It’s Wednesday Morning: Rechts oder Links?

Guess what day it is! GUESS WHAT DAY IT IS!!!

Well, no, it’s a day where (unusually) OMWC pinch-hits on links. I was tempted to make them all sports, but the Orioles are depressing me. So it will be the usual mixed bag, starting with…

Proof that Team Red is as worthless of a sack of shit as Team Blue.  Wouldn’t it be nice if there were some political party that would, I dunno, FOLLOW THE FUCKING CONSTITUTION?

And speaking of hilariously inept Team Blue, DWS is getting her floppy dugs caught in a wringer. Of course the reason given is “racism.” I’m not making that up. And of course, as always, she’ll skate and low level folks will get hypovehiculated. Which is totally different and not at all racism.

You have to wonder if the Iranians are risking encountering a US Navy captain who is a former MPS cop and is easily startled. They could become deceased. The passive voice in the headline is unintentionally funny.

OMWC predicts tomorrow’s headlines: Listeria Outbreak!

Peter North Hardest Hit.

 

 

Comments

536 responses to “It’s Wednesday Morning: Rechts oder Links?”

  1. Gray Ghost

    I’ll just repost what I put in the JewDay thread:

    So, I guess OCare repeal and replace got shot down last night? After Pence had to break a 50-50 tie to get debate on the bill to the floor? I guess you can add Cotton and Lee to Ken Shultz’s shit list.

    How hard is it to just send a repeal bill to the floor? Then worry about fixing problems with a subsequent bill?

    1. Devil’s Advocate, they are worried that a flat repeal can’t pass through reconsiliation.

      As myself, however, they’re just jellyfish.

      1. straffinrun

        A little hard on jellyfish, don’t you think?

        1. No. those poisonous, stinging, balls of snot can go fuck themselves.

          1. Gray Ghost

            +1 “This bright blue thing on the beach is neat. Wonder what it is…?”

            A memorable experience for three year old me.

          2. AlexinCT

            Jump into the loving embrace of a Man of war – by accident, I add – and spend a week in the hospital with serious burns, then come talk to me about what hell is.

          3. Gilmore

            come talk to me about what hell is.

            Buddy… I’ve seen bat mitzvahs that could scour a man’s soul and have him begging for death before the end

          4. straffinrun

            When was the last time a jellyfish had the power to revoke a terrible piece of legislation but refused?

          5. Have you never heard of the Diet of Medusozoa?

          6. straffinrun

            Turns you to stone or Jelly?

    2. Spartan Dad

      I think the straight repeal bill gets its vote today.

    3. Brett L

      Yeah. I think that the message might have gotten into whatever passes for a primordial brain of Senate leadership that they’re going to lose the Senate for sure when their constituency stays home or turns out to vote (against them) in the primaries. Put up a straight repeal vote it out. If it gets shot down by the Parliamentarian, you get to go back to your base and say, “we did what you asked and it didn’t work, give us 60”

      1. WTF

        Or, you know, use the Harry Reid option and shit-can the filibuster and pass it with 50 plus Pence.

    4. Suthenboy

      I should go talk to them about repealing Obumblecare. I bet I could even convince Schumer and Pelosi to vote for repeal.

    5. Hyperion

      Well, the Democrats in the GOP ‘COULD’ be primaried if their constituents would get some fucking ballz and do it. I don’t even blame the GOP, I blame voters. Get those fucking leftists out of the party and fix the damn problem.

    1. MikeS

      Guten morgen

  2. Rick C-137

    Concerning the sperm story, the reaction will go thusly…

    Something cuck, something something cuck, something.

    1. I’ve heard some arguments that it’s the result of the increased use of Soy Proteins in our diets.

      1. Rick C-137

        Interesting. The whole thing seems like a setup for a joke, but I suppose there are actual implications to it

      2. Old Man With Candy

        That doesn’t explain why there’s 2 billion Chinese.

        1. We’re using Soy differently. The way they’re processed in East Asia destroys the estrogen-imitators while we do not.

          1. Old Man With Candy

            Not so much; there’s a whole suite of phytoestrogens in soy products, and the Asian diet contains about a zillion forms of soy. Fermented soy products (e.g., tempeh, miso) are particularly rich in aglycone. See the excellent review by Heather Patisaul (doi 10.1016/j.yfrne.2010.03.003).

          2. Which is why so many Asian men can look like a woman with some makeup and a wig. /Thai Lady Boys

          3. It wasn’t my theory, but that does open the question of “Is there an Asian genetic factor that differentiates the way they react to it?”

            There would be precedent for a dietary differential in humans (see Adult Lactose Tolerance).

            Of course, this is still working off the hypothesis that soy is to blame.

      3. Brett L

        Or BPA! Or glyphosate! The chemical basis is always suspect, but maybe higher insulin rates (on average) are to blame.

        1. Old Man With Candy

          Global warming.

        2. You forgot the birth control pill casuing estrogenized waterways.

          Shit, with so many extra hormones running around, it’s no wonder we’ve developed dozens of new genders…

      4. Suthenboy

        Soy? No, avacados.

        1. commodious spittoon

          -2 āhuacatl

      5. Bob

        I wonder if it’s something simple like high body fat.

        1. Its all due to the easy access of porn. Men get rid,of their sperm more,often than they used to.

          1. But Enough About Me

            Did you insert the extra commas to indicate appropriate places to pause for a quick fap?

          2. It’s, hard, to, type, using, just, one’s, left, hand.

          3. JD

            I read that in Shatner’s voice.

  3. Rick C-137

    Britain following a path laid out by their brave French betters

    http://money.cnn.com/2017/07/26/news/uk-bans-gasoline-diesel-engines-2040/index.html

    1. Tundra

      Meeting the 2040 deadline will be a heavy lift. British demand for electric and fuel cell cars, as well as plug-in hybrids, grew 40% in 2015, but they still only accounted for less than 3% of the market.

      Stiff upper lip, chaps! Remember, Queen and Country!

      Fucking idiots.

      1. Rick C-137

        Somehow they figure that apeing the frogs is a good call, but just like Macron’s proposal, this one will never be fulfilled wither.

        1. AlexinCT

          I say follow thee money. Someone is going to get stinking rich peddling subpar product because government mandated it. Think of Solyndra or other such Obama era money pits that made some connected people rich, but screwed tax payers and consumers hard.

      2. I predict that a future parliment will very quietly slip a repeal clause in a longer bill and this will go away.

      3. Lachowsky

        Any mention of how they plan on generating all the extra electricity needed to charge all these new electric motors?

        1. They’ll put a windmill on top of every car so that it generates its own power as it drives! We’ll have perpetual motion! It’s Genius!

          1. Lachowsky

            https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=WhtKkl0L7Ek

            Windmills do not work that way.

          2. commodious spittoon

            We could get rid of runways by putting planes on giant treadmills for takeoff.

          3. ChipsnSalsa

            Love that idea!

        2. Magic?

          Nuclear power? *laughs*

        3. Tundra

          They will receive all the power they need from the orgasms of Gaia.

          1. Scruffy Nerfherder

            Just where is Gaia’s G-Spot?

            *asking for a friend*

          2. Rick C-137

            Atlantis?

          3. RBS

            Greensboro, NC.

        4. Pope Jimbo

          The math works out! (As long as you round off pi to 3).

          And why not round off pi too? That is just some stupid white man relic that makes math too fucking hard anyhow. And as has been proved now, laws of physics can be changed by the right bill passing through a legislature.

          1. AlexinCT

            They have been doing the same hoping to change the laws of economics for over a century, and have yet to give up on that..

        5. JW

          I swear to Zod, that about 3 or 4 years ago, there was a news story about massive brownouts in the UK for 2 summer afternoons, from heavy electrical demand on the grid and very slack wind, stalling the Magic Power Windmills.

          Damned if I can find it today. I swear that I wasn’t hallucinating that day!

          1. Winston got around to “correcting” it.

      4. thrakkorzog

        Lay back and think of England folks.

    2. Brett L

      Aren’t their truck drivers all Poles and former ‘Slovakians?

      1. Chipwooder

        From Soviet Yugoslavia, yep

  4. Gray Ghost

    Oh, and related to the IT staffer story, he’s out on bond with a GPS monitor. LOL.

    FTL:

    Bill Miller, spokesman for the US Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia, told TheDCNF that Awan “was arraigned today in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on one count of bank fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1344. He pled not guilty and was released pursuant to a high-intensity supervision program. The conditions of release are that he receive a GPS monitor, he abide by a curfew of 10 p.m. to 6 a.m., and that he not leave a 50-mile radius of his residence in Virginia. Awan was also ordered to turn over all of his passports.”

    So, how will Awan commit suicide, and when? Place your bets…

    1. He’ll commit suicide by JDAM.

    2. Brett L

      Wait, the dude literally tried to flee the country and you’re letting him out on bail?

      1. Chipwooder

        No flight risk at all

        1. AlexinCT

          Democrats need him to die or get away because he probably will embarrass and expose them if he actually has to tell a court what happened.

      2. Gray Ghost

        I know, isn’t it great?

        Assuming he still wants to leave, how hard would it be for him to go to the Pakistani consulate/embassy, get them to put the bracelet on something else, get new identity documents, and fly away?

        Or I guess TPTB are hoping that letting him run free will attract other people they may wish to talk to.

      3. stilljustcarol

        Probably easier for him to commit suicide if he’s not in jail.

      4. whiz

        They took away his passport.

        1. WTF

          Good thing they are impossible to fake.

        2. SP

          “Awan was also ordered to turn over all of his passports.”

          ALL of his passports. Sexism! I only get one!

          1. ChipsnSalsa

            Did he pinky swear that the ones turned in were “all of them”?

          2. JaimeRoberto

            And there’s no way he could get a new one at the Pakistani embassy.

    3. Suthenboy

      He will shoot himself in the back of the head. Twice.

    4. westernsloper

      I don’t think this one will commit suicide. My current working tin foil hat theory is they are blackmailing House D’s including Greasylocks Schultz, and they know his wife, who is sitting in Pakistan, will release everything that has been stolen should anything happen to him.

    5. thrakkorzog

      I’m still trying to figure WTF happened with this whole IT staff story.

      1. Gray Ghost

        AIUI, pretty much everything that went past DWS’s desk went through their hands. Also, didn’t they provide IT services to a bunch of other Congresscritters, including some on committees like Intel and Armed Services?

        That, and hilarity like giving root access to contractors in China, to the database that held the compiled SF-86 questionnaires, makes the handwringing over what Snowden and Manning revealed seem like much ado over nothing.

        Jeez, what other corrupt revelations are we going to discover about the Obama Administration?

    6. Drake

      Shot by a sniper robber while walking down the street, nothing stolen.

      1. AlexinCT

        Botched robbery attempt that resulted in a tragic death but nothing being taken, huh? Happens a lot to people that tick of demcorats…

        1. Waterfall Insurance

          It’s always suspicious when the Dems aren’t trying to take something.

      2. JD

        He’ll hang himself on Chester Bennington’s birthday.

    7. mexican sharpshooter

      So, how will Awan commit suicide, and when?

      Tomorrow afternoon he will eat at Chipotle.

  5. The 150 Worst Albums Made By MenTW: Jezebel

    That said, here is our canon of dread! We didn’t really need to acknowledge that, for every 150 great albums by women that get made, there are at least twice as many terrible ones made by men, but as a thought exercise it was fun to think about the male albums that I, and my coworkers at Jezebel and the wider net at Gizmodo Media Group, think are the shittiest. We didn’t provide blurbs because that would have required listening to this awful discography yet again. They’re in no particular order apart from the top 10 or so, which deserve more disdain from me, personally, than most. You might find your favorite group on here, but don’t feel offended. Taste is always subjective, and it’s 2017; everything is bound to be utterly stupid from here on out.

    10. Maná, Drama y Luz
    9. Eminem, Relapse
    8. Bruce Willis, The Return of Bruno
    7. Bob Dylan, Christmas in the Heart
    6. Kevin Federline, Playing With Fire
    5. Toby Keith, 35 MPH Town
    4. Chainsmokers, Memories… Do Not Open
    3. Lou Reed & Metallica, Lulu
    2. Lynyrd Skynyrd, The Last Rebel
    1. Kid Rock, Rock N Roll Jesus

    1. Rick C-137

      I only know some of these, but I would say anything by Bruce Willis is probably crap, along with k-fed. That’s almost a funny joke, if only it was just ribbing bad albums

      1. Gustave Lytton

        Judge for yourself.

        https://youtu.be/a3vMKSA0OKc

    2. Lachowsky

      It’s funny Jezebel is all of a sudden putting out a hit piece that has kid rock at the top of it. They gotta direct their base’s outrage at the right targets.

      1. leonadasiv

        Which is funny. “He’s a horrible artist, therefore we shouldn’t vote for him”. I know nothing about his proposed policies, but most sane people don’t care.

        1. leonadasiv

          *don’t care about your artistic talent when voting.

