I have been a libertarian, to varying degrees and levels of enlightenment, for all of my adult life and probably most of my childhood as well. There is not really a defining event I can point to as a road to Damascus moment regarding politics. If there is one thing, however, that I can hold up as a shining example of why I believe that government is inept, corrupt, and generally full of more shit than the third member of the human centipede, it is the National Firearms Act. The NFA is quite possibly the worst law in America. It simultaneously violates the constitution, endangers human health, gives bureaucrats massive power, places unreasonable burdens on civil rights, bans or heavily restricts otherwise common products, and does all of this while not actually performing any useful function. Add in the fact that we have had this dumpster fire on the books for over EIGHTY FUCKING YEARS and the prospects for recovery are grim. In order to keep this post out of the novella section, I won’t go too deeply into details, but the cliff notes version is that rifles with barrels less than 16 inches in length are considered ‘short barreled rifles’ and are a royal pain in the ass to buy and make. They cost an extra $200 dollars per gun to register and registration can take up to a year. Silencers are also similarly restricted because… reasons? I honestly don’t know. I guess they just hated gun owners so much they wanted them all to blow their eardrums out. If you want to know more the Wikipedia page is linked above.
Fortunately, like most bad laws, the NFA is complex and poorly written. This allows freedom loving capitalists to find loopholes to exploit for fun and profit. And exploit them we have! Using just a bit of technical understanding and a careful reading of the law, some clever individuals have found suitable workarounds for most of the restrictions that the NFA has created. The most common of these available are AR/AK pistols. As I stated before, if you have a rifle with an overall length less than 26 inches or a barrel less than 16 inches, it is considered a sbr. If the gun does not have a stock, however, then the ATF has decided in their benevolence that this is a pistol. I wrote about these kinds of pistols in my last post so I won’t repeat myself too much, but these can be extremely fun and useful guns if you need something handy and compact with lots of firepower. By themselves, these guns are fairly awkward to handle, but if you attach a single point sling or an arm brace (more on that below), they become extremely viable systems. They are very common and affordable. You cannot, however, just take a normal rifle and cut it down. If you make a pistol out of a rifle, then by law you have made a SBR or AOW even if you remove the stock. It has to come from the factory as a pistol or you have to build it as a pistol from parts. You can take a pistol and make into a rifle though, and then take that rifle back to a pistol with no problems. The other thing you cannot do is attach a vertical foregrip to a pistol, ANY pistol. Doing this makes the gun an AOW in the eyes of the ATF and you go to prison. Angled foregrips, however, are completely kosher. I told you this law was retarded.
I mentioned before that a SBR is a gun that has a barrel length less than 16 inches or an overall length less than 26 inches. What if you have a gun with no stock, a barrel length less than 16 inches and an overall length greater than 26 inches? Is it a rifle? Nope. Is it a SBR? Wrong again. Is it a handgun? Not that either. What you have is a class of weapons known simply as ‘firearms’. This is a relatively new breed of gun that first came to the forefront when a company named Franklin Armory debuted their XO 26. It is an AR with an 11 inch barrel, no stock, and a foregrip. Normally foregrips on this type of gun are verboten, but because it is longer than 26 inches it is beyond the purview of the NFA as long as you don’t put a stock on it. The vertical foregrip doesn’t sound like much but it actually does make a gun like this a lot easier to shoot. Plus it’s a nice fuck you to the gov, which is a reward unto itself. You don’t have to buy that version, you can make your own if you like. As long as the gun was not originally a rifle, it can be made into a firearm. Just make sure the overall length is greater than 26 inches.
Okay, so a foregrip on an AR is probably not the most exciting thing ever. How about a short barreled pistol grip shotgun? As I said before, a shotgun must have a barrel length greater than 18 inches. Unlike rifles, there are no pistol loopholes in regard to smooth bore guns, so you can’t simply build a stockless shotgun and call it a pistol. BUT, if you have a shotgun with an overall length greater than 26 inches, a barrel length less than 18 inches, and no stock, you officially have a ‘firearm’. Enter the Mossberg Shockwave. This is a pump action 12 gauge with a 14 inch barrel. The secret is the shockwave birds head grip. The grip sticks out almost inline with the barrel, unlike a traditional pistol grip. This grip is what gives the gun the overall length needed to beat the NFA and escape regulation. They still lack a stock so they are not the most stable shooting platform, but they are definitely useful at close range, and they are short enough to be holstered like a large handgun. They would make an excellent car gun or even home defense weapon. I plan on picking one of these up when prices level off.
