Category: Media

  • The Glibening, Part One: The Annunciation

    The Glibening, Part One: The Annunciation

    by Tonio

    Feb 12, 2017

     

    First Commenter stepped onto the the ceremonial soapbox in the Great Chamber, his badge of office, an outsized analog shower clock, swinging to and fro from its rope and nodded to Monégasque Mercenary who narrowed his gaze at the crowd.  The assembled commenters became uncharacteristically quiet. “Assholes,” said First Commenter, “I’ve got some bad news for you all – the dungeons are closed and we all have to leave. They’ve decided to go with unionized prog commenters; the desperate dregs of Gawker who will churn forth endless laudatory comments about Lakshmi’s tattles.. They are even promoting the trolls to commenter trainees.”

    A great cacophony went up. There were hoots, howls, growls, yowls, screeches, preachments, garment-rending, vomiting, farting, pissing, hissing, moaning, incontinence from every orifice imaginable and from some which you don’t want to imagine. There were accusations, counter-accusations, finger-pointing, denouncements, critiques, jeers, tears, laughter and despair.

    A free-for-all melee ensued. Old grudges were revived and prosecuted. Weapons were drawn and employed. Offal was grabbed and ripped from recently opened bodily cavities then flung causing a new round of retching. Eventually the commenters’ energies and ichors played out and the more solid parts of their excorporealated tissues had dropped, slumped or slid to the floor and were slowly migrating towards the floor drains borne upon the myriad rivulets of their commingled humors.

    Dr Funkenstein, the homeopathist, worked the crowd offering his “medical” services, but received no takers. The bodies of the dead and nearly-so were looted. Wounds were bound and elixirs drunk. Eventually the surviving commenters pulled themselves together and returned their attention to the soapbox.

    First Commenter raised his big hand in the air and clenched it into a great fist. The commenters quieted down. He lowered his big hand and raised his small hand so as to read from a scrap of parchment. “Ok, people, no more of that. Just clear out your things and queue up by the West gate. You can take anything which is reasonably yours but nothing that is reasonably theirs, take nothing that is nailed down or screwed down, take absolutely nothing that has their inventory tag on it. You have until midnight, people. And I know I’ll regret this, but any questions?”

    Hands were raised, with not a few forming rude gestures.

    “Mario.”

    “Couldn’t we sacrifice an icky papist to them, you know, someone who believes in weeping statues which are the anithesis of rationality,” asked Mario as he bound a nasty bite on his forearm and looked pointedly at Axl. “You know, to curry favor and all?”

    “Silence, atheist sodomite,” commanded Axl shaking his heavy bishop’s crozier at Mario and fingering the bejewelled pectoral cross he wore overtop his episcopal robes. “You’re just pissed off because your boyfriend Rico let you down.”

    Mario started whining and rocking back and forth while looking at a laminated pocket photo of boyishly handsome journalist Rico Suave who had debunked the Tiger Beat tentacle-rape hoax article. How far his hero had fallen since then.

    “Whine louder, sissy boy, maybe someone will care.”

    Mario bellowed, then reared up and pivoted towards Axl.

    First Commenter looked at Dr. Bombay and pointed at the two antagonists. The shaman began chanting in Gujarati and reached into his camel scrotum sporran and drew forth a putrefied monkey paw which he held upright, palm outward by the protruding stumps of its radius and ulna, and shook it at each of the two antagonists in turn. Odd bits of rotting simian flesh pelted the crowd. Suddenly, Mario and Axl both shrieked, grabbed their crotches and flopped to the floor writhing in pain to the polite applause of the crowd.

    “Thank you, Dr. Yes, Tom.”

    “Couldn’t we just stay on and eat the squirrels…and then each other,” asked the bitter old commenter with rheumy eyes as he licked something unsavory from his gnarled claws with their long yellowed nails.

    “No, Tom, we can’t. They’re going to evict the squirrels and replace them with a machine, a great electrical engine.”

