My friend told me about a new used car dealership that opened up in town over by the railroad tracks. The owner decided he’d revolutionize the used car industry by offering cars at their true market value plus a 5% bump for overhead and salary. He’d make up for the lower margins with volume.
I strolled into his lot and started kicking tires. A 2009 Honda Fit caught my eye. 17K miles and the body looked perfect. “Why don’t you take it for a spin?” the owner asked as he flipped me the keys. It had responsive steering, supple brakes and decent power for such a small engine. “We’ve checked around and this model with this mileage and condition goes for $7,200, so we’re offering it for $7,530.”
I stood there thinking about it for a long while. I had only $7,100 to spend. Of course, I needed the car for work and my job was essential to put food on the table, so I knocked $200 off his price in my head. Being a woman, it was obvious that I could be raped walking around at night, so I sliced another $300 of the price. Really, how much would it cost society to deal with another rape? And, isn’t this owner part of the raping gender? Also, I’m nearing fifty years old, so I’ll need money for retirement. If I don’t have enough for my old age, I’ll be a burden on society. I knocked another $500 off his price. Raised by a single mother: $600. Genetically prone to obesity: $450. Lesbian experience in college: $150. Bad teeth, left handed, bad at math, more than five vowels in my last name. The numbers were flashing through my head like John Nash working on differential geometry.
Finally, I had my answer. “I’ll take the car. According to my calculations, you owe me the car and $2,600.” As I listed my deductions, the left side of the dealer’s face started twitching. When I reeled off the last deduction, he reached out his shaking arm and handed me the title.
. . .
She pulled out of the dealership in the purple Honda Fit and turned up the song that came on the radio. She had loved Alanis Morissette ever since she had heard it playing in the background while eating out her college roommate. She looked in the rear view mirror and saw the dealer waving good bye, some pinkish liquid running down his forearm. She thrust her arm out the window and flipped him off. “Fuck your white patriarchy!” she yelled and stomped on the gas.
. . .
BAAAAAAAM! “Hey, Boss. What was that?” the young mechanic shouted from the Fiat he was under. “No problem, kid. Just means the train was on time.” He started wiping off the brake fluid on his arm, proud of himself for not mansplaining to the lady that brake lines were bad.
We’re going to hell, aren’t we?
Eh, maybe it’s not worth believing in a God that is totes cool with intersectionality
Is a Jewish carpenter a diversity hire?
Not in ancient Judea. That would probably be a Samaritan
“He was a good Samaritan, if you can imagine such a thing.”
I thought we had arrived?
….this isn’t where I parked my libertarian moment!
“Lesbian experience in college: $150.”
I’m just going to say what everyone is thinking: one single lesbian experience in college does not grant you victim points. She probably just did it to impress guys, thus -200 points for appeasing the patriarchy.
http://www.kabc.com/2017/11/16/leeann-tweeden-on-senator-al-franken/
Also, Al Franken is the Nick Gillespie of sexual assault. There’s a freaking picture incriminating him.
Did he wear a leather jacket while doing it?
Again, I’m using the more common definition of ‘Nick Gillespie’. From Merriam-Webster:
Nick Gillespie (adj.)
(1) an object or person that is lame or pathetic
(2) an object or person that is leather clad and douchy
(3) an older person that refuses to age gracefully
Eg: Everyone in the meeting agreed that Tom was the Nick Gillespie of the company after he failed to meet his sale projections for the third quarter in a row.
Tell us how you really feel about Gillespie. Don’t hold back. Hahaha.
I only say things that I find amusing. And this amuses me. Ha
You’re just jealous of his salary.
Well, yeah. You got to be making some boku bucks to own both a formal wear and leisure wear leather jacket for each day of the week
I think JS is making a joke because a little while ago he was taken aback by his comment comparing someone to Gillespie being interpreted as an insult by other commenters. He was amused that everyone who replied took his comparison as an insult and has been running with it ever since.
You, my friend, are a genius.
“Make ‘Nick Gillespie’ An Insult Again!”
And I am going to continue to make my lame (gillespie?) jacket joke every time.
Does Gillespie wear The Jacket, or does The Jacket wear Gillespie?
Has anyone ever seen gillespie without the jacket?
Exactly.
Better question: has anyone ever seen Gillespie without the amazing head of legoman hair?
The Jacket and the Hair. Paging SugarFree
Legoman Hair, Perfect!
Here He is for sale!