Now let’s get into some really fun stuff. How do you get around the machine gun ban? When you get right down to it, the functional difference between a semi auto gun and a full auto one is simply a matter of how fast you can pull the trigger. Some of you may be familiar with a technique known as bump firing, in which you hold a gun in such a way that the recoil of the gun causes your finger to bump the trigger, resulting in what appears to be fully automatic fire. A company figured out a way to design a stock that slides freely and allows you to bump fire the gun while actually controlling and aiming it. Enter the slide fire stock. They make models for ARs and AKs that start around $200. It is a bit gimmicky and it takes some practice to get used to it, but it does work. It’s still more than I am willing to pay for such a device, but anything that make gun grabbers shit their pants can’t be a bad thing.
So slide fire stocks are a good first step, but let’s take things to the next level. The legal definition of a machine gun is any gun that fires more than 1 bullet per motion of the trigger. The ATF considers pulling the trigger and releasing the trigger as two separate motions. Some clever guy decided to make a trigger that fires when you pull the trigger and then fires again when you release the trigger. The result looks something like this:
That is not a full auto AR. It is a binary trigger. It is completely legal and stamp free. I can hear you creaming your panties from here. They are pretty expensive though, coming in around $400 for just the trigger pack. It is considerably less expensive than even the cheapest full auto gun, however, and much more accessible. Franklin Armory was the first company to come out with a binary trigger (I think their unofficial slogan is ‘We love to fuck with the ATF’) but there are now a few of them on the market.
Now it’s time to talk about a slightly more controversial topic: pistol arm braces. These caused quite the stir when they were released a few years ago. They are designed so that a person who is disabled or has weak arm strength can put a brace on an AR pistol, slide his or her arm into the brace, and hold and fire the pistol more easily. If you remember my last post, I showed you a picture of one. They look a lot like a stock. They also work a lot like a stock, too, if you shoulder them. When these first came out, the ATF issued an opinion letter that stated that these were not considered stocks and would not make your pistol into a SBR no matter how you used them, as long as they were not modified. Thousands of these braces were sold, most of them probably not to disabled veterans. People declared it the death of the SBR. Videos popped up showing smiling people happily shouldering and firing AR and AK pistols while wiping their asses with the ATF logo*. The world was at peace. Then people got a little reckless. Other companies came out with their own, more stock like designs. People started modifying the braces, increasing their lengths, making them collapsible and foldable. The tipping point was when a company called Black Aces Tactical actually put one on a short barreled shotgun and got it declared as a firearm. The ATF took the unusual step of specifically articulating that people were not allowed to shoulder these guns. Why were these guns singled out? Well, they weren’t. A few weeks after that declaration, the ATF sent out a new open letter stating that, in their opinion, touching a gun equipped with an arm brace to your shoulder was redesigning a pistol into a short barreled rifle, and that anyone doing that was making an unregistered SBR. Was the ruling arbitrary, capricious, completely devoid of legal backing, and nigh impossible to enforce? Of course it was, it’s the fucking ATF! Despite this, few people wanted to risk their freedom over such a thing, and the pistol brace craze was over… until recently. Last month, in a stunning bout of clarity and common sense, the ATF reversed their reversal, and once again you can shoulder your arm brace like a boss. Being the ATF, they may change their mind again at any point, so buyer beware.
The last thing on this list requires a bit of explanation. Say you’re an environmentally conscious gun owner. I mean a really environmentally conscious one. You only use lead free, shade grown ammo, you only buy guns made from non old growth forests, and you ensure your targets are made from 100% recycled paper. Yet that still is not enough to soothe your aching guilt. Well, my friend, you need a solvent trap. Simply thread one of these cylindrical tubes full of tiny cups onto the end of your rifle and it automatically catches all 8 drops of the used, contaminated gun cleaner that washes out of your barrel during cleaning, ready for proper disposal at your nearest hazardous waste facility. What’s that? It looks like a silencer? Gee… I guess it does. Huh, that is one strange and completely uncanny coincidence. It can’t be a silencer, though.. I mean, you would have to own a drill press and at least 1 extra long drill bit to make it into a functional silencer, and everyone knows that kind of technology is far out of the reach of your average yokel. Okay, okay, fine, how bout this: For a more heavy duty option, you can buy one of these handy adapters that let you thread a common automotive filter right onto the end of your gun. That thing will hold enough solvent to last a lifetime, and there is simply no possible way that an oil filter could be used as an effective silencer. Nope, no way at all.
