Author: Tonio

  • John McCain, Arizona Politics and Libertarians

    [et_pb_section admin_label=”section”][et_pb_row admin_label=”row”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Text” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid”]

    It's not a toomah!
    It’s not a toomah!

    US Senator John McCain (R, AZ) was just operated on for glioblastoma, an aggressive brain cancer. He has a roughly even chance of surviving for another year, three-year survival rate is in the single digits. Should McCain die in office or resign, his replacement will be appointed by the Governor of Arizona. One unique feature of Arizona law is that the governor must appoint a senator of the same political party as the senator being replaced. This appointment will last until a special election in 2018.

    Current Arizona Governor Doug Ducey is a Republican whose term runs through 2018 and is eligible for re-election to a second four-year term that year. So it seems likely that Ducey will have to appoint a replacement for McCain. Ducey, a businessman prior to his political career, is no libertarian but does have some liberty-friendly positions on shrinking government and school vouchers.

    Arizona is a mostly red state with some libertarian tendencies. Arizona legalized medical marijuana in 2010, but in 2016 rejected Proposition 205, Arizona Marijuana Legalization Initiative, by 2.64 percent. Arizona has some of the most gun-friendly laws in the nation. Arizona voters also elected Sheriff Joe Arpaio repeatedly.

    McCain’s was last elected in 2016 and his term runs through 2022. The best outcome for libertarians is that Gov. Ducey will appoint a young, liberty-friendly senator to replace McCain. Given McCain’s prognosis, his replacement would have a good three to four years of tenure before seeking election. Such a senator would lack McCain’s baggage and track record, and could establish a name for himself or herself before standing for election in Nov, 2022.

    Of the eleven appointed US Senators who have sought election since 2000, only one has failed election. There were an additional eight appointed US Senators during this period who did not seek election. This is, however, a rough metric.

    When discussing terms of office I’m using the last full year of the term of office and discounting the few days of the following year when the term actually ends. Sources Consulted: US Senate website, Wikipedia, Ballotpedia, NRA-ILA.

    [/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section]

  • Part Three: The Gliberdammerung

    Previously: Part One – The Annunciation, Part Two – The Obligatory Production Number

    Jane Fappington-Smyth slumped in the elevator lobby, waiting for the old woman to arrive, annoyed that she had to meet and greet her predecessor like she was an intern or an assistant or something. She, Jane, was now Editor of Thought! magazine; Regina Kestrel had had her day. But no matter, today would be her shining moment. She was going to do the one thing which Kestrel never could – rid the magazine’s website of the hated yokel commenters. Gilhooly and the others would take her seriously after this.

    She could hear the receptionist yelling, presumably into the phone handling one of the many prank calls. “No, there is no Hugh Briss here. Please stop calling.” She wondered if this one would last a week. The elevator lobby was dated and old-fashioned, just like Kestrel. Lots of chrome and smoked glass, the shiny sculpture of the Thought! magazine nameplate covering the wall opposite the elevators. Large antique metal ashtrays, tapered metal bowls from the days when people actually smoked lined the walls. This was a liberalterian magazine, after all. A real one that got printed out on thin shiny paper every month and mailed to people who mattered. People who had cocktail parties where you could meet Tim Russert and get invited onto the Sunday morning cable talk shows if you sucked up.

    Gilhooly joined her in the lobby. It made Jane feel slightly better that she wasn’t greeting Kestrel alone, but equally annoyed that Kestrel was still getting the royal treatment after all these years. “So, Jane, about that Salter fellow, the one whose mother, the nurse…”

    “If we’d have covered that then it would have given them a taste of power,” said Jane, interrupting peevishly. “What, then? Thought! acting as their own personal Sixty Minutes whenever any of their yokel friends or relatives get in trouble? These are not people who exercise good judgment; this is the ‘hold my beer’ crowd. It was a good opportunity to rid ourselves of them, and I took it. That bullshit piece I published the next day about that other police overreaction case was the ultimate ‘fuck off’ to them. It felt so good after all those years of sleights and snark.”

    “The man sells tractors for a living. Tractors.” Jane was on a tear. “Imagine bringing him to a cocktail party. ‘What do you do, Mr. Salter?’ ‘I sell tractors for a living. Hyuk.’ What would that person actually have to say to Andrew Sullivan or Arianna Huffington? ‘Yep, tractor business real good this year.’ Andrew may be barking mad, but at least he’s witty and presentable, and he had the foresight to not have comments on his website,” she said, getting in a desperate dig at the founding editor.