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Lego-Leather-Jacket-Minifigure-Man-x-1-Black-Hair-Lego-Minifig-/381964758832
I’m not saying you have an obsession. …
Come on- it’s funny.
Agreed. And gillespi is a douche.
Just Say’n – Jacket
Thanks for the detailed explanation.
Franken is photographed sexually assaulting a woman . . on a military aircraft . . with the photo most likely being taken by a military photographer . . with at least one other witness in the photograph.
So federal jurisdiction and federal crime and federal prison, right?
“We could find no evidence that Franken intended to grope her, and no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case. Not guilty.”
The jacket always gets permission to be a homewrecker.
What lesbian experience?
Nick Gillespie clicked on to Glibertarians.com
Nick: Let’s see what alt-right nonsense they’ve got up here
*reads a couple articles*
Nick: Don’t see any mention of the impending ‘Libertarian Moment’. What a bunch of jackasses
*clicks on most recent article*
Nick: How is it ‘libertarian’ to be opposed to intersectionality?
*begins reading comment section*
Nick: Motherfu….
*clenches fist*
Nick: YES I WEAR OTHER THINGS BESIDES THE LEATHER JACKET
*continues reading*
Nick: Why would there be a Merriam-Webster entry about me? Sonofa…
*pounds desk*
Nick: I am not the Nick Gillespie of libertarianism! *Pauses* Fuck these guys
*angrily closes website*
Made me laugh picturing Nick doing that.
I LOL’ed like a motherfucker! Well done.
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2017/11/al_franken_should_resign_immediately.html
Yes!!!!
Perfect timing. My supply of liberal tears was starting to run low.
And will there be an ounce of reflection about what a loathsome tosser he was toward Willett?
And to think, a few short weeks ago there were progressives putting him forward as their next Presidential candidate
If this #meetoo shit takes him down I will dance a fucking jig.
I’m just hoping there will be a made-for-TV movie about the incident. Then I’ll know how to feel.
I’m going to OT here cause that’s how I roll.
See if you can spot all of the logical fallacies!
Does Increased Gun Ownership Help Decrease Crime?
The answer will
notsurprise you!Best line in the article:
PAY NO ATTENTION TO THE PROGS BEHIND THE CURTAIN!
“We’ll never know whether Willeford’s shots prevented the gunman from harming more people, ”
This guy seems impartial.
SIEGEL (in my head): Does your cavalier use of synthetic control groups discredit your research?
Oh Robert Siegel, we will never tire of you saying “now, remind us…”
I think someone said it best about feminists that they want the equality without any of the responsibilities or consequences.
And I wanted to post something that an acquaintance wrote in response to the proposal that we raise the smoking age:
“When there are social problems that exist in this country, we as a collective can brainstorm solutions. In essence, we have the freedom to guide decision making for positive outcomes for society as a whole. This is not some on high declaration from big government types that try to tell you what is good for you. Science can determine the effects of certain actions. Reading the science and recognizing the impacts of actions on other things, such as healthcare costs, these elected representatives have decided being proactive on a health issue. This actually makes sense when talking about a young population in transition from childhood to adulthood, especially when addiction, and physiological/brain development are involved.”
Continued:
“I am curious about, from a libertarian point of view, is the preference for one view of freedom over another. I think I would be able to make more free choices if healthcare costs were lower, and I think healthier people have more liberty. This could mean regulating consumption of proven hazardous activities in society (and positively impact communal and individual liberty). A simplistic view in this case would be lower costs in our current insurance based health system (and associated positive health effects) vs. 3 fewer years to smoke. Which is really the more liberty inspiring action? My view in this case would be regulation actually increases liberty. Sometimes “big government” regulation actually can result in greater freedom, just in a different way.
Do these actions align with other limitations, like driving or military service? Maybe or maybe not, but that could also mean we reevaluate those relatively arbitrary ages for those activities and root policy in evidence based decision methods.”
No, it’s straight up mob rule, the tyranny of the majority.
Ask him how he feels about “society” deciding that homosexuality leads to more bad outcomes than heterosexuality and outlawing it as a result.
I like the unsupported assumptions that government health insurance means you will be healthier, and also that government involvement means lower costs, in spite of ample evidence to the contrary. Among other ridiculous premises, like you are freer if you are prohibited from making choices someone else would consider wrong. Maybe smokers are willing to trade some theoretical years of life in exchange for the pleasure they get from smoking? Who are you to tell them the can not?