        2. The Last American Hero

          You know who else was a lousy artist?

          1. Jackson Pollack?

          2. commodious spittoon

            There is something pretty compelling about his work.

            It compels me to roll my eyes and move along.

    3. leonadasiv

      I guess there is no other reason Kid Rick is #1, none at all.

      1. one true athena

        Exactly, they totally didn’t start with the premise of “let’s put Kid Rock on the top of some List of Shitty Things” and then work their way back from that.

    4. Count Potato

      “104. The Beatles, Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band”

      SMDH

      I also wonder how many men are involved in “every 150 great albums by women that get made”.

      1. leonadasiv

        Anyone who has time to make a top/worst 150 list has way to much time on their hands.

        1. Scruffy Nerfherder

          Rolling Stone hardest hit

    5. Chipwooder

      Spiderland? Only one of the greatest indie albums ever. Yankee Hotel Foxtrot? I don’t even really like Wilco and I think it’s a very good album. Critics loved it. Kid A? AEnima?

      TWO NUNS AND A PACK MULE?? Woodchipper time, plain and simple. Wahhhhh, Steve Albini called his band Rapeman so we’ll stick an incredible album we’ve almost certainly never listened to on our shitty list.

      1. Chipwooder

        I mean, I hate myself for responding to trolling, but even as trolling fuck that cunt. I’m sure she’s one of those Jezzie writers who acts as if shitty dance pop Beyonce is the fucking equal of Mozart.

      2. Brett L

        Aenima? I’ll burn their fucking houses down. First of all, the sonic interludes that wove between tracks are fucking magic that there aren’t 150 albums in the world could match. Second, I count at least 4 solid hits on that album. Discounting HWP and Learn to Swim. They have gone too fucking far.

        1. Lachowsky

          Fuck smiley glad hands with hidden agendas, fuck these dysfunctional insecure actresses.

          Yeah one of my favorite albums of all time.

        2. bacon-magic

          Learn to swim Jezebitches.

        3. Jefe Hayek

          Tool. Man, I just don’t get their appeal. Talented musicians, to be sure, but their music is just…bleh. Overwrought lyrics to boot. To each his own, but hard pass from me

          1. Brett L

            Its okay that you’re broken.

          2. Lachowsky

            Sorry bro. Must be rough being lame.

          3. I stand with Jefe. ::glowering look::

          4. Jefe Hayek

            Thank you, Lord Humungus *thumbs up*

            Tool is the ultimate “you just don’t get it” band. Naw, I get it; they wank around on their instruments, think never subtle puns and allusions are ingenious, and generally give off a nor as smart as they think they are vibe.

            Mark Prindle sums it up nicely:

            America’s Tool is a much-respected heavy metal band containing such lasting figures as guitarist Adam Jones, extraordinarily gifted drummer Danny Carey, bassist Justin Chancellor (who replaced original bassist Paul Of’Love) and hilarious black comedian Maynard Keenan Wyans. The band plays a tremendously heavy, at times funky, at other times industrial, at most times boring set of up-down-up-down two- or three-chord combinations in most of their songs, but augments them with exceedingly tight rhythms, melodic vocals and lots of artsy quiet parts (so you have to keep turning your stereo volume up and down and up and down – almost as if you’re performing one of the band’s riffs!). Their lyrics are generally as negative as my assessment of their music, whether they be threatening rape or making bold, revolutionary statements like ‘Christianity is bad.’ I wouldn’t argue that the band “sucks out loud” — the music is far too taut, technical and well-performed for outright dismissal. I just personally can’t get into them because no matter how much concern and exertion the band and its producers put into the *sound* of each song, the riffs themselves seem to be based on a big block of air. In other words, if you sit down to play a Tool song on your acoustic guitar, you’ll more than likely find yourself (a) playing a mid-80s Megadeth-style bass line or (b) alternating between two or three tedious barre chords that are right next to each other. The band is too slow to kick ass and too melodically limited to excite my pleasure centers (which reminds me – Come excite your penis at Mark’s Pleasure Center!). They’re friends with the Melvins though and a couple of them love Neil Hamburger, so they can’t be all bad!

    6. The Last American Hero

      What, no mention of Dream Machine after those anti-Jezzi comments?

    7. Gilmore

      Women never make shitty music

      1. Sure they do…when they’re in love with some worthless man.

  6. Rick C-137

    The EU doing something sensible? Of course I’m sure there’s a pound of flesh to be had somewhere here.

    http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-40714946

  7. This body-positive artist draws plus-size women to teach his daughters confidence

    We love when men embrace body positivity with the same fervor as women, so when animator Pierre Rütz started posting sketches of plus-size women slaying, we couldn’t help but notice.

    The artist sketches body-positivity activists like Danielle Brooks and Ashley Graham, alongside model Iskra Lawrence, singer Niykee Heaton, and even a plus-size version of Wonder Woman.

    1. “Body Positivity” hurts the fatties it claims to be trying to help.

      Stop feeding your faces and start working out before you get too old to turn things around!

    2. “John walked through his apartment. Hanging on the walls was his treasured collection of fatty art work, which he had arm wrestled Marlon Brando to acquire.”

      1. AlexinCT

        Epic brah..

    3. TK

      I’ve been going out on regular dates with this chick that likes to send me articles about body positivity and posts from people on facebook telling people not to fat shame. She goes on and on ranting about how these people need to eat a fucking salad and do some cardio and they should stop teaching women that its okay to be fat.

      I sent her this article and her reaction was “Ew, body positivity so fucking annoying. Its not sexy”

      LOL

      1. Brett L

        As long as you didn’t meet her at the Anorexia/Bulimia recovery group, that’s great

        1. TK

          Na, she’s healthy. Got a slammin’ body. An enthusiastic participant in the patriarchy. She proudly accepts the label of shitlord, too.

          1. commodious spittoon

            When’s she moving down from Canada?

          2. TK

            Shes a home grown American country girl.

          3. bacon-magic

            Pics or it didn’t happen.

          4. Akira

            She proudly accepts the label of shitlord, too.

            Do we even want to know why you gave her that title?

      2. F. Stupidity Jr.

        they should stop teaching women that its okay to be fat.

        Well, it is okay. It’s not great, but it’s not inherently bad beyond the attendant health issues. I’m not talking about pretending that a pretty fat woman is 100% every bit as sexy, if not sexier, than Demi Lovato* – I’m saying that the anti-fat concern trollers are coming off like the healthier than thou assholes that used to badger smokers in the 1990s.

        I mean, whether I’m fat, a smoker, a drug user, a drinker – who gives a shit? But for some reason, fatties get the OMG YER HEALTH treatment more than other groups.

        * Best example I could think of, top of my head. I mean she’s hot, but surely I could have done better.

        1. I don’t care if you’re fat.

          I care if you’re annoying.

          After telling fat people they should be proud of their flab, “Body Positivity” activists ineivtably start trying to tell everyone else they should be attracted to landwhales as much as they are to healthy people. I don’t want to let them get to this stage, so I mock and deride them while still at the “it’s okay to be fat” stage.

        2. TK

          She’s not a anti-fat concern troll. She eats fast food occasionally. She’s a healthy weight and not obsessed with exercise but she does some light cardio. She’s just not okay with the whole “beautiful at every size” bullshit.

          Its more about these people that constantly feel the need to shout from the rooftops that being obese is not the obese person’s fault*, and in fact, its society’s fault and EVERYONE needs to conform and pat everyone else on the back and tell each other that they’re beautiful no matter how unhealthy they are.

          And I completely disagree on the whole smoker, drug user and drinkers not getting the “OMG YER HEALTH” treatment. They DO get this treatment. There are regulatory requirements for labeling cigarette packs, there is public funding for anti-drug programs schools crusade against all of these things for every kid during for 12+ years. Everyone says smoking is terrible for your health, and its very frowned upon now. Drug use is certainly frowned upon – we make people piss in a cup to get entry level jobs for christsakes. So I call bullshit on your point about that.

          Also, its not the drinkers, smokers and drug users out there pumping out articles about “don’t shame my drug use you shitty person” and “smoking is sexy at every stage of cancer, shitlord.” If they were, I’d be pissed about that too.

          1. TK

            *obviously there is tiny minority that actually have genetic and thyroid issues. That’s not who I’m talking about.

          2. F. Stupidity Jr.

            She’s not a anti-fat concern troll.

            Wasn’t saying she specifically was.

            EVERYONE needs to conform and pat everyone else on the back and tell each other that they’re beautiful no matter how unhealthy they are.

            That’s not good either. It’s almost as if there’s a middle ground between “Fat is awesome, everyone should do it!” and “Hit up a treadmill sometime, you fat fuck.”

            There are regulatory requirements for labeling cigarette packs, there is public funding for anti-drug programs schools crusade against all of these things for every kid during for 12+ years. Everyone says smoking is terrible for your health, and its very frowned upon now.

            I don’t deny that, but that stuff is institutionalized now because the shaming happened a long time ago. MADD and Partnership for a Drug-Free America was 1980’s stuff. Anti-smoking zealotry was huge in the 1990s. But fat-shaming seems to be on the rise.

            Also, its not the drinkers, smokers and drug users out there pumping out articles about “don’t shame my drug use you shitty person” and “smoking is sexy at every stage of cancer, shitlord.” If they were, I’d be pissed about that too.

            Maybe they should be. Maybe we were wrong to give people shit about their choices, even if those choices led to bad outcomes. I mean, sure – a close friend, a family member – you don’t want them to suffer and you’ll do whatever you can to help them. But badgering strangers (thanks, internet anonymity) is just stupid.

            Let’s say we MUST go to one extreme or the other: praise fatties for being themselves or browbeat them for being fat. I think the worst result from the first is a number of delusional people running around, thinking they all that. The worst result from the second is that the state has to step in to save people from themselves, and we’ve already seen that happen with other vices. I’ll get arrested for possessing drugs. If I want to smoke, I have to pay a fuckload in taxes and can basically only smoke in my own house. What’s the cover politicians are running for all these soda taxes that are gaining in popularity?

          3. TK

            There’s a big difference between (1) being bothered by people going out of their way to shame you for not praising someone for being fat and (2) advocating for state control/programs to try to force people to lose weight. I hope that you’re not saying that just because I’m expressing my opinion that this will be some sort of slippery slope to state power/control. That’s the sense I’m getting from you on this.

            I don’t think that anyone here is advocating for (2). Getting out there and randomly calling people on the street fat-asses is “fat-shaming” as you like to call it. It’s being a jerk and its not cool.

            However, if some fat person comes up to me on the street and calls me a shitty person for being willing to pay to see Jessica Alba naked but being revolted by the thought of seeing Rosie O’Donnell naked, then the proper response is ridicule. They’re free to write all the articles they want on it, and I’m free to tell them that I’ll never find big sexy, and that they need to eat a salad and get some exercise.

        3. John Titor

          As an ex-smoker I have absolutely zero sympathy for the fat acceptance people. It’s one thing if you’re just fat and don’t give a shit and have some people harassing you about it, in the same way just having a cigarette is fine. But smokers don’t go up to people and scream “HEY YOU NEED TO ACCEPT MY LIFE CHOICES AND ALSO I’M JUST AS HEALTHY AND WONDERFUL AS PEOPLE WHO DO TAKE CARE OF THEIR BODIES.’ ‘Fat acceptance’ actively promotes a hatred of fat people because their most vocal proponents just push people too far.

          1. ChipsnSalsa

            I saw getting after fat people to be the next socially acceptable thing to badger and coerce people about. Perhaps the no fat shaming crowd saw this writing on the wall and are trying to head it off at the pass.

          2. TK

            I seriously doubt that, Chips. These are the type of people that would like speech codes and would enjoy throwing people in jail for saying things that give them bad feelz.

    4. Scruffy Nerfherder

      I note that the body positive artist still requires his subjects to have a waist smaller than their chest.

      1. Right?! I dig on big girls from time to time, but there’s a difference between a big woman with attractive proportions and a fat slob. Body positivity seems to be a scam to convince the Honey Boo Boos of the world to not bother with getting a little bit of exercise and not eating like a teenager.

    5. WTF

      This body-positive artist draws plus-size women to teach his daughters confidence to be self-indulgent fatties.

  8. California May Let People Dissolve Their Corpses to Stop Climate Change

    According to Bay Area public radio station KQED, a “green alternative, known as water cremation, bio-cremation or flameless cremation” is becoming more popular:

    Basically, the body is dissolved in a hot chemical bath, leaving a sterile solution that can be flushed down the drain. The carbon footprint of this process is just a quarter of traditional fire cremation because it uses so much less energy; and only a sixth of a burial because it doesn’t require the materials for concrete headstones, mahogany caskets or the chemicals used in embalming.

    Dissolving the body also allows metals in the body to be recovered and recycled, and prevents possible toxins, such as the mercury in tooth fillings, from being released into the atmosphere.

    Funeral homes reportedly charge $150-$500 more for this liquid cremation process than for cremation using fire.

