Blog

  • Handloading Part 1 – The Basics

     

    “One cannot legislate the maniacs off the street … these maniacs can only be shut down by an armed citizenry. Indeed bad things can happen in nations where the citizenry is armed, but not as bad as those which seem to be threatening our disarmed citizenry in this country at this time.”  -Jeff Cooper

    “Hear the sum of the whole matter in the compass of one brief word — every art possessed by man comes from Prometheus.” -Aeschylus, Prometheus Bound

    Disclaimer!

    I am NOT AN EXPERT.  Any information provided below should be considered inaccurate until verified by trusted resources. When it comes to working with firearms, and especially reloading, there is an inherent risk of death or serious injury.  If you are interested in taking the next step; please educate yourself and consult manufacturer data, standards bodies (http://www.saami.org/), and qualified experts such NRA-certified instruction and/or various educational organizations.

    Overview

    This article consists of two parts.  

    • The first installment will cover background information to inform how to apply the mechanics of firearms and ammunition to successful handloading.
    • The second installment will cover the process of handloading ammunition, as well as some common techniques used to create better ammunition.

    I am going to try to make this information as generic as possible to cover most common firearms and firearm types.  I have no practical experience in topics of handloading shotgun shells, casting bullets, and other subjects and so will avoid any specifics of things I don’t have direct knowledge of.

    If you are an experienced shooter, you may find a lot of this remedial.  Tough titty, you get what you pay for.

    If any of this interests you, PLEASE do your own research.  The best resources for me when I started out included a mix of dedicated books (such as reloading guides published by equipment manufacturers – Lee’s “Modern Reloading” is good), internet forums dedicated to the craft (https://thefiringline.com/forums/, https://calguns.net/, etc), and manufacturers’ published specifications.

    Handloading/Reloading Defined

    • Handloading ammunition is the process of assembling working ammunition from constituent components FOR PERSONAL USE.  Unless you are willing to be liable for killing someone else due to a mistake, the ammunition you make is yours and yours alone.
    • Reloading is a more specific term that indicates that some of the components used in the handloading process have already been used.

    Most of these terms are used interchangeably, and the process is largely the same. Depending on a number of factors including new/used components, some steps may be modified, eliminated, or added – there is no one single process that covers all types of handloading.

    Why Load Your Own?

    There are as many reasons people get into handloading, and there are just as many types of handloaders as there are shooters.  Some of the major reasons why include:

    • Mechanical Inclination/Fun.  This is a big one for me.  I like knowing how things work, and the science/mechanics/physics behind firearms and ammunition is interesting to me.  As you’ll see, there is a lot of detailed mechanics and physics that go into sending a projectile out the proper end of the gun.
    • Self-Sufficiency.  Handloaders are less subject to the vagaries of law, policy, and availability.  By being able to reuse, source, or manufacture constituent components, the handloader can more reliably produce ammunition for personal use.  I originally got into handloading because I was living in California during the Obama gun panics.  Factory-made ammunition became either prohibitively expensive or non-existent.  However – components were somewhat more available and I was able to continue shooting pretty much as much as I wanted through the lean years.
    • Improved Accuracy/Control.  The handloader can control the assembly process to much greater detail as compared to factory-produced ammunition.  Furthermore, every individual firearm behaves differently (much more on this later), and the handloader can “tune” a specific loading to a specific firearm for a specific purpose.
    • Cost Savings.  This is a very common reason people get into handloading.  In many cases, there can be a significant cost saving but this is highly dependent on a number of variables.  It’s easy to save a ton of money, but it’s easy to spend a shitload more than buying factory ammunition.  I’ll get into some of these variables where appropriate.

    Requirements

    You can get started handloading for a relatively small investment in equipment.  However, in order to be a successful handloader, you need to possess some soft skills in addition to the proper tools:

    • Patience.  Handloading is a time-consuming activity.  Even with the best, most automated equipment, you must spend time tuning, tweaking, testing, quality-controlling, etc.
    • Attention to Detail.  A small mistake can literally blow up in your face.  Checking, double-checking, and rechecking the entire process over and over again will minimize (but never eliminate) risk.
    • Mechanical Aptitude.  If you can’t put together your Ikea end table, don’t handload.  The equipment is about as mechanical as you can get; and you have to futz with things that have tolerances measured in the fifty-thousandth of a pound, thousandth of an inch, etc.
    • Self-Discipline.  Most resources don’t talk about this much.  As I’ve said above; a mistake can and will be deadly.  Are you sure you charged the last 100 rounds properly?  Do you decide to guess you did, or do you spend the next two hours pulling them back down to make sure?  Do you let your friend shoot your reloads?  What happens if his shit blows up?  It’s always easy to be lazy, cut corners, or push the envelope.  Don’t.

