Something every libertarian knows is that many people see liberty differently than themselves, and most want to expand the liberty they feel is lacking, not liberty as a general value. Case in point, in my fair country, guns are hard to acquire by civilians, but most to don’t see this as an infringement of liberty.
I wrote a post before about freedom de facto and de jure. There is also the distinction between actual and perceived. I do not smoke marijuana, so I do not see marijuana prohibition as an infringement of liberty. I drink beer and would be outraged at beer prohibition. Most people believe themselves to be free enough, as long as the world seems to be generally how they like it. They feel more liberty with compulsory government healthcare, for example, than without, and care little that others feel their liberty infringed by this. They are, of course, outraged about every little thing they happen to care about and does not go their way.
I was thinking of the perception of freedom by children, which is quite different than adults. A child, as long as he is not an orphan toiling away polishing monocles, sees life–and freedom–as doing as much of what he likes as possible. Often playing. They live in a perfect socialist world–their family–and cares of money or economics are usually distant, relative to adults. This as long as there is a minimum standard of living–and this does not have to be too high, having a roof over their head and food in their belly often is enough. Those from reasonably responsible families, lower middle class upwards, have a special type of freedom, freedom from care. Of course, a child’s real liberty is quite restricted. But the reason this is–their immature mind–is the reason they don’t care about the adult stuff–entering contracts, for example. They, of course, can have a temper tantrum when the freedom they care about–let’s say drawing on a wall–is infringed.
Some left-wingers are much like children in their view–they want the victuals taken care of and want to do what they will with their time. They want to play free from care. Sadly this does not work for adults, wish as they might. But this is not the point of this post, although I can’t pass an opportunity to mock the left.
I was thinking of my very own childhood as an example of a moment of feeling pretty damn free, compared to now, when I perceive all sorts of infringements upon my liberty. Romania still has a sizable rural population as EU countries go, with many country dweller practicing more or less subsistence agriculture–non-remunerated family laborers, as they are called in government statistics.
There was a rather fast attempt at urbanization during communism, to build the glorious industry of the multilaterally developed socialist society. Many urbanites had elderly parents in the country, and it was the custom for city kids to spend holidays with rural grandparents. I was no exception. This was mostly due to lack of availability of other things to do with children when schools closed, but also because it was thought to be good for kids to spend time in the country. I agree with this, I can say they were some of the happiest times of my childhood and were actually good for my development. Those were the days my friend, we thought they’d never… Moving on.
I had no major trauma as a child. I was healthy and so was my family. While not rich, we never really had to worry about our next meal. My parents worked hard and managed to provide as well as possible in those days. The collapse of communism was chaotic for most Romanians, but as a child, I was insulated from most of the worst stuff. It never touched me; I didn’t even realize a lot of it, beyond the sudden availability of a bounty of goods to buy–although not that much money to buy all of them–unlike the last stark years of the old regime.
My grandma lived off the beaten track–as Romania goes–a village along a small river in a valley surrounded by wooded hills. The comforts were not great, but they needn’t be. No running water and the toilet was a latrine unconnected to the house, which got pretty interesting come winter when the blizzard was blowing between the wooden boards. The TV was a black and white vacuum tube number and it needed a minute or so to warm up before starting. But did we complain? I think not. Kids these days!
Back then we were as free range as it got and had the kind of freedom that only a kids have. We had some chores–all village kids did–but not as many as the local boys, we being holidaying city slickers and the like. So much so that the chores were almost fun. Feeding livestock, drawing water from the well (tastier than anything we got in the city), helping in the garden. Those sorts of things took a few of hours. Maybe an hour of school work was needed–we had “holiday homework”.
After that, the long summer day was ours. Nothing we had to do–except be close to home after dark. Not a damn care in the world. We were a gang of some 7 or 8 boys with little adult supervision. There were, as you can imagine, no play dates in rural Romania. As an adult, I now appreciate the value of unstructured play. We had control of our time, and always found the way to stave off boredom.
At no certain time of the day, we would drift to the unpaved road outside the yard, and find whoever drifted there at the same time. In summer, we would have a daily swim in the river–we had our deep holes in the otherwise shallow stream, no adults, no lifeguards, nothing. We would – like all Romanian kids – play football or just wander the hills and forest. All we had to do is scream “Granma we’re going”. We would jump off a high dike in the water, climb trees, and scale ravines and all the good things reckless boys do. Scrapes and bruises were common, but no one got really hurt – some luck involved, I guess, probably lots of kids got hurt in Romania. But bad cases were rare – none in my memory among my group. We were mostly shirtless, often barefoot; with a tan no beach holiday can ever give. We had bows with reed arrows, slingshots, pocket knives, and access to axes, hammers and more.
In a way, country life spoiled me–all summer and some of the autumn I ate just-picked fruit, straight from the tree, and vegetables from the garden. I do not like fully ripe fruit, just about halfway so to be somewhat more sour than sweet, so I could choose just the ones I liked. Milk came from cows those days, not from cartons, and the chickens ran around the yard eating bugs and grass, and the meat and eggs tasted nothing like 90% of store chicken.