    “Don’t even get me started on his kids’ names – ‘Notapenny Fortribute’ – poor thing will have to spend her life explaining to people that her father is a bitter clinger. Hopefully, she goes by ‘Penny.’”
    “Jane,” the voice came through her fashionable headset with the purple light which matched the highlights of her hair. Just because you were editor of a major think-tank magazine didn’t mean you had to stop looking stylish, unlike Kestrel who looked like everyone’s grandma and probably bought her dowdy outfits at Dress Barn. “Ms. Kestrel is boarding the elevator. Oh, and the commenters just mooned Preet and taunted him in song and someone managed to setup a live feed; it’s going viral.”

    “Fuck.” Jane felt herself about to throw up and looked around desperately. The ashtrays. She lurched toward the nearest one on her over-tall heels and buried her face in the bowl just in time. The gush of digestive juices amplified the long-dormant stale cigarette smell which wafted up to her nostrils causing a fresh gout of vomit, this time fully emptying her stomach into the foul, reeking bowl which didn’t have a flush feature.

    The elevator doors opened. The first thing that hit Regina Kestrel was the acrid stench of vomit. Hmph. In her day it had been piss; good writers always smelled of piss. She stepped off the elevator and recognized her successor, all rump and purple bangs, obliviously throwing up into one of the corridor ashtrays. The purple hair always reminded Regina of her ten-year-old great niece.

    “Dmitry.”

    “Regina,” said Gilhooly sheepishly, glancing at Fappington-Smyth.

    Jane straightened up, wiping her mouth with the back of her hand and turned around to see Kestrel. Fuck, fuck, fuckity fuck.

    “Another one, dearie? At your age, too,” asked Kestrel.

    “Hello, Regina,” she said hoarsely, her throat burning with stomach acids. “No, it’s not that. Those yokeltarian monsters in the dungeon just mooned and taunted Preet in a really bad musical number and it got out and went viral. But I’m getting rid of them, and those stupid squirrels, too!”

    “Foolish girl,” hissed Kestrel.

    “Oh, what-ev-er,” Jane finally broke composure and did something she had always wanted to do, sass and eye-roll the old woman. “You always hated the commenters, anyway.”

    Gilhooly shook his head slowly.

    The elevator dinged and the doors opened and squirrels began streaming out. Goddammit, thought Jane, someone had put the motherfucking squirrels on the goddamn elevator as a joke, probably that little shit Suave. She was so going to dock his pay for that. The squirrels didn’t scatter but stayed together in a roiling gray mass which swarmed in her direction. She stepped out of the path of the swarm, pressing herself up against the wall. The swarm then changed direction towards her. Jane looked desperately at Gilhooly and Kestrel, who looked on disapprovingly from well outside the path of the swarm.

    Suddenly, she understood. She had laughed at their warnings and ignored their explanations. She had persisted in her attempts to destroy tradition. At least she wouldn’t have to live with the shame and embarrassment of defeat.

    She backed up against the wall and began screaming. The swarm quickly engulfed her and the screaming continued for thirty-eight seconds, a very long and uncomfortable thirty-eight seconds for Gilhooly and Kestrel, and presumably the poor receptionist. The swarm of squirrels then disengaged, revealing a skeletonized body. The face had been eaten completely off, but the purple-streaked hair remained intact. The body seemed to want to take a step forward but both knees collapsed, then the pelvis hit the floor and the torso pitched forward into a faceplant on the carpet and lay still.

    “You tell them and tell them,” observed Kestrel.

    “Indeed,” said Gilhooly, sucking on his unlit pipe. Gilhooly pulled out his phone and called the special emergency number he’d been provided.

    The swarm of squirrels returned to the elevator doors and reared up to push the “down” button.

    “Sunshine Cleaning Services…Good evening, Dr. Gilhooly…Yes, we’ll send a van right away, about fifteen minutes…Of course, sir, the ‘problem’ will be handled with the utmost discretion and dignity.”

     

    Next: The taint-withering conclusion.

  • HR 610 and the Conundrum of School Choice

     

     

    The full text of HR 610 may be found here.

    H.R.610 – To distribute Federal funds for elementary and secondary education in the form of vouchers for eligible students and to repeal a certain rule relating to nutrition standards in schools.

