an interests in making sure every kid gets an education anyway, then vouchers for private school is a much better way to accomplish that–than public schools.
This is school vouchers for healthcare–vastly superior to Medicaid.
Vouchers are to public schools as the GOP’s subsidies are to Medicaid.
I am not even really into auto racing, but two of my favorite movies of the past decade are about F1 racing. I highly recommend Rush, about the rivalry between Nike Lauda and James Hunt. The other is a doc called Senna, about of course, the Brazilian legend Ayrton Senna. After living a few years in Brazil and hearing his na me so many times I had to check that one out and was not ddisappointed.
+1 on Senna. I watched it with my daughter (who had never watched a race in her life) and she loved it. It’s just a flat-out great story, well told.
Will look for Rush. Thanks for the recommendation.
Rush was okay, but the forced camera moves and zooms actually take away from the excitement of the racing scenes.
However, Natalie Dormer makes up for that.
Ah, so, they’ve Can-Ammed IndyCar.
I guess it’s a good thing I’m meh on open-wheel racing (with the exception of Formula Ford).
WEC (LeMans) and IMSA (Daytona 24) is still some damn fine racing,
WEC LMP1 class is always between the big boys in multi-million dollar spaceships that move like stink, but the GT class is where the real racing is at.
Not waiting for the Afternoon Links, so here you go.
Nice to see the school system taking on the Dark Side.
“The situation has been resolved — there was no threat. Thanks for your understanding as we maintaing our number one priority of keeping students safe.”
And now to make students extra safe, they’re offering vouchers so parents can have their kids educated at a Vader-free school.
Ha ha, just kidding about that.
“The student was wearing a Darth Vader outfit with a plastic mask and was carrying a bag with him, and that outfit looked like he might be wearing a bulletproof vest or a flak jacket,” an unidentified police officer told reporters at the scene. “That, with wearing that mask and walking into the back door of the school, made a person very concerned. What’s more, we were aware that shooting at him would prove fruitless.”
Wildlife sanctuary in Colorado kills 3 lions, 3 tigers and 5 bears after the county commissioners deny relocation request – claims of flooding dangers at existing location
So Detroit, Cincinnati, and Chicago hardest hit?
Nice to see I didn’t miss Talladega Part One this year. It’s on this weekend.
I said it here when some prog said it, and I wont hold back for you:
A cartel isnt socialism.
Its free market capitalism — but stupid. And thus deserves to fail.
Socialism is when the state owns the means of production. IRL isn’t the state.
The excuses of the boot-lickers in the sport are all based on some nugget of truth, but IndyCar isn’t failing because motorsports are unpopular or because the economy is bad.
I had heard that motorsports were shrinking because Millennials don’t care about cars, want to own one let alone drive one. And from what I’ve seen of their driving, this narrative rings the most true.