All kidding aside, don’t fuck with these. You can probably bullshit your way through even the most flagrant violation of one of the other rules listed above. It’s not like cops are going to pull out a tape measure and check your barrel length if they see you at the range. But there is no way on God’s green earth you are fooling anyone into thinking that big fucking can on the end of your gun is anything other than a silencer. You can buy these online and at most large gun shows, but ffs just say no. Assuming the republicans pull their heads out of their own asses sometime in the next 18 months (asking a lot, I know) we might even get silencers off the NFA list. Until then, you’re just going to have to wear ear plugs and deal with it like we all have. Oh yeah, and for the record, I am not a lawyer so don’t take anything I just said as legal advice.
*Not really.
Also, if you have questions or ideas for the next firearms Friday let me know below.
I think you should write a post called “Great Moments in Concealed Carry”.
You could start with Plaxico Burress.
Darwin award nominees, firearms division? I’ll look into it.
3D printing and 80% AR lowers
Now that is something I could definitely work on.
seconded
Third.
I enjoyed the Cody Wilson interview that Reason did. Good stuff there.
Gun tech from back in the day?
I know there were some crazy guns in the 1770’s
Not something I’m intimately familiar with but I can crack some digital books
I’m guessing you’re familiar with his work already (since you frequent TTAG as well), but the Forgotten Weapons channel on Full30 or YouTube has a few videos on cool 18th century guns.
Why Jose Wales is more bad ass than Magnum PI because Jose Wales carried numerous revolvers so he never had to reload, he just pulled another gun. Also, what the hell is with all the black powder substitutes these days, and where the hell is all the black powder gone? I went to get supplies to dust off the pistol I have not shot for thirty years, and was lost in the black powder/muzzle loader isle. It was in Cabella’s so not a salesperson to be found, and I got the wrong stuff because I am a gatherer and not a hunter in shopping situations..
9mm compared to 45ACP /s
History of British gun laws might be interesting. I understand things were pretty free (not counting Catholic vs Protestant fun times) until 1920. Cultural background and all that.
CarnikCon long ago solved the 9mm vs .45 ACP question:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=06aRQ-ejqmU
It’s long, but trust me. It’s worth it.
9mm vs. .45ACP? Thats one way to break the comment record.
Caliber development, particularly ones that seemed promising but fizzled out. Btw, love my .45GAP.
Really? .45 GAP always struck me as an answer to a question no one asked.
What makes you like it so much?
I’ve gone back and forth but I find it easy to shoot. Which was supposedly the draw for it, a .45 with less kick and easier to control and put accurate fire down range.
Oh yeah, and for the record, I am not a lawyer so don’t take anything I just said as legal advice.
You might ask the edit fairy to make this bold in the article, and give it its own paragraph.
Great post, BTW.
If you’re stupid enough to listen to me, that’s not my problem.
You didn’t mention that you weren’t a licensed physician, so I took your entire article as medical advice.
Now, I’m going to sue your ass.
Good plan, since my ass is worth more than I am.
Thicc a$$?
HM, you have your next Thicc Thursday
Until someone drags you into court. Most likely the Bar Association. Guilds don’t like it when you tread on their turf.
Jeremy Corbyn pushing for that hard-to-get White Man’s Burden demographic.
I’m still amazed the Tories almost managed to screw up their huge advantage when their opponent is this moron.
I guess that’s what happens when British Bernie Sander leads a party.
That’s a pretty bald admission that the left feels that minorities belong to them. “without us, you’re just savages!”
If the right had any brains, they’d point this out more often = “They call us the racists, but democrats still treat you like slaves”
Enter the Mossberg Shockwave. This is a pump action 12 gauge with a 14 inch barrel. The secret is the shockwave birds head grip. The grip sticks out almost inline with the barrel, unlike a traditional pistol grip. This grip is what gives the gun the overall length needed to beat the NFA and escape regulation. They still lack a stock so they are not the most stable shooting platform, but they are definitely useful at close range, and they are short enough to be holstered like a large handgun. They would make an excellent car gun or even home defense weapon. I plan on picking one of these up when prices level off.