It is hard to find good food in most city stores and markets–although things are improving. I am not going to start praising organic for the sake of organic, but most fruit and vegetables in the city markets are not picked at the right time and spend some time in crates. The stuff in supermarkets, at least in Romania, is inedible to me. I don’t know if it was in my favour to get the taste for the good stuff or, like life-long city dwellers, to think the food you find is good, because you don’t know better. I am a city person now and like it that way, so I won’t go back to live in the country anytime soon. The trade-offs are not worth it. But I can have the odd pastoral fantasy. And I can be amused of urban friends who couldn’t tell a sheep from a goat up close well in their twenties.
In the end, rural childhood was a taste of freedom missing from some city raised kids, and one I won’t likely find again. Maybe it is one of the many reasons urban folk favour government on the bigger side. Or maybe not. As country grandparents start disappearing, new generations of kids will not have access to this. They couldn’t, really. Or maybe they will from a VR headset or the next Minecraft. They will have many things I did not, and anyway you can’t go all Luddite about things, and I do not. But one can occasionally be nostalgic of things past.
Most people think freedom = no personal responsibility. And that is because government pretty much tells them that. This is why they favor government expansion.
When you cease to be free to care for yourself, you are a slave.
“The Devil he blew an outward breath, for his heart was free from care”
Freedom with too many is freedom from the consequences of bad choices or actions… That the state controls every aspect of your life to make sure you don’t make these bad choices never sinks in with these morons..
I find that odd.
When something bad happens to me because of my actions, I typically shrug it off, go “Yeah, that was stupid”, clean up the mess and move on. I only get angry when it’s someone else’s actions. I’d rather be free from the consequences of other people’s bad choices than my own.
The major problem with today’s snowflakes is that they aren’t allowed to make their own decisions when they are young and therefore when they are older they think bad results are someone else’s responsibility (without even giving a thought that is was their own bad decision), OR they freak out because they haven’t had the experience of bad consequences from a decision before the age of 16+.
The self-esteem movement in public education doesn’t help. If you’re afraid to tell people they fucked up, they’ll never think a fuck up could possibly have come from their actions.
*sounds of FDA raid vehicles approaching*
At least it didn’t come from BAGS
In the 90s we had bags for milk in the city stores, hated those things
Not pasteurised either just a bucket of fresh milk
Actually, it still does come from cows.
Great article Pie. Your childhood summers were similar to mine. Great memories.
We would run around town all day and only come home “when the siren blew.”
It is (was?) common for small towns around me to have the emergency siren go off at certain times. In my town it was noon, 6pm and 9:30pm (dinner, supper and curfew) The 9:30 curfew wasn’t ever enforced, but on summer nights most parents set that as the time to start making your way back home.
And yes; I said dinner is at noon and supper is at 6pm.
We also had a late-night emergency siren test thing, but it was at 9. Most kids were expected to be home within five, ten minutes after the siren.
I suppose it’s the small town version of church bells ringing on the hour? ha-ha
Life in rural Romania sounds a lot like life in the rural south of the USA. We did a lot of the same things. A lot of them stupid and unsupervised. (chief among the stupid was experimenting with black powder. There’s just loads of really dangerous fun that a 12 year old boy can get into with his friends and a can of black powder.)
We didn’t have a factory whistle or town siren. You just had to be within earshot around dinner time and again as it got close to bedtime. We got a few stitches and a few broken bones along the way (did you know that wild grape vines can break if you use them as a swing off the edge of a bluff? Yeah, well they can.)
Head home when the streetlights come on. Effingham Illinois — small town mid-west.
“Effingham, a town in Illinois – not what your profane Uncle asks you to pass at Easter dinner”
I was in ye olde 2BN/130th INF – there was an infantry company in Effingham.
Life in rural Romania sounds a lot like life in the rural south of the USA.
Indeed. I grew up in a small Texas town, and looking back, it was frickin’ idyllic for a kid. “Be home when the streetlights come on,” roaming the town in a pack of kids and dogs, doin’ what we did. We would get home some days so filthy my father would have us strip off in the back yard and hose us off.
Inside was safer than outside – we were less likely to be attacked or caught in the crossfire.
/gang country during the peak of the crack ‘epidemic’.
Dear dog, a Mary Hopkin lyric. They must have used that on you when they kept you in the Lubyanka, all those years ago ….
I still dream about it some nights
Thinking about it though, the sentiment of the song makes it almost perfect for transcription into one of those sad, reflective slavic songs.
*gets up, picks up half-drunk bottle of slivovitz and drowns his sorrows*
I thought it was originally a sad, reflective Slavic song.
Try this.
No, Mary Hopkin was a one-hit-wonder in the UK (although actually Welsh) with that song, Made it to the top of the charts for a couple of weeks in 1968.
Nid oes neb yn drist ac yn ddrwg fel y Cymry.
This sort of reminds me of my childhood. Summer days followed a pretty standard formula: morning cartoons with breakfast, house chores and outdoor chores, lunch with Mom, the entire afternoon at the town pool, sit-down dinner with the whole family, roam the neighborhood with the other kids until dark, repeat.
Pool? Not that rural then… any indoor plumbing by any chance?
Hah! There was indoor plumbing, indeed. This was a rundown of the week days, mostly.