Fuck off slaver.
This point doesn’t compute with progs. It’s similar to the argument that some women just might actually want to sell sex in return for money. In the prog mind, the citizen simply just doesn’t know what’s good for them. They would never even consider doing that themselves, so the citizen must be getting exploited!
See, the next step is to outlaw cigarette smoking, sugar drinks, trans-fats, high sodium snacks, and eventually flirt with reinstating a limited alcohol prohibition (cocktails and fine wines such as to be found at Trader Joe’s exempted). Then we will see tremendous health savings.
and organic free range gluten-free fruit beer from whole foods.
This is how a lot of liberty has been eroded over the decades:
1. Get the government to fund something that sounds good on paper (if you think about it from a simplistic “good intentions” point of view, that is)
2. Complain that peoples’ choices are driving up the costs
3. Assert that the government has the authority to regulate those choices because they have been shown to increase the amount of money that the government must spend
This is particularly pernicious in regards to healthcare. When the government’s purse-strings are tied around every health decision, basically every area of your life is fair game for regulation.
Reinstate? What we have can only be described as limited alcohol prohibition now.
Ah, the oft-forgotten section 2 of Amendment XXI:
How about that person go live in a germ bubble and have 3 perfectly balanced meal shakes a day? Oh, and pistol whip him if he doesn’t do his full treadmill time twice a day.
It’s really for his own good, to make him more free.
That broccoli aint going to eat itself dammit!
won’t that end with only approved foods and exercise regimens?
That’s probably a best-case scenario.
I always try to bring in something that the control happy guys likes to do that is a little outside the norms. sports, drinking, cars, hair dye, tattoos. whatever. anything that could be turned against them.
make their argument right back at them replacing the activity with whatever they enjoy. now watch them contort to make sure that their pet hobby is “still ok”
Ironic speech? Manbuns? Double-hopped IPAs?
whatever it is they do. anything they might hold dear.
Sex? I hear it has a correlation with STDs, which drive up health costs and reduce quality of life.
Get thee to a nunnery!
Ah, the “slavery is freedom” argument.
You know what else makes people less healthy? Stress. You know what contributes to stress? Hearing offensive speech. Therefore, banning speech really makes everyone more free. Because science.
PS: This guy is a full on authoritarian, but i didn’t know how to respond to this word salad.
Snarkily reply that you think it’s an excellent idea, and that you are 100 % sure it will work because no age based prohibition on the consumption of substances has ever been flouted in the history of America.
Don’t answer and don’t bother. I doubt he’s truly interested in your point of view or wants any kind of meaningful debate. Conversations like this are best had in person where everyone has to be civil and do on-the-spot thinking without google. Facebook is no place for political discussion- no one is changing their minds and everyone is losing respect for each other.
I let him write his screeds on my page because like you said, this stuff is done better in person and also, he is a full on authoritarian. I remember getting him to admit after prodding that our rights are up for debate and can be changed if the majority decided it to be so. After that, I rarely discussed anything political with him.
So, he admits he doesn’t understand what rights really are. Yup, there is no basis for any kind of rational discussion with him.
This douche sounds like he is perfectly willing to make the rest of us give up our freedoms so he can have the illusion of security and a warm fuzzy feeling that his idiotic dogma makes him a good guy for doing this shit.
So your friend is Tony.
“There is nothing intelligent about the idea of a ‘smoking age’, Slaver.”
There’s almost nothing you can say. What he just wrote – to the extent we can understand righteous gibberish – taken to its logical end is plain old authoritarianism with personal agency completely stripped out.
‘Positive outcomes’. Oh shut up.
They sure know how to invent phrases to hate.
“You have just thought-exercised yourself to a position of greater ignorance.”
I think more men and women are catching onto this.
I think of a man and I take away reason and accountability.
First wave feminism was about according women additional rights but without the accompanying responsibilities.
Second wave feminism was about removing women’s existing responsibilities.
Third wave feminism is about assigning additional responsibility to men without any accompanying rights.
That about sums up the history of Feminism.
Very funny story.
we as a collective can brainstorm solutions.
Fuck you, and the broom you rode in on.
That caught my eye too. Are we some kind of hive mind now?
Resistance is futile!
I doubt he’s truly interested in your point of view or wants any kind of meaningful debate.
No nonconforming viewpoints, please, you’ll derail the collective’s train of thought. “We” is strictly code for “those of us who agree”.
