SugarFree
After the Matt Helm novels, I had to go back and read the first ten Destroyer books again. There’s was no particular reason I stopped at ten, just felt like a nice number. I’m not sure how many times I’ve read these books since I was a kid. I’ve read the series to #112, Brain Storm, and I have read all of the novels that Murphy and Sapir have written at least twice (i.e. the first 55 of them.) They are like corn chips; cheap, not very filling, salty and delicious. But reading them back-to-back shows the cracks in the formula and the wearying nature of that sort of serial fiction where at least 5% of the book is just recapitulation the set-up and background.
In my quest to read things I wouldn’t normally try, I’ve been working my way through the John Maddox Roberts‘ SPQR detective series, set in late-Republic Rome. This is a two-fold departure for me because I don’t read much detective fiction nor do regularly indulge in historical fiction. I’m up to the 7th book and find them very enjoyable. There is another ancient-Rome-detective series by Steven Saylor, Roma Sub Rosa, that appears to cover the exact same period. I’ll try it out in a year or so and see which is better. I’m not such a history buff that inaccuracies annoy me, so YMMY.
jesse.in.mb
Calexit #1. Matteo Pizzolo writes a near-future dystopia set in a besieged Los Angeles. While coming at it from a lefty slant he manages to humanize the people caught up in events regardless of side. I’m looking forward to future issues to see where he takes the series.
A Canticle for Leibowitz. Walter M. Miller, Jr.’s 1960 novel about the collapse of society after a nuclear Holocaust, and a Catholic order founded by a Jewish weapons tech meant to keep whatever is left of civilization alive as benighted populists try to punish the literate for bringing down the fire. I was listening to this on the drive east and missed most of the saber rattling with North Korea. By the time I got caught up the novel felt frustratingly timely. Fuck.
Little Boy Lost. I picked up this J. D. Trafford novel as a Kindle First and started reading it shortly after passing through St. Louis where the novel is set. The setting was painted lovingly and I’m massively frustrated that I didn’t get Bosnian food while there. The whodunnit aspect of the story had a great cadence although the solution was telegraphed too early. The novel touches on issues of class and race without feeling hamfisted, which is surprising these days.
JW
I’m reading Altered Carbon by Richard Morgan. Very enjoyable read and soon to be a series by Netflix. Recommended by SugarFree. SugarFree is a king among men–handsome, rich, virile—and the best friend I have ever had. I love SugarFree and he certainly didn’t write this for me.
Gojira is re-reading the entire Lord of the Rings series, starting with the Silmarillion. He’s already on the last book. He hadn’t read them since college and forgot that they aren’t just the origin of so many fantasy tropes, but are actually fantastic books and a real joy to read.
Old Man With Candy
I’m doing a read and a re-read of two older books. In the former category, Garry Wills’s Inventing America is a deep dive into the background and creation of the Declaration of Independence, one of the most remarkable documents in human history. It’s not light reading, structured more as something like a PhD dissertation (back in the days before po-mo took over the academy), but it’s endlessly fascinating. Besides a detailed look at the creation and editing of the document, Wills makes a compelling case that the intellectual roots lie less with Locke and more with Hutcheson.
The Vintage Mencken is a grab bag of essays and excerpts from the Bard of Baltimore, assembled by Alistair Cooke. Harsh, cynical, on point, and delightfully crafted prose, this is something you can pick up and dive into anywhere. It has been said that history never repeats itself, but it often rhymes, and reading Mencken’s political essays, one is struck by the truth of this aphorism.
Riven
So, I’ve been reading the Sandman Slim series. Right now I’m on book #5, Kill City Blues, and it’s been a lot of fun so far. I think the author does a decent job of giveth and taketh-away from the eponymous Slim, so he never really gets too overpowered. (And he doesn’t even walk away intact from some fights, which is fun, too.) Granted, you know he’s not going to get curb-stomped into oblivion because, c’mon, there are four more books after this one. But the author has built an interesting universe, and that helps me stay interested since I’ve always been one for the sundry details. All of the Heaven/Hell, God/Lucifer stuff is particularly fascinating to me, what with my very tenuous, Sunday school arts and crafts Bible background. Overall, I’ll finish the series unless something heinous happens in the next two or three books. I thank SugarFree again for the recommendation and for helping me realize that reading really can be fun. (It was for a long time when I was young, and then somewhere along the way it felt like anything I read needed to challenge me. Just like every movie doesn’t need to be Citizen Kane, not every book needs to be Crime and Punishment.)
Brett L.
Jesse and SF talked me into hate-reading Urban Enemies which featured a number of throwaway stories written from the perspective of the villain of some of the day’s hottest urban fantasy series. Most of it was mailed in. They can buy me $12 worth of drinks, each. Much more fun urban fantasy is John Conroe’s latest Demon Accords novel, Winterfall. Conroe delights in finding new and destructive ways for his demigod characters to kill people. There’s no pretense to it, just ever cooler ways of killing bad guys. I’ve read the whole series and had fun with all of them. Finally, I re-read The Half-Made World. I don’t know how to summarize this book. Animistic gods that have taken to inhabiting guns and trains respectively have squared off in a world that isn’t quite finished and can change in response to the people who inhabit it. One old man could undo both sides. A chase ensues. It’s set in a weird wold like China Meiville does, but toned down so that it doesn’t take over the whole story.
I also read The Midnight Assassin, a non-fiction recounting of Austin’s first serial killer by long-time Texas Monthly feature writer Skip Hollandsworth. I think all of the reviews are correct. It is a good recounting, but frustrating because nobody knows who the killer was. But do stay until the end for a fun speculation on a Jack the Ripper connection.
SP
Revisiting Agatha Christie, re-reading some books by OMWC’s Favorite Jew, and beginning Italian Short Stories for Beginners (because I’m now 19% fluent according to Duolingo).
sloopyinca
I’m currently engrossed in Fun With Dick and Jane. If Puff gets run over at the end, I’ll be mightily pissed.
Playa Manhattan
Here’s my lame excuse for not reading: I’ve been gambling away my kids’ college funds in Vegas. But it’s OK, I have a system, and any moment now, the winning will start. I did begin reading this, but after ten minutes, my lips got tired. I figure that after the past few days, I’m due, and that’s really more important than that stupid math shit.
Heroic Mulatto
Pimps don’t read; they compose literature reviews. One article accepted with revisions, two other articles being prepared for submission, and one paper submitted for a conference.
I’m in a writing phase, so I’m not reading so much.
the Commute Audiobook just finished “Murder at the Vicarage” (Agatha Christie’s first Marple book).
While I’m on the subject, the final verdict is disappointed in firearms understanding.
Spoilers
While there was a Mauser revolver in that caliber, as described, the use of a silencer on a revolver would not have the described effect, nor would the sound be mistaken for a sneeze. I am disappoint, Agatha.