Weekends we’d take our camper to a nearby lake, but sometimes we’d go out there for a whole week or two. Def no indoor plumbing there; Dad always had to dig a hole. A big hole. Lots of fond childhood memories of feeling free, no doubt.
Fantastic, Pie.
When were you born, if I may ask? I was born in ’87 and I think that my age-cohort has to be the last few years of allowing children to be children without freaking out about it. My brother and I would make spray-paint flamethrowers and put our trampoline (we were both gymnasts) by the adjacent tree and would climb up 20ft or so and jump off the branches. Shit like that.
My parents would likely be arrested now for allowing such behavior.
It’s one of the reasons I will likely never be a parent (though I have absolutely no interest in doing that anyway).
Kids in Korea often don’t know how to think for themselves and are usually rigidly controlled, but in some other ways they are trusted to have enough responsibility to go about their day without parental guidance. What little down-time they’re afforded they’re trusted/expected to manage their way around the city on their own. Good on ’em.
84. Spray paint was scarse for us but we made bomba with something that was called carbide and watter.also we had a sort of elastic slingshot which fired pieces of wire twisted into an arch, no idea how to describe them
We off course had standard slingshots with stones
Acetylene bombs. Good, clean fun.
Boys are just gonna do stupid boy stuff, aren’t they? It is a wonder any of us live to breeding age…..
Darwinian Culling.
There’s a reason women live longer.
Ahh, calcium carbide and water.
Smells like …. destruction.
When were you born, if I may ask? I was born in ’87 and I think that my age-cohort has to be the last few years of allowing children to be children without freaking out about it.
I think you’re right. I was born in ’88, and my experience was very different from my brothers’ (’95 and’ 96). Although, some of that may be our environment. My experience up to age 12 (living in a semi-rural farming neighborhood) was night and day different from my later experience (living in a subdivision with soccer moms rending their garments every time little Johnny skinned a knee.
Born in ’88, similar experience. My parent’s almost never knew where I was from 8AM to 6PM in the summer. After dinner wad over most nights I’d go out again until the streetlights came on.
I think it helped that I grew up in a very rural part of Pennsylvania, where the people are about 30 years behind the rest of the country.
Wow, yutes!
I was born in ’78, and I have fond memories of running around in the woods across the street from our house (this was in Bowie, MD) getting into Roman candle fights as a pre-adolescent. A buddy of mine got shot in the leg with salt by a farmer who’s field we always used to cut through. I’m not sure that’s the kind of stuff kids are gettin’ into these days, at least not in that neighborhood.
Getting shot in the leg? Sure, in Chicago.
If a kid did the (mostly harmless) things I did during summer vacations , they’d be in jail today. How are today’s kids ever going to have any red-blooded fun and still grow up to inherit our monocle factories?
I had classmates in school that were city grown and i was surprised to find.out they never actually climbed a tree. I mean really climb it not the bottom branch
The tree in our backyard was too tall to climb – it literally had no branches below the ten foot mark. We couldn’t figure out how to get up there. It was lightly damaged in a storm and some jackass cleanup crew decided to cut the whole thing down – probably because they got to sell the “damaged” timber, and it was a solid 55-year old maple.
I never had the courage but a neighbors dad was the village electrician and there were wooden poles in that time and he had some climbing spikes which could be uses on such trees
That’s what ropes are for.
Too tall to climb???? You dont know how to bear hug a tree?
Nope.
Grew up in the suburbs, born in 91. My childhood was.way different. I wasn’t allowed to travel further than visual contact with my house till about 12. Even after 12 I had to tell my parents where I was going until I was 18. It seemed like where I grew up the wealthier and middle class kids usually had little freedom with either stay at home parents or constant day care, the lower class kids often were allowed to explore the neighborhood more.
The snobbery was also of the chart. This was the “dangerous” area of town, and people called kids who lived their junction rats.
https://www.traveliowa.com/aspx/dest.aspx?id=6910
There are dangerous parts of Iowa?
Some straight up gangstas.
Des Moines, Iowa = Dirty Money Island https://youtu.be/_4REYAW92Oc.
It’s an island is the sense that it is surrounded by a river on one side.
It’s like you never saw Children of the Corn.
<fx: Pulls up suspensers, clears throat, selects best Yorkshire accent >
When I were a lad, back in ’61, summer mornings were out of the ‘ouse, and up the street to a local park. Well, I call it a park, it were actually an area of bombed-out public land that had been levelled after the luftwaffe had remodelled it. Play around there for a bit, as all the local kids assembled, and then we’d be off and away larking around in the streets. All the kids had 2d (two pence, old money) and knew how to use a public phone and had 2 phone numbers memorized, usually their home phone, if their family had one, otherwise a neighbor, and usually another neighbor.
Back home at noon for a snack and a drink, back out ’til 6.30, usually travelling up to 2 or 3 miles away to some other wooded area. After 6.30, most kids’ fathers were home, so everyone’s roaming range was severely curtailed. Home before dark, or dad would get his belt off and nobody wanted that to happen.
And you tell the kids today that ….
So you can tell when a limey’s kids are grown because he’s gone from belts to suspenders?
That was us dressing in Sunday TRAP best ….
Some dads had prodigious beer bellies and needed both. Not my father, but my grandfather did.