A friend of mine just bought two and we made (re-made) the grip for it out of wood with finger-grooves. I plan to pick one up before the ATF or the state of Washington figures out their blunder.
Fuck them, it’s what they get for trying to legally define every nut-and-bolt aspect of a firearm.
To my knowledge, the atf are very aware of these but the nfa is specifically worded to exclude such devices. I’m just surprised it took 80 years for someone to figure it out.
The result looks something like this:
That is not a full auto AR. It is a binary trigger. It is completely legal and stamp free. I can hear you creaming your panties from here.
I’ll be in my bunk.
Once again, totally blown away by the glibs’ posts.
I’m not a fan of binary triggers. I don’t like the idea of being locked into that second shot. I believe some of them have ways to prevent the second firing but it’s not intuitive to me.
Most if not all of them let you cancel the second shot by flipping on the safety.
Still a non natural movement to me. It requires a second action to prevent the shot, that makes me nervous.
I had that same thought and then went back to watching the video again.
I missed the local machine gun shoot this year.
I imagine you would get used to it like anything. Maybe? I gave it a whole three minutes thought, and wonder why, on most occasions, one would not want to shoot something twice if they decided it needed to be shot once. {Big game for the freezer being one exception) I would think it would take quite a bit of practice to get that second shot anywhere near accurate after a lifetime of semi-auto indoctrination though.
Actually if you’re quick on the trigger it should hit very close to your first shot since the recoil impulse acts as a single hit on your shoulder
One recoil hit for both shots? Interesting.
I long for the days of caseless…
Look up hyper burst technology. The idea is 2 shots so fast it feels and sounds like 1
Yea, the Russians have been doing that with the An-94. Would be a great reivew if there was any way to get your hands on one in the west. Also, said to serve as way to defeat hard armor.
Very much agreed. Especially since the binary triggers don’t really allow you to fire any faster than a good single-stage match trigger.
I saw a Prius with an NRA sticker down the jersey Shore last weekend. I’m still flummoxed over it.
Maybe they were confused and thought they were supporting the troops with a USMC decal?
NRA stickers on priuses (prii?) I’ve seen. It’s NRA stickers in Jersey that confuse me.
Save money on gas, buy more guns. Makes sense to me.
They thought they were supporting FDR.
Anyone have any experience with .327?
Nothing first hand. My understanding is it gives you 357 ballistics with less recoil and you can fit 6 rounds into a 5 round sized gun. It didn’t really take off but it’s having a bit of a renaissance right now.
Yeah, seems ideal for a j-frame sized snubbie minus the not taking off yet
It’s a great gun for trap lines. Had enough power to kill anything I’m likely to snag with only one, rather small, hole. PA doesn’t allow semi-autos, including handguns, for hunting. Its a pain in the ass to drag a rifle around, so a .327 revolver works great for what I want.
Also shoots very flat, so it’s great for target shooting, if you’re interested in that.
You just reminded me of when I attempted to kill a trapped raccoon with a subsonic 22. I was using it because I was in an urban area but shot placement matters in that scenario. First one bounced off his skull. He was kind of pissed after that.
Trash pandas can get very ornery.
Learned my lesson. Always execute them like a Nazi would, shot behind the skull.
Looking for a CCW but I’m also in PA and that would be a good secondary purpose
Try a Ruger LCR. My .327 is a Ruger Single 7 with a 7 inch barrel, which is to big for carry purposes but it is more accurate. I haven’t shot an LCR in .327, but I’ve shot it in other calibers and they’re a good carry revolver. As an aside, though they are hard to find, .327 can also fire .32 HR magnum, .32 Smith and Wesson long, and .32 Smith and Wesson short rounds. Thru don’t poop up as much, but they’re cheaper and good for target practice.
They don’t pop up as much, rather. I’m sure they all poop thru the same. Damn phone.
I have a 32 H&R mag. It shoots great but I imagine the 327 is a notch hotter. Warning: 32 caliber makes the awfullest crack. It is like a nail in the ear. The wavelength 32 cal produces is….painful. It really is just a .30 carbine with a rim. You can get 30 carbine ammo a lot cheaper.
It’s funny that lefties freak out over full auto weapons (which they apparently think are still legal). Those with military experience – correct me if I’m wrong, but they seem to be only good for suppressive fire. If someone wants to kill a lot of people quickly, they’d do a lot better with a semi-auto rifle. (This assumes you want to selectively target people, or actually have to aim at someone across a battlefield, as opposed to a terrorist who’s happy to kill a bunch of people lined up at a nightclub or a TSA airport checkpoint.)