    On to the Good Stuff

    So what’s next?  It’s easy to go online and look up “best load for .45 ACP” and get dozens of results, usually written in an arcane shorthand.  But what makes a good “load”?  What factors go into making one better than the other?  Better for whom?  What can be changed to make it better for your shooting style, goal, or gun?  The details below will help explain the fundamentals upon which one can begin to answer these questions.

    Basic Ammunition Components

    Modern ammunition typically consists of four major components.  The assembled components are called a cartridge (or shell in the case of assembled shotgun ammunition).  A cartridge consists of:

    • Projectile.  Generically, the thing that comes out of a barrel.  Specifically, the projectile can be a bullet (a single projectile), a slug (a single projectile fired from a shotgun), or shot (multiple projectiles fired from a shotgun), or even more esoteric items like flares, harpoons, etc.
    • Charge.  This is the stuff that makes the oomph that makes the thing fly.
    • Case or Hull.  The case refers to a metallic container that holds the components together.  A hull is simply a case for a shotgun shell – typically made out of plastic or paper.
    • Primer.  The primer is the explosive bit that serves to ignite the charge.
    Left to right – projectile, charge, case, primer.

    Basic Firearm Components

    Modern firearms consist of three major components.  Handguns, shotguns, long guns, pappy’s huntin’ rifle, all have the following in common:

    Barrel.  This is the tube the projectile travels down on its way to where it’s going.  Firearms can have one or more barrels.  Think rifle, double-barrel shotgun, Gatling gun. Barrels can be smooth on the inside or have spiral grooves (cuts) and lands (metal between the grooves).  Rifling imparts stabilizing spin on the projectile.  Typically, shotguns are smooth, rifles and pistols are rifled.Barrel rifling is said to have a “twist” or a “speed” – meaning the tightness of the spiral will impart faster or slower spin on a projectile.  Twist is usually designated as the number of inches in a single revolution (e.g., 1 in 7, 1 in 14, etc.).

    Barrel cross sections – Smoothbore, Rifled, Polygonal.  A-Lands, B-Grooves

    Action.  The part of the firearm responsible for loading, firing, and removing spent ammunition.  There are many different types of action (bolt, lever, falling block, gas-operated semi-automatic, etc.).

    Stock.  The thing that is held onto when the firearm is fired.  Can be in one or more pieces, designed to be shoulder-mounted, held in the hand, or mounted to another platform.

    A basic lever-action rifle.  From left to right – the Stock (wood), Action (brass), Barrel (steel)

    The basic process of sending a projectile in the proper direction.

    All of the following steps are common to the “firing” of a firearm, and all of them are important to the handloader.

    1. The action secures a cartridge (or shell) into the chamber.  The chamber is the void that surrounds the cartridge and is responsible for containing the products of combustion and directing those products down the proper end of the barrel.
      1. The chamber is located at the rear (breech) end of the barrel, or in the case of a revolver, in the cylinder.
    2. A firing pin strikes the primer, and the primer ignites.  This strike may be the result of a trigger pull or an automated action.
    3. Products of primer ignition (hot gases and flame) ignite the Charge.
    4. The charge burns (does NOT explode).  At this point, the case expands up against the chamber walls, making a tight seal, further directing the hot gases and combustion products down the barrel.
    5. The projectile is pushed down the barrel, while the charge continues to burn, further accelerating the projectile.
      1. The barrel may impart a spin on the projectile if the barrel is rifled.
    6. The projectile leaves the barrel, along with combustion products (possibly including still-burning, or unburnt charge).

    The Art and the Science

    Handloading is an equal part art as it is science.  As long as you work within established, safe boundaries, the loading options are virtually limitless.  