/ End Spoilers
Eh, she’s British. Messing up basic knowledge about firearms is a proud cultural tradition for them. (No. 6 excluded, but expatriated)
Interestingly, there are revolvers that can be fitted with a suppressor, but they require some unusual engineering.
When I hovered over the link and saw “Nagant”, I said to myself, “yep, this is gonna be good.”
The most remarkable thing about the Nagant revolver is that is was reliable.
More complicated than your standard revolver with more things that can go wrong, but it still worked.
That is pretty remarkable.
See also: rabid hoplophile Charles Cooke.
Plenty of revolvers can be fitted with a suppressor, but all revolvers get some blow-by, which defeats on of the major suppression elements.
*one of*
Right, the unique engineering of the Nagant I linked to above is that it eliminated the blow by, forcing all of the gas through the barrel. Doing so increased the muzzle velocity and allowed for efficient suppression.
My work network settings block Wikipedia for some unknown reason.
Which is really strange, because I’ve been able to go some of HM’s depravities with nary a blip.
Your network guys have some weird filters. Anyway, if you’re interested in odd firearm designs, look up the Nagant M1895 when you are on network that will let you. The seal system that it used to prevent blow by is pretty interesting from a gun nut/mechanical engineer point of view.
As a non-writer, I’ve always wondered how writers segregate themselves from other writers’ writing. It’s like songwriting, very time I imagine trying to come up with lyrics or a new tune I immediately start thinking of other songs. Maybe it’s just something you have to do before you can do it.
Easy.
Step 1 – Stop reading
Step 2 – Focus on the characters, their personalities and their interplay. Any similarities in plot with existing work will be mitigated.
Step 3 – Be diligent in editing to remove copyright conflict.
Step 4 – Public Domain inspiration is your friend.
Once you have stalled, you can resume reading. It also works if you’re reading in genres you don’t write. Hense the mysteries playing on my commute. My style does not lend itself to writing mysteries, so any inadvertant influence will be in terns of phrase and personalities.
I just happily incorporate anything stylistically or phrase-wise that strikes my fancy, whether it’s for the free stuff here or my regular paid writing gigs. “Appropriation” is a word I love.
It’s not “Appropriation”, it’s “Inspiration”.
Some here are guilty of inappropriation.
Unparalleled thinking.
It’s good to read your own genre if you’re trying to write to market, because it helps you zero in on the tropes readers want. (This especially goes for romance.) That said, I can’t go near a sci-fi book or TV show when I’m on a deadline because it reminds me of what I’m supposed to be doing and that stresses me out, haha. So I can’t even follow my own advice. But if you’re not lifting whole passages verbatim, being subconsciously influenced by other authors is probably a good thing for the marketability of a book. If something sticks in your mind, it’s probably a trope, and readers tend to like that.
That reminds me, I need to think of the problem Stanley and Prof Jarvi will run into when they get to the dig site…
I’ve been working on introducing characters and it slipped my mind.
They forgot their shovels?
That would make for a lame adventure story.
Indiana Jones and the Shovel of Ames!
They get killed at the shovel store?
You probably couldn’t keep the conceit up for long, but a story about heroic adventurers who keep getting tripped up by totally mundane shit (like forgetting the shovels) could be hilarious.
That really depends on what they use for substitutes, doesn’t it?
Jawbone of an ass has already been taken.
You wouldn’t want to use that anyway, not after those Moroccans were done with it…
Peachy Rex:
Sounds like It’s a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World.
I need to think of the problem Stanley and Prof Jarvi will run into when they get to the dig site…
Zombies.
Trump.
If I keep posting snippets, you guys will have read the whole book before it goes to the editor…
What blade style was the knife? /knife nut
I haven’t decided.
Klingon.
“One article accepted with revisions, two other articles being prepared for submission, and one paper submitted for a conference.”
Impressive!
My first thought when reading that was “When will they post to Glibs?”
Ha!
We’d take them.
Hmm. I wonder if I could convince anyone this counts as peer review.
Calexit #1
I didn’t realize we’re allowed to post porn here.
A Canticle For Leibowitz is a fantastic book. Really enjoyed it.
At the moment, I’m going back and finishing up a book called Warsaw 1920, about the Russo-Polish war. It’s pretty short, only really detailing the military maneuvers, but it’s interesting to see how the author pushes the idea that it was as important a battle for the West as Marathon or Waterloo, since if the Poles has been defeated Lenin would probably have spread communism to post-war Germany.
Before that, I read through Dreams of a Great Small Nation by Kevin McNamara, about the Czech Legion, which was one of the most entertaining non-fiction books I’ve ever read. These guys were badasses.
On the fiction side, I finished Vladimir Sorokin’s Ice Trilogy, which was an interesting story about the Tunguska meteorite and a group of people who have their hearts awakened by it. It’s pretty heavily rooted in Russian history and culture so I’m not sure how much of it I understood fully but I enjoyed it (I’m on a bit of a Slavic binge ATM.)
Goddammit, I fucked up my italics again. Edit Faery, I beseech thee!
Hey, I’m no fairy, NTTAWWT.
Do NOT read ACFL’s sequel
I’ve heard it’s pretty awful, planning to avoid. You can’t really sequelize the first one anyway.
I have been meaning to read ACFL for 30 years now. I have almost bought it a dozen times.
Guys, this is what happens when you don’t meet deadlines.
DDoS’d?
Let’s just say that I didn’t write that about myself.
Suuuuuure.
Why wouldn’t you claim that? That was the most interesting one.
Seriously. That was great!
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.
ASP.NET MVC 5 – Jonas Fagerberg and Glibertarians.com.
I just used MVC 5 for something. Maybe if I had used 3 and 4 it would have been easier to pick up, but it seems abstracted to the point of lunacy. I now have to modify, like 6 files to add a function and a display. I’m sure once I get shit built, I’ll be glad of it.
Current read:
1) Fiction: Fall of the Mazalan Empire, series by Steven Erickson
2) Non-Fiction: True Believer by Hoffer
3) Magazine: Claremont Review of Books
4) Internet: Glibertarians, Sultan Knish, and Tumblr pron
1) Fiction: Tom Jones by Henry Fielding
2) Non-Fiction: Human Action by von Mises
3) Magazine: Every 1897 issue of The Chap-Book, a literary criticism magazine. I found the entire volume in one big book in a used bookstore.
#3 sounds like a great find
It is… It also has short stories, poems, and novels in serial form (although I don’t want to read those if I don’t have the complete novel). There are some interesting and funny advertisements as well.
What I’d like to do is scan every page and disseminate it over the Internet as a .pdf, but it would take for fucking ever.
I just finished Love in the Ruins, and am still processing it.
In the meantime, I’ve picked up The Three Body Problem. I’m only on chapter 3, but so far the oppression of the commies in China during the cultural revolution seems pretty spot on.
Thanks to SF, I assumed these were chapter titles for Hillary’s memoirs.