Full auto is almost useless for any sort of aiming unless you’re Arnold Schwarzenegger.
You could probably do more damage with a semi auto glock with 30 round mags than an AR or AK with better concealment and improved mobility
You’d do alright with something belt fed. Also, fully auto stuff is legal. You just pay your 200 dollar tax and you’re good to go.
I believe that tax takes a while to process. I have a friend who waited over a year for his silencer tax stamp.
Yea, I put in for mine last august still waiting.
Yeah, register with the state, wait a few months, blah, blah, blah. I don’t have a criminal record (I swear I’m a libertarian, bros), so I could get one, but… fuck them. I want my Tommy Gun.
For full auto it’s not even about the wait times. They closed the registry for full auto in 86. Because of that there is an artificial supply cap and prices are astronomical. A legit Tommy gun will run you about 30 grand right now.
*gets out wallet*
I’ll take two.
*adds Diane to muggee list*
dude has 2 tommy guns, man.
Hey, serious question, the AR platform is considered open because the patents expired. Surely patents on the tommy gun have expired. You must be able to build and sell an identical twin (leaving it semi-auto), yes?
Actually, there are several companies which do so. They’re not cheap however, everything milled, try and keep em historically correct etc. Can’t recall the name but one will sell it to you with a fitted violin case and drum magazines.
Yes. There’s a manufacturer, or was, that was selling semi auto Thompsons. Another that sold semi auto M-60’s.
FN will sell you a semi auto MAG or or a 240 for something like 10k… of course they redesigned the bolt and the receiver rails to really make it a bitch to run… reliably.
Well, the FN semi-auto 240 had to be redesigned so the ATF would agree that it couldn’t be “readily converted” back to full auto. It wasn’t exactly their choice.
Semi auto M249 I believe. Would love to see a semi auto M240.
Thompsons are gonna be expensive to make, no matter what. They’re from the golden age of firearms design, when all the parts were machined by hand, out of 4140 steel, on manual lathes and mills.
I’d take one of my ARs over a Tommy chopper for any kind of practical use, but no one can deny that the Thompson just oozes class.
That they do. Although, changing magazines annoys the piss out of me, you really need to line ’em up just right.
Meh… fuck it. I’ll take a stamped surplus Serbian AK.
Last I checked, cheapest full auto is something an M-11 or M-10. Few companies do the tacticool stuff for them as well, but I think that sorta defeats the purpose. I recall there was another firm that had approval for some kind of conversions on them provided the converted parts were made before the close of the registry.
Cheap being 4~5k. For a Cobray.
Isn’t there an almost loophole to the post-86 manufacture- if you’re a manufacturer, the company can own or possess their own samples?, as long as they don’t transfer them. Or lose track of them.
Not a loophole, working as intended. Government agencies still have to buy em, which means manufacturers need to have stock to demonstrate. Same if you’re an importer. To do either though you need to be a licensed manufacturer or importer of Class 3 arms though, which is not an easy set of hurdles to clear.
Or, if you’re a dealer of NFA items and are friendly with the local police chief, they can give you a letter to get some post-86 samples of full-auto items ostensibly to demonstrate to them in case they wanted to order some for the PD.
As usual, laws don’t matter if you’re sufficiently connected.
If you have a manufacturer’s FFL with a SOT (Class 3) you can make whatever you want. Technically you’re supposed to register with ITAR but if you’re not selling the stuff you make then there’s no point to.
If you’re not selling the stuff you make that’s a quick way to lose your SOT and face a federal fraud charge.
Not necessarily. You can be in what’s “research and development phase” which basically means you’re building to test and not commercially.
Right, but you still need to be selling. If you’re 6 years into R&D without a product you’re going to catch an audit.
BRRRRRRRRRRRRRRT
/warthog
The warthog was simply the holster for the GAU-8 Avenger.
“Can we build an airplane around this?”
“Yes. Yes we can.”
“D00d, this’ll be epic.”
(which they apparently think are still legal)
I had that conversation last weekend, and it wasn’t even with a lefty. Just a person who was not gun savvy and thought they were legal over the counter just like any other gun. I am sure they are out there for the collectors, but I have never seen one in a gun shop.