Newsweek claiming the alt right is using false flags against antifa
I don’t know who to believe, so can we just kill them all?
Why the fuck would anyone need to use false flags against antifa?
While accepting the idea that people like Cernovich are loons who are making a lot of shit up, it’s not true that there is no connection between NAMBLA and antifa.
Meanwhile, sites like Slate and Salon openly advocated for more acceptance of pedophilia within the last few years…
Links? I usually avoid those sites as I lack Derptologist’s resistance to their content, sot his is news to me.
Behold!
Salon deleted theirs recently and blamed their previous ownership for allowing it.
https://www.redstate.com/streiff/2017/02/22/remember-salon-thought-pedophilia-next-big-trend/
I can’t find the Slate article I read a while back. But here they recently gave someone a platform to defend Spacey’s attraction to 14 year olds:
http://www.slate.com/blogs/outward/2017/11/01/how_calling_kevin_spacey_a_pedophile_hurts_the_gay_community.html
I’m sure their defense of Milo (who was, in fact, the ‘victim’) and Moore is coming swiftly.
So is right now the moment in time when everyone who has ever been molested goes public and confronts their attacker (real or imagined)?
Al Franken, this state Senator from OH, everyone within 50 miles of Hollywood, Roy Moore’s ladies…
I’m looking for some old ladies to dish on the Kennedys – or at least some more coverage on those who already did.
How they have not already set up a clinton victim memorial in DC is beyond me.
It’s the logical extension of #metoo-ism
It’s funny that a leftist nonsense meme is going to circle back and destroy Hollywood and DC.
You arrogant ass! You’ve killed US!
I’ve got it!
We’re going to kill a friend, Yevgeny. We’re going to kill Ramius.
We’ve got a little boomlet going on here in Colorado too…
http://www.denverpost.com/2017/11/15/paul-rosenthal-sexual-harassment-complaint/
Rosenthal did seem to like younger guys enough to seek out a handful of republican aides during one lobbyist event I remember. Impropriety under the golden dome is pretty normal. This just seems like bad flirting with a young staffer hoping for a political gig not actually telling him to fuck off. Funny thing is with campaign staff in particular these sorts of things go both ways. Overeager young hopefuls who want to climb the ladder can get rather inappropriate trying to entice their bosses too.
It was stupid what he did and shows he’s an idiot given his position (which further cements there’s no decorum among politicians) but sexual assault it ain’t.
Now I’m starting to worry for women who DID actually face sexual assault. They’re getting drowned out in this witch hunt because clearly the muckraking media is digging and digging hard.
What do you think about the allegations, if true, of him forcing his hot senator’s tongue down her throat?
Ewwww
That’s dicier but she should have kicked him in the nuts or slapped him and be done with it. He’s a jerk for having done it.
I guess how I understood sexual assault all these years was off.
The incident should have come out 10 years ago. #metoo
Yeah, that’s about right. This is what happens when people get brainwashed into this “rape culture” narrative. Now boorish behavior, or sometimes even behavior that used to be considered normal/acceptable is now rape/assault. Now every woman is a victim and every man is a predator.
Just goes to show, Harvey Silverglate was flat out wrong. It’s nearer 30 felonies a day.
Drudge is running the creeper groping Franken photo.
This one is going to be hard to put down the memory hole. The pic is just too much. I expect next time Franken runs it will be on billboards all over Minnesota.
I think they’re legitimately trolling us now.
The Secret Feminist History of Brown Paper Bags
The jokes write themselves!
I’m going to home and burn all of my plastic bags now. That’s the only intelligent response to that article.
This wasn’t humorous.
At all.
It was HI-LARIOUS!
How do you have time read this? Don’t you even work?
My orphan read it to me as I worked!
He’s deaf but he reads real good.
You taught your orphan to read? Do you even libertarian, brah?
“Oh Master Rufus, this was not a nice story! Was it true?’
‘Yes #462 it is. And if you over cook the pasta again I’d watch your back.’
Al-dente eh?!
*muppet lashes out*
He’s canadian. ’nuff said.
I think someone said it best about feminists that they want the equality without any of the responsibilities or consequences.
Really? I think they just want power. I think if they’d got all the equality while making others bear the responsibilities and consequences, they’d still make more demands.
This. “Equality” is just a rhetorical smokescreen the left uses to excuse its venal pursuit of self-interest
And they’ll eat and beat any woman who doesn’t fall in line.