She’s getting some great reviews – particularly for the audio book which she apparently read in her robot voice.
That is an amazingly authoritarian book.
Dinesh D’Souza: The Big Lie (subtitle: No, *You’re* a fascist!) – his angriest, most sketchy work yet. Still manages to score a few hits against the Left. I like his spirit.
Last one of his I read was What’s So Great About America. Not sure I want to read another one.
I read him back when he was still good and actually tried to summarize the other guy’s viewpoint before trying to refute it. Not that he did this well, but most polemicists don’t do it at all.
Now it’s as if something happened (like maybe Preet sending him to a halfway house?) that made him extra-embittered, and his gestures at fairness seem to be a thing of the past.
I’ve been “reading” the Silmarillion for close to a decade now…
I just finished Hells Angels a couple of weeks ago and then started Heinlein’s I Will Fear No Evil
Fanciftion mashup of the Silmarillion and Hell’s Angels?
I don’t think the Tolkien estate would mind, I hear they’re really easygoing. /sarc
A Hunter S Thompson rendition of Lord of The Rings?
(“Samwell had been crushing up the Lembas and snorting it off the edge of his elf-blade “GIANT SPIDERS!!” he moaned. Paranoid, I assumed.”)
We can’t stop here, this is Orc country.
Although, I am currently (like right now) reading an eat shit letter from a LGBQT rights organization that was delivered to a client earlier this week after my client made a gay couple remove all of their various social signals from their yard. I have to say I am not terribly excited to get involved with this one.
“Fuck off and hang yourselves” isn’t a credible response?
That was basically what I told my client’s President. Then he told me how the property management company already responded and did a poor job of it.
What authority was he acting under when making said order of removal?
Only the standard “For Sale” signs are allowed in the front yard unless you get permission from the HOA. These guys did not get permission. Of course, one of the neighbors has like 15 Trump signs hanging in his windows.
Is there a difference between window signs and yard signs in the rules, or are we looking at selective enforcement?
I’m not a fan of virtue signal signs, and I dislike HOAs, but I hate selective enforcement.
Your client must have forgotten the “woke” exemption.
I’m having trouble visualizing how one virtue-signals with lawn ornaments. i need photographic aids (or some artists rendering)
Try harder, Gil. Try harder. It’s in the mind’s eye.
When the Canadian election was on one of the people in town had four sandwich boards on their front lawn where they had written a long rant about how Harper was evilest man ever. That’s what I’m visualizing.
I always remember the scene where the store will only accept credit cards (not cash) any time I fly.
Regarding The Silmarillion – check out Corey Olsen’s lecture series on it, especially the more condensed college lectures he offered several years back and posted online. I found that reading it alongside a college class discussion made it more engaging and enjoyable.
I’ve spent the last couple months rereading my Shakespeare. Julius Caesar, The Tempest, Hamlet (3 or 4 times), King Lear and MacBeth. Best opening scene is from The Tempest when the boatswain tells Gonzalo on the ship during the storm:
Nobody I care about more than myself. You’re a king’s advisor. If you can order the storm to calm down, we can all put down our ropes and rest. Go ahead, use your authority. If you can’t do it, be grateful you’ve lived this long and go wait to die in your cabin, if it comes to that.—Harder, men!—Now get out of our way, I’m telling you.
Pass a law and you can stop the force of nature that is X. Smartass and ballsy.
Ship’s sinking anyway, what’s he got to lose?
If Gonzalo has his way, quite a bit even if he succeeds.
I feel a lot better after talking to this guy. He doesn’t look like a person who would drown—he looks like he was born to be
HANGED
Gonzalo implies that the Boatswain looks and acts like a dangerous criminal.
hanged. I hope he lives long enough to be hanged. The rope that hangs him will do more good than all the ropes on this ship, since it’ll guarantee he stays alive through this storm. But if he’s not destined to die by hanging, then our chances don’t look too good.
*Obviously not the original scrip.
I’d say the Tempest is organized around society as we know it disorganizing. Then later [Spoiler Alert] the wizard-who-may-be-a-stand-in-for-Shakespeare tries to reassert normality after his own fashion. But it’s been a while.
I just started it a couple days ago and had forgotten most of it. It certainly is different from his other plays.
Whether from personal belief or to stay on the right side of the censors, Shakespeare tended to end up with some recognizable (to his audience) legitimate social order restored. But in the meantime, the people who were disrupting the order got a lot of good lines. I won’t presume to read the Bard’s mind and guess what he was trying to pull.
Either he’s being subversive, or he simply has to give even the most stereotypically evil characters good lines.
Shakespeare did not create in a vacuum. The actors would have been a nightmare if they didn’t get at least a few decent lines…
Certainly Richard III has some of the best lines because he’s the villain.
As a businessman who happened to have a knack for words (yeah, that’s a real overlapping Venn diagram there! /sarc), Shakespeare would have known that the audience would like to see a little disruption, but not in a way that would get the theater closed and his head chopped off.
So he was a writer, poet, entrepreneur, with an eye out for the people with head-chopping authority. I have no doubt many articles or books have been written about these factors and how they led to bad guys getting so many good lines. Then you kill them just to make sure you’re not holding them forth as examples!
Some bad characters need to die for the story to make sense, right? *Wink Wink*
And if you’re not the notorious person I’m thinking of, ignore that.
Sometimes one character gets boring and gets replaced for a time, but I’m just a statue.
…with perhaps a thicker skin.
Knew it. Fucking Tulsa.
Or Tulpa. Whatever.
It was funnier when you were cursing the city in Oklahoma.
OK Eddie.
Ding Ding Ding.
kek
Knew it. Fucking Tulsa.
Tulsa nightlife: filth, gin, a slut.
(It’s a palindrome.)
<a href="http://theheathledger.blogspot.com/2007/07/tulsa-resident-still-upset-over-that.html" title="Tulsa resident still upset over that one episode of Friends. ” target=”_blank” >Tulsa resident still upset over that one episode of Friends.
Edit Fairy, can you please HEEEEEELLLLLLLPPPPPP?????
Thank you kindly.
My favorite Willie Shakes is The Taming of the Shrew, but I may be a misogynist?
“Petruchio: Come, come, you wasp; i’ faith, you are too angry.
Katherine: If I be waspish, best beware my sting.
Petruchio: My remedy is then, to pluck it out.
Katherine: Ay, if the fool could find where it lies.
Petruchio: Who knows not where a wasp does wear his sting? In his tail.
Katherine: In his tongue.
Petruchio: Whose tongue?
Katherine: Yours, if you talk of tails: and so farewell.
Petruchio: What, with my tongue in your tail? Nay, come again, Good Kate; I am a gentleman.”
Am I alone in thinking Kate was miserable at the start? A largely self-inflicted misery at that.
Miserable and thus lashing out at those close to her.