In my experience as a fat bastard, the added pressure from an oversized gut made it easier to keep the wait of trousers in place. A belt to protect the button from popping would be sufficient.
Grandfather was old school. Suspenders (=braces) with buttons on the inner pant (=trouser) lining. That 2″ belt was necessary on those heavy worsted pants.
Did you also learn the ancient Yorkshire martial art known as ecky-thump?
Aye up, I had to keep meself busy after they ‘ad trouble a t’mill.
Really great article. I grew up in the suburbs but I still had the same type of freedom. I had friends that lived on our street, and I just had to tell my mom where I was going and be back by dark. If I wanted to ride by bike, I could go wherever I wanted, as long as I kept away from the busier streets. During the summer there were kids who spent a few weeks visiting their grandmother next door to me. She had a huge yard, and we’d build forts and do things that would be considered terribly dangerous today.
The ironic thing is, we were probably less safe back then in terms of sexual predators and crime, but today we act like there’s a monster around every corner.
There can be up to 3 pedos in the average bush. You never know
Now that I think about it, I hear a lot of people being nostalgic about their childhood, but then they say something like “things are different now”, or “kids are different now”. Which is true but they fail to realize we made things different, and we made kids different by the way we treated them.
Have you read the papers? The real danger is in the classroom, where Van Halen’s Hot for Teacher is apparently an anthem for millennial teaching grads.
To be fair, my cousind and me (I myself) did.some stupid thigs like throw rotten tomatoes at cars or rotten eggs at people, and i dont know how we figured we wouldent get caugth, we were hiding but in our yard. My parents didnt believe in hitting children but his did, so he got the worst of that, although they were mostly his ideas, i was a pretty quiet and well behave kid when he wasnt around
uh huh suuuuuure
I was innocent i tells ya
Innocent like that kid down the street from my grandma who made another kid drink gasoline (no shit).
A deviant friend and I did similar things. Throw tomatoes at cars, roll tires down hills, hit golf balls down the street and onto main Street of our little town, break into the school through a roof access, shoot bb guns at pretty much everything… Definitely got caught a few times, both by the popo and older kids (the tire thing. Still have a scar from being chased through backyards and running into a fence in the dark). Never got busted for the school thing though. That might have changed my life trajectory a bit, likely for the worst.
Born in the 70s, I had quite the Tom Sawyer childhood. I rarely saw my parents during the weekday – especially during summer – since I was busy running around with my cronies. Swimming, exploring the local dump or pine forest, poking through the nearby construction sites, or getting into a big crab apple fight with the neighbors. Skateboarding, basketball, skiing in the wintertime (once I took skis over to my friend’s house, who lived two miles away), and lots n lots of biking since that was the only way to get around quickly in a suburban sprawl.
It taught me – if anything – to be resourceful, and some minor woodcraft skills. It was also helluva lot of fun.
Out parents were in the city so we saw them every other weekend. It was better after communism, but before gas was scarce and there was this scheme where on alternating weekends only cars with plates ending in odd and even numbers could be on the road. So my parents.could not.drive certain weekends
Careful who’s around when you say that.
*perks up*
/California Legislature
OT: The Great Outdoors Gone Wrong or Why I Won’t Rent Chainsaws and Ladders As A Package
Favorite moment at 2:55
*Edit Ferry says…you are repaired, my good fellow!”
Why I Won’t Rent Chainsaws and Ladders As a Package
Oh My God that brings back bad memories. Like from three months ago.
For more “hilarity”, check this one. The second entry gets the Darwin Award.
I would probably have stripped the bark off the trunk on that one. It looks like it was pretty badly damaged further up,
Our back neighbor got bit by the chainsaw the other day. My wife heard the saw stop and then he screamed “call the ambulance, I got myself good!”
I’ve done the chainsaw on a ladder thing and was lucky to have escaped unscathed. The saw wasn’t the problem, the 2500 lb branch that kicked the wrong way and hit the ladder was.
This reminds me, I have a stump to cut tonight. The tree blew over in a wind storm, and broke at about 6′ high.
No ladders and chainsaws. I repeat NO LADDERS AND CHAINSAWS.
Is the tree still attached to the stump? If so, beware of built up stresses in the wood. I’ve seen those situations go very, very sideways.
It’s completely detached. Even if I cut wrong on the stump, it’s probably light enough to pick up on my own, so it’s not gonna crush me or anything. It would’ve been a much messier job if the top 25′ of the tree were still there.
If the trunk is bigger than my thigh, I get the experts to do it, unless it’s an emergency.
We had a bunch of damage as well. The third truckload of tree remnants is sitting by the curb as we speak. I had to hire in a crew to take care of a big black olive and a sea grape. They both had broken hunks way in the top that I wasn’t going to try by myself …. not least of all because I don’t have a 50 foot ladder.
So the crew that shows up doesn’t have a bucket. This young kid (well, less than 30 any way. I’m getting old, I guess) wearing a ninja mask jumped around on top of this terrifyingly shaky ladder and jumped from limb to limb, swinging a 16″ chainsaw around like it was a toy lightsaber. Dude was amazing, but he scared me to death.