Hey, Taylor Swift. Why won’t you be a good feminist and tell us why you won’t pick a side?
I thought they wanted a piece of pie
No. They want cake. They all want cake.
CakeInTheSky just don’t have the same ring to it but I’ll try
Brakes are patriarchy. Also it is sad for a glibetarians contributor to appropriate women and refer to themselves as one
Every person who claims to be a woman on a libertarian website needs to show pics or it didn’t happen.
dick pics that is
Is there any other kind?
Q hardest hit…
Franken is photographed sexually assaulting a woman . . on a military aircraft . . with the photo most likely being taken by a military photographer . . with at least one other witness in the photograph.
So federal jurisdiction and federal crime and federal prison, right?
You slay me.
on a military aircraft – was the aircraft doing a strafing run?
Booooooo!
I always offer to pay my whiote male debt to women by offering 10% discount on the regular price of a night of hot sex with me but I don’t get to many takers.
I usually give em a sliding discount based on age and appearance.
last few days while commenting on this fair blog I have been getting this shit several times
unused
The server encountered an internal error or misconfiguration and was unable to complete your request.
Please contact the server administrator, webmaster@glibertarians.com and inform them of the time the error occurred, and anything you might have done that may have caused the error.
More information about this error may be available in the server error log.
What gives?
I get that on occasion. I don’t know what causes it but clearing your cache and restarting your browser usually fixes it.
The site is trying to tell you that you are a closeted homosexual.
It all makes sense now
I don’t see a closet anywhere.
Closeted prog is more like it.
#METOO
It means you talk too much.
Oh yeah well your face is stupid
Thanks to your excellent article about Romanian candybar commercials, apparently a Romanian colleague of mine got me an unsolicited Rom bar. I am going to collect it tomorrow and indulge in mediocre candy much the way that I would with a Hershey’s chocolate bar or plain M&Ms.
Cool! It tastes better if you follow it with 50 ml of good Rum.
Is the effect the same as eating any generic candybar chased by 50ml of good rum?
only better cause it is romanian
Is 50ml half of the bottle or the whole bottle?
“only better cause it is Romanian”
The nougat was replaced by blood?
Whole bottle
^^^
Judge declares mistrial in Senator Bob Menendez federal corruption trial
Next time around the Prosecutor should talk more about his flights on the Lolita Express.
Looks like the judge checked his bank account this morning and the wire transfer went through.
Meh – he yelled at the Jurors to come to a verdict several times.
“What’s a verdict?”
-juror
Surprisingly, not the dumbest question asked by the jury in this case.
Sounds like a political holdout on the jury to me. I bet it comes down to one or two jurors and no more.
One of the jurors left to go on a cruise before the deliberations finished, and talked about what went on before the mistrial was declared. It was like 10-2 or 11-1 when she left.
Finally some good news.
These Cities May Be At Risk Of Drowning Due To Global Warming, According To NASA
Excuse me, I have several tons of coal I need to burn in an open pit.
Thank goodness we have NASA. How else would we ever know which cities were near an Ocean?
Stolen (with h/t)
NASA should stick to photographing Jupiter
I think they’re more interested in Uranus these days.
Hong Kong is extremely adept at civil engineering efforts. As a result, they could easily adapt. Who cares about those other cities anyway? Don’t cry for Dakar, they had it coming.
Yes, even if the AGW crap was true and the glaciers all melted, the cities would have no choice but to “drown” because seawalls and other engineering controls are impossible to build.
Indeed. Amsterdam is just a grand illusion.
cities next to the ocean could be under water if there is more water.
huh. the more you know.
meanwhile new orleans…
I’m 700 miles inland and surrounded by mountains. This is excellent news.
Let me know when real estate prices in those cities start dropping because of the global warming caused exodus.
Sounds like Buffet needs to raise insurance rates on his coastal buddies.
May be. Might be. Could be.
The latest ice age is ending. There is no ‘may be’ about it. Sea level will continue to rise just like it has been rising for the last 10,000 years.
I swear I’ve read this somewhere before. It’s the strangest feeling of Deja Vu. As long as the train wasn’t derailed or ended up on multiple tracks it’s probably fine.
^^^
Too late, the train left 20 seconds early.
Glibertarins.com news coverage of the event.
I want this guy for my PR team.
I’m a horrible person for laughing as hard as I did at that.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kx5WJjXmuQI
Sounds like a political holdout on the jury to me. I bet it comes down to one or two jurors and no more.