There’s a lesson to be learned in a lot of Shakespeare.
Yes. In almost every single line.
“Brevity is the soul of wit” says the man to whom brevity is a stranger.
There’s a reason that the teen movie adaptation cast her as a stereotypical 90s white girl feminist.
Apropos of something, my daughters pooled their resources and bought me a “complete” Bill Shakey some years ago. Excellent gift but it is fucking unreadable due to its sheer size and mass. Fifteen-pounder gathers dust on the shelf. I could build a reading stand like a proper Victorian gentleman but… Anyhoo, Shakespeare is the balls! Whooooooooo!
King Lear has some of that. Gloucester talks about banging Edmund’s mom while Edmund is standing nearby.
I just finished Tai-pan. Does clavel always create such a complex and rich world, just to burn it to the ground in the last 10 pages? Just curious before I start Gai-Jin. Either Gai-Jin or shadow demon, I haven’t decided.
Skip Gai-Jin, read literally any other book of his. King Rat is superb, Noble House was riveting, Whirlwind is (imo) his best. Gai-Jin felt like a late-in-life cash-in.
Shogun. Shit, Shogun. Easily his best. Whirlwind is a great read, though.
I read sho-gun first. I’m reading them in internal chronological order. I already bought Gai-jin, so I’ll try it, but glad to hear the other works are good.
It’s not terrible, just forgettable. I’ve reread all of his a couple times, but not Gaijin.
I loved shogun. I believe I had read it three times. I will read it again in the future.
ONNA!
If that’s my Shadowdemon, I must confess that I regard it as a weak entry in the series. Not sure if that’s a reflection of the finished product, or the messy route by which it was composed.
It’s number 2, so I’m reading it. I have a compulsion for doing things in order. BTW Blue is number 3, is it a continuation of the story or just your third work?
There is a chronology for the stories as they relate to books 1 and 2 just after the table of contents in Lucid Blue (and Other Tales Too). The story “Dirge of Carcosa” was supposed to be Book 3, but it just came out too darn short.
It’s number 2
That’s kind of a harsh review…
Yes. Basically. Although Gai-Jin spends more time burning it down.
Oh, and I’ve been scolded for not having read Coin Locker Babies. Finally made the haul through that a couple weeks ago. Absolutely loved that.
Ian Rankin’s Rather Be the Devil. Most recent of the series, all set in Edinburgh. Got to enjoy a nerd moment (and whisky) as the Oxford Bar, featured prominently throughout the series, was less than a block from my hotel.
Also just finished Sting-Ray Afternoons, a good memoir by Steve Rushin (SI writer). He grew up just a few miles from me, so the story was very similar to my own. For those of you who grew up in the ’70s, it’s a fun look back.
New Rankin? Gotta go give Amazon some more money now.
I liked the last few a lot. It’s hard to keep the same characters interesting and changing, but he does a pretty good job.
I’ve enjoyed his books for years. My now wife started me on them years ago when she sent a couple in a care package back in OSW days.
Appearently I’m two books behind. How the hell did that happen?
There was a pretty good gap after Exit Music when it looked like he might hang it up, but it’s been a pretty consistent string since. I wasn’t a fan of the spin-off novels, though. Without Rebus, they just aren’t as interesting.
i am a bad person. i’m really only browsing it. and I already owned it, i just never read it (still haven’t. its not really a book anyway) Main takeaway: everyone could write
bettergoodermore smarter-sounding in the 19th century.Part of me wonders if it’s related to the nature of the communications.
Today I’ve written I have no clue how many words in expectation of near-instant response, so I’ve been sloppy, knowing full well I can elaborate on any misunderstanding.
When writing to someone who is days or weeks away by post, one might take more care in the phrasing. And this habit could easily become ingrained and carry over to other writing.
That’s an interesting point. The labor-intensity of delivering messages actually informs the prose. I’m sure an economist somewhere has already penned an unreadable dissertation on the idea.
I’d guess that’s part of it. But it doesn’t really explain the casual elegance of phrasing people had. I think it was more-obviously a reflection of actual speech habits. Old-timey people talked fancy-like. And my economic interpretation of the ‘why’ might be that being able to speak-well was a sign of social status. It was the onion on the belt of their zeitgeist.
When you factor in selection bias in surviving documentation, it also removes a lot of the lower class and all of the illiterates. Much of the work they produced is no longer around for comparison. So I don’t think they were all more eloquent in speech and prose than we are.
meh. I’ve read letters from lower-class merchant-seaman in the 18th+19th century, which were basically spelled phonetically (they were literate, but uneducated), yet they still retained a formal sentence structure which by modern standards would embarrass most college professors. the average mode of speech was simply far more careful and specific.
Have you seen the tripe college professors put out these days. They are not the gold standard of literacy. Or even the median.
my point
” I’m sure an economist somewhere has already penned an unreadable dissertation on the idea.”
Blows raspberry at Gilmore.
Yeah, I can fire off an email to a co-worker pretty quick but when I am writing a letter it takes awhile because I have to write it, then go back and edit it so it reads like it was written by an attorney.
That’s why I now send all emails along with mp3’s of slow-placed folk music, and try to write them in Ken Burns/Civil War style:
Dearest boss,
It is my most sincere hope that this email finds you in good health. I cannot rightly say whether the TPS report will be complete by morning’s first glimmer of light, as the sheer size of such an endeavor is quite daunting. I can only hope that me and my fellow men are equal to the task.
Sincerely,
L___________
Excellent.
Now i want a plug-in for Outlook that will have all my emails read aloud by Shelby Foote
and change the “CC” button to “Secede”
Altered Carbon is really good. I need to get around to reading the sequels.
That said, I recall that there was a certain… thing that happens during a sex scene in the book that made me go “ew”. I thought it was a one-off, but then it happened again during another sex scene. So I’m guessing it falls into the category of “the author’s personal weird sexual fetish”.
Don’t leaving me hanging…
I just remember the sex scenes being juvenile and not very appealing, like something written by a kid who watches way too much porn.
So Altered Carbon is written by George RR Martin?
*Speaking of which, i used to think Game of Thrones was like “Lord of the Rings, but with more titties”
Then I saw HBOs Rome, and realized that it could have been 100x more ridiculous
Are you thinking of the series, or the books? There’s quite a difference, IMO.
Goddammit, what’s the fetish?????
https://www.goodreads.com/review/show/1086955255?book_show_action=true
OK, he lost me with that one.
It’s not like he approved. He killed the guy who did it with a monomolecular shard pistol.
Eh, it wasn’t that crazy. The hero had sex with a woman and, after he finished, immediately went down and began giving her oral. The first time I just thought “ew, that’s not the order one usually does these things.” The second time I thought “huh, that’s a somewhat unusual and yet oddly specific thing that keeps happening.” Not that I’m getting judgmental, mind you, I just think it’s funny/interesting when a writer reveals their own fetishes or interests or hangups like that.