    You know who else had a problem with disposing of a large numbers of bodies…

    1. The Plague Doktors?

    2. Old Man With Candy

      The Clintons?

    3. Rick C-137

      Huh, any mention of the chemicals used in this process? I imagine this might be like electric cars, defer the icky stuff out of sight.

      1. Gray Ghost

        Thought it was an aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide, heated to something like 120 C (not sure if they actually get it to boiling or not) and retort for something like 18 hours. You end up with an organic soup and some spongy bone matter, plus whatever inorganics were in the corpse. Sift, throw the bone mush into a ball mill, and no more body.

        1. Grummun

          So they’re dissolving bodies in hot lye? Like lutefisk?

          1. Gray Ghost

            Yep, alkaline hydrolysis. See, e.g., this Atlas Obscura article. KOH at 300F+

          2. commodious spittoon

            Lutefisk is people!

        2. A Leap at the Wheel

          That doesn’t sound so bad to me at all. I’ve never been enamored with the idea of being preserved, put in a box, and then put in the ground and taking up what could be otherwise productive space. Didn’t bother me on a greenie feelz level, but as an engineer I abhor that kind of inefficiency. But my wife would much rather have a plot to come visit, so if I die first (I will), that’s what I’m going to get. Maybe I can see if there’s any legal (and safe) way to get burred under a tree or in a garden she can visit instead of a big dumb rock.

    4. Rick C-137

      Muhammad, PBUH?

    5. leonadasiv

      So I guess I’ll have to ship all my corpses to California…

      1. AlexinCT

        SOILENT GREEN!

    6. Gray Ghost

      You know who else had a problem with disposing of a large numbers of bodies…

      There’s a memorable passage in Richard Rhodes’s book, “Masters of Death,” where he recounts an instance where the Nazis tried a variant of that method.

      Unfortunately, they didn’t make sure the victims were dead first… Even the Nazis thought that method was too much, and no further attempts were recorded.

      A great, horrifying read.

      Closer to home, I’ve mentioned at TOS, the L.A. Times’s article on the Mexican gangland practitioner of that method, “El Pozolero.” So droll. Evidently it works very well.

    7. Scruffy Nerfherder

      So Walter White is running the morgues in California now?

    8. MikeS

      John Wayne Gacy?

    9. Warty, from his rape dungeon?

    10. Suthenboy

      “Funeral homes reportedly charge $150-$500 more”

      *facepalm*

      These idiots have no idea what money is. It’s a measure of expended resources.

      1. Holger-da-Dane

        Space+time is a resource?

    11. ChipsnSalsa

      Bricktop?

    12. Chipwooder

      Mistah Wu?

    13. mr simple

      The US before Obamacare?

    14. mexican sharpshooter

      This is retarded. I told my kids at the first sign of dementia they need to leave me out in the woods somewhere.

  9. “Mr. Trump kept up pressure on the Senate on Tuesday with Twitter posts.”

    Huh.

    I have the urge to both laugh and weep, for some reason.

  10. Scruffy Nerfherder

    SJWednesday: Save the Derp Edition

    Dear Everyday Feminism readers, we need your help.

    Our communities are being targeted and exploited more than ever by Trump and those like him — across the US and the world.

    Over the years, you’ve come to rely on Everyday Feminism to help you understand what’s happening and what you can do about it.

    Right now, it might feel like you need us even more than ever.

    But, like so much in our society right now, Everyday Feminism might not make it if our community of loyal readers doesn’t come together to support this important work.

    Across the media industry, dropping ad rates are wreaking havoc. Companies are being forced to lay people off and, sometimes, even shut down.

    We, too, faced this threat recently. We turned to our community with a #SaveEF Emergency May Booster Fund campaign. This campaign was intended to buy us time to figure out a plan to restore our financial stability.

    When we asked for your help, you showed up.

    You showed us how passionate you are about supporting Everyday Feminism, how deeply you believe in our work, and what a profound impact it’s had on your life. Because of your generous donations, we were able to pull through the last couple of months.

    And now, we’re fighting for the long haul. We’ve taken the time you bought us and have been looking ahead, dreaming, and working. We’re finally ready to take Everyday Feminism to the next level!

    Our new cultural campaigns will focus on key topics important to resisting oppression in this current political climate. We’re streamlining our educational model to give you a more comprehensive framework for fighting against injustice.

    But, in order to do this, we need your financial support.

    Unlike many other media sites, Everyday Feminism is led entirely by women of color and queer people of color, fairly compensates those who write for us, and is deeply committed to the personal and social liberation of all people.

    So we’re asking you — our loyal readers — to rally behind us once again so that we can back away from the continuous threat of shutting down and FINALLY become fully, financially sustainable.

    Being financially sustainable means you will continue getting the life-changing articles you’ve come to expect from us, without the worry of us disappearing – ever.

    As icing on the cake, it also means we’ll be able to go ad-free. That’s great, because we all hate ads!

    1. TL;DR – We don’t make content people want to read, so pay us for the virtue signal.

    2. Lachowsky

      They should see if the Koch brothers have any spare funds. It think it would be wonderful if the Koch brothers funded EF.

    3. Rick C-137

      So when they fold, they can blame TrumPutin and Milo, yeah? Can we take any credit?

      1. TK

        Half their views come from us.

        1. Rick C-137

          So at least 50%, I’ll take. We’re this close to a controlling share of damage done to EF

    4. Pomp

      Our communities are being targeted and exploited more than ever by Trump and those like him

      ,

      ::Koo-koo clock noises::

      1. TK

        This caught my eye too. Are they saying that their advertisers are Trump supporters which is causing their revenue to go down?

    5. Old Man With Candy

      fairly compensates those who write for us

      If the compensation were truly fair, they’d get revenue from people paying them to run their shitty articles.

      1. I don’t think you can get more fair than free trade. They must be talking about that other kind of “fair”, i.e. the one that pre-adolescent kids refer to when they want their parents to buy them something.

        1. AlexinCT

          The one where if you can’t have something you want, someone else – with these people usually government- takes it away from those that have it?

    6. WTF

      It still fascinates me that apparently large numbers of women in America actually believe they are oppressed. That level of cluelessness is astonishing.

      1. AlexinCT

        There is a ton of power in claiming victimhood in this country. Why would you not ride that bandwagon and profit from it if so encouraged?

        1. WTF

          Oh, I get that, of course. But a lot of these women seem to actually believe it to be true.

          1. AlexinCT

            I don’t know if they really believe it or want everyone else to believe they do. One of the most hardcore feminista types I had the misfortune of knowing always wanted everyone to know how independent and self sufficient she was as a single mom. That she was always wasting her money on crap, ignored her kids, and in general expected someone else to always do the heavy lifting or pick up the bill, was blatantly obvious, but she worked hard on making sure people believed that she believed she was a victim that was fighting the system.

            It’s easy to claim you are an independent and capable person when you expect daddy government to use tax payer money to protect you against your own dumb choices, actions, and the general calamities you attract by virtue of your own inability to accept you would never be able to make that work on your own.

    7. Rufus the Monocled

      And when they’re still around once Trump is no longer around it will be proof they were paranoid buffoons, right?

      1. AlexinCT

        No it will be proof they fought and beat the partiarchy!

    8. commodious spittoon

      Across the media industry, dropping ad rates are wreaking havoc. Companies are being forced to lay people off and, sometimes, even shut down.

      Ya know, it’s a bit like petro-states and low oil prices: it’s all upside.

    9. one true athena

      shorter: “we took the thousands of dollars you gave us and spent it on mani-pedis and mojitos and now we NEED MOAR $.” But a fool and her money, I guess, so you do you, feminists.

    1. Crimea River? Are we talking the Salhir, the Kacha, the Alma, or the Belbek?

      1. Rick C-137

        Which one would piss the russians off most? Lets go with that one.

    2. leonadasiv

      I was part of an S-corp and got a little screwed. My opinion: don’t form an S-corp if you can’t absolutely trust your business partner (and you can’t). But that’s just my experience.

    3. thrakkorzog

      Who could have guessed that leaving your wife for a hooker might have negative consequences?

      1. Badolph Hilter

        It does seem counter-intuitive.

      2. commodious spittoon

        In July 2016, Barbara Mikkelson sold her half of Bardav to these five men, leaving her ex-husband with five new partners in the company.

        I hear a couple dudes up in Canada got in trouble for that sort of thing.

    4. KibbledKristen

      The fucked up thing is that it was going around Facederp that it was the ISP holding the site hostage for no reason.

      Yeah, I’m not getting in the middle of some couple’s divorce dispute. Let Judge Judy handle that shizz.

    5. Vhyrus

      In the summer of that year, Bardav had entered into an agreement with a newish San Diego company called Proper Media to “provide content and website development services as well as advertising sales and trafficking” to Snopes.

      I read newish as newsish and almost spit my coffee.

  11. Scruffy Nerfherder

    SJWednesday: The Acronomicon Edition

    White people say the darndest things.

    And these days, many Black, Indigenous and People of Color (BIPOC), along with many White people, are in agreement that there are certain statements or ways of thinking that are classic evidence of a White person.

    1. Lachowsky

      Classic evidence of being a white person?

      Evidence, as in a crime?

      1. Scruffy Nerfherder

        The whole article is a treat.

        Even when we can acknowledge that colorism exists, us light-skinned and white-passing people of color have a hard time getting past the paralysis of guilt and shame over having benefits that we did not choose to receive.

        However, the failure of imagination that occurs when we let guilt and shame rule us prevents us from seeing the opportunities that come with occupying a place that is neither here nor there.

        1. Lachowsky

          That’s just fucking retarded

          1. WTF

            Seriously, how do you “have benefits” if you also “did not choose to receive” them?

      2. Scruffy Nerfherder

        Those with conditional white-passing privilege — which is when a BIPOC might be recognized as either White or BIPOC depending on context — may regard tanning as a way to feel closer to their community.

        When a light-skinned BIPOC’s skin is darker, they may be more recognizable to the communities they so desperately want to be accepted by.

        1. Look at me! I’m tanner in the summer so I’m closer to people of color! But once winter comes, I’m back to being ol’ whitey.

          1. Rick C-137

            You’re obviously abusing your privilege, shitlord. Report to the reeducation camp for reconditioning.

          2. Rick C-137

            Alternate Take: “I’m a transracial pioneer! Look at me!”

          3. WTF

            Trans-racial makes more sense than trans-sexual or trans-gender, since race is supposedly just a social construct but sex has a clear biological basis.

        2. It’s an imitation of life.

    2. straffinrun

      We don’t say BIPOC. We say “Not White”.

      1. I guess it’s better than “mud people”.

    3. Rick C-137

      BIPOC? Really? Really, that’s what they’re going with? Hokay.

      1. The language must churn before people can figure out they’re just talking racist bullshit, so the terminology changes almost daily.

        1. Scruffy Nerfherder

          How else can you be at the vanguard of a new science? New hypotheses and theories abound when all you have to do is invent a word!

          1. You test a hypothesis or Theory by attempting to disprove it.

            The drivel these people spew is intended to go unchallenged.

          2. Scruffy Nerfherder

            Well yeah, but SCIENCE!!!!

          3. WTF

            They FUCKING LOVE SCIENCE!

          4. AlexinCT

            CONSENSUS!

        2. Rick C-137

          +1 Latest Edition Newspeak Dictionary

    4. Scruffy Nerfherder

      Other musings from the same intellectual:

      WHAT IS WHITE RELATIONSHIP DIVESTMENT?

      In this context, divestment refers to the belief that our personal and professional relationships are any combination of the following types of investment: emotional, economic, energetic, spiritual, physical, intellectual. To engage in white relationship divestment is to consciously decrease or cease entering into emotional, economic, energetic, spiritual, physical and intellectual connections with individual white people and white-dominated organizations and institutions. Divestment efforts happen along a continuum that operates in conflict with white supremacy, a philosophy that insists that the needs and interests of white people be the priority in every thought and action that people of color (POC) carry out. When we fail to do so, we are given consequences. The most severe and violent punishments are acted out upon the bodies and lives of black people.

      Xe’s website is a treasure trove of derp.

      1. Scruffy Nerfherder

        Those of us who are able and willing to engage in various types of relationships with white people may actually have a responsibility to do so. I haven’t decided if that is 100% true yet, at least for myself. As a light-skinned, middle class, mixed Asian-appearing person who does not fear for my life on a daily basis, it is certainly my duty to tell people who are lighter/whiter than me to get their shit right for the benefit of myself and those darker than me. It follows then, that it makes sense for someone like me to selectively engage in mutually beneficial relationships with some white people and white-passing people of color in the interest of the collective well-being of me and mine. I’m not there yet right now though. Sorry. Working on it…

        I highly recommend that all people of color divest themselves of white relationships at some point in their lives. Or at least invest in creating and maintaining POC-only spaces, relationships and communities that are free from the influence of white people. I have never been more in love with myself and my peoples than when I realized that we are capable of doing anything and everything without the “help” or approval of white people. Perhaps you may think it is possible to have this sense of self-worth without divesting yourself from white relationships but I strongly beg to differ.

