Category: Social Media

  • Transmogrification and Projection

    What was once a humorous but true observation has become a blatant tactic with the Left: everything they do is about projection.

    The 24-minute news cycle is currently obsessed with transsexual and transgender rights because the President rescinded an awful “Dear Colleague” letter that was fraught with more danger than just who uses what bathroom.  Naturally, of course, the Right, being stupid, latched immediately onto talking about who uses what bathroom, but I digress.

    The Left fell in love with the term and promptly used it obsessively, wrongly, and beat its usefulness into the turf.  The Left accuses anyone who dares questions the rationality or wisdom of a “victim’s” feelings of “gaslighting” that person. Gaslighting, however, is not about refuting or mocking the fee-fees of a humorless 19-year-old twat (gender neutral) on Twitter.   Gaslighting is actually a systematic form of abuse which causes the victim to question his own memory, his own recollection of facts, his own judgment and perception.  When I think of a campaign to systematically undermine known facts, rational thought processes, and good judgment, one political and cultural group stands out to me.

    Naturally, the Left is whinging about gaslighting (without using the term correctly) while actually gaslighting the American public about gender and sexuality.  If you are one of those crazy regressives who thinks there are two biological sexes, and those two sexes (male and female) happen to correspond neatly to “socialized” gender roles (men and women) that have evolved over thousands of years and generally hold true across cultures and civilizations, boy are you in for it.  The Left is willing to Madred you until you squeal, “There are 1,000 genders!” We have actually come to the point where it is considered bigoted and awful to repeat biological, historical, psychological, and sociological facts.

    I am sure, to no one’s surprise, my feelings on transgenderism and transsexuality will make me first against the wall when the First Internationale – United States Edition convenes its Comintern. I am a semi-educated layman on psychological disorders, and Gender Identity Disorder — I mean, Gender Dysphoria — fits fairly neatly into the class of problems called psychotic disorders.  I am not the only one to think so, and the evidence is pretty compelling.  For example, a study conducted in the Netherlands, a country notably “progressive” on this issue, found that GID/GD was the primary diagnosis in only 39% of psychologists’ patients.  For the other 61%, it turned out,  “cross-gender identification was comorbid with other psychiatric disorders.”  Another paper in The Journal of Psychiatric Research found that 71% of GID sufferers had or currently have an Axis I psychological disorder, and wrote, “Lifetime psychiatric comorbidity in GID patients is high, and this should be taken into account in the assessment and treatment planning of GID patients.” The paper rightly points out this may be a chicken-egg problem:  are GD sufferers’ additional psychiatric symptoms caused by the high stress of having GD, or does the comorbidity of Mood and Dissoaciative Disorders with GD prove GD is a kind of psychosis that “travels along” with mentally ill patients?  Given the aforementioned Dutch study, where only 39% of GD sufferers had it as a primary diagnosis, I know which side I’m taking.

    Science!

    It’s important to note GD remarkably mirrors Body Integrity Identity Disorder.  If I were a conspiracy theorist, I would say it is rather convenient the DSM-V renamed Gender Identity Disorder at around the same time Body Integrity Identity Disorder was named as such, but fortunately for you, I’m off Alex Jones duty this week.

    All kidding aside, the parallels between GID/GD and BIID are obvious.  You suffer from a delusion, despite biological and social evidence, that your body is “wrong” somehow, and the only way to fix it is to radically alter it.

  • Thursday Afternoon Links

    Good afternoon. My name is Swiss Servator, and I will be taking care of your links this afternoon.

    Raclette for all, yes?
    Payment is kindly requested in CHF

    Today’s specials are;

    Lawfare, biting social media in the arse,

    Iron Law in action,

    Statements made on a carrier (personally, I would avoid this one – last time the chef ran this dish out…meh)

    Prog cannibalism,

    I got nuthin’ for this one

    *begin voodoo chant*
    Now go do that libertarian voodoo that you do so well!
  • FCC Chairman Calls For Rollback Of Net Neutrality “Mistake”

    Proponents and enemies of net neutrality can stop guessing what the new head of the FCC will do.  He has made it abundantly clear that he will move to dismantle the rule.