I can’t wait to see the smug interview on Rachel Maddow.
“Thank you for your service to the nation.”
*Just kidding- I’ll never see it.
wouldn’t it be crazy…
A Franken defender gets the vapors because she found some pictures of Leeann Tweeden wearing next to nothing (and looking smashing, naturally)
either you borked the link or they took the tweet down cause no pagey foundey
I was an “inappropriate and bullying” post, I’d guess. The censors took it down.
Oh man, I kill myself sometimes.
See? SEE?
They’re fair and impartial!
maybe this?
not sure, I’m not the edit fairy.
I would guess she pulled it down. Look at this hot mess.
LOL she’s an “author”
Looks like she’s one of the scriptwriters for Series 4 of Outlander
I hope the dialogue in Outlander is better than that.
I’ve not ‘consumed’ TV and shows for years, but Mrs#6 ends up hating herself for the dross her frailties cause her to consume.
Outlander is like “50 shades of Gray” meets “Poldark”. It’s full of gratuitous female-friendly soft porn, badly acted, making all the mistakes of fanfic-level time travel stories. The heroine has had more strange than Winston’s mom, most of it arising from really implausible plot. I can only imagine that the actress who plays her is actually some kind of sexual gymnast and her current squeeze has a lot of money to spend satisfying her banal desire to re-establish her fame.
On the upside, the footage shows Scotland in a far more appealing sequence of views than I remember whenever I’ve been there.
Transform it into Robert Muller slashfic and we have a winner!
I see a possible entrant for the Bulwer-Lytton Fiction Contest.
Must have been deleted because I got “That page does not exist”.
‘Twas. Here is the screenshot.
So, they have literally just gone to “She was asking for it”!
You must be pretty young. That was precisely the defense, when it was ever addressed, when people called out WJC in the 90’s.
The left has always been quite happy to slander women when it suited their agenda.
Monica was an obsessed stalker! She forced poor Bill into fucking her!
Slick Willy got all kinds of weird defenses for banging an intern.
“I think American women should be lining up with their presidential kneepads on to show their gratitude for keeping the theocracy off our backs.” -Time Magazine Reporter
“There were almost these sparks flying between them from that first moment when they saw each other.” -Law Professor
Oh, I well remember Slick Willy and Hillary’s war room to smear Bill’s accusers and contain his “bimbo eruptions”. I’m just surprised they’re still willing to go down the old “she was asking for it” road given the current atmosphere.
I’m just surprised they’re still willing to go down the old “she was asking for it” road given the current atmosphere.
Why wouldn’t they? Seriously, what is the downside. Do you think even the intersectional feminists are going to choke on this? Just a couple of days ago we were laughing at a feminist article about “Why we should believe sexual harassment accusations against conservatives more than against liberals”. You could tell these buffoons to march in the streets insisting that the height of women’s rights is to be forced to wear a tent over their bodies and on cue they’d be out there marching. Oh, wait, that precisely happened a couple of months ago. The atmosphere? These people believe what they’re told to believe. And they believe it as gospel.
It’s not victim blaming when they’re circling the wagons. Really if you think about it, Franken is the real victim for this slut luring him into that honey trap.
Yeah, how dare she fall asleep in front of Al Franken, when he knows there are breasts under that vest just screaming out for groping!!
When she fell asleep, they went all out of whack, and Al was just adjusting them.
He’s a white knight! Her breasts were not protected by the vest until he did some rearranging. He’s a hero to us all!
Hey, it’s all good. Franken released a statement saying thousands of taxpayer dollars should be spent investigating him, and that he is totes behind women’s rights ‘n shit.
I like the Right to Repair tag.
Hear the the bell, Stuart Smalley, it tolls for thee.
How long until they give Franken the Biden treatment of being a goofy uncle who sometimes gets a bit handsy, isn’t it so adorable?
You were groped by me, Al Franken.
https://mobile.twitter.com/MelMorgan1350/status/931221482671300609.
Interesting if true.
I’m not a supporter of the “first time is free” defense, but I’m quite prepared to believe that the most egregious perpetrators of this kind of behavior are serial offenders, simply because they weren’t slapped on the peepee when they did it. So it’s hardly surprising that a single public claim brings forth multiple additional claims.
Of course, the people who don’t get that tend to NOT get it because of their relative prominence in their field, so to that extent, they have genuine privilege, something we poor minions do not enjoy.