    HR 610 is a seemingly dry and dusty bill currently with the House Committee on Education and the Workforce; but HR 610 has the potential to fundamentally re-shape publicly funded education in the US. Previously I covered the “nutrition standards” aka school lunch part of this bill. Now let’s dive in to the delicious libertarian puzzle that is the voucher part of HR 610.

    Section 102 repeals the The Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, which was part of President Lyndon Johnson’s War on Poverty. The 1965 act in it’s much-amended form tips the federal education dollars scales towards poor students by net funding poor students at a higher rate than non-poor, which creates perverse incentives failing students.

    Repeal of the 1965 act is coupled in Sec 102 (b) with a limitation on the authority of the US Secretary of Education:

    The authority of the Secretary under this title is limited to evaluating State applications under section 104 and making payments to States under section 103. The Secretary shall not impose any further requirements on States with respect to elementary and secondary education beyond the requirements of this title.

    So, still federal funding of local schools but no more micromanagement. We may fully expect the delicious irony of critics of this carping about the lack of accountability when the consistent position of those critics has been more money, always more money, while the schools continue to fail. Presumably there is some large number of net jobs in in public education whose only function is to collect the figures for the US DoEd so as to keep those block grants coming. Those jobs would suddenly become superfluous, as would the jobs at DoEd to check those figures and approve the block grants.

    Section 103 is the real meat of the bill. Currently block grants to schools are awarded according to multiple criteria. At the most basic level is per-child funding to Local Education Agencies (school boards), then the extra poor-kid funding as outlined above, and various other shenanigans. The new legislation would entirely flatten the federal block grant program to proportional per-child funding. True equality.

    Section 104 states that to be eligible for block grants that various states must make it lawful for parents of an eligible child to elect to enroll their child in any public or private elementary or secondary school in the State; or to home-school their child. So, a soft mandate on the states, but a mandate the states may avoid by foregoing federal block grants.

    Section 105 contains a mandate that states who wish to receive federal block grants must establish a voucher program:

    (5) DISTRIBUTION TO PARENTS.—

     

    (A) IN GENERAL.—From the amounts allocated under paragraph (3), each local educational agency that receives funds under such paragraph shall distribute a portion of such funds, in an amount equal to the amount described in paragraph (2), to the parents of each eligible child within the local educational agency’s geographical area who elect to send their child to a private school or to home-school their child (as the case may be) and whose child is included in the count of such eligible children under paragraph (1)(A), which amount shall be distributed in a manner so as to ensure that such payments will be used for appropriate educational expenses.

     

    (B) RESERVATION.—A local educational agency described in this paragraph may reserve not more than 1 percent of the funds available for distribution under subparagraph (A) to pay administrative costs associated with carrying out the activities described in such subparagraph.

     

    There you have it. Federal tax dollars going to icky religious schools, objectively evil for-profit schools and slack-jawed fundamentalist home-schoolers. And the act doesn’t say anything about whether those schools must be accredited by anyone. Someone bring the fainting couch.

    Treating everyone the same? Sounds suspiciously like A-N-A-R-C-H-Y. Also, triple word score.

    There is a one percent rakeoff for local education agencies for administrative purposes which is not unreasonable. The voucher payments are not to be considered as income to the child or his parents. The act also contains the interesting definition: The term “eligible child” means a child aged 5 to 17, inclusive. So, no federally funded Pre-K, and no federal funding for kids who were “held back” for a year or two. Everyone gets thirteen years of federal education block grant money.

    But now let’s look at what the act doesn’t do. It doesn’t require the states to setup a voucher program using state funds. Some states may become so cross at Congress that they forego federal grant money altogether rather than pass any money through to competitors or home-schoolers. And the act does not address funding; congress will still budget a line item for those block grants, but hopefully will reduce that amount as states drop off.

    The House Committee on Education and the Workforce, where HR 610 currently resides, has twenty two Republican members including Chairwoman Virginia Foxx (NC), Vice Chairman Joe Wilson (SC) and Tea Party star Dave Brat (Virginia).  The committee also includes seventeen Democrats. It will be interesting to see if the Republican members really do have the stomach to upset the apple cart. But they have cover for HR 610 which is far less extreme than HR 899 (Massie, KY) which outright eliminates the DoEd.