        Hopefully you will find resonance with my journey of white divestment. I manifest the day when autonomous communities of people of color flourish on this land once again and lead the path towards the Oneness and higher consciousness that pony-tailed new age white men play at on their fair trade yoga mats.

        1. Lachowsky

          “I have never been more in love with myself and my peoples than when I realized that we are capable of doing anything and everything without the “help” or approval of white people.”

          I can get on board with that. I think that we should end the welfare state too. It’s counterproductive.

          1. Heshe and his/her “peoples” would probably get a hell of a lot more done if they didn’t spend so much time contemplating the ethnic background of their navels and exploring new and complicated ways to categorize people based on skin tone.

          2. B.P.

            Does that mean she’ll be refusing the help of the American Colonization Society in relocating to Liberia?

        2. thrakkorzog

          Speaking as a white person, I fully support the author’s attempt to get avoid white people. it saves me from having to deal with at least one smug self-satisfied prick.

        3. TK

          LOL. All these people see is skin color, its hilarious. I really hope the left just moves further and further towards this line of thinking. This has to be completely unacceptable to 9 out of 10 people.

          I have no problem with these actual racists staying the fuck away from me.

          1. WTF

            This has to be completely unacceptable to 9 out of 10 people.

            When plainly stated, sure. That’s why they have to bury it in a word salad of jargon and nonsense.

          2. Microaggressor

            It’s not so easy to just come out and say “I support segregation”.

      2. Count Potato

        There already is a word for that, it’s called “self-segregation”.

      3. WTF

        So, basically, white relationship divestment means avoid certain people because of their skin color. Yeah, that’s not racist at all. MLK is spinning so hard in his grave he could power Manhattan.

      4. Microaggressor

        white supremacy, a philosophy that insists that the needs and interests of white people be the priority in every thought and action that people of color (POC) carry out

        Who needs accurate definitions when you can have paranoid conspiracy theories?

    5. Gilmore

      “”BIPOC””

      They’re already tired of “”poc””? Just when people started using it without air quotes

    6. Holger-da-Dane

      White people say the darndest things.

      And these days, many Black, Indigenous and People of Color (BIPOC), along with many White people, are in agreement that there are certain statements or ways of thinking that are classic evidence of a White person.

      I’d say that sentence is classic evidence of “BIPOC” people also saying the darndest things. YMMV.

  12. I listened,to Glenn Beck’s show on Sound cloud last night. He was extremely agitated about what the Senate was doing (this was before the vote to open debate, I think).

    He called for people to break away from their parties and form some sort of coalition to do…something…

    All I could think was, “There was this guy…Ron Paul was his name, I think, who was committed to Constitutionally limited government like Beck,says he wants, but during the two Presidential runs all Beck and his cronies could do is make fun of him. Not that an endorsement from Beck would have meant much to the Paul campaign. The fix was in at GOP HQ.

    1. westernsloper

      I listen to Beck on occasion if I am working in the shop and can hear the radio. He has had a bit of a transformation (so he claims) over the past few years. I would imagine he would back Ron Paul or someone like him now. Of the two constitutional small government types last go around on the R side, Rand or Cruz, he backed Cruz. I think he would have gotten behind GayJ but GayJ is not exactly a constitutionalist. I don’t know what Mr gay Nazi wedding cake is. Beck did interview all the L party candidates. They liked Austin Peterson the most.

      1. Jefe Hayek

        Beck is such a performance artist that I really don’t believe anything he says, ever.

    1. Stinky Wizzleteats

      Politically motivated psychological diagnoses are a cornerstone of the discipline. They shouldn’t be but they are.

      1. leonadasiv

        Are you saying, :gasp:, that psychology is as much of a science as economics?

        1. WTF

          Probably less so.

  13. I promise *crosses fingers behind back* this will be the last link of this type until I complete my “The Search for STEVE SMITH” post.

    Yellow jackets and ape men

    “One sighting was in broad daylight where the person saw the creature come out of the woods and sit next to a pond,” Bakara said of the instance around three weeks ago. “This person had never even heard of Bigfoot — they thought it was an ape man.”

    The other sighting was much scarier for the couple who had gotten out of their car to look at something — certainly not Bigfoot — when they saw it and the creature saw them, it was reported.

    “They only saw the outline of the creature, around 75 feet away, but what horrified them was the growl,” Bakara said second-handedly. “I’ve heard other people tell me that when you’ve heard this growl, you know it’s not a bear or a dog or a bobcat. This one was so big that it reverberated their bodies — they could feel the vibration. It growled so deeply and scared them so bad they got back in their car and left.”

    1. Rick C-137

      STEVE SMITH VIBRATE IN SOME BODIES!

      1. AlexinCT

        +eleventy rapesquatch

  14. MikeS

    Since there was no musical link today (statement of fact, not criticism) I’d be happy to oblige:

    It gets between your toes

    1. MikeS

      Gotta go with two today

      Don’t lose your head

  15. straffinrun

    That family friendly stamp o approval openly mocks us and this is our best response?

    1. Rick C-137

      I’m on the clock, soooo…..

      1. straffinrun

        Same here. 15 more minutes. Beer o’clock.

  16. KibbledKristen

    My wish for your Hump Day is that this guy is on your commuting route.

    1. Rick C-137

      Fantastic, simply fantastic. How come I never see any of these cool peolpe IRL?

    2. westernsloper

      That is great.

    3. Tundra

      Ha!

      I’d give him money.

    4. MikeS

      I wish he was my neighbor.

      Well, that may be taking things a little too far…

    5. ChipsnSalsa

      Should post on CL that he has “free metal” available curbside.

  17. The Late P Brooks

    However, the failure of imagination that occurs when we let guilt and shame rule us prevents us from seeing the opportunities that come with occupying a place that is neither here nor there.

    Ostentatious piety and self-flagellation. How else will we know how saintly they are? I say again. The sooner these people disappear up their own assholes, the better.

  18. westernsloper

    Chipotle Mexican Grill is betting big on queso, hoping that this — the chain’s “most requested item”

    Ahhh, the fine dining food topping of choice for many a stoner on a midnight 7-11 run. That will turn things right around. Cheese by Dupont.

  19. Study: 90 Percent Of American Men Are ‘Overfat’

    The researchers found that up to 90 percent of adult males in developed countries are overfat, along with up to 80 percent of women and half of children.

    While the problems were most magnified among denizens of the United States and New Zealand, they were fairly pervasive worldwide.

    Previous research by the same authors had concluded that up to 76 percent of the world’s population may be overfat.

    Meanwhile, measuring body mass index (BMI) isn’t effective for determining whether someone is overfat, so Maffetone et al. devised a simple equation to help anyone make that determination.

    Quite simply, if the circumference of your waist measures more than half your height, you’re overfat.

    90% of men also have pussy beards.

    1. Grummun

      Quite simply, if the circumference of your waist measures more than half your height, you’re overfat.

      Because BMI wasn’t bad enough as a bullshit metric for physical fitness, we’ve now have a metric that is even stupider and more bullshittier.

      1. Grummun

        Uh blockquote not strikethrough *slinks away*

      2. leonadasiv

        Yeah I’m 6 foot and 155lbs. Not anywhere near what people would consider fat. My waist size is 34. That means I only have two inches to be considered “overfat”, which would imply that I’m fat now.

        1. Yusef drives a Kia

          Damn Dude! I’m 5’10” and 140Lbs, skinny people or what?

        2. MikeS

          The two of us are proof why this is bullshit. I am the same height and have the same waist as you, but I weigh 215lbs.

        3. 6’3″, 240 lbs., and my waist is a 36, although I wear 38s in a lot of off-the-rack pants because I’ve got big ol’ thighs. So, yeah, I’m in the same boat. I don’t have a six-pack, that’s for sure, but my body fat percentage was something like 18% last I checked.

          And I agree that BMI isn’t the best metric for fitness, nor is waist to height ratio. Body fat percentage is better, but still not perfect. Really, the best indicator is physical fitness, i.e. how much you can deadlift, how many pull-ups you can do, how long it takes you to run a 5k, stuff like that.

        4. Grummun

          The slavering devotion to “one-size-fits-all” metrics really burns my britches. Our “wellness” overlords look at the population as a whole, and pronounce that “all healthy people will fit into this box,” nevermind that there are a crapload of factors that go into being healthy, and there are lots of outliers away from the mean for all of those factors. But judging healthiness on a case-by-case basis would require actual work, like understanding individual and family medical history, and tracking the change of biometrics over time, you know, like your GP does.

        5. 6’2″ – 215 to 220 pounds – 33″ waist. No 6-pack abs but definitely not on the fat side of the ledger. Weightlifting 3x a week gives a different body composition than my born skinny dude look.

          When I was a “healthy” 180 pounds, I looked like a stick with a big Dutch melon on top.

      3. Viking1865

        BMI is not a bullshit metric. Yes, there are outliers. If you are an NFL RB with a 30 BMI, you’re an outlier.

        99.9% of the people who are overweight by BMI are fat fucks.

        1. Brett L

          The only health ratio that remotely stands up to analysis is waistline circumference. Once you go over 38 for both sexes, health outcomes go down in rough proportion to how far beyond 38 you are. There’s a hard bottom on healthy waist circumference, too. But its like 24 or 26 for men. That doesn’t mean that the second you start wearing a 40″ waist pant you’re fucked, but you’re definitely courting what now gets lumped as “metabolic disease” (diabetes, congestive heart problems, kidney and liver problems, etc).

        2. AlexinCT

          Not according to my doctor, who told me according to the BMI index both of us where fat for carrying so much muscle…

          1. Viking1865

            If you lift heavy and regularly, you will join the BMI outliers club. But if you grab me 100 Americans with a BMI of 30, 99 of them will just be fat.

        3. ruodberht

          Shh. Even libertarians need narratives, and you’re destroying theirs.

    2. Gray Ghost

      90% of men also have pussy beards

      Are these beards that smell like pussy, or beards that look like pussies, or something else.

      They do say the thing gets in the way of whatever you’re eating…

      1. I just notice that a lot of overweight men get these little beards that outline their mouths, looking more like pubic hair. Hence “pussy beards”.

        My own theory: they are trying to distract from the jowls

        1. Viking1865

          Oh yeah when I was a fat fuck I grew a beard, because I was “big lumberjack guy” No I wasn’t, I was fucking obese. Lost all the weight, shaved it off a few months back. Turns out having a jawline makes your face look better.

        2. Michael

          Yeah, that’s not a good look on anybody. It’s like a comb-over, but for fat dudes.

          1. AlexinCT

            The last time that dude had pussy is when pussy had him…

          2. DOOMco

            “Where’s Francis?!
            -oh.”
            Wade Wilson.

    3. Chipwooder

      When I was an active duty Marine with a decent PFT (3 miles in 22 mins, 15 pullups, 100 crunches in 2 mins) I was about a 33 waist at 5’7″.

  20. Tundra

    Medicaid: The Snag in Obamacare Repeal

    Some good points in this one about the farce that Medicaid has become.

    One tends to think of medical insurance as being for hospitals, surgeries, drugs, MRIs, lithotripters, and stuff like that. Medicaid’s original mission, however, seems to have “mission creeped” into shielding the estates of the middle class, leaving the taxpayer to pick up the bills for those who have assets.

    1. westernsloper

      *Tundra lights the Ken signal

    2. westernsloper

      In “The Uninspiring Medicaid Debate” in July, Cato Institute’s Michael Tanner wrote that the Medicaid expansion didn’t apply to pregnant women and children, and:
      ” It’s also worth noting that nearly two-thirds of Medicaid spending actually goes to the elderly and disabled in nursing homes. In fact, an entire industry of eldercare lawyers and accountants exists to help the middle-class elderly shield their assets so that Medicaid can pick up the tab for their long-term care. Medicaid reform might actually force states to consider whether all Medicaid recipients are equally in need of taxpayer-funded support.”

      This has been a bitch of mine for awhile. (I just can’t articulate it as well as a Catoid) Too many people think they can sit on assets and stick the tab for their care to everybody else. It is immoral to steal from others when you or your family could probably pay for your care.

      I had this discussion with my very conservative father just the other day. He says he would have no problem taking whatever he can get from the Government now if he can qualify. He sees it as the assholes have been stealing from him his entire life, and he is due. Hard to argue with that, and I am sure he is not alone with those feelings.

      1. Tundra

        He’s not alone, I’ve heard it frequently. Medicaid needs to die. If cities or counties want to put something together for the truly needy in their midst – have at it.

      2. WTF

        He sees it as the assholes have been stealing from him his entire life, and he is due.

        I am not unsympathetic to that view.

        1. Lachowsky

          That’s why medicade is so hard to kill. The fuckers have been stealing from me and I want my money back. However, if they give me my money back they can’t pay for all the other people whose money they stole. Ponzi scheme, pure and simple. same with SS.