    A tumult of chittering and barking arose from behind the exquisitely carved ebony screen filling the window into the Chamber of the Squirrels. The screen depicted a great beast spawning forth monsters and tentacles which in turn devoured humans and even its own spawn. Disturbing in their seeming normalcy were the interspersed carvings of squirrels going about their business unmolested by the beast and indifferent to the commenters. Then suddenly the squirrel vocalizations stopped only to be replaced by a scritchity, scrapity grindity sound which grew louder and louder. First flakes, then a virtual stream of black sawdust fell down the sill of the window and within a minute the only remaining parts of the screen were the carvings of the squirrels and a supporting lattice. The squirrels then streamed out through the remnants of the screen and swarmed through the Great Chamber into the hall towards the exit.

    “Goodbye,” said Rufus, tears streaming down his cheeks.

    (To be continued.)

  • A Place of One’s Own

    by Tonio, Feb 12, 2017, (incorporating edits by the estimable Jo Ferova)

     

    We have embarked upon an enterprise and we now have a blog-type thingy of our very own. Thanks to the web design people, lawyers, funders, cheerleaders, naggers, cranks and everyone else who made this possible.

    Now what? How much content do we need to post to stay respectable? How much of that needs to be original, and what’s the article length we are trying to hit? Is there an editorial committee? What are our standards?

    We’ve made a big splash on opening day with multiple articles. Can we maintain this and attract enough others to provide like-minded, high-quality articles?

    We. Need. Content. There are no requirements for journalism degrees, publication credits or other mainstream media credentials. We as commenters have been providing content, some of us for years. This is our strength. We are not the mainstream media and we do not live in their bubble. We are scientists – noted chemists, researchers into gravitational waves, innovators in robotics and engineering. We are teachers and cooks, lawyers, web and tech devs, Uber drivers, clerks and weirdos, and we have been making waves and driving our own conversation for plenty long enough.

    We got this, and we have the education, skill and life experience to back it up.

    Some things like Betsy DeVos’ confirmation require very little effort, research or writing – it’s basically cut and paste. Just like the AM/PM Links articles on that other website. Can be done by pretty much anyone. This is the non-original content, aka news.

    As to the tone of the enterprise – I would not seek to impose any rules on anyone else, but here are the things I’m going to strive for: no backbiting of H&R, Reason or the Reason Staff in editorial content. I don’t want this to be a bitchfest. I don’t want this to turn into something that only exists to react against something else. That way lies the shrill pettiness of blogs like “A Smarter Andrew Sullivan,” “Sully Watch” and (gods help us) “Sully Watch Watch.” Reactions to the writings of others are always fair game.

    If Shikha Dalmia does another “Fascists had it coming because speech is violence” tweet I would consider it fair to react against that, to point out that Dalmia has a history of anti-free speech tweets and to give an impassioned defense of the First Amendment. Leave the name-calling to the commenters – ours or theirs. Refer to her as Shikha Dalmia initially and thereafter as Dalmia.

    Now, as to our former colleagues back in the old country: I will not begrudge anyone for simply staying at H&R. I will encourage people to join us but never hint or insist that they leave H&R.

    Our comments added value to H&R – not much, but enough. Both by driving page counts which drives advertising revenue, and by attracting others to the debates, fact-checking snark, trolling and general cringe-worthiness. We’ve seen SugarFree’s stories plagiarized by the WaPo, I’ve seen arguments and turns of phrases used by myself and others show up later in other places. Some of those people will follow us to our new home and Reason’s loss shall be our gain. I have no interest in harming Reason, but as libertarians often point out, not-giving is a very different thing than taking. They are no longer advancing our needs, so we should no longer give them aid and comfort by adding value to their site. We are competing with them in the marketplace of ideas.

    Game on.

     

    A/N: (originally published as “The Road Ahead,” edited to reflect evolving situation)

  • Trump Derangement Syndrome

    I’ll likely write more about this later, but for the moment, I wanted to share some of the more unhinged things showing up in my Facebook feed. Normally, I’d just laugh at this shit, but since there’s real stuff to be concerned about and protest, the stupid Prog sideshows are actually pushing things in the wrong direction. As an example: “Sessions is a Nazi racist!” gets people excited about bullshit and grabs all the media attention, “Sessions supports asset forfeiture and wants to continue the gutting of the 4th and 5th Amendments,” a REAL concern and something that would potentially speak to conservatives, gets lost.

    Anyway, these actually made me laugh.