  • The Glibening ~ Part 2

     

     

    The commenters began to shuffle out in a desultory fashion, their feet making splishing and sploshing noises as they trod through the various reeking viscous liquids and quivery bits. Rufus began singing the Commenter Anthem:

    Every comment’s sacred,

    Every comment’s great,

    Everytime we post one,

    She gets quite irate.

     

    Monégasque Mercenary and Woodchuck of Foreboding began to skip towards one another and as they passed they locked arms and slid one eighty on the slickery floor.

    Every snark is wanted,

    Every snark is good,

    Every Godwin needed,

    In our neighborhood.

     

    Axl and Rufus, Drs Bombay (you know, from Mumbai) and Funkenstein, and various other pairings of commenters  also did the skip, link and spin until the whole chamber was filled with singing, dancing and airborne droplets of bodily fluids kicked up by all the footwork.

    Let the snowflakes spill tears,

    By gallons in their pain,

    Market glut shall make us,

    Flush them down the drain.

     

    Once each dance couple parted the two members each skipped towards a new partner in a great chain reaction of free radicals for liberty.

    Every fact-check needed,

    Every takedown great,

    Every time we reason,

    Progs get quite irate.

     

    Then the commenters all linked arms and did a kick-step-kick first leftwards then rightwards.

    Let Preet now come with,

    Subpoenas by the pound,

    Ken shall show that mutton-

    Head the law more sound.

    At the mention of Preet the commenters unlinked arms, bent over, dropped trou or flipped up skirts and mooned with the full knowledge that performance of rude gestures in an absurd fictional production number does not rise anywhere near the level of an actual threat.

    Trolls they doth Gambol,

    Cross the fields and plain,

    Nothing we can e’er do,

    Will make them not insane.

     

    The sight of the commenters’ bums was not a pretty one what with all the welts, boils, sores, lesions, scabs, pustules, scars and tattoos. But show and shake them they did as if there were actually an audience, or a camera or if the scene were being described by an invisible narrator in a piece of cringeworthy slashfic.

    Every comment’s sacred,

    Every comment’s great,

    Everytime we post one,

    She gets quite irate.

     

    With the commenters still bent-over and mooning, the most dainty and petite of the commenters, wearing a shimmery elfin dress such as one would see on an Olympic ice-dancing contestant slid towards the end of the line of commenters and vaulted upwards and over in a somersault then untucking to do a series of cartwheels along the backs of the commenters. before vaulting off the last commenter and exiting stage right.

    The commenters quickly pulled their garments up and formed a human pyramid with Dr. Bombay at the apex, his South Asian indigenous shamanic outfit festooned with multiple indigenous South Asian gnostic symbols of various sizes and colors, a virtual follow spot illuminating him.

    And, cut.

  • HR 610 – Restoring Parental Freedom to Pack Lunches, Etc.

    Congressman Steve King (R, IA) has introduced HR 610, titled Choices in Education Act of 2017. The bill does two things – establishes a nationwide voucher program and tinkers with the school lunch regulations. I’ll cover the voucher program at length in another article. Here’s a brief walk-through of the the school lunches part.

    Hey! Teachers! Leave them kids alone!

    Section 9(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1758(a)(1)(A)(i)) is amended by inserting before the semicolon the following: “, to establish a calorie maximum for individual school lunches, or to prohibit a child from eating a lunch provided by the child’s parent or legal guardian”.

    That would amend §1758 to read as follows (changes in bold):

    • 1758. Program requirements

    (a) Nutritional requirements

    (1)(A) Lunches served by schools participating in the school lunch program under this chapter shall meet minimum nutritional requirements prescribed by the Secretary on the basis of tested nutritional research, except that the minimum nutritional requirements-

    (i) shall not be construed to prohibit the substitution of foods to accommodate the medical or other special dietary needs of individual students, to establish a calorie maximum for individual school lunches, or to prohibit a child from eating a lunch provided by the child’s parent or legal guardian; and

    (ii) shall, at a minimum, be based on the weekly average of the nutrient content of school lunches.

    So, no calorie maximums and no confiscations of lunches sent from home. Not that the Congress has any business meddling in education in the first place, but this is not the typical unfunded mandate to take positive action which Congress has traditionally imposed upon public schools.

    Public education priority. All your lunch are belong to us.