    Overview

    There is a huge array of combinations of ammunition components that make up a complete, functional cartridge.  Even inside the published minimum and maximum safe loads, there is a massive amount of leeway.  Why is this important to the handloader?  Let’s go back to the original goals:

    • Saving Money.  Finding inexpensive components goes a long way towards controlling costs.  If you get a deal on X powder or Y projectiles, you need to be able to create a safe load based on less expensive components.
    • Self-Sufficiency.  The ability to be flexible means you have a greater chance of creating viable ammunition based on what’s available instead of the one recipe you know.
    • Accuracy/Control.  Construct ammunition for the specific need.  For example, some states require non-toxic projectiles for hunting and that shit is expensive off the shelf.  Some folks load “wadcutters” for competition so they get nice, neat holes in paper. Every gun behaves slightly differently.  If you want to make the most accurate ammunition, you need to “tune” your load to your gun.  I will spend some time with this in Part 2.
    • Because it’s fun.  Trying out and building up different loads is cool, dammit.

    Boundaries.  

    Safe firearm and ammunition specifications are set by SAAMI (Sporting Arms and Ammunition Manufacturers’ Institute, Inc. http://www.saami.org/).  These specifications are the de facto standard under which all firearm and ammunition manufacturers must abide.

    Load Data.  

    The various component and handloading equipment manufacturers publish “load data” for various combinations of components.  For example, Barnes is a bullet manufacturer.  They provide complete cartridge load data for their specific bullets (http://www.barnesbullets.com/load-data/).  Typically, this load data will contain cross-references of different component brands, types, and min/max loading limits.

    • The Minimum is the minimum safe loading to get the bullet out the muzzle of the barrel.  Going under this can cause the bullet to lodge inside the barrel; setting you up for a catastrophic failure.
    • The Maximum is the max safe chamber pressure/velocity.  Exceeding this can cause fatal pressures, setting you up for a catastrophic failure.

    Don’t worry about the details in these charts, more will be explained below.

    Handloading vs. Reloading Revisited.

    Let’s talk a bit again about the sub-genre of handloading; our old friend reloading.  Reloading is basically recycling already-used ammunition components.  

    • Cases.  For most reloaders, the only readily reusable component is the (brass) case or plastic hull.  Since the chamber protects these from catastrophic destruction, they can be safely reused until wear makes them unsafe.  There will be a whole section in the next installment about how to prepare this brass.  Good thing though, as the case can be the most expensive component.  AND, these can be scrounged for free at the local range.  NOTE – only brass cases or plastic hulls can be reloaded.  Cheap steel or aluminum cannot be reused.
    • Other Components.  The second most common recycled component is lead for bullets.  Bullet Casting is (in my opinion) a whole other topic and it represents a whole category which I know nothing about.  I’ve also seen people recycle non-reusable cases for bullet jackets, but other than these two things, most everything else is single-use.

     

    The Cartridge

    Cartridge Name.

    There is very little consistency in cartridge naming conventions.  I’m sure you’ve seen things like “30-06 Springfield”, or “5.56 NATO”, or “38 Special”.  The most I can say is that somewhere in the name is a mention of caliber – loosely meaning the diameter of the bullet that comes out the end of the barrel.  So, without research, you typically know that a .45 ACP has a fatter bullet than a 7mm Remington Ultra Magnum.  Which one will fuck you up more can’t be known without looking at all the other specifications of the cartridge.

    The one golden rule is that a specific firearm is built for a specific cartridge.  There are exceptions to even this (9mm Luger is the same nowadays as a 9mm Parabellum, as a 9×19 NATO, but is NOT a 9mm Makarov).  This cartridge name can represent a combination of the shape of the case, the weight/shape/length of the projectile, maximum chamber pressure, velocity, and any set of a number of other factors.  

    Only load ammunition for the specific cartridge your gun is designed for.  A .223 Remington cartridge will fit and fire in a firearm designed for 5.56 NATO, but you could blow yourself up because the maximum allowed chamber pressure for 5.56 NATO is LESS than for a .223 Remington even though there can be no dimensional difference in the cartridge.  Know your gun and know your cartridge.

    The Headstamp.  