          1. AlexinCT

            Same applies to SS for sure sir…

      3. Pan Zagloba

        ) Too many people think they can sit on assets and stick the tab for their care to everybody else. It is immoral to steal from others when you or your family could probably pay for your care.

        But, unless you gut any kind of state-provided healthcare, you wind up with Ant and Grasshopper situation. If you are responsible and save up, you will be forced to spend those savings to pay for care. If you piss it away on vacations and hookers, someone else will pick up a tab.

        1. Scruffy Nerfherder

          Yup

          Which is why I believe that any state funded care should be bottom of the barrel, economy seats, quality.

  21. The Late P Brooks

    NEEDZ MOAR NAVEL-GAZING

    No wonder many voters distrust institutions and the establishment. Their engagement with the party mostly consists of receiving fund-raising emails intended to enforce programmatic conformity while activating fear of and resentment toward the other party.

    Republicans have already suffered the costs of feeding their supporters a toxic diet of anti-Democratic Party propaganda. They wound up with Mr. Trump as their standard-bearer. Democrats should not make that mistake.

    Yeah, that’s how we got Trump. It’s all clear to me, now.

    1. And yet it’s the BernieBros who shot at congresscritters…

    2. american socialist

      Let me guess…krugnuts wrote this?

    3. KibbledKristen

      No wonder many voters distrust institutions and the establishment.

      That is in no way reflected in how they actually vote.

    4. B.P.

      They still have no idea where Trump came from.

    5. Holger-da-Dane

      Republicans have already suffered the costs of feeding their supporters a toxic diet of anti-Democratic Party propaganda.

      I call bullshit. This isn’t at all why the GOP wound up with Trump at the helm. But keep believing that, Democrats.

  22. The Late P Brooks

    Sloopy shaved off his mustache.

    Did he go full Amish, and leave the chin whiskers? You’ll have to get him a straw hat.

    1. Tundra

      He’s very plain.

  23. Fatty Bolger

    A google search for “Imran Awan” still turns up almost nothing in the MSM. The brave souls at the Washington Post did finally run an AP snippet about it, headlined “Wasserman-Schultz fires IT staffer following fraud arrest”, though.

  24. The Zenome Project

    The Mental Gymnastics of the Prog: apparently Amash and Massie are now agents of the RUSSKIES! Hang the Traitors!

    1. leonadasiv

      Yup vote for peace makes you a traitor.

      1. The Zenome Project

        If these folks were real progs they would be on Team Bernie and protest the sanctions, but alas they’re just run-of-the-mill hacks.

    2. Who tweeted it? They have me blocked.
      Was it Weigel?

      1. The Zenome Project

        Random nobody @MattMurph24, but made the top of my search fees because he got a bunch of retweets and likes from other insane progs like him.

        1. Chipwooder

          Sad to see Matt “Guitar” Murphy sink so low. What would Jake and Elwood say?

  25. Scruffy Nerfherder

    This article is your typical “The only real way out of high pill prices is price controls” tripe.

    However, the subject does raise a question. To what extent is the US drug market subsidizing other countries’ price controls?

    1. WTF

      To quite a large extent. Given price controls in other countries, the only way to recoup the enormous costs of trying to actually bring a drug to market is to charge what they can in the US. If the US adopts price controls, it would essentially kill innovation and R&D, because there would be huge cost and little payoff in developing a new drug.

      1. Scruffy Nerfherder

        That is my thought as well. I’m wondering if anyone has actually quantified the problem (outside of the drug companies themselves, who probably don’t want to talk about it)

        1. AlexinCT

          The political class knows this but doesn’t care much that is where we are at.

  26. I just got a wapo alert that Trump banned trannies from the military. That should make today interesting.

      1. TK

        Holy shit that is hilarious

      2. Rick C-137

        I just saw the first one, this dude is Charles dickens of tweets, by which I mean he maximizes word count

      3. mr simple

        I get not paying for surgery or whatever, but the only qualification that should be considered is ability to do the job. This is government enforced bigotry and shouldn’t be supported.

        1. How is it bigotry? Every person is able to serve. They just can’t do so as a person of the opposite sex.

          1. Count Potato

            That’s like saying “every person is able to serve, they can’t do it if they are attracted to the opposite sex.”

          2. Scruffy Nerfherder

            My condition would be that if the person requires medical care, including medications, in order to facilitate or maintain their transition then they have no business being in the military. I don’t care who or what you choose to entertain your junk.

          3. Count Potato

            Arguing that they aren’t healthy enough could be valid, but I’m not familiar with what those restrictions are.

            Otoh, cisgendered women require more medical care than men.

          4. american socialist

            Attraction to a sex and and being confused about your sex is not the same

          5. Brochettaward

            People get kicked out of the military for all sorts of shit that would cost time and money while being a distraction. People are blocked from certain career paths for far less. The notion that the transgendered should be some special protected class there is absurd.

            It’s also a case of completely perverted incentives. We’re going to take in the transgendered and shell out tens of thousands of dollars on time consuming transition procedures while they have a contract? That policy was a fucking disgrace.

          6. CPRM

            On a similar note, if one develops a disease while in the service, even if it is not caused by being in the service it is covered for life under VA benefits. So, if they can assert a claim that their gender-dysmorphia only came about while they were in the service, then all costs after they leave the service are covered.

        2. WTF

          Sorry, the purpose of the military is to kill people and break things. If the military experts think something will interfere with or diminish that mission, and the reasoning in this case is sound, then so be it. The military is not for social experiments.

          1. Spartan Dad

            Yes, this is what it comes down to. Do transgendered individuals pose a detriment to combat efficacy?

            It doesn’t matter why or how or feelings. If the answer is yes then they shouldn’t be allowed in. It’s not bigotry that people with chronic diseases and other conditions that can impede the efficiency of a unit are banned from service.

          2. Scruffy Nerfherder

            +1 Flat Foot

          3. Pope Jimbo

            -1 Women Marines in combat units.

            I agree it shouldn’t be a place to experiment, but when the Marines ran a bunch of tests that proved that women couldn’t keep up (in general) in combat units, they were told to shitcan the study and go ahead with the integration.

          4. Spartan Dad

            I watched a doc about a group of British soldiers going door to door in Iraq. They were ambushed inside a building and it devolved into hand to hand combat. One of the Brits won by physically picking up his attacker and beating him into pulp before being able to slip his knife out. He was then able to help his comrades.

            There’s no way a woman would have been able to do this. She would have been killed and allowed her attacker to go help his fellow ambushers, possibly leading to the deaths of the entire British squad.

          5. AlexinCT

            These people have always seen the military, which most of them despise anyways, as a great vehicle for social experimentation, and consider it to be primarily a place for them to force society as a whole to accept whatever trend they want to push. So it is no surprise that they would rather have the military end up both hamstrung and wasting valuable resources to push some social agenda. That the military would then also have trouble in times of conflict and be practical guaranteed to incur heavier casualties due to the inefficiency introduced by the social engineering agenda, is considered a big bonus as well, because that allows them to use military losses as a means to attack a president they don’t like.

          6. Pope Jimbo

            I think that the military is a victim of its own success. The military when told to integrate racially went ahead and integrated to an amazing degree when no one else was even close.

            The progs think that integrating women would be the same. They won’t admit that the physical differences between men and women dwarf those between races.

          7. F. Stupidity Jr.

            Sorry, the purpose of the military is to kill people and break things.

            That’s it exactly. There are a great number of institutions in our society that make efforts to include people that need accomodations. The military need not be one of them, at least not in any kind of combat roles.

          8. mr simple

            You mean like the study in the 50s that “proved” that the gay lifestyle is incompatible with the military lifestyle? You don’t get to make bigoted proclamations and have them hold the force of law. No one (here) is saying the military is for social experiments, but whoever wants to join the military should be able to as long as they can perform the tasks required. If none of them make it, then so be it. But you can’t exclude people from government service because some people think they’re icky because of percieved possible issues that are easily solvable or not applicable to the entire group.

          9. Pope Jimbo

            There are a shit ton of medical reasons already that prevent people from service in the military.

            I agree that if they can do a job, they shouldn’t be prevented from joining. If, though, they need a lot of additional support (medical or otherwise) then they should be banned. Just like we ban other people with physical conditions that might be an issue if we went to war.

          10. Brochettaward

            I’ve seen people kicked out for bad body acne. Lazy eyes. Laser eye surgery can get you banned from certain career paths. But we’re here arguing about people who are being pumped full of expensive hormones. The level of accommodations a transitioning individual would need is well beyond those involves with other conditions that the military discriminates based upon. That’s before we even get to the massive risk they pose from a mental health standpoint.

            This isn’t government enforced bigotry. It’s reality. This isn’t segregating the races or banning the darkies from combat units.

          11. mr simple

            Right, it’s definitely not bigotry to exclude individuals based on group status, it’s the default libertarian position. Other than that you’re just assuming facts not in evidence. The same arguments have been made about allowing gays or other groups in our integrating the armed forces. I’m among the first to say what’s shouldn’t be changed or AA words put in place for any situation, but if some dude wants to put on lipstick, grow his hair long and have people call him ma’am, it shouldn’t automatically preclude him from service.

            I think some people here hate progs and their crusades so much that they’re willing to support anything that the progs would be against.

          12. Bob

            Military training is expensive. There’s good reason to exclude people from training. Blowing 10 million dollars to train 100 soldiers where only one will pass is stupid. That is why medical conditions disqualify people. It’s not there may not be asthmatic who can pass, it’s that it will waste millions to find them, and that time and money is better spent on people likely to fail.

            Anyone who thinks they are something they are not is delusional. There’s no reason the military should expend anymore effort finding, training and arming a transgender then they should on a transracial or someone who thinks they are Napoleon.

      4. Because Twitter does some odd things it took me some effort to get the three twits the statement was spread over.

        Donald J. Trump Donald J. Trump
        @realDonaldTrump
        39m
        After consultation with my Generals and military experts, please be advised that the United States Government will not accept or allow……

        Donald J. Trump Donald J. Trump
        @realDonaldTrump
        31m
        ….Transgender individuals to serve in any capacity in the U.S. Military. Our military must be focused on decisive and overwhelming…..

        Donald J. Trump Donald J. Trump
        @realDonaldTrump
        27m
        ….victory and cannot be burdened with the tremendous medical costs and disruption that transgender in the military would entail. Thank you

        1. Tundra

          Oh my.

      5. Count Potato

        “with the tremendous medical costs”

        I’m sure those are insignificant compared to the military budget.

        1. WTF

          So what, I’d rather not have the military spending even more money and time on bullshit to affirm someone’s mental delusion rather than on actual military effectiveness.

          1. Pope Jimbo

            I was swinging with the wing in the Marines and lived high on the hog when in the field, but even then it was pretty apparent that real operations in the field are a lot different than normal ops.

            If people in your unit need all sorts of medications to function, they won’t do well in the field. I don’t know, but my guess is that people who need insulin are probably barred from a lot of billets in the service too for the same reason.

          2. AlexinCT

            These days, with the military having far more people than they need/want looking to sign up (for the benefits, mostly), the admission standards/threshold for acceptance have gone up drastically. My son was basically disqualified from service because his medical history showed that he had had a seizure as a kid during a bout of high fever. He was bluntly told that they were not going to take the risk he ended up with some medical condition even though the chance was all but non existent. I know a super smart kid that tried to join as well but was denied because he was overweight (in the past this was never a problem and the weight issue was always fixed by the time the recruit finished basic or they were gone). Spending a ton of money, even when that money is comparatively peanuts in the grand scheme of defense spending as whole, on people that have special needs above and beyond stuff mandated by law, is not happening these days.

            What’s next? The ADA will be used to demand the military accommodate paraplegics?

          3. Pope Jimbo

            It isn’t fair that those trenches don’t have a wheel chair ramp built in them! How are our brave soldiers supposed to go over the top?

          4. AlexinCT

            I know you are joking Jimbo, but considering some of the arguments I have heard from people that like the idea of making the military a social experimentation playground, I will not be surprised this exact scenario actually plays out in earnest. Lets prey we will have enough people that remember what the military is supposed to be for if we ever get in a situation where the military will actually have to fight a near-peer or peer opponent.

          5. Don’t you see, all we need to do is to complete the neural interface, then we can wire the cripples into walking armored fighting suits. Send them in first to draw the fire and have the more agile regular people knock out the enemy position. Given enough armor, they can soak a couple of hits and possibly survive.

          6. Pope Jimbo

            UnCivil don’t be silly. No one would ever suggest that we put gimps into armored suits.

            No, gimps get their brains transferred to large blue alien bodies. Simple science dude.

          7. Pan Zagloba

            Don’t you see, all we need to do is to complete the neural interface, then we can wire the cripples into walking armored fighting suits. Send them in first to draw the fire and have the more agile regular people knock out the enemy position. Given enough armor, they can soak a couple of hits and possibly survive.

            I see you have well understood the precepts of Codex Astartes. Only in death does duty end!