Money well spent to avoid trying to do the job myself. The other couple of tons of tree that I cut up and hauled away were enough of a workout anyway.
Some of those people are idiots. Some were unlucky. And some might be dead.
You know you could have just posted this scene and we would have gotten the point.
I like Monty Python, but those damn English accents always makes it difficult for me to understand what they’re saying without paying close attention
That’s why g_d invented closed captioning
*Turns on CC*
“Unintelligable Glaswegian Cussing”
*Turns off CC*
Have you ever been to Scotland UnCivil?
I stayed south of Hadrian’s Wall.
The Romans built that wall for a reason
-It looked like I was going to have to spend the night in Glasgow.
-Jesus Christ.
LOL
This is more like Glaswegian.
The laugh track spoils the joke.
It’s for a British audience. Most of ’em need to be told hen it’s OK to laugh, and by implication, when it isn’t.
Should be able to perfectly understand this then, no English accents at all.
That accent is worse than the combined awfulness of Canada
That’s jokes there bud. If you’re really going to chirp us you got to give’r. Careful though, some pulls’ll throw you into a donnybrook over it, give you the ol’ left-right. But afterwards we’ll pick up a two-four and some darts and everything’ll be aces.
You’ve bested me Titor. I have no idea what you just wrote and I am frightened by the intelligible conjunctions.
*unintelligible
Translation from rural English-Scottish-Irish Canadian redneck:
That’s somewhat funny, my good man. But if you’re going to insult us you must really try your best. I would be careful who you say it to however, some young men will beat you up over it. But afterwards they’ll invent you out for beer and cigarettes, all insults forgotten.
You’re fucking ten ply bud.
Really? Ya ‘e ‘ad a cuppa two tree odd wads, but all all I dot it was perty cris, heyna?
Just Say’n; here’s a little Canadian Redneck musical that might answer some questions you have.
“You’re fucking ten ply bud.”
Urban dictionary says this is the ‘worst Canadian insult’. You guys need better insults
Also, that’s only like the fifth worst accent in Canada.
Urban dictionary also says that ‘snowflake’ is a white nationalist buzzword about Jews, so their knowledge of cultural values may be slightly flawed.
Urban dictionary really is just the democracy of two brain-damaged, woke wolves and a medicated sheep arguing over what’s for dinner
American accents are not uncommon in Monty Python ….
What makes you think anyone can understand American Accents?
Homegrown veggies are the best. I need to get off my ass next spring and plant a garden again.
I’ve tried doing some gardening in my back yard, the damned deer eat everything down to the stem. The more entertaining is that something decided to try to take a bite out of one of my ghost chili plants. There was just a single bite taken out of the pepper, probably about chipmunk sized. I didn’t see any chipmunks in the yard for about a week after that.
Chilis developed Capsaicin to kill small mammals so that their seeds would only be eaten by birds, whose digestive systems wouldn’t destroy them.
If it merely drives them away, the effect is just as good. Plus, since humans now plant them for that attribute, it is a very successful strategy.
This led to me filling a spray bottle with oil, and dropping in several dried ghost chilies. I let that sit for a while, and when the chipmunks get too comfortable around my house, spray down every single hole that I can find with that oil. At least once I hit one of the little bastards, I could hear it start spinning around and freaking out down the hole.
The deer are the bigger problem, they’re just rats with hooves.
Pictured: Nephilium.
I hate everyone in that picture.
Find a hunter and get some stomach/intestines with the food and shit still in them. Split them open and spread around the edge of the property. Doesn’t take much but it’s effective.
Works for kids too, but it’s harder to find those entrails.
Planned parenthood yard sale
Scruffy’s yard.
Yard
Pretty much like that.
So…. the animals won’t want to live there, but neither will I
Later that day…
That sounds more like an interesting way to meet the neighbors. I live in the suburbs, but there’s a park (which is part of Cleveland’s Metroparks) less then a mile from me.
Homegrown veggies get picked at the right time, and don’t need to be varieties that sacrifice taste for durability or extended shelf life.
I hated gardening as a kid.
Too much damn work, so today we just get them from a local gal who runs a CSA and sells at a FM. Yummy goodness of homegrown without all the work. Sure it costs $20 a week for the box, but I don’t have to spend an hour or two a week working at it.
OT- Noted useful idiot, Rico Suave, writes article that contradicts its premise and makes little to no sense.
https://reason.com/blog/2017/09/25/what-i-saw-at-milo-yiannopouloss-sad-abo#comment
He contradicts himself, for example: “Organizers claimed the administration tied their hands, but offered no evidence that campus officials were anything but accommodating in the weeks leading up to the event.
That said, the security measures taken by the university on Sunday were incredibly restrictive, making it impossible for the planned rally to proceed.”
And he makes ludicrous statements such as: “Unlike at other campuses, Berkeley administrators have maintained that they are committed to protecting free speech on campus, and deserve praise for saying so.”
Ben Shapiro, Ann Coulter, and Milo were not available for comment.
This is just beyond pathetic.
And he makes ludicrous statements such as: “Unlike at other campuses, Berkeley administrators have maintained that they are committed to protecting free speech on campus, and deserve praise for saying so.”
Stated intentions Uber alles.
Virtue signalling moron loves it when other people virtue signal despite actions indicating the opposite, news at 11.