I read a few of the Steven Saylor Roma books a few years ago. I didn’t think they were all that good. I had just read I, Claudius and Claudius the god though, so I may been a little unfair in my judgement as I loved those books.
I agree with you about Saylor. He is overrated. I do/did enjoy the Simon Scarrow “Eagle series” which is about the Roman Army and a young Vespasian. You might enjoy that more.
It is hard to beat Robert Graves though.
I’ll check those out. And agreed. Robert Graves is excellent.
You mean, I, Clavdivs.
Colleen McCollough’s Rome series is pretty good. It starts strong but peters out by the end. First Man In Rome is a rollicking yarn.
Speaking of books, someone apparently bought their way onto the NYT bestsellers list. FURY ENSUED. The #WeNeedDiverseBooks group took it as a personal affront because it knocked THUG down to the number two slot after TWENTY FIVE WEEKS at the number one spot. But don’t worry. Good triumphed over evil.
Since the “Bestseller” is is not actually ranked by sales, I’ve taken no notice of it.
I’m sure this is incredibly common. I think the only reason anyone noticed is because THUG got knocked down. If it had been a different book in the number one slot, they probably would have gotten away with it. Which is sleazy, but the whole list is. It’s difficult for me to get outraged when no one is getting outraged about the fact that the list itself is completely rigged, and probably half the books on there are there for the same reason.
Is it bad that I’ve never heard of either of these books?
The one that bought its way on, no one had ever heard of before. If they’d spent a little of that money on buzz, probably they would have gotten away with it. This is the other one.
My eyes were threatening to roll out of my head just reading that description.
I read to escape.
It’s so heavy-handed. And of course it’s the darling child of Book Twitter. That’s why I’m saying, the only reason I think these people got caught is because they knocked the BLM book off its pedestal. Whenever a genuine book comes along and replaces it as number one—and it’s bound to happen soon, there’s no way it can genuinely be selling MORE copies than any other book, including new releases, for six freaking months—they’ll probably run a protest against the other author for being racist and knocking the sacred tome off its throne.
Something tells me a chart based on raw sales wouldn’t have either book on it.
So the NYT bestseller list is basically fake? Shocking.
It was when I was younger, less jaded, and didn’t know better.
Non-Fiction- Vesuvius- a biography by Alwyn Scarth It is the geologic history of the mountain and the various eruptions. Interestingly what is known as Vesuvius is actually a younger volcano that is formed within a larger volcano, Monte Somma, which also wiped out towns around 1780bce.
Fiction Re-Read- The Moon is a Harsh Mistress. I had long work flights to Korea. The woman sitting next to me starting giving me the stink eye when she saw me read it. I asked her what was up and engaged her in conversation about it. By the end she was interested and said she will try it. Considering her Bernie button on her pack I don’t think she’ll be liking it.
Non-Fiction; The Viking Art of War by Paddy Griffith An interesting examination of how the Norse actually fought.
I’ve been working my way through the John Maddox Roberts‘ SPQR detective series, set in late-Republic Rome.
I’m a sucker for that time period, so I’m definitely going to have to check those out.
I really liked the Marcus Didius Falco series by Lindsey Davis. Falco’s an informer, basically operating like a private investigator in 70’s and 80’s AD Rome. The language and style is modern, but the setting is historically accurate.
Have you tried Steven Saylor’s Roma Sub Rosa series set in the late Republic?
I haven’t. But I looked it up and somebody described it as a “Roman Sherlock Holmes.” Sold.
I’d rather have the Roman Poirot.
Doyle tended to not give the reader the evidence needed to figure things out beforehand. With Christie, even if you miss it, when it’s brought up you go “Oh yeah, I forgot about that,” instead of Doyles “Where the fuck did that come from?”
With Poirot it was often some sort of psychological analysis that seemed sound on the face of it, but when you thought about it, could also be entirely wrong. But Poirot is still one of my all-time favorites, so I would take that too.
Yep – I enjoy the parts where he’s just walking around the neighborhoods of the 7 Hills of Rome talking about who lives where and what the neighborhood is like.
Fiction – Joe Steele, Turtledove’s alternate history where Stalin immigrated to the U.S. and became the President.
Comic – Just finished what’s been made of the second run of Uber, wherein things are not going so well for the U.S.
Non-fiction – Way too much time on Atomic Rockets.
I still have a Turtledove book about if the confederates won…I need to read and then set next to the Lincoln statue when they come to tear it down in my Town.
The Guns of the South. Time travel! AK-47s!
There’s also his six book series about Union-Confederate conflict up until the 1940s. And because it’s Turtledove of course there has to be analogs for everything from Hitler to Stalingrad.
You mentioned Seneca several days ago. I decided to go on a buying spree and have a 6-book library of stoicism en route to my home. Hopefully I will get around to reading them by the end of the year.
After reading the Stoics for an extended period Nietzsche’s “Oh, you noble Stoics, what fraud of words!” quote will be permanently etched in your mind.
It occurred to me that, aside from an extremely good introduction to political philosophy course I took as a general education requirement in university undergraduate, and reading Nietzsche’s Will to Power collection for fun, my library of actual formal, complete philosophical classics is rather light. I am looking forward to reading them.
About a decade go I purchased this beautiful, barely used leather-bound copy of The Prince, and was so excited about the condition of the book until I found that the dimwit previous owner had taken highlighter to passages and written inane inquisitive notes in the margins in black ink. The markup ceases after like page 20, which especially infuriates me in its own way.
Any sort of annotation on the pages of a book is a pet peeve of mine. It shows great disrespect for the work.
I might be a little neurotic on this fact though, as I had issues with purpose-made workbooks and didn’t want to write in them either.
I still have the book too. Behold the criminal act!
They needed to take notes and paraphrase on that?
What’s a stenographer’s pad or a coffee-stained dollar store scrapbook littered with hastily scribbled post-it notes?
Deep.
That was the whole “Mercenaries are unreliable” screed, wasn’t it?
I will never understand the people who try to argue with the authors in the margins. I highlighted and wrote notes in plenty of texts in university but I never felt the urge to go “NUH UH”.
Disagree.
@UnCivil nope, bit about violent religious movements vs. unarmed ones.
@JT It’s been a while since I’ve read The Prince.
HA! If I’d bothered to read forward of the underline instead of just what preceeded it, the page makes it clear.
Laziness induced failure.
One final turd.
*sigh*
This previous owner…
I can’t even finish that thought.
:: claps furiously ::
Previous Owner – Robby Soave! The cunt is left-handed, sinister even.
What are your feelings about crudely drawn images of female superheroes doing, um, unheroic things showing up in the margins?
Big Ounce owes me a couple of grams that bag pinching mofo.
I’m rereading GOT cuz I’m stupid.
“Severed head – take a drink.”
No you’re not. You’re bacon.
Thanks!