          8. Count Potato

            It’s not “bullshit to affirm someone’s mental delusion” it’s that gender dysphoria is a mental illness where transition might be the best treatment. And I’m not using “mental illness” pejoratively.

          9. Brochettaward

            The military doesn’t take people and kicks people out for all kinds of “mental illnesses.”

          10. My nephew’s first wife got kicked out of the Army right after boot camp. The powers that be didn’t want to deal with a vegetarian who didn’t like being shouted at. Or at least that’s how I heard it.

          11. Count Potato

            Sure, if it’s something that prevents them from doing their job.

          12. Brochettaward

            Which, despite whatever delusions you have, includes being transgendered.

          13. Count Potato

            What delusions I have? I don’t see why a MTF couldn’t do the same things cisgendered women are doing in the military now.

          14. WTF

            gender dysphoria is a mental illness where transition might be the best treatment

            Based on what? The rate of suicides among transgenders is just as high or actually higher after “transitioning surgery”. If someone is suffering from a mental illness convinced they are a dog trapped in a human body, we don’t “help” them by grafting on floppy ears and a furry fucking tail. This is actually worse than bullshit, it’s destructive lunacy on behalf of social signaling.

            And none of this has anything to do with whether it makes sense to force the military to accommodate this.

          15. Count Potato

            Except there is no evidence of humans having dog brains.

            Yes, there is a lot bullshit and social signaling. Anything become retarded when taken to the extreme. Saying that a woman doesn’t have to built like a fashion model to be attractive, does not mean that women are “healthy at every size”.

          16. WTF

            And there is no evidence that transgenderism is anything other than a delusion, so my points stand.

        2. Michael

          I don’t think cost here is limited to hormone therapy, gender reassignment and whatnot. There’s likely a much greater cost associated with the sheer risk posed by allowing transgendered individuals serve in combat roles. Isn’t suicide already disproportionately high among trans people? They’re not exactly the type that you want to send off to war.

          1. AlexinCT

            I am certain that the cost from damage from bad publicity from a whiner claiming the military was abusive for demanding they do their job instead of just being there to make the tax payer finance their pet peeve, factors in bigtime there as well.

    1. Pope Jimbo

      Serious question, but how many trans folk are there? And how many of them want to serve?

      My gut feel is that there really aren’t that many trans people out there, but now that fucking middle america has gone ahead and accepted the homos, progs have to find some other group to use as the recipients of their virtue signalling.

      Why did those squares have to fuck up the whole gay thing? Shit now that most people don’t give a shit, you might see them start voting GOP too.

      1. Brochettaward

        I’ve heard figures that put it at .3% which sounded ridiculously high to me. One transgendered in school claimed there were a couple of dozen in a school with about 14,000 students. So, my guess is that we’d have to move that decimal over to something like .03 or .003%.

      2. Jefe Hayek

        Much like the oft repeat LGBT = 10% of the population BS, I’m sure you can divide whatever number they give you by 10 or more and get something close to accurate

        1. Count Potato

          Bisexual women are hardly rare. But coming up with an actual number is very difficult because it’s mostly based on surveys, which are terribly unreliable.

      3. Gilmore

        “”how many trans folk are there? “”

        Depends how you define it.

        If you include everyone from post-op, pre-op, and ‘in therapy prior to becoming pre-op’ (often required by law), it’s about 0.3%- 0.5% of the population, or just under 1m-to1.5m people in the us

        Interestingly, about 15-20% of the us tranny population lives in the DC area.

        1. Gilmore

          https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1530.html

          In the opening section there they go through the various methods of quantifying the tranny pop

          1. Count Potato

            OK, that makes way more sense. Because if DC was like Bangkok or Sao Paulo, someone would have noticed.

          2. Count Potato

            What do you call it when someone Gilmores a reply to Gilmore?

            Anyway, tranny pop:

            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fmDtfblPfCU

        2. Count Potato

          15-20% live in the DC area??

          1. Gilmore

            No that’s wildly off. It’s like 2-5%

            The # in my head was something like 20% higher than any other city.

            Also, on my phone while eating.

      4. Bob

        Depends, if free surgery is involved it’s likely to be quite high.

  27. Spartan Dad

    Trump to Ban Transgenders from Serving in Military
    https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-administration-to-ban-transgender-individuals-from-serving-in-u-s-military-1501075174?tesla=y

    The president made the announcements in a series of tweets

    I’m in the camp that these tweets are deliberate to distract and draw attention from the actually important shit going on. His tweets are crafted to ensure maximum rage from progs over things most sane people don’t really care about.

    1. The big story is DWS. I hope he doesn’t draw attention from that.

      1. american socialist

        If they are putting together a case then I would say so

        1. american socialist

          Case needs to be quietly worked and then boom

          1. Oh, I doubt there will be any leaks. Those are reserved for the WH goings-on.

      2. Fatty Bolger

        It’s a minor story in the MSM, and they’d like to keep it that way. DWS fired a staffer after he was arrested. See, she’s handling it. No big deal. His lawyer says he’s innocent, we’ll let the legal system sort that out, let’s move on.

        1. I still don’t remember any of them reporting when she all but threatened to cut off funding for the Capitol police if they didn’t give her laptop back.

          1. Fatty Bolger

            Oh, well, that was, um, just a hyperlocal law enforcement issue. Yes, that’s it. Hyperlocal.

          2. Brochettaward

            They barely reported on her being fired by the DNC for favoring Hillary, and then taking a job with her campaign the next day. Why would we report on a little insignificant threat like that?

          3. AlexinCT

            That is information your unwashed plebes, but especially those horrible deplorables, don’t need because they are not smart enough to understand the nuances of this complex issue and realize how great what Debbie did was for the cause of justice and humanity as a whole. Shit, these people might all get the wrong impression from those facts and we end up with more Trump!

    2. american socialist

      Healthcare repeal vote is today

    3. leonadasiv

      I will say, by making Twitter the official gateway of new information, Trump is doing then a huge favor. Maybe this Trump is in the pocket of Jack Dorsey.

      1. The Zenome Project

        I’d grown to like the Trump tweeting quite a bit. It’s a much more effective bully pulpit tool than I expected.

    4. TK

      Donald Trump just keeps gluing extra dimensions onto his extra dimensional chessboard.

      1. Brett L

        He really does know how to suck all the air out of the media fires. They’ll spend two days shouting about this while the Senate votes on repeal.

    5. xenophon

      Sanity prevails.

  28. The Late P Brooks

    To what extent is the US drug market subsidizing other countries’ price controls?

    A lot.

    1. AlexinCT

      From what I have read, it is almost to the tune of 99%.

  29. Tundra

    Finally!

    PURIFY YOUR SYSTEM
    WITH THE SEVEN-DAY
    CHILI DOG CLEANSE

    Juice fasts, raw foods cleansing, water-only detox — you’ve probably tried them all by now. Fads like these promise to leave you feeling rejuvenated, but their effectiveness is uncertain at best. That’s why more and more nutritionists swear by a proven, deceptively simple approach to wellness: a seven-day-long dietary cleanse in which you eat nothing but chili dogs.

    Yes, you can flush your body of years’ worth of accumulated toxins, simply by consuming between eight and twelve chili dogs every day for a week. Through this uniquely formulated system, stronger immune protections, clearer skin, and quicker neural pathways can be within your reach; all thanks to the nourishing, invigorating, purifying power of several pounds of chili dogs — Nature’s Perfect Food.

    1. Scruffy Nerfherder

      Some of us don’t want to die on the toilet.

      1. Rick C-137

        -1 achey brakey heart

    2. That and some Natty Light will be sure to clean you out.

    3. MikeS

      McSweeny’s is awesome. Here’s my favorite:

      How You Can Still Have Your Pudding If You Don’t Eat Your Meat

    4. Brett L

      Dude, just go to Chipotle

    5. Holger-da-Dane

      Find some smoked all pork wieners in natural casing. Fry them on a pan, make sure they’re heated all the way through and slightly greasy.

      Slice open a hotdog bun, add ketchup on one side and mustard on the other, spoon in raw onions and french fried onions. Add one of the wieners to the bun. Now add a home made remoulade (half sweet relish, half mayo, a dash of curry powder, and a bit of salt) on top of the sausage, or tartar sauce in a pinch, and finally put thinly sliced cucumber salad (just cucumber in vinegar and sugar, not dill pickles, you heretic!) on top.

      Now you have a hotdog as Thor intended. Tak for mad!

  30. Hyperion

    Concerning the one with the unwashed hair:

    “On Tuesday, an IT staffer who worked for House Democrats, including former DNC chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL), was arrested at Dulles International Airport for a bank fraud charge.”

    Yep, elections have consequences. If Hillary was president *shudder*, this guy would have probably been given a ride on Airforce One.

  31. The Late P Brooks

    They get wooly.

    My exhaustion with the idea of “Confederate” is multiplied by the realization that this show is the brainchild of two white men who oversee a show that has few people of color to speak of and where sexual violence is often gratuitous and treated as no big deal. I shudder to imagine the enslaved black body in their creative hands. And when I think about the number of people who gave this project the green light, the number of people who thought this was a great idea, my weariness grows exponentially.

    This show’s premise highlights the limits of the imagination in a world where oppression thrives. These creators can imagine a world where the Confederacy won the Civil War and black people are still enslaved, but they can’t or aren’t interested in imagining a world where, say, things went in a completely different direction after the Civil War and, say, white people are enslaved. Or a world where slavery never happened at all. What would happen in a show where American Indians won the conflicts in which they were embroiled as the British and French and other European nations colonized this country? What would happen if Mexicans won the Mexican-American War and Texas and California were still part of Mexico?

    It is curious that time and again, when people create alternate histories, they are largely replicating a history we already know, and intimately. They are replicating histories where whiteness thrives and people of color remain oppressed.

    Your perpetually aggrieved whining wearies me.

    Also, I an unaware of any restriction (aside from artistic talent) on your ability to scribble out a black supremacist narrative and peddle it to a studio. When one contemplates the vast tsunami of execrable movies which get made annually, the notion that yours somehow will be kept out of production by the vast White Wing Conspiracy is silly.

    1. Rufus the Monocled

      But I guess that show on Netflix (I forget the name) about SJW protesting is okay, right honey?

      It feels like the people who ‘muse’ and have a job at the NYT are the idiots in college classes who waxed gibberish in class while everyone rolled their eyes behind their backs.

    2. The marketplace of ideas is a foreign concept to idiots like that.

    3. Scruffy Nerfherder

      My exhaustion….

      Spare me the bullshit. You’re so exhausted that you’re writing an article for NYT.

    4. Chipwooder

      There’s that “black bodies” shit again. So tiresome.

      1. WTF

        Do they not realize how dehumanizing that is? They are people, with personalities, and emotions, not “bodies”. I guess collectivists always gotta demean individuality.

    5. Spartan Dad

      Or a world where slavery never happened at all. What would happen in a show where American Indians won the conflicts in which they were embroiled as the British and French and other European nations colonized this country?

      Reminds me of the King of the Hill episode where everyone learns John Redcorn’s ancestral tribe were cannibals and not the ‘noble savage’ envisioned.

    6. WTF

      , but they can’t or aren’t interested in imagining a world where, say, things went in a completely different direction after the Civil War and, say, white people are enslaved.

      It’s been done.

      1. one true athena

        it’s like the prog who was upset about it and tweeted something like, “Why don’t they ever think of a story where the Nazis won? HUH? WE KNOW WHY don’t we?” and then about a billion people answered, “uh, Man in the High Castle ring any bells, sweetheart?”

        1. WTF

          You would think they might have sense enough to do a quick google search before they spew in ignorance. But then I guess they wouldn’t be proggies.

    7. Q Continuum

      Effective temperature = retard.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_body

    8. Raven Nation

      A lot of that stuff has been done in literature as well. For example, Thomas Harlan’s Sixth Sun series.

    9. Badolph Hilter

      Or a world where just as the North is about to win, talking apes with advanced military capabilities time-travel in from the future and enslave ALL of them. Now THAT’s a series the people deserve.

  32. The Zenome Project

    Other 2018 Election Shenanigans, this time IL: Their governor Rauner faces a difficult re-election because he obstructed a bunch of Democratic tax hikes, but he likely will lick his lips nonstop if this Pritzker guy is his opponent.

    J.B. Pritzker, a billionaire businessman with political ambitions, told Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich he was “really not that interested” in the U.S. Senate seat the governor was dealing in late 2008.

    Instead, Pritzker offered his own idea: Would Blagojevich make him Illinois treasurer?

    “Ooh, interesting,” Blagojevich said during a November 2008 phone call with Pritzker. “Let’s think about that. You interested in that?”

    “Yeah,” Pritzker answered, “that’s the one I would want.”

    1. Chipwooder

      Ah yes, the Obama-bankrolling Pritzker family. Should be said in the same manner as “the Gambino family”

      1. The Zenome Project

        I know the name Penny Pritzker, she ended up getting some cozy Obama Cabinet position, I think Commerce Secretary. I’m sure that family is knee-deep in the Chicago machine.