It’s not really surprising, it’s just his standard MO: Anything vaguely left-wing is held to far, far lower standard than any form of right-wing, and who needs to research or actually analyze a topic?
Doesn’t anyone have any editorial control at that place, or is it just a free-for-all?
Don’t answer that. Rhetorical, stupid question.
With Gillespie in charge, it’s basically worse than a free-for-all.
The one that really stood out to me was when Soave claimed that Trump admitted to sexual assault during Pussygate. Uh, no, he didn’t, and claiming that someone admitted to a crime is actually defamation that can get you sued you moron. If your magazine was actually relevant you could end up in some shit. Couple people emailed Gillespie to point this out (that statement should have never gotten by editing anyway).
The article was never changed or corrected.
Uh, no, he didn’t, and claiming that someone admitted to a crime is actually defamation that can get you sued you moron.
Worse: its defamation per se, which (if memory serves) is deemed harmful to reputation and opens you up to punitive damages.
Part of being “committed to protecting free speech on campus” is the expectation that members of the community are going to be fucking adults about it.
The “free trauma counseling” is evidence that the administration has no such expectation.
Organizers claimed the administration tied their hands, but offered no evidence that campus officials were anything but accommodating in the weeks leading up to the event.
https://milo.yiannopoulos.net/2017/09/redacted-emails-from-berkeley-prove-the-school-is-lying/
^ that took me seconds to find. not minutes. seconds.
This is the guy who thinks that Donald Trump’s idea of trade protectionism is some kind of magical, terrifying unknown that has never happened in American history. Research is not something Rico is competent at, or probably even knows how to do.
The worse part about Soave is that he is literally a useful idiot. He’ll excuse away left-wing violence and censorship, because he definitely wants to be ‘cool’ and ‘woke’. But, because he occasionally goes against the grain (just barely against the grain), people who actually advocate for free speech (like the people at Spiked) invite him to speak on their lecture series (along with fellow useful idiot ENB).
I’m just going to state what is embarrassingly obvious: mainstream conservative voices are now better defenders of ‘free speech’ than mainstream libertarian voices. That is fucking ridiculous.
I dont consider the cosmo types crowd mainstream libertarian. They are exactly as you describe Soave.
Looking for such a creature, yeah, you would have better luck with the constitutional conservative crowd or…god forbid, around here. None of the people I consider true libertarians call themselves such.
I found the official Glib transport.
It does raise the question: what would a hearse need a wood chipper for?
Spreading the mulch?
“I am a city person now and like it that way, so I won’t go back to live in the country anytime soon. The trade-offs are not worth it. ”
Since we need more like you Pie I am gonna plant this seed in your head: You can have all of that ( I grew up the same way but with flush toilets and access to guns) and still have your city amenities. Rural life in America has electricity, running water and CARS. A thirty minute drive and I have access to any fancy goods I want. A thirty minute drive home and I can shoot guns in my yard, hear no traffic – just the wind in the trees, or fish in the bayou. Deer season is approaching and if I want I can walk 100 yards from my house and harvest deer – then walk 100 yards back for fresh hot coffee and a hot shower. The same for ducks. I have what I consider to be a rather nice house and I cant even see my neighbors houses from here. The closest inhabitants are cattle half of a mile away and across the bayou. On top of that this parish has some rather good schools and school bus service for the whole parish.
There is no trade-off here.
Oh, that reminds me – and recommendations of things to see when I visit Louisiana?
Which part? Where will you be?
I am in the midst of planning the road trip. The turn-around point was New Orleans, but the northbound route goes more through much of the state. Nothing have really been fixed yet.
Turning around coming from east or west? The best restaurants are in Lafayette.
Truth is there isnt that much to see in Louisiana. Old plantation tours and some swamp tours etc.
Hunting and fishing is good, food is good, but for brief visits to see spectacular stuff, not so much. It really requires an extended stay.
If you like beer, UCS, Parish Brewing in Broussard (suburb of Lafayette) is excellent. Ghost in The Machine, their DIPA, gets all the accolades, but I actually think their American Wheat Ale, Canebrake, is superior.
That’s my FIL’s place to a tee. He’s got a stocked pond and can shoot in his yard without bothering anybody, but he’s probably no more than fifteen minutes away from town and has city water. His Internet access sucks–he’s on satellite via DirectTV–but I think that’s more a function of his not really caring much about good broadband than lack of access.
But can you rurals get Mexican ass sex 24/7?
Depends on where you are. Around a small town called Forest Hill there are lots of Mexicans in the nursery industry.
Deer season is approaching and if I want I can walk 100 yards from my house and harvest deer – then walk 100 yards back for fresh hot coffee and a hot shower.
Well, you’re lucky. The deer in our neck of the woods are smart enough to know when hunting season begins and make themselves scarce. We have a good friend of the family who comes up with his son to hunt on our land quite a bit during hunting season, and I can’t remember when the last time is he got a deer.
Deer season is approaching and if I want I can walk 100 yards from my house and harvest deer
That far?
When I started deer hunting in rural Wisconsin (also, 30 minutes from Capitol Square in Madison), I shot my first deer while standing on my back porch. On opening day.