I gave my Dad GOT a few years ago just to see if he liked it. He did and ended up reading all of them. He passed away last year – his last words on GRRM were “fat, lazy, bum.”
The man also needs a better goddamn editor. You could cut half of Feast for Crows out and it wouldn’t matter.
That was the first book I ever wanted to throw out the window.
Ahh, so you’ve never read Terry Goodkind then. I think I made it 6 books in before I just hung it up. One of the only book series that I never finished.
Piers Anthony, He had some individual story that I couldn’t finish (one of the only books I’ve never finished)… and I just dropped the Xanth series after the book that had no new action and was 100% recap… I know authors just write for $$$, but I need some entertainment.
I did and have read them all! I liked up until the last two books. He was headed in the right direction then…meh.
The Sword of Truth series is what I assume you’re talking about. He is libertarianish leaning though, which I like.
That’s the one. I made it up to the book that dealt with two completely new characters for a full novel, tying into the main story in the last chapter or so. The book before that was the one with the slavery and sculpture carving. From what I’ve heard Goodkind (at least at one point) said he was an Objectivist.
I read to the end and it was…alright. I really liked the first books but it did get tedious and hokey.
^this x 1,000. And it ain’t just Feast for Crows.
War and Peace is 1/3 the length of what GOT will eventually be and say 20x as much about human nature.
Your dad will undoubtly share with GRRM that both died before ASOIAF was finished.
He’s a shitty writer with no real clue how he’s going to die things together. That is all.
Nice John-o
Fine with me if the quality is maintained. The problem is he’s got this Cosmere thing going on with people and at least one sword moving between the worlds of his different series.
woops – that was a reply yo Fatty
All you people whinging about GOT being a bloated series makes me laugh.
The undisputed champion of that has to the be the Wheel of Time series.
I just re-listened to Words of Radiance as book 3 comes out in a couple months.
Start with The Way of Kings if you like GOT but prefer an author who will get the thing done.
Those are awesome, but I wasn’t overjoyed to find out it’s going to be a 10 book series.
Try to figure out his Cosmere if you want to make your head hurt.
Warbreaker is another good one from him.
Sanderson’s a freaking word machine. I don’t know how he does it – I can keep his pace for about a week and then it becomes “See spot run” as my brain just refuses to do more, and he keeps it up every single day.
I got the entire series cheap on Kindle and re-read it a while back. Really enjoyed it, too. It’s so dense that there’s a lot you pick up on that you missed in the first reading.
Hilarity from just 8 months ago.
Oswald should probably stop hoarding food in general.
Also, anyone who contributes their voice to this abomination is a shameless whore who cannot be respected or trusted.
It’s like the Lego Movie but bound to be even stupider!
Awwww….my son has that game and likes it.
Minecraft is basically virtual legos. It’s fine.
Minecraft: Story Mode is retarded, poorly written fan fiction cynically being made by Microsoft so Minecraft kids will buy it.
As to recent reading:
No books, but I have a stack of magazines back-logged that I’ve been catching up on — Reason, Car n Driver, Car Craft, Shooting Illustrated.
Reason Magazine does not inspire the level of rage that many of the Reason web articles do; some of that may be due to the commentariate, but at least some of it because of a little less ‘hip-shooting’ by the authors.
I keep telling everyone that the print edition is still good.
KMW of the purple hair seems to be keeping that side sane.
Re-reading Elizabeth Pryor Brown’s “Reading the Man” about R.E. Lee; “Lost Victories: the Military Genius of Stonewall Jackson” by Bevin Alexander; and
“Stars and Bars Over Philadelphia”: Lee and Jackson win Independence,” an alternative history novel written by two libertarian activists.
Blackadder, of all people, is the most sensible in the room.
He did get smarter (and go down in social class) as time went on…
Holy Shi-ite! I’m actually reading Destroyer #68 – Look into my eyes. Totally reading it because I need a break from other heavier books.
Like SF, I remember reading a ton of these in Jr. High. My favorite thing about them is I can read most of them in only a few days (what with my issues reading makes me feel good).
The first serialized books I read like that were Doc Savage – Man of Bronze
Like so…
He was like the first super-hero.
+1 Sargasso Ogre.
Mind if I do a “What are we Listening to” entry?
New QotSA came out today. So far, it sounds more like Eagles of Death Metal than a return to QotSA.
I appreciate that Homme isn’t into repeating himself for the fuck of it, and God knows I wouldn’t want somebody to do something that didn’t inspire them just to sell records. That being said, . . .
Sometimes the most unexpected thing you could do is to not change your sound. Maybe the most unexpected thing to do would be to go rediscover your original sound.
It’s rare in life when an artist changes bands, entirely, and comes up with yet another great sound. I can’t tell you how many artists can’t top their first efforts. It’s usually because their first effort was inspired and new, and you can’t just recreate that inspiration on demand. It’s a rare band that beats out their first effort. Even Zeppelin–even Zeppelin–had a hard time topping their first effort. I still rank Zeppelin I as their second best effort, only outdone by Physical Graffiti. But there were, what, four records in between them? And that magic almost never carries over into a new band.
Homme following up Welcome to Sky Valley with the debut of QotSA–you don’t expect them to be that good. What an accomplishment.
Album cover maybe NSFW.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gf6qnX4rmDU
It’s just a very rare thing when people are all looking forward to the next Beatles album, and it turns out to be Sgt. Pepper. From Star Wars to The Matrix, introducing inspired ideas will always be more interesting than expanding on them. I guess that’s the paradox of inspiration. Everybody wants you to be inspired by the same things that inspired you twenty years ago, but inspiration doesn’t work like that–not even for the best of them.
Some people never do anything inspiring.
Thirty years later, they’re still writing sequels–The Jockstrap of Shannara.
Is it better to have innovative ideas and execute them poorly, or derivitive ideas executed well?
I had a long argument with a musician acquaintance about this. He was bagging on two of my favorites, AC/DC and Motorhead, for their lack of artistic ambition, whereas I find them to be refreshingly aware of what it is they do well, and thus they stick to that. No one ever wanted to hear a jazz fusion album from AC/DC.
AC/DC makes the same song over and over. And that song is friggin’ great
I never understood why a rock fan can’t enjoy both AC/DC and Jeff Beck. They’ve both got their share of great albums and stinkers, and they took entirely different paths to get there.
I do.
Sometimes even the stinkers are great. I have weird affection for Yes’ Tormato.
“Don’t Kill The Whales” used to draw chuckles from me and my fellow Prog-Lovers forty years ago. That is a bad Yes album, Sir.
Speaking as an AC/DC aficionado from way back, you have to understand what those bands were doing at the time. The Bon Scott run was the only AC/DC I ever cared about–and do people realize they were a glam band?