    “It has become evident that the FCC made a mistake,” Pai said at Mobile World Congress in Barcelona, according to a copy of his prepared remarks provided to CNNTech. “Our new approach injected tremendous uncertainty into the broadband market. And uncertainty is the enemy of growth.”

    Reality!

    Thank God we have someone that understands market realities and how consumer choice is better facilitated when agencies get out of the way and let firms compete.

    According to CNN:

    The net neutrality rules, approved by the FCC in 2015 amid an outpouring of online support, let the agency regulate the Internet as a public utility, placing greater restrictions on broadband providers.
    The rules prevent Internet providers like Comcast (CCV) and AT&T (T, Tech30) from deliberately speeding up or slowing down traffic from specific websites and apps. In short, the rules are intended to prevent providers from playing favorites.

    Bullshit!

    Except there was no “outpouring of online support when people understood the issue and the uncertainties it placed on ISPs.  It existed based solely on how the question was asked and what pony the respondent thought he/she’d get by supporting it.  What it did, however, do was to stifle innovation, expansion, competition and relationship-building within the industry’s varying sectors that would reduce costs.  It was going to retard progress that had been made, it would have imposed content restrictions and requirements and it would have increased costs for everybody downstream of the regulators.

    Mark another one down in “garbage that the current admin has started the process of fixing in a way libertarians should be satisfied with”.  I know it pains some people, but its the truth.

  • Millennials and Socialism

    Joel Kotkin at the Daily Beast has a new article up about Millennials: The Screwed Generation Turns Socialist.  And they appear to be the most leftward since the Great Generation.

    In this past election, those over 45 strongly favored Trump, while those younger than that cast their ballots for Clinton. Trump’s improbable victory, and the more significant GOP sweep across the country, demonstrated that the much-ballyhooed Millennials simply are not yet sufficiently numerous or united enough to overcome the votes of the older generations.

    Yet over time, the millennials —arguably the most progressive generation since the ’30s—could drive our politics not only leftward, but towards an increasingly socialist reality, overturning many of the very things that long have defined American life. This could presage a war of generations over everything from social mores to economics and could well define our politics for the next decade.

    And some broad political generalizations ensue about the voting patterns of the existing generations.  For the sake of brevity we will skip this and get right to the meat of the article:

    Millennials’ defining political trait is their embrace of activist government. Some 54 percent of millennials, notes Pew, favor a larger government, compared to only 39 percent of older generations. One reason: Millennials face the worst economic circumstances of any generation since the Depression, including daunting challenges to home ownership. More than other generations, they have less reason to be enamored with capitalism.

    These economic realities, along with the progressive social views, has affected their voting behavior. Millennials have voted decisively Democratic since they started going to the polls, with 60 percent leaning that direction in 2012 and 55 percent last year. They helped push President Obama over the top, and Hillary Clinton got the bulk of their votes last year. But their clear favorite last year was self-described socialist Bernie Sanders, who drew more far millennial votes in the primaries than Clinton and Trump combined.

    And Socialism – everyone’s favorite zombie ideology lives on:

    Roughly half of Millennials  have positive feelings about socialist, twice the rate of the previous generation. Indeed, despite talk about a dictatorial Trump and his deplorables, the Democratic-leaning Millennials are more likely to embrace limits on free speech and are far less committed to constitutional democracy than their elders. Some 40 percent, notes Pew, favor limiting speech deemed offensive to minorities, well above the 27 percent among the Xers, 24 among the boomers, and only 12 percent among silents. They are also far more likely to be dismissive about basic constitutional civil rights, and are even more accepting of a military coup than previous generations.