The next year, I shot a deer, went to a UW football game (the Badgers beat Iowa, if memory serves), and got laid, all on the same day.
I could just lean out of the window and consign the buggers to eternal sleep and a quick trip to the crock pot but someone would call the gendarmes on me and I’d be taking a trip up the river toute de suite 🙁
OK Glibs. I need advice.
I *tried* to order a new S&W Model 66 recently. Turns out that the lead time on one is ridiculous, but since I’m getting a sweet discount from S&W, I can buy a Performance Center gun for the same price a lowly standard retail purchaser can get a normal 66. So, I have a choice, given that I want to be .357 magnum capable (but most of the time I’ll be shooting .38).
I can go for this:
Performance Center Model 686
Or this: PERFORMANCE CENTER® PRO SERIES® MODEL 686 PLUS
or the one in the linked posting.
I like 7 rounds, but 6 is OK. I like a 4″ barrel, but an inch either way is OK. This is a gun for fun, not a gun for work.
Or this: PERFORMANCE CENTER® PRO SERIES® MODEL 686 SSR
686 PLUS. The all-caps makes it ZARDOZ approved.
The first one, while not saying it’s a plus, is actually 7 rounds.
They’re all ZARDOZ-worthy, really, even if they aren’t a Webley-Fosbery
Well, the gun is good, even if it is a Smith and Wesson.
If it’s for just for shiggles and you never plan on having to realistically carry it, I always go for the larger capacity and longer barrel. Those can be a liability in concealing a wheel gun, but if you won’t be doing that is rather have the extra rounds and the boost to power and accuracy from the longer barrel.
What are you using it for? If you want to CC it then the snubnose is the only option (I have CC’d a 7 round 357 and while doable is not terribly fun). If you want to OC it then the 4″ model looks good. If you’re thinking about hunting I would do the 5″ barrel.
This is a toy. After the initial excitement, it’ll probably get used at the club when I do ‘Personal Protection Activity’ (basically, experienced regulars doing combat shooting drills) and when I need to train someone on revolver.
If it has more than 50 rounds of 357 put thru it in a year and more than a couple hundred of 38, I’ll be surprised
It looks like the only one that’s a Performance Center, and not a Pro Series bridge line, is the 2.5 inch one. I’ve no idea if the Pro Series (which I infer is somewhat new) will have the acclaim (and hold the value) that the PC stuff does. Also, it looks like the only one of the three that gets any lockwork played with is the PC one. So, though I prefer shooting with a 4 inch vs a 2.5 if I’m using irons, I’d get the PC shorty.
I will say that short barreled .357s are kind of a waste of time. The cartridge really needs a longer barrel to build up a good head of steam. But .38s are still fun, and probably just as effective, Messrs Marshall and Sanow aside.
The cylinder is stronger in the 7 round 686+. Not Ruger GP100 strong, but it’ll handle it better than a 6 shot. It sounds counterintuitive but it has something to do with the way the locking mechanism is offset in the “meatier” space between the cylinders in the 7 shot rather than aligned in the 6 shot. 7 shot speed loaders are also available in convenient enough quantity that it shouldn’t affect your decision. The L-frame 686+ would likely soak up more recoil than the K frame 66.
I know I’m not helping.
Helpful enough. I have to make sure I’m L-frame compatible, but at 6ft 3in with big hands, yeah, I think a L-frame is likely to be a better fit
Yeah, go with the 7-round model.
Sounds like you’re suited to handle the N-frame. This beast holds 8. I’ve only seen it in the wild once though, so I imagine they aren’t easy to find. Same price as the 686 SSR.
http://www.smith-wesson.com/firearms/performance-center-pro-series-model-627
Like I say, because this is being purchased direct from S&W, the warehouse situation might be different from what the normal distribution network sees.
I do doubt they have warehouses full of them though, unless Saruman just placed an order for his Uruk hai.
that wood grip is a beaut.
I like the unfluted cylinder too.
The 66 has the standard barrel, the 686 the full lug barrel. I have the 586 ( same gun in blue ) and a model 19 ( blue and identical to the 66 ).
I can hit much better with the 586 as the full lug helps dampen the recoil. The standard barrel model feels better in my hand and is very well balanced but with the heavy barrel model I can fire rapidly and accurately.
The seven round model is a larger frame, a bit chunkier in your hand but still nice. I have never shot one so cant really say on it. I have a bunch of large frame smiths but in larger calibers.
For pure fun it is hard to beat a good single action pistol in 45lc – just tossing that in.
You are buying a smith and wesson revolver. You cant really go wrong with any of those choices.
I figured as I get a discount, I can get a performance center which will be as nice as a minty fresh unshot 1970’s S&W for the same price as a non-discount ‘standard production’ gun.
My ideal would be a performance center 66, but they only do the 66 as a standard model.
Looking at the performance center stuff now…
You are a big guy, big hands…I think Mex Sharpy is right. The larger frame with a 6+ barrel you would find comfortable and the recoil pretty tame. Ever shoot pistols long range? You would be amazed at how far you can hit with a good revolver and that one is perfect for that sort of thing. .357 shoots pretty flat and far. Good for just plinking too. That’s a fun gun. You can never wear it out. I have a 32-20 K-frame that my great uncle carried in the moonshine wars in the early ’20s. It’s in good shape and shoots like brand new.