The only real solution here is for prosecutions to the fullest extent of the law, in tandem with a zero-tolerance policy for vexatious and false allegations. You have a real beef about the accused? Then suck it up and prosecute, but please ensure that you have credible evidence, because you’re in a court of law and perjury, no matter how well you think you are justified in punishing someone you don’t like, is itself a criminal offense.
Agreed. Unless the accusers have a press conference with Gloria Allred. Then it’s almost certainly fake.
I’d take it out of Allred’s hands. These would be criminal prosecutions via a DA, not civil actions. I’m not convinced she’d be halfway as useful as a prosecution resource with some punkass DA with a hard-on to burnish his political credentials.
Even if this were pursued with Allred taking the lead, I’d be happy to see the litigants hold press conferences and pursue a claim. The defendants for the first few cases are likely to be politicians and Hollywood panjandrams, and as Allred goes into a 3rd or 4th case, the public and likely the juries will have become quite skeptical of her ambulance-chasing schtick. Who knows, we might start seeing some high-profile jury nullificatons.
Then, litigants will stop using her in cases, Allred having burned thru’ her on-again, off-again 15 minutes of fame, and the process will become far less “Entertainment Today” and more like ‘normal’ court.
I’d hesitate to call her “clients” litigants.
Only some of these women are fame-whores. I suspect that a number of them have legitimate claims, although a skeptical yet naive person might wonder why it’s taken them (all) so long to speak out.
OT: FreedomToons: Gun Control w/ Piers and Cenk
I was not surprised to find out that the AK-15 and AR-47 are both actual products and as expected are niche variant rifles. Coincidentally both in 7.62×39.
Cenk also called for banning the AR-17 once.
which was a shotgun. a very rare one.
“First, they come for the boomstick owners, but I was not an owner of that model”
Bolt-action, too, the rarest of shotguns.
Posting this? This right here? It’s a macroaggression. You’re trying to give me a seizure from all the derp.
The Piers voice/disposition was not nearly saturated enough with incredulity, nor belligerence, no smug. C-
“Yo Adrian, I committed statutory rape”
http://www.dailywire.com/news/23670/sylvester-stallone-now-accused-sexual-assaulting-emily-zanotti
Stallone too? How hard is it to not sleep with teenagers when you’re in your 30’s? Come on
#metoo
Who would find this surprising?
Hey man, unlimited shrimp at Red Lobster!
And Over the Top‘s reign of terror continues….
Mel Gibson is going to be the cleanest guy in Hollywood.
“I will give my statement denying these accusations, but first, you will blow me.”
P.S. No jews
PPS – sugar tits are more than welcome, though
You forgot the brackets.
Should read:
No (((Jews)))
Edit fairy- please fix
But these ((())) are code for Jews. So writing (((Jews))) is basically calling them “Jews Jews”.
The most insidious of (((them)))
The really sad thing when I see that kind of thing in print I think of LISP.
… that was … well articulated and erudite …
I’ll stop now.
The secret double jew, true servant of the Illuminati.
Jewey Jews
I don’t think you people know what this means. No continuation of Rambo’s story. This whole thing has gone too far.
“It’s over, Johnny, it’s over.”
NOTHING IS OVER!
If a few sexual assaults are the eggs that have to broken for more John Rambo, that’s the price society is going to have to pay.
I think the idea of a movie about a covert rescue of a Vietnam vet from an assisted-living residence in Dubuque, from under the noses of a team of Langley-trained counterinsurgency specialists, might not gain much traction, despite the inevitable belief that John Rambo is just to frail, feeble and senile to infiltrate the kitchens thru’ the laundry chute.
That and Rambo retired to a small shack in SE Asia?
If they could roid Sylvester up to his ’80s glory days build he wouldn’t even feel that broken hip.
Of course, the twist to the story is that the guy he saves can’t even remember his own name.
They did that movie. Sorta.
That’s the one where Helen’s a sniper?
Yep.
I came here to rescue you from Rambo.
Richard Crenna, master of scenery chewing
I always enjoyed the fact that Richard Crenna had enough of a sense of humor (or needed the money badly enough) to spoof his own character n Hot Shots Part Deux
Really hard according to Dazed and Confused.
“”The following day, she approached Stallone for an autograph but met DeLuca, who gave her keys to a room on the hotel’s 27th floor.””