Glam had a few aspects to it. The spaceman theme was a big part, but some acts didn’t use that at all–like Gary Glitter, Suzy Quatro, and T-Rex. Some of them didn’t use the glitter stuff/super start stuff. The third element of Glam was a nostalgia for rock and roll. The appearance of Eddie in Rocky Horror was one instance of that, but even Bowie in his Spiders from Mars phase was singing about being a rocker in Suffragette City. Gary Glitter was all about nostalgia for rock and roll–and AC/DC focused exclusively on that aspect of it.
They were a glam band that played rock and roll, and they played some of the best rock and roll ever.
I maintain that Whole Lotta Rosie (studio or live, take your pick) is the greatest rock and roll song in the history of the world. To whatever extent rock and roll revivalists like the early Misfits, Social Distortion, X, etc. were doing rock and roll, AC/DC had picked up and started that trend with other glam bands at the time–way back in 1974. It’s also important to remember the influence that the rock and roll aspect of Glam bands like AC/DC had on the early punk rockers in the UK–where bands like AC/DC and the Ramones had a big influence.
In the U.S. “Punk Rock” is a type of music, but in the UK, at the time, a “punk rocker” is a type of person (as in rockers vs. mods) like a “hippie” was originally a “young hipster” a la the beatniks of San Francisco circa the mid-60’s. I mean that quite literally. Just as there were original beatniks around in the coffee houses of San Francisco when the first hippies started showing up (who referred to those kids originally as “young hipsters” and then “hippies”), there were original Rockers left over from the mid-60s, who noticed young AKA “punk” kids, who rode motorcycles and listened to old rockabilly. That is the sense in which people like Sid Vicious, Steve Jones, of the Sex Pistols, the guys in the Clash, and the Bromley Contingent people (Billy Idol of Generation X and Siouxie Sioux) were “punk rockers”.
It just meant they they were young “rockers”.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VP0kPogg-Yo
AC/DC was in the middle of that trend. All of the punk rockers I mentioned above were deep into glam. Jones was lately the DJ at a radio station in LA, and he almost plays Glam exclusively.
If it were only for AC/DC’s influence on punk, they would be huge. If it were only for having written the greatest rock and roll song in history, that would be huge. That they were also hugely influential on American metal, with basic chord structures, riff rock, etc., that would be huge.
Their influence is huge, and they’re the best rock and roll band ever.
Motorhead is the same way. The first time I heard a Motorhead song was probably at a Battalion of Saints show when I was still in the 6th grade in San Diego. The song “Motorhead” fuses punk and metal–and they were the first to do that. That song was written when Lemmy was still in Hawkwind circa 1972. It doesn’t go back farther than that. They fused punk and metal before there was punk.
What’s GBH without Motorhead?
When I was in boarding school, my roomate was an amazing guitarist. He could not appreciate punk rock or AC/DC–and let’s face it, he didn’t really like rock and roll. He liked Yes. He liked Rush. He liked other bands that had amazing guitarists, and he’d sit there with headphones all day picking out songs by his favorite guitarists. “Hey Bob, I’d say. The Meat Puppets are playing the 9:30. Let’s go!” He’d rather sit there and pick out guitar solos.
Some people want to like rock and roll more than they really do.
Chris Squire’s solo record, Richard Wakeman’s solo record, Emerson, Lake and Palmer, etc., etc. these guys are amazing virtuosos, no doubt about it. Back then, I thought life was about meeting girls, getting into fights, and rock and roll. That did not make me unsophisticated. My Latin was pretty good, I sang Hyden’s Creation in a touring choir, and I was really into opera.
Next time your friend starts dissing AC/DC or Motorhead, tell him he’s a phony–that he really just doesn’t like rock and roll. Because that is rock and roll.
If he protests, ask him if he’s into Haydn or Wagner. When I want to get sophisticated, my horizons are wide enough that I’m not limited to Jethro fucking Tull.
You are incorrect, Sir! The greatest balls-out Rock tune is “Nobody’s Fault But Mine” by Zep. It has been my theme song since I was twelve years old. AC/DC is music for Lugins and thugs, no nuance, no soul.
If you were going to go with Zeppelin, their greatest song “In My Time of Dying”.
“Nobody’s Fault But Mine” is a great song, but it isn’t rock and roll.
It’s blues. Zeppelin did rock and roll, but then they also did reggae. Led Zeppelin was a great blues band. And they did experimental stuff straight from Planet X–see Kashmir. Again, their greatest work was on Physical Graffiti.
Their greatest blues was on the first album. It’s the greatest blues album ever. That they covered standards and made them their own–better than the originals without loosing the rough edges is an amazing accomplishment. If they’d never done another record, it might be the epitome of blues. After that, what else was there to do?
The answer is Physical Graffiti.
Zeppelin is to the blues was Bach is baroque. They finished it. Nothing left to do but imitate. That’s why people stopped doing baroque after Bach.
I should add, “In My Time of Dying” is blues–not rock and roll.
It’s like Elvis. Love Me Tender isn’t rock and roll.
Half the crooning Elvis did wasn’t rock and roll. When Elvis did rockabilly, it was great.
The rest of it may have been good, whatever it was. But it wasn’t rock and roll.
I appliqued “ZOSO” on the back of my jean jacket when I was fifteen. I appreciate your comments about Zep because they were about to slide into irrelevance after Physical Graffiti. Thanks for not bringing up the “cultural appropriation” of the first albums. They just took some obscure Willie Dixon stuff, reworked it and ultimately made his ne’er-do-well heirs into millionaires.
Tons of imitators, though. I recently down-loaded an album of Italian Baroque and its pretty great. Correlli is especially good. Handel was a boot-licker but his use of percussion sets him apart. Lots of great Baroque music out there, you just have to seek it out.
Aerosmith has only ever written one song. U2 changes genres every five years. Only one of them produced a hottie elf chick.
She looks like her dad, though, which is weird.
It’s kinda like when Elvis’ daughter was hot. Yeah, she was hot, but she looked like the King.
I don’t want to have . . . with a female version of the King or a female version of Steven Tyler.
*shudders*
Ah, the old apple with a worm-hole conundrum!
I’m listening to super-weird French lo-fi black metal from the 1990s.
Les Légions Noires
I was given a thumbdrive. There are WAY more bands than wikipedia’s list.
Brand new Steven Wilson album is giving me all the right feels so far.
The Pineapple Thief’s Your Wilderness.
Proving once again that having Gavin Harrison in your band can only make your band better.
Having just returned from a delightful road trip that included several days in northeast New Mexico, I’ve been binge-reading Tony Hillerman mysteries. (The hubby is a long-time fan.) So far, I’ve raced through Listening Woman , People of Darkness , The Dark Wind , The Ghostway , and Skinwalkers and have just started Coyote Waits . Productivity at work taking a sizable hit.
Fun fact for Sloopy’s benefit: The Dick and Jane readers were created by my great aunt . Those kids (and Spot and Puff and D&J’s little sister Sally) put me through college.