“Of course, a child’s real liberty is quite restricted. But the reason this is–their immature mind–is the reason they don’t care about the adult stuff–entering contracts, for example. They, of course, can have a temper tantrum when the freedom they care about–let’s say drawing on a wall–is infringed.”
It doesn’t take long to figure out this is why Democrats want 7 year olds to be able to vote. They’ll promise all the free wall drawing any kid wants in exchange for their vote.
Summers in Manhattan Beach-
Ages 10-15:
Lifeguard training camp from 7am to noon. Be a kid at the beach until dinner. Go home and eat 6000 calories.
Ages 16+
Get a goddamn job.
In california I imagine you have to start the job search at 16 because once you fill out all the necessary paperwork and make it through the red tape you’ll probably already be 18.
Don’t be absurd.
It takes until you’re 26.
And by that time, Republicans will have killed you through lack of healthcare.
I had a pretty sweet gig waiting tables at a fancy Italian place 5 nights a week. It came out to over 20 bucks an hour (1995 dollars) and it was mostly (unreported) tips. Plus, plenty of free pizza.
On at 5pm, off at 10.
It was pretty much the perfect summer job.
From about 1993-1995 (long before the nationwide domination of places like Whole Foods) I worked for a small “gourmet” grocery store. Pretty much a jack-of-all-trades. Stocked shelves, bagged groceries and carried them out, cleaned up after closing (which was at 7). Made like $7 an hour, but the customers had more money than sense, so I’d usually double my income in tips.
And around Thanksgiving and Christmas I’d be getting $20 and $50 and $100 tips just because.
Summer job + weekends + after school.
Do kids have any sort of shot at working nowadays?
Yeah, but the number of opportunities have fallen.
The town I live in is pretty snobby, so the high school girls all fight over the 4 or 5 vacancies at places like American Apparel and Sephora. The smart kids chase jobs like usher at a local art museum’s movie theater, and doing office admin at the local funeral parlor.
The eternal opportunity of lifeguard awaits any kids who are motivated enough to do a very time consuming course before they can get paid, and there’s always checkout/bagging at local stores, but the hours tend to be patchy, fitting in around the at-will hourly staff that works there all year-round.
” The collapse of communism was chaotic for most Romanians, but as a child, I was insulated from most of the worst stuff. It never touched me; I didn’t even realize a lot of it, beyond the sudden availability of a bounty of goods to buy”
Unpossible! That must have been state capitalism!
Good article, Pie. Did you kids ever run into any vampires? Had to ask.
Good analogy of the left being children – wanting security for free and live without the responsibilities. They want their cake and eat it too.
Nice write up.
A child, as long as he is not an orphan toiling away polishing monocles, sees life–and freedom–as doing as much of what he likes as possible.
Are you trying to tell me that my orphans don’t like polishing monocles?!?
What he’s saying is that it doesn’t matter what the Orphans like, Mr. Brooks.
A child, as long as he is not an orphan toiling away polishing monocles, sees life–and freedom–as doing as much of what he likes as possible.
I’m not sure that isn’t a bad approach for adults, either. Provided, of course, your view of “doing what you like” isn’t limited solely to hedonistic impulses, but is, for lack of a better word, a more mature view that takes into account the long term and discharging duties voluntarily undertaken.
Great stuff thanks for the contribution.
Note on your observation that a child’s family creates the perfect socialist environment: I’ve often thought the same thing, agreeing with your observation that the ardent Leftist really does have quite a childish view of reality. In their case, they’d like the government to take on the role that Mommy and Daddy had when they were a child. They want to experience that utter freedom from responsibility they had as a child.
What most people don’t understand is that freedom from responsibility is not only impossible, but that even if it were, it’s no freedom at all. Responsibility is inseparably intertwined with true expression of free will. Actions have consequences and accepting responsibility for those consequences is part and parcel of living a fully developed and actualized existence. Progs’ rejection of logic in favor of emotion simply a reflection of this childish understanding of reality; they truly are in a state of arrested development.
According to Locke, natural rights go hand-in-hand with natural laws.
Responsibility is inseparably intertwined with true expression of free will. Actions have consequences and accepting responsibility for those consequences is part and parcel of living a fully developed and actualized existence.
This.
Hey glibs,
I had a phone interview with a small software company today and fell flat on my face during the technical interview.
Last year, I went through a year long coding bootcamp (evenings) for full stack development while working my day job. After graduating in January, I got a bit complicit in my routine despite being a bit miserable and didn’t make any major job searching moves until now.
The interviewers asked mostly for a lot of what I assume should be basic technical terms for OOP programming (since they are a JAVA shop). I wasn’t very prepared for this kind of interview and need to brush up on my tech-speak while continuing my search. Does anyone recommend a good resource or book that would help?
Here is a book.
Get immersed in doing some simple coding in your target languages – because after using words like inheritance, polymorphism and typecasting, you’ll probably end up having to demonstrate that you understand them by writing or critiquing some real code.
I dunno which full stacks you worked with, but chances are none of them used Java to any extent, so in the specific case of the interview you just had, you’d have been winging it anyway.