  33. The Late P Brooks

    Our military must be focused on decisive and overwhelming victory and cannot be burdened with the tremendous medical costs and disruption that transgender in the military would entail. Thank you

    Wait, what?

    1. Tundra

      It has to be a feint.

  34. Drake

    So DC lost another gun case – slapped down for their “Good Reason” requirement for CCW. When will one of these rulings apply to New York and New Jersey?

    1. Count Potato

      I don’t know. But the NYPD ignores federal law in NYC airports.

      1. mr simple

        How so? Not disagreeing, just haven’t heard if this.

        1. Drake

          If you are traveling with a legally checked and your flight ends up in NYC because of weather … they will arrest you.

        2. Count Potato

          I’d have to google examples, but this is the law:

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firearm_Owners_Protection_Act#.22Safe_Passage.22_provision

          And I remember that entry being much longer…

    2. DOOMco

      hopefully asap?

    3. WTF

      Whenever SCOTUS decides to take up a case to reconcile differing circuit decisions on the issue. So far they have refused to do so and let the disparate decisions stand.

      1. Drake

        One more Trump Justice and hopefully they’ll take it up and issue a forceful ruling.

        1. WTF

          I gave up hope when they allowed the 3rd Circuit’s ruling in Drake to stand, which basically said that New Jersey prohibiting citizens from bearing arms does not burden the right to bear arms.

    4. Brochettaward

      It doesn’t even matter in DC. They’re going to do the same disingenuous bullshit they’ve done multiple times now and just slightly tweak the wording and force people to litigate for their rights all over. They’ll keep doing this until they get a left majority on the Supreme Court.

      1. WTF

        Sounds like what’s needed is for some wealthy conservative/libertarians to bankroll a suit against DC on civil rights grounds for big bucks, and sue the actors making the decisions personally because they don’t get qualified immunity when knowingly violating civil rights.

  35. Count Potato

    “But the more I think about it, the more I realize that this wasn’t about issues at all — and that in fact, politics seems to be less and less about issues every single day. It isn’t about finding solutions anymore. No, it’s all about ramped-up, hyper-partisan rhetoric, where you’re either on one side or the other, and must see the people on the other side as if they’re not “people” at all. It’s all about either unconditionally hating or unconditionally supporting your side, an approach that pretty clearly leaves no room for any sort of discussion.”

    http://www.nationalreview.com/article/449819/katherine-timpf-fox-news-man-dumped-water-targeted-attack

    1. Drake

      She should have brought along the gorilla-like wrestler she sits next to on that show I surf by sometimes.

    2. The Zenome Project

      Only now NR understands that progs play by Alinsky’s Rules and not the establishment R Japanese Tea Ceremony Rules? It only took 10 whole years.

  36. Q Continuum
    1. Drake

      There are plenty of easy ways to cool off a planet. The problem is our planet isn’t overheated.

      1. Fatty Bolger

        We’re still in an ice age that began 2.6 million years ago. And CO2 levels are very near the historic low of the last 500 million years. Of course, a lot of those people who “fucking love science” would have no idea what I’m talking about.

        1. WTF

          Yeah, we are not currently even in a warm period, we are in an interglacial period within the current ice age.

    2. Tundra

      It’s gotta be the Onion.

      Right, Q?

      Right?!?

      1. Q Continuum

        In a saner world…

    3. ChipsnSalsa

      Tiny Swiss project…

      They are calling you out Swiss!

    4. westernsloper

      Backers say the risky, often expensive projects are urgently needed to find ways of meeting the goals of the Paris climate deal to curb global warming that researchers blame for causing more heatwaves, downpours and rising sea levels.

      So suck all the CO2 out of the atmosphere, and dim the sunlight. Got it. Wouldn’t it be funny if they lowered CO2 levels and sunlight enough to kill all the plants causing mass starvation, and then in a rush to fix their error, they try to increase the amount of sunlight but instead they destroy the atmosphere and we all die in a fiery burst like an ant under a magnifying glass. That would be hilarious!! Hah!

      Maybe some things should be left alone.

      1. Brochettaward

        There’s no way in hell I trust climate zealots to engineer the world’s climate over their doomsday prophecies. They can go right to fucking hell.

      2. Pope Jimbo

        These are the same people who bitch and moan about GMO crops. Can’t play god with our food! That is too important.

        Climate change? Sure, go ahead with whatever plan you had on your mind.

  37. KibbledKristen

    Democrat is the part of inclusion and tolerance and loving poor people! Not at all elitist or racist!

    1. F. Stupidity Jr.

      Kristen, when we say tolerance, we don’t mean all the time! I mean, the Mayor was coming! We’ll let ’em back in after he goes, but we’re talking about the MAYOR here!

    2. Homeless people are not a problem for DeBlasio. Unlike dead people and illegals, they don’t tend to vote.

      1. Brochettaward

        When asked for comment later that day, de Blasio press secretary Eric Phillips claimed: “These sources are refusing to provide their names because what they are saying is not true.”

        The fucking irony.

  38. Count Potato

    “Rep. Trey Gowdy opined on the craziness inside the Trump administration where the prezzy is attacking the attorney general endlessly.

    And he says that if he were in Sessions’ position, he would leave.”

    http://therightscoop.com/trey-gowdy-if-i-were-sessions-i-wouldnt-stay/

    1. Q Continuum

      We can only hope.

    2. KibbledKristen

      HHmmm…all you people who picked Gowdy as the next AG may be onto something.

      That’s like the colleague who wants your job pulling you aside and whispering “Why do you put up with that? I’d quit if I were you”

    3. The Zenome Project

      I don’t think Sessions is going anything IMHO – I know that civil asset forfeiture and the WoDs are unconstitutional garbage and should be protested to death, but the reason he is there is because of illegal immigration and sanctuary cities. Right around the time of Trump having his “feud”, the DoJ started to further crack down on the sanctuary cities. All of this seems like kabuki to distract the media.

  39. Q Continuum

    The puzzle pieces to the lower sperm count are all falling into place…

    https://www.thecollegefix.com/post/34858/

    1. commodious spittoon

      “Men’s Engagement Manager”

      It’s not for you, Jen.

      1. Fatty Bolger

        They’ll be playing the wokest version of D&D ever all over campus soon.

        1. Scruffy Nerfherder

          +1 Level 26 Gender Creative Cleric

          *unsheathes Dildo of +9 Inches*

          1. Pan Zagloba

            That really sounds more like a Warhammer (Slaneeshi) character.

    2. Scruffy Nerfherder

      The successful candidate will also recruit and train students to “serve as role models for men-identified students related to the development of healthy relationships and healthy masculinity,” the job description states.

      The successful candidate must have a masters or doctorate in a field related to social work or women’s studies, it adds.

      Oh FFS

      1. Q Continuum

        Gotta keep the SJW self-licking ice cream cone going somehow right?

      2. ChipsnSalsa

        healthy masculinity

        That will be defined by who?

        1. Scruffy Nerfherder

          I like the men-identified students part.

          Now just identifying as male means you’re a shitlord.

          1. ChipsnSalsa

            But identifying as a woman (while still having a penis) will not entitle you to the grievance rights a woman would normally be able to swing.

            I think I got that right, hard to keep track.

  40. Count Potato

    “The refugee wave that buffeted Germany in 2015 is now crashing down on the nation’s courts, as migrants seeking relief from the Syrian civil war challenge efforts by one of Europe’s most welcoming states to limit their rights.

    Some 250,000 asylum appeals are pending across Germany, according to estimates from an association of administrative court judges. Nearly 13,500 are ongoing in the capital alone, part of a tenfold increase over the past year.

    Stephan Groscurth, a spokesman for Berlin’s administrative court, said the appeals — filed by the growing number of migrants who have been denied protection or given less than they were seeking — make up two-thirds of court business. “This will paralyze us for years,” a judge told Der Tagesspiegel, a German daily based in Berlin.”

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/merkel-welcomed-hundreds-of-thousands-of-refugees-now-some-are-suing-her-government/2017/07/20/2d9e13aa-68a7-11e7-94ab-5b1f0ff459df_story.html

    1. migrants seeking relief from the Syrian civil war

      So about 3-10% of the migrants?

    2. Brochettaward

      …to limit their rights.

      I wonder how often the Washington Post describes, say, self-defense as a right? The word doesn’t mean what they think it means.

      1. They use the word “Rights” when they mean to say “Entitlements”

  41. DOOMco

    she slapped the car??

    “After that, it is unknown to BCA agents what exactly happened, but the female became deceased in the alley.”

    (bolding mine)

    Authorities found no weapons at the scene.

    you know, apart from the murder weapon.

    “It’s certainly reasonable to assume that any police officer would be concerned about a possible ambush under these circumstances,”

    FUCKING NO.

    1. KibbledKristen

      You just knew these pigs would find any way they could to blame the victim and say “good shoot”.

      1. DOOMco

        How dare she put her hands on a cop car!

        1. AlexinCT

          They had to shoot that bitch to protect the tax payer from her damaging their property!

      2. commodious spittoon

        As soon as the officer’s race became known, they could count on the mainstream press to throw on the retrothrusters. Now it’s just a matter of inventing some millimeter-thin excuse to allow them to paper over the shooting. “He was startled! Can you blame him, what with all the anti-black, anti-Muslim violence going on?”

        1. DOOMco

          “hey, dispatch? I heard a noise in the alley over here, could you sent that one Somalian cop you hired?”

    2. Brett L

      They certainly took fingerprints to verify that, right? Or did the car just magically get on the wash list?

      1. They send a car for detailing after any incident comes close to it.

    3. DOOMco

      In my head, I can’t think of a reason she would strike the car in any angry way. I’m thinking it was the normal “I’m here/out of the way” tap, like how I tap the roof of my friends cars when they drop me off. its half “thank you”, half “it is now safe for you to drive”.
      Or it was hands on the roof as I lean to the window, because that’s a comfy way to talk into a sedan for some people.

      1. Raven Nation

        Or possibly, they had driven past where she was waiting and she let them know she was there.

        But even with all that, he shot through the opposite door which means he came close to killing his partner.

        1. DOOMco

          that too.

    4. Tundra

      “It’s certainly reasonable to assume that any police officer would be concerned about a possible ambush under these circumstances,”

      Nope. Not in that neighborhood.

      Vhyrus called it last night – this is their last hail mary. They searched her house, ffs, and came out with nothing.

      1. DOOMco

        If they are afraid of ambushes, they:
        shouldn’t be cops.
        should never leave the station.
        should never stop moving when they do leave the station.

      2. Tundra

        Police reform debate surges in Minneapolis mayoral race after Justine Damond shooting

        Reforming the police department has been a priority for Hodges since Jamar Clark was shot and killed in north Minneapolis in the fall of 2015, but Damond’s death in voter-rich southwest Minneapolis has renewed calls for change and thrust police reform into an already heated mayoral campaign.

        DON’T SHOOT THE TAX CATTLE!

        1. Pope Jimbo

          Uffda. Imagine the hurt Minneapolis would be in if the rich, white prog ladies all get scairt and move to the suburbs. I doubt that Little Mogadishu will be able to pick up the slack in tax revenues.

        2. Pope Jimbo

          I should also point out that this mayoral race is really shaping up to be quite the deal.

          Already uber-prog mayor has to fend off crazies that even further to the left than she is. There is no one in this race who is even moderately sane.

          1. Tundra

            Minneapolis appears to be thoroughly and completely fucked. Look for a productive class exodus, particularly when they enact the $15/hr minimum wage lunacy.

            Fuckers. I used to love that city.

      3. WTF

        They searched her house

        What in the fucking fuck is the basis for a search of someone’s home who is neither suspected not accused of any crime, and for which there is no probable cause?!

        1. DOOMco

          If they found anything at all, they could use it to justify murdering her!

        2. kbolino

          FYTW, section 27, subsection b, paragraph 6

    1. commodious spittoon

      Not gonna touch that even with your browser.

      1. straffinrun

        Hey, CS. You feeling any better about the car troubles. Was rereading Crime and Punishment today and thought, “Man I hope CS doesn’t kill a pawnbroker.”

        1. commodious spittoon

          I was looking up pawnbrokers in the area when I heard Jordan Peterson discuss it.

          I got it taken care of. Wrote off the Subaru, sadly. It’s likely fixable, but not for what it’s worth and not for what I can invest in it. Bought a nicer beater instead. Just need it to last me a year or so!

          1. straffinrun

            If you got the cash, how about this?
            What blew my mind about C and P was how the kid goes from just having a fantasy about the crime to dwelling on it to unconsciously carrying it out. Blunt truth from the Russian genius.

    2. Scruffy Nerfherder

      A lot of schlumpy dudes taking her up on the offer I see.

    3. AlmightyJB

      Ewww…sloppy seconds

    4. Q Continuum

      Some of her other “work”.

      https://vimeo.com/139219694

      NSFW.

      Question: Do these performance “artists” get their entire income from govt grants?