(The online cheat sheet I use to NOT SF my links failed to produce the attempted italics for all those titles. Are italics possible here? If so, howyadoit?)
<em>The test to Italicize</em>
How did you not not do that?
& lt ; (no spaces) makes <
& gt ; (no spaces) makes >
The majick of hypertext ~~ <3
em in less than greater than for italics, strong for bold. Blockquote and a continue to work as normal.
As well as < s > for
strikethroughWon moar tyme–
As well as &
for strikethroughFuck–
&; ?
<
Wizardry.
He turned me into a newt, but I got better.
Finished The Ascent of Money. A good read, but very obviously was published right before the great recession, which really hurts it. Putting financial instruments in their historical context is a very good way to help me understand what they are and what problem they solved at the time.
Picked up and set down The Queen’s Poisoner. Never work with children or animals. A precocious 8 year old that happens to have the deductive capabilities of an adult when the plot demands it is not my cup of tea.
Son of the Black Sword. Much better than the mental masturbation that was Monster Hunter International. Recommended by someone on this board, and thanks for that. They said it was better than Moorcock. I was skeptical. It is not, but that’s a pretty high bar.
Narrative of the Life of Fredrick Douglas. Been on my bucket list for ages. Glad I started it. Very difficult to read, even if I modulate my emotions and tell myself that Douglas is doing his damnedest to make himself sympathetic.
Captain America and the Struggle of the Superhero: Critical Essays. A mixed bag. Some good, some bad.
The Jungle Book. Picked up and set down. This book just does not do it for me. I’ve tried and failed three times to get into it.
Recommended by someone on this board, and thanks for that. They said it was better than Moorcock. I was skeptical. It is not, but that’s a pretty high bar.
That was me! Although I think I said I liked it more than Moorcock, even “Hawkmoon”. Moorcock is the better writer, but I prefer SotBS characters and plot. Also, I loathe Elric. Which I guess you’re supposed to but I’m of the opinion that if you hate a genre, don’t write in it.
Ok, if you said you like it more than Moorecock, then there’s no issue. De gustibus non est disputandum,
I really, really enjoyed the Elric stories. I know that most people see is it as a hate-fuck of high fantasy (including the Author), I see it as more of a return an older definition of hero. The kind of guy that was cursed by Hera and goes momentarily crazy and kills his kids and wife. Or who’s seen too much shit to ever settle down as a peaceful farmer. Or who soils his name as the noblest knight in Britany to get in his best friend’s wife’s knickers.
He was not shitting on high fantasy, he was shitting on Howard. Elric is just anti-Conan in every aspect (decadent civilization vs robust barbarity, frail vs strong, prince vs wanderer, practices magic vs shunning it etc).
I preferred the Corum series but I was a 19 year-old stoner layabout. I wanted to slap Elric right across his pasty, effette face.
Currently reading a self-help book: The Subtle Art of Not Giving a F*ck – A Counterintuitive Approach to Living a Good Life. Trying to find something (besides pills) that’ll teach me to stop getting so mad about… everything.
Anti-nihilism works.
If nihilism sounds exhausting, that means anti-nihilism sounds restful?
Nihilism – Nothing matters, there’s no meaning to anything, feel bad about it.
Anti-nihilism – Nothing matters, there’s no meaning to anything, and that’s fucking radical because you can make your own meaning.
I would thinat anti-nihilism would be closer to “everything matters” which would result in exhausting frenetic concern and activity.
No, John, these men are cowards
Summers in Rangoon, luge lessons…
Quite typical, really
Isn’t that called existentialism?
Pretty much, but I’m riffing on a trope more than anything else.
Say what you want, at least it’s an ethos.
Beer?
I haven’t been reading anything with a narrative lately, just old game books and other things that can entertain without bringing my mind into a state of focus.
I would like this recommend this serial. It’s complete so you can just read it without waiting for new installments.
It has two things going against it. First, it’s only available on that wordpress site, presumably because the author hates money. Second, the author has a really stupid name.
It is also long. like really long. Like the complete Harry potter series, plus War and Peace, plus another hundred thousand words long. Whether this is good or bad is up to you.
I did, however, enjoy the ever-living fuck out of it. It’s a modern-day superhero thingy with a joyous lack of exposition and enough character development such that when one character straight up murders the superman analogue, you are cheering for them.
I was late to the morning links post which is mostly dead now, but I read the Federalist piece about the post-Charlottesville bullshit and I noticed this talking point repeated in the comments:
Letting Nazis march in Skokie was fine because we didn’t have a President who relies on racist scumbags for electoral gain.
I realize that the Democrats have gotten to rewrite all of their history when it doesn’t suit them anymore, but it’s not exactly difficult to Google up the 1976 electoral map. The sitting President when the Nazis marched through Skokie would not have won the then-recent election without a substantial number of “racist” votes from the South.
As ever, it’s principals over principles with the left. Their excuses are what they call “nuance”.
I am hate listening to Ready Player One because it is HOT STEAMY HOT GARBAGE.
Has this been discussed:
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-08-25/mystery-deepens-after-us-confirms-16-diplomats-suffered-traumatic-brain-injury-cuban
That reminds me of this book from my childhood. I loved those books. (The “mind reader” part of the title is a misnomer, it really just scrambled their brains.)
I am currently rereading ” The Glory of Their Times: The Story of the Early Days of Baseball Told by the Men Who Played It” by Lawrence S. Ritter. A lot of great baseball anecdotes from a century ago.
Another good early baseball book is The Summer Of Beer And Whiskey. Prior to the American League challenging the National League establishment, the American Association challenged the NL and you get a much better picture of what typical American life was like than you would get from an American history book.
Currently watching a silent movie starring Babe Ruth. The Elvis of his time.
I loved that book. It’s such a vivid portrait of late 19th century life, warts and all.
Late, as ever… but I’ll chip in:
I just finished reading the “Game of Thrones” series this summer. I decided to read the books in preparation for this season, since they apparently diverge starting last season. Quick review – it starts out better than it finishes, so far at least.
More shocking: I enjoyed the TV series more than the book. I thought the story was tighter, the characters (particularly the women) were better and more sharply drawn, and the politics cleaner. That’s a rare feat. Usually the book is miles better, even when the film adaptation is spot-on.
I’m currently reading “Neuromancer.” I’m only about 25% in, so no review yet. But it is a classic, so my review isn’t swaying anyone.
Also late. I’m reading Air Superiority Blue, an inside look into the development/procurement of the F-15 fighter jets. The title comes from the color the jet was originally painted – a light blue that would make it difficult for the enemy to pinpoint the jet in a dogfight. The color was very effective – they had to paint wing tips, etc orange during flight tests for adequate visual verification of test points. But some general nixed the color: “We’re not flying a baby blue jet!” So the color changed to the standard gray. The book is an interesting look into successful weapon system development.