I remember years ago just after Heston had died, some of his collection made it to Crossroads of the West. He had a pristine late model FG-42. Was going for something like 150k.
Ya, that is a bit out of the price range of the shops around here. I had to DuckDuckGo the FG-42. That would be a great addition to a collection if one was into that.
If I ever win the lottery, I’m assembling a collection of every individual weapons system used by each of the belligerents during the second world war.
America, a horribly homophobic country.
You people need to work on your step sister issues though. Also Vermont and Nebraska seemed to have watched Roger Rabbit in their formative years.
She was just drawn that way.
Er, cartoon? Really?
AK & TN, too. Be interesting to see what the provinces looked at…
A couple of fun-loving bad hombres had a little bit too much fun with vertical fore grip-equipped 1911s
Baby Face Nelson bagged one of his (still unbroken) record 3 FBI agents with one of those 1911-conversion SMGs.
When I was young and even up into mid-adulthood most gun nuts were people who liked hunting guns. These days most guns seem to be people guns and a lot of people take that into consideration when buying. I find this a little disturbing. My love for firearms was always for the beauty of the gun (blue steel, walnut) and the craftsmanship. I dont like the synthetic, blocky pistols that are so popular today and I am not a big AR fan. Mostly I find the prospect of having to shoot a person something to avoid at nearly any cost save that of my life or someone else’s.
My last purchase: (on the left chambered in 460) http://www.bighornarmory.com/photos/4/hunter-black-guns/
“The most dangerous game…”
That’s a beautiful long gun, mang.
I’m not big on the idea of shooting someone either, but I love my AR. I find the modular nature of it to be absolutely fascinating and think the ergonomics are excellent for target shooting. Black rifles and polymer pistols have their own beauty to me.
My fiancée, however, totally agrees with you. Loves lever actions more than anything else in the world (possibly including me) and much prefers the Remington 1858 replica over my polymer semi-auto pistols.
De Gustibus, I suppose.
I understand where you are coming from. I am kind of the same way, but I also think AR’s are pretty cool machines. Not enough to go buy one, but I have shot friends AR’s. You can never go wrong with a lever action rifle though. Another thing I don’t own, but it is on the list.
I won’t lie, most of my guns are in the direct spirit and intent of the second amendment.
^This right here
Same here. I’ve built some of my own hunting rifles, mostly on pre-WW1 Mauser actions. My .338 Win Mag is the best shooting rifle I own, even better (albeit with a lot more wallop on both ends) than my AR-15 – I can bust clay pigeons with it at 200 yards from a prone, standing or kneeling.
I like my AR. But my first love is precision bolt guns. How about a Friday on e-e-e-e-e-evil sniper rifles, by which I mean every scoped bolt-action hunting rifle ever made?
The ATF: We Hate You, and We’ll Shoot Your Dog.
“Or, if you’re lucky, your wife.”
-1 Lon Horiuchi
Well, technically, -1 Vicki Weaver.
And then give your guns to Mexican drug cartels.
So, my Dad (who lives in Georgia in the States) is in the end-stages of dementia, and will probably shuffle off This Mortal Coil before too much longer. Back in the day, he was quite the hunter, and has a number of large-caliber rifles (he used to hunt big game in Africa, fer Chrissakes). My SIL showed me a video of his “head room” where he keeps all the trophy heads of what he’s bagged. He also has all of his rifles on the walls.
When I saw the video, I almost cried. The rifles are quite nice, but Dear God In Heaven, the optics are astounding! The video’s resolution is poor, but my brother and I realized that, even if we can’t import the rifles into Canada, we should just strip the optics off of ’em and bring those in. They’re quite possibly worth more than the rifles (which we could just sell to people in Georgia, after all . . . )
Most people say the optic should cost as much as the gun if you’re serious. If you have a choice and you really want to hit what you’re aiming at, get a cheap gun and an expensive scope.
A truth I didn’t understand until I personally experienced quality optics.
They’re not wrong.
I’m gettin’ me one of those binary triggers for my replica Springfield Musket.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=37OWL7AzvHo
Gas-pipes are cool and all but I daren’t own one. Somebody will get shot. Probably Festus, maybe his neighbor. I used to be a gun afficianado when I was a kid. It’s like handing a bee-hive to a bear.
An intro to long range would be a fun topic. You may even be able to talk me into writing it up.