     

    The no-calorie-maximums part will doubtlessly cause hysterics among the usual suspects, but in practicality will free the school lunch folks from having to worry about going over the limit by one calorie and incurring the wrath of US DoEd retribution.  And while this is indeed micromanagement of the schools by Congress, it is a net gain because it rolls back existing onerous federal regulations; regulations which should not exist, of course. The US Secretary of Education would still be in the business of  prescribing minimum nutritional requirements for school lunches.

    The second part is a huge win for parents – no confiscation of lunches sent from home. HR 610 may also override the peanut butter bans in place in many schools.  While still meddling in education, this is a more libertarian-friendly form of meddling as it articulates an individual right which the government may not infringe – much like the First Amendment.

     

    The House Committee on Education and the Workforce, where HR 610 currently resides, has twenty two Republican members including Chairwoman Virginia Foxx (NC), Vice Chairman Joe Wilson (SC) and Tea Party star Dave Brat (Virginia).  The committee also includes seventeen Democrats. It will be interesting to see what they do with this.

  • The Glibening, Part One: The Annunciation

    The Glibening, Part One: The Annunciation

    by Tonio

    Feb 12, 2017

     

    First Commenter stepped onto the the ceremonial soapbox in the Great Chamber, his badge of office, an outsized analog shower clock, swinging to and fro from its rope and nodded to Monégasque Mercenary who narrowed his gaze at the crowd.  The assembled commenters became uncharacteristically quiet. “Assholes,” said First Commenter, “I’ve got some bad news for you all – the dungeons are closed and we all have to leave. They’ve decided to go with unionized prog commenters; the desperate dregs of Gawker who will churn forth endless laudatory comments about Lakshmi’s tattles.. They are even promoting the trolls to commenter trainees.”

    A great cacophony went up. There were hoots, howls, growls, yowls, screeches, preachments, garment-rending, vomiting, farting, pissing, hissing, moaning, incontinence from every orifice imaginable and from some which you don’t want to imagine. There were accusations, counter-accusations, finger-pointing, denouncements, critiques, jeers, tears, laughter and despair.

    A free-for-all melee ensued. Old grudges were revived and prosecuted. Weapons were drawn and employed. Offal was grabbed and ripped from recently opened bodily cavities then flung causing a new round of retching. Eventually the commenters’ energies and ichors played out and the more solid parts of their excorporealated tissues had dropped, slumped or slid to the floor and were slowly migrating towards the floor drains borne upon the myriad rivulets of their commingled humors.

    Dr Funkenstein, the homeopathist, worked the crowd offering his “medical” services, but received no takers. The bodies of the dead and nearly-so were looted. Wounds were bound and elixirs drunk. Eventually the surviving commenters pulled themselves together and returned their attention to the soapbox.

    First Commenter raised his big hand in the air and clenched it into a great fist. The commenters quieted down. He lowered his big hand and raised his small hand so as to read from a scrap of parchment. “Ok, people, no more of that. Just clear out your things and queue up by the West gate. You can take anything which is reasonably yours but nothing that is reasonably theirs, take nothing that is nailed down or screwed down, take absolutely nothing that has their inventory tag on it. You have until midnight, people. And I know I’ll regret this, but any questions?”

    Hands were raised, with not a few forming rude gestures.

    “Mario.”

    “Couldn’t we sacrifice an icky papist to them, you know, someone who believes in weeping statues which are the anithesis of rationality,” asked Mario as he bound a nasty bite on his forearm and looked pointedly at Axl. “You know, to curry favor and all?”

    “Silence, atheist sodomite,” commanded Axl shaking his heavy bishop’s crozier at Mario and fingering the bejewelled pectoral cross he wore overtop his episcopal robes. “You’re just pissed off because your boyfriend Rico let you down.”

    Mario started whining and rocking back and forth while looking at a laminated pocket photo of boyishly handsome journalist Rico Suave who had debunked the Tiger Beat tentacle-rape hoax article. How far his hero had fallen since then.

    “Whine louder, sissy boy, maybe someone will care.”

    Mario bellowed, then reared up and pivoted towards Axl.

    First Commenter looked at Dr. Bombay and pointed at the two antagonists. The shaman began chanting in Gujarati and reached into his camel scrotum sporran and drew forth a putrefied monkey paw which he held upright, palm outward by the protruding stumps of its radius and ulna, and shook it at each of the two antagonists in turn. Odd bits of rotting simian flesh pelted the crowd. Suddenly, Mario and Axl both shrieked, grabbed their crotches and flopped to the floor writhing in pain to the polite applause of the crowd.