    But fear not there is some hope:

    Other factors could slow the lurch to the left. There is a growing interest in third party politics, not so much Green but libertarian; 8 percent of Millennials voted for Third Party candidates, twice the overall rate. Overall, Tufts finds that moderates slightly outpace liberals, although conservatives remain well behind. Millennials, note Winograd and Hais, also dislike “top down” solutions and may favor radical action primarily at the local level and more akin to Scandinavia than Stalinism.

    As Millennials grow up, start families, look to buy houses, and, worst of all, start paying taxes, they may shift to the center, much as the Boomers did before them. Redistribution, notes a recent Reason survey, becomes less attractive as incomes grow to $60,000 annually and beyond. This process could push them somewhat right-ward, particularly as they move from the leftist hothouses of the urban core to the more contestable suburbs.

    As the old saying goes, read the article for yourself to get all of the details.  There is also a warning to the Republican Party, suggesting they abandon socially conservative ideas that offend Millennials.

     

    My analysis: Political generalization are often broad, and many writers assume that the parties are static and will only become fossilized as the next generational wave comes roaring in.  And maybe there is a lag in time before the voters trust an ostracized party again, one that I believe the Democrats are going through now, and the Republicans went through after Bush the Second.  Of course, Trump’s election may be a political outlier; we shall see how much he upsets the DC apple cart.  Based on past history I don’t give him much chance against the Bureaucratic State.

    Regarding Millennials – I see some of them drifting rightward as time and their incomes rise.  Some may keep their idealism, but reality has a funny way of destroying that.  Perhaps this is a chance for libertarians or even the Big-L Libertarian Party?  I have little trust in the latter, but some distant hope for the former.  We have to find ways to educate, and dare I say, gain some political leverage during this strange Trump intermezzo.  It remains to be seen whether that means the slow take-over of the Republican Party, or splitting off on our own.  Based on the current two-party dynamic, I’m guessing the first.  But if that brand image is forever tainted, then maybe a strong Libertarian party is the way to go.

     

  • Late Night Anti-Muslim Bigotry Post

    A hottie Muslim pre-school teacher (if that’s the correct term for pre-school; it’s what the news is using here, so I’ll stick with their phrasing) in Arlington, Texas, has been fired.

    The reason? A recently discovered series of disgusting tweets making Holocaust jokes and encouraging others to kill Jews, made mostly in 2013. The tweets from Nancy Salem were uncovered by a group called Canary Mission, with the stated purpose of exposing antisemitism on college campuses. According to Canary Mission, Salem was one of a group of 24 antisemetic students at the Univeristy of Texas Arlington, who were described as anti-Israeli activists.

    https://canarymission.org/wp-content/uploads/photo-gallery/Salem_Nancy/Nancy_Salem_cm02_Facebook_Jan_5_2017.jpg
    Nancy Salem

    In a plot twist, the university states that Salem was never a student there, and that they are not familiar with Canary Mission.

    This raises an interesting question in living in a free society: the pre-school is not publicly funded. In the digital world of today, where everything everyone says is on the record forever provided an intrepid enough researcher devotes the time and resources to uncovering it, where is the line beyond which non-work related banter becomes fodder for public sanction, including in the workplace? This particular case is easy enough; the tweets can certainly cause reputational harm (NSFW) to the Children’s Courtyard, where Salem was employed. However, looking beyond the odious nature of this story, can the same be said of political affiliations? If the parents have a right to know that their children are being watched over by a gorgeous jihad-supporter, do parents in San Francisco have the right to know that the person watching their children might be, *gasp*, a Republican, and therefore an evil bigoted white shitlord? Is there a point at which no one will ever be able to say anything online for fear of only being hired at ideologically sympathetic companies? Will I begin to write posts comprised entirely of questions, like a certain Judge?

    This possibility is directly related to enterprises being hounded out of business by radical leftist activists if said enterprise is not discovered to be friendly enough to gay marriage, to use a recent example. In a world where everything is made political, everything is made of shit.

     

  • Trump Derangement Of The Day

    As if there was some shortage of derangement and a refill was needed.

    Sally Kohn outdoes herself.

    H/T to Grand Moff Serious Man, who digs around in places I dare not go.