      Also, would.

      1. Scruffy Nerfherder

        Other than the horrible bolt-ons, she’s quite attractive.

      2. Count Potato

        Depends if she’s actually crazy or just trolling. She’s conventionally beautiful. So I also suspect that she might not be a feminist.

      3. whiz

        “Naked Selfies”? I thought that, in a selfie, one of the people in the picture is taking the picture. I don’t see that there. /pedant

  42. Whiskeyjack

    With everything bad out there I just wanted to share a story to reaffirm that there are good people out there. Good Samaritan

    And hoping that the html worked.

    1. DOOMco

      link worked
      welcome?

      1. Whiskeyjack

        Thanks. I’m mostly just a dirty lurker, I think this might be my first meaningful post.

    2. Q Continuum

      That is a nice story.

      It’s also fun imagining what progs would say about it:

      “Stupid Christfags should remember their Sky Man gave the woman Parkinson’s in the first place. Some benevolent deity He is!”

      1. Whiskeyjack

        Yeah it’s my uncle and family. They are actually going to be interviewed on NBC news tonight as well.

        I can only image the hoops they would have had to go through to help this woman through a government charity.

        1. straffinrun

          Two posts now? Lay off the Whiskey, Jack. 😉

    3. KibbledKristen

      Very cool!

  43. Q Continuum

    I know this story has been posted several times, but I just love this quote:

    http://www.politico.com/story/2017/07/25/debbie-wasserman-schultz-aide-arrest-240960

    ‘”This is clearly a right-wing media-driven prosecution by a United States Attorney’s Office that wants to prosecute people for working while Muslim,” Chris Gowen, Awan’s attorney, said in an email declaring his client’s innocence.’

    1. DOOMco

      hah

    2. commodious spittoon

      I totally thought this was the Minnesota cop. “I TOLD YOU GUYS!!”

  44. KibbledKristen

    So I sent a testing list to a bunch of my colleagues to test a new web site. I included a page that I knew was broken, just to see if they would catch it. I got a reply from one tester so far of “everything worked!”.

    FML.

    1. Q Continuum

      ENTRAPMENT!

    2. straffinrun

      You should do the links sometime. Bet you get the same result.

    3. Pope Jimbo

      Why are you trying to make your colleagues enact your labor? (or however that goes)

    4. Tundra

      Amateurs. I always hedge my bet:

      “Kristen, I haven’t had a chance to go through the whole thing, but what I’ve seen so far looks great. Nice job!”

  45. Enough About Palin

    Peter North Hardest Hit.

    I lose at least 50% of my sperm damn near every day.

  46. commodious spittoon

    Rolling Stone features Justin Trudeau on new cover.

    Best twitter take: “oh shit did he bomb a marathon?”

    1. compgrokker

      Oh man, that’s the funniest thing I’ve read all day. I seriously just burst out laughing at my desk… thank the gods I work at home, or I’d be getting some funny looks from coworkers.

    1. ChipsnSalsa

      “Charged with assault” should not be connected to a case that involved death.

      1. WTF

        In explaining the charges, Kleine said “there’s no evidence whatsoever that these officers intentionally killed Zachary Bearheels.”

        Which would make the appropriate charge manslaughter.

        1. Unreconstructed

          But read further – the “assault with a weapon” charge carries the same sentence as manslaughter, but with a lower burden of proof. If I didn’t know better, I’d think the prosecutor was actually trying for a conviction here.

          1. WTF

            Interesting, and unusual.

  47. Tonio

    “DWS is getting her floppy dugs caught in a wringer.”

    That’s poetry, I tells ya, poetry.

  48. robc

    Speaking of poetry, did anyone invite Agile Cyborg over here?

    1. Brochettaward

      There’s no need. Agile left a little bit of himself inside of us all. Seeds, if you will.

      1. Tundra

        Space jizz is mighty.

    2. DOOMco

      I haven’t seen him in a while over there.
      I also don’t go there very often.

  49. Enough About Palin

    Saw a documentary on Tupak last night. What a fucking narcissist. And all of his shit sounds the same (and I like rap).

    1. KibbledKristen

      I thought he was fantastic in Gridlock’d, though.

    2. Gilmore

      I am also a pac hater

      Never did anything 4 me

      1. AlexinCT

        Not even when he got shot and became one pac?

    1. DOOMco

      top reply.

      1. commodious spittoon

        Inbetweeners for the win.

        That show is like girlfriend repellant, at least for the women I’ve tried to introduce.

        1. DOOMco

          for most i think so.

        2. Rick C-137

          My wife actually loves it, but she has a pervy sense of humor

    2. ChipsnSalsa

      I guess the reactions posted depend on the postee’s physical location.

  50. Ed Wuncler

    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/07/26/trump-announces-ban-on-transgender-individuals-serving-in-military.html

    “After consultation with my Generals and military experts, please be advised that the United States Government will not accept or allow…Transgender individuals to serve in any capacity in the U.S. Military. Our military must be focused on decisive and overwhelming..victory and cannot be burdened with the tremendous medical costs and disruption that transgender in the military would entail. Thank you.”

    I see a shit storm of epic proportions on social media.

    1. The Zenome Project

      Checking conservative Twitter, MAGA World and NeverTrump both seem to agree that this is a distraction tactic, but for different purposes. NeverTrumpers are saying that Trump might be trying to amp up the conservative/nationalist base before he “unprofessionally” fires Sessions. A couple of neocons are bickering about why Trump announced the policy and not Mattis. MAGA World is saying that this is a media distraction tactic from the DWS investigation and the HC vote. I’d rather just watch and see where the pieces fit.

      1. commodious spittoon

        Some guy I follow, partly for the insight and partly for the borderline-conspiracy theorizing lulz, insists that Trump deliberately makes himself the magnet for abuse, then abuses his cabinet members to make them sympathetic figures among his opponents. So Sessions, only a few months ago considered a reprehensible racist by Dems who get all of their knowledge of the world drip-fed by MSNBC, is now the only thing standing between America and Russia’s imminent annexation. And, I suppose, by that logic, Mattis is free to dump water on the PC brush fire moving through the DoD while Trump takes the heat for his inflammatory tweets.

    2. The Zenome Project

      I’m a little weary of the derp coming from liberal Twitter, so someone else may need to give a synopsis. Dave Rubin’s objections are well-reasoned and sane, but that’s a tiny minority of the left.

      “Trans ban makes no sense and is red meat. Ironically, my DM this morning was about a gun toting trans woman I met…”

      “Argument can be made about govt paying for surgery. But anyone who has passed mental/physical requirements should be 100% equal.”

      1. ChipsnSalsa

        So, Dave Rubin is TK?

        1. TK

          “The left left me, I didn’t leave the left!”

      2. Bob

        Passed the men’s or women’s physical requirements? Because those requirements are tied to promotions.

  51. Scruffy Nerfherder

    Scientism Symposium

    Alternatively, how to miss the point.

    At the opening ceremony, Countess Bettina Bernadotte, president of the Council of the Lindau Meetings spoke about the need for scientists to respond to those who challenge scientific facts. “Scientists cannot ignore what is happening in the world,” she said. “Some rulers, and people, seem to feel threatened by progress and the fact-oriented power of science.” This was also the theme of the keynote address, “Science as an Insurance Policy to the Risks of Climate Change,” by Nobel laureate Steven Chu. Due to a family emergency that prevented Chu from being present, the speech was read by William E. Moerner, Nobel laureate in Chemistry.

    1. AlexinCT

      Yeah, because the scientific method and history both clearly show that whenever consensus science was challenged it was by heretics that needed to be brought low.

      1. WTF

        They always tout consensus because the scientific method doesn’t support their CAGW hypothesis.
        But they FUCKING LOVE SCIENCE!!

  52. The Late P Brooks

    A thought regarding the transgender-while-military discussion:

    What roles will these people be serving? If a guy wants to wear a dress to Ranger School, I don’t think that’s gonna work out well for anybody.

    But there are also a lot of accountants and floor sweepers and graphic designers. Even intelligence analysts; I’m sure they’re not poring over still-damp reconnaisance photos with a magnifying glass, but whatever they do, what difference does it really make? So what if the guy in the next cubicle is reading Hillary’s e-mails while wearing silk stockings and a garter belt? I’m sure there are people right now on the “Don’t tell” plan.

    Once they get out of basic training, I’m guessing a major part of the headache goes away. BUT- not all of it, and why can’t they find a way to offer their services to the nation via an alternate path? In short, if they’re grandstanding in pursuit of a political agenda, fuck ’em.

    1. KibbledKristen

      Back in the DADT days, the military was desperate for Arabic translators, but they discharged a bunch of Arabic-speaking gays. Smart.

    2. Bob

      As far as I know there’s no ban on cross dressing or being effeminate or masculine. There are physical requirements, and those are tied to promotions. If a man took a female physical training test they would likely blow it away and the score would give them an advantage for promotions. There’s also separate uniforms, separate regulations for hair, separate living quarters, etc.

      My guess would be this ban will come down to the fact that trying to do anything which requires uniform, hair, physical requirement accommodations will be the line. Going out dressed opposite sex on Friday nights will not be over the line.

    3. R C Dean

      I think people are asking the wrong question: “Can we accommodate trannies in the military?”

      I think Trump answered the right question: “Why should we accommodate trannies in the military?” If they have to be accommodated (and they do), is the juice in military effectiveness worth the squeeze? His answer was “No”, and I don’t see anything yet that makes me think its the wrong answer.

  53. The Late P Brooks

    MAGA World is saying that this is a media distraction tactic from the DWS investigation and the HC vote.

    Why the fuck would you do that? Why would you want Rachel Maddow whipping her dozens of faithful followers into a frenzy over Trump’s plans to round up the gays and ship them off to death camps, when she could be hemming and hawing about what a giant nothingburger it is to have the former DNC chair under investigation for massive security breaches?

    1. The Zenome Project

      It’s possible that the FBI is investigating more people in her circle and they don’t want the media to talk about it yet. DNC is a bit like the mafia, I think.

    2. one true athena

      I don’t think the DWS stuff plays into it, because Trump/Bannon/etc gotta know that’d be buried as much as possible anyway. Especially if the dude’s out on bail, there’s probably nothing going to happen for awhile anyway. The Obamacare stuff though, I can see why they might think it’d be good idea to have all the leftists chasing the rabbit of trans in the military, and not crying about Don’t Take Away Muh Healthcare And KIll Me Dead.

      and of course, the best part of Trump doing it by tweet, is that they can “clarify the policy” later. and when there’s a shitstorm over that clarification, they get to “clarify it some more”. it’s a perfect rabbit that’ll run whenever they want it to.

      1. R C Dean

        Especially if the dude’s out on bail, there’s probably nothing going to happen for awhile anyway.

        The Dems desperately don’t want this investigation to go anywhere. I think that’s why a foreign national who is part of a criminal organization (according to the FBI) who was arrested trying to leave the country got released on bail; the fix was in with the trial judge.

        He wouldn’t even need to go to the embassy to get a passport. He’s part of an international crime ring, remember? Even if he did turn over all his passports, he can get another one fedexed to him any time, would be my working assumption.

        The odds are this guy rabbits out of the country, and the investigation dies.

  54. KibbledKristen

    The MSM is (ironically) inherently conservative and wishy-washy. The only way this DWS story is going to get into the MSM is for smaller outlets to keep hammering it, and Tweeting it, and Facederping it. At some point, it will gain critical mass and the MSM will be embarrassed not to have reported on it.

  55. KibbledKristen

    More on DWS (as a shoe hound, I keep wanting to type DSW). These people.

  56. KibbledKristen

    T-Mass uses the phrase “squad goals”. IFL him.

  57. Raston Bot

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/im-a-scientist-the-trump-administration-reassigned-me-for-speaking-up-about-climate-change/2017/07/19/389b8dce-6b12-11e7-9c15-177740635e83_story.html?utm_term=.87268a81da81

    a week old but still LULZ worthy..

    On Wednesday, I filed two forms — a complaint and a disclosure of information — with the U.S. Office of Special Counsel. I filed the disclosure because eliminating my role coordinating federal engagement and leaving my former position empty exacerbate the already significant threat to the health and the safety of certain Alaska Native communities.

    NOOOOOOOOOO NOT THE COORDINATOR FOR FEDERAL ENGAGEMENT!!!!!!!!!!11

  58. Raston Bot

    swamp draining continues…

    I didn’t think I’d ever leave the CIA. But because of Trump, I quit.

    related, i didn’t think i’d ever vote GOP but because of Trump…

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/i-didnt-think-id-ever-leave-the-cia-but-because-of-trump-i-quit/2017/02/20/fd7aac3e-f456-11e6-b9c9-e83fce42fb61_story.html?tid=a_inl&utm_term=.3ec4cd4369f8

    Clarification: This column should have included a disclosure of donations made by author Edward Price in support of 2016 Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton. In August, Price gave a total of $5,000 to the Clinton campaign and the Democratic Party.