    “Thank you, Dr. Yes, Tom.”

    “Couldn’t we just stay on and eat the squirrels…and then each other,” asked the bitter old commenter with rheumy eyes as he licked something unsavory from his gnarled claws with their long yellowed nails.

    “No, Tom, we can’t. They’re going to evict the squirrels and replace them with a machine, a great electrical engine.”

    A tumult of chittering and barking arose from behind the exquisitely carved ebony screen filling the window into the Chamber of the Squirrels. The screen depicted a great beast spawning forth monsters and tentacles which in turn devoured humans and even its own spawn. Disturbing in their seeming normalcy were the interspersed carvings of squirrels going about their business unmolested by the beast and indifferent to the commenters. Then suddenly the squirrel vocalizations stopped only to be replaced by a scritchity, scrapity grindity sound which grew louder and louder. First flakes, then a virtual stream of black sawdust fell down the sill of the window and within a minute the only remaining parts of the screen were the carvings of the squirrels and a supporting lattice. The squirrels then streamed out through the remnants of the screen and swarmed through the Great Chamber into the hall towards the exit.

    “Goodbye,” said Rufus, tears streaming down his cheeks.

    (To be continued.)

  • A Place of One’s Own

    by Tonio, Feb 12, 2017, (incorporating edits by the estimable Jo Ferova)

     

    We have embarked upon an enterprise and we now have a blog-type thingy of our very own. Thanks to the web design people, lawyers, funders, cheerleaders, naggers, cranks and everyone else who made this possible.

    Now what? How much content do we need to post to stay respectable? How much of that needs to be original, and what’s the article length we are trying to hit? Is there an editorial committee? What are our standards?

    We’ve made a big splash on opening day with multiple articles. Can we maintain this and attract enough others to provide like-minded, high-quality articles?

    We. Need. Content. There are no requirements for journalism degrees, publication credits or other mainstream media credentials. We as commenters have been providing content, some of us for years. This is our strength. We are not the mainstream media and we do not live in their bubble. We are scientists – noted chemists, researchers into gravitational waves, innovators in robotics and engineering. We are teachers and cooks, lawyers, web and tech devs, Uber drivers, clerks and weirdos, and we have been making waves and driving our own conversation for plenty long enough.

    We got this, and we have the education, skill and life experience to back it up.

    Some things like Betsy DeVos’ confirmation require very little effort, research or writing – it’s basically cut and paste. Just like the AM/PM Links articles on that other website. Can be done by pretty much anyone. This is the non-original content, aka news.

    As to the tone of the enterprise – I would not seek to impose any rules on anyone else, but here are the things I’m going to strive for: no backbiting of H&R, Reason or the Reason Staff in editorial content. I don’t want this to be a bitchfest. I don’t want this to turn into something that only exists to react against something else. That way lies the shrill pettiness of blogs like “A Smarter Andrew Sullivan,” “Sully Watch” and (gods help us) “Sully Watch Watch.” Reactions to the writings of others are always fair game.

    If Shikha Dalmia does another “Fascists had it coming because speech is violence” tweet I would consider it fair to react against that, to point out that Dalmia has a history of anti-free speech tweets and to give an impassioned defense of the First Amendment. Leave the name-calling to the commenters – ours or theirs. Refer to her as Shikha Dalmia initially and thereafter as Dalmia.

    Now, as to our former colleagues back in the old country: I will not begrudge anyone for simply staying at H&R. I will encourage people to join us but never hint or insist that they leave H&R.

    Our comments added value to H&R – not much, but enough. Both by driving page counts which drives advertising revenue, and by attracting others to the debates, fact-checking snark, trolling and general cringe-worthiness. We’ve seen SugarFree’s stories plagiarized by the WaPo, I’ve seen arguments and turns of phrases used by myself and others show up later in other places. Some of those people will follow us to our new home and Reason’s loss shall be our gain. I have no interest in harming Reason, but as libertarians often point out, not-giving is a very different thing than taking. They are no longer advancing our needs, so we should no longer give them aid and comfort by adding value to their site. We are competing with them in the marketplace of ideas.

    Game on.

     

    A/N: (originally published as “The Road Ahead,” edited to reflect evolving situation)