How hard is it for teen girls to not have sex with rich powerful movie stars? I will conduct some primary research and get back to you.
her claim is that she was just “innocently fucking sly stallone in his hotel room”, when sly suggested his bodyguard join in, and that she never said no and that he never even said anything coercive.
if she was victimized in any way, she’d have had a wonderful case to bring to a 1980s lawyer, who would have happily collected millions in hush-money for her.
And of course the lawyer would have to wear a white blazer with a t-shirt under it.
Sporting a man-perm while sniffing profusely.
Those were the days. Don’t forget to roll the sleeves up.
And shoulder pads like an NFL linebacker.
I am reminded of this sketch about 1980s ‘youth exploitation’
That was pretty good, I haven’t seen that one before.
I love how they keep replaying that dance in slow motion. Fucking kills me every time.
She went up to his hotel room. She never objected, even by her own account. She was actually approached by the police and refused to do file charges or make a report.
This one goes into the “regret-sex ain’t rape” bucket.
Scratch the “or make a report”. She did that, but didn’t file charges. Of course, its been a long time since a victim had to file charges in order for the prosecutor to indict.
Sorry, clicked before the followup:
In Nevada, sixteen is the age of consent. So, no statutory rape charges , only rape-rape. Based on her account, that would have been a losing case for the prosecutor.
The new Rambo movie is back on!
One of the reasons Trump won is because the Democratic Party is seen as being for extreme environmentalists, feminists, illegal aliens, LGBTQI+, BLM, government employee unions, et. al. If you’re not in one of those groups, then what does the Democratic Party have to offer you?
That hasn’t really changed since Trump was elected.
I’d expect the Democrats to make gains in the midterms–like every party out of the White House does in the middle of a new president’s term. But I don’t see the Democrats convincing the radical environmentalists, feminists, illegal alien interests, LGBTQI+, BLM, or government employees to nominate someone who isn’t all about catering to their interests.
They can’t help themselves. That’s who they are. That’s what they do.
They can’t even bring themselves to put the pig in a dress. They still think America still wants a pig. America sent about the ugliest president we’ve had since WWII to the White House instead of their favorite PC pig–in no small part because he wasn’t PC. You know what’s changed because of the revelations about Weinstein?
Nothing. Absolutely nothing.
You know what’s changed because of the revelations about Weinstein?
Nothing. Absolutely nothing.
I’m going to have to disagree with that. What has changed is that they no longer have the credible pretense that they aren’t as ugly as the ugliest president we’ve had since WWII. Pre-Weinstein, they made the case that Donald Trump was some unusually pernicious lady-groper. Post-Weinstein, it’s become clear that he would qualify in Democratic circles as “just one of the guys”.
There used to be this term people threw around–“jailbait”.
I bet I can think of a dozen known stars who had girlfriends under the age of 18–and everybody knew about it–off the top of my head.
Jerry Seinfeld, Ted Nugent, the lead singer of The Knack (Sharona), Kobe Bryant, Jimmy Page, Jerry Lee Lewis, . . .
When a 16 year old girl is on a mission to lose her virginity, you’re supposed to run like hell–but it’s not uncommon or unusual. My understanding is that the average girl loses her virginity at 16. Doesn’t that mean as many lose it at 15 as do at 17, 14 as do at 18, etc.? It isn’t surprising that they lose it with older guys–it’s probably common. Younger than 16, a lot of guys wouldn’t know what to do when it’s on or even when it’s on. It’s probably gonna be an older guy that does the deed, and girls that age were always more interested in older guys anyway.
The hot chicks in junior high wanted boyfriends in high school. The hot chicks in high school wanted someone in college.
You’re supposed to run away from jailbait. No question. But it doesn’t surprise me if rich and famous guys have to turn down jailbait more often than the rest of us.
Sexually provocative girls who are too young is a classic theme in Americana.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Where_Are_You_Going,_Where_Have_You_Been%3F
Back in the ’50s, they used to warn girls about being lured into “white slavery”.
Sex with late teen girls is wrong and should be illegal, but it isn’t extremely unusual or necessarily deviant. I’m starting to wonder if we’re inventing new forms of deviance to replace the old ones now that the old ones aren’t considered deviant anymore.
“Sex with late teen girls is wrong and should be illegal.” Assumes facts not in evidence – especially considering the thrust of the rest of your post.
http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2017/11/12/i-will-survive/
Justin Raimondo has been diagnosed with late stage cancer. Like him or not, the man has been a consistent critic of American interventionism and was a colleague of Murray Rothbard