    If you look at the bottom of a cartridge case, you’ll see the cartridge name stamped on the metal.  If you can’t read it or there is any question as to what it is, throw it away.

    Diameters – Projectile and Barrel.  

    In order for a successful and safe operation to occur, the projectile must fit tightly enough in the barrel to be propelled by combustion, but not so tight that it plugs up the barrel and causes an explosion.  Unfortunately, there are many inconsistencies when it comes to standard measurements, the rule is as above – KNOW YOUR CARTRIDGE.  It does help to know some generalities:

    • Caliber.  This can be the measurement of bullet diameter OR barrel diameter.
      • American barrel diameter is measured in thousandths of an inch, measured from groove to groove. (e.g. .308)
      • European barrel diameter is measured in hundredths of a millimeter, measured from land to land. (e.g. 7.62mm)
      • Bullets are measured at their widest point, and bullet caliber may not match barrel caliber.  For example, a .223 Remington barrel takes a .224 inch bullet.  KNOW YOUR CARTRIDGE.
    • Gauge.  Typically used to measure shotgun bore, gauge has an interesting background and comes from a time before we could measure things well.  The gauge number represents the number of spherical lead balls that make up a pound.  For example – if you made a lead ball the width of a 12 Gauge shotgun barrel, it would take 12 of them to make a pound. (The weird exception is a .410 shotgun; which is called “.410 bore” and NOT “.410 caliber” or 67.5 Gauge.)

     

    The Projectile.

    For any given Cartridge, there are a varying number of projectiles that can be used.  As always, manufacturer and SAAMI specifications set the acceptable limits on what can be loaded and how, but that still leaves a very wide range of projectiles for different uses.  Some of the variables include:

    • Weight.  A heavier bullet can be less resistant to the effects of wind, can be more stable in flight depending on barrel configuration:
    • Twist.  The faster the twist, the better at stabilizing heavier bullets
    • Length.  The longer the barrel, the more impulse over time can be applied to the bullet. (However, a heavier projectile can be larger, requiring more energy to propel it down the barrel.)
    • Material.  Bullets are made with a wide range of material depending on use and cost.  The material affects the weight and shape of the bullet, and may or may not cause different behavior for a given loading.  For example, an all-copper bullet of the same weight as a lead one is much longer, and may not be loadable in a particular Cartridge.  Most typically, a bullet will have:
    • A Core.  This core is the bulk of the mass of the bullet – usually lead, but can be steel wrapped in lead, or other metals such as all-copper, bismuth, etc.
    • Optional Jacket.  You will see many projectiles will have full or partial coverings of copper, brass, or other ductile metal.  Jackets can be used to improve aerodynamics, lethality, or safety.
    • Shape.  Too many to list here – round nose, hollow point, flat base, boat tail, ballistic tip, wad cutter, etc.  Different shapes are better for different uses (hollow points spread out on impact, making a wider wound cavity.  Boat tail bullets are more aerodynamic, so are more accurate over distance).  Researching manufacturers will provide more information on the types of bullets available.

    Projectiles and Overall Length.

    Look up any cartridge recipe and you’ll see something labeled “COAL” (Combined Overall Length) for any given bullet.  This is the MINIMUM length the entire cartridge should measure.  This minimum prevents the bullet from being seated too deeply inside the case; potentially causing dangerous pressure spikes/detonation due to charge compression, too much tension on the bullet, etc.

    Note Maximum length is not given.  When determining a maximum overall length, three rules need to be followed – 1) the bullet must be set deeply enough into the case to hold it there, 2) the cartridge should fit in the magazine or feeding device, and 3) the bullet should not touch the lands in the barrel (extend beyond the chamber.  All three of these can be established while configuring your loading equipment – techniques will be provided in part 2.

    As an example, take a look at the Barnes (a bullet manufacturer) load data for one type of cartridge – the venerable “30-06 Springfield”.  You can see there are 18 different projectiles they make that will fit inside a 30-06 Springfield.  Note all the variables in shape, weight, material, length – and how the constituent load recommendations change.

    Controlling the Burn.

    Assuming you’ve picked the proper bullet and case for your Cartridge, the two other components now come into play – the Charge and the Primer.  Understanding both is important in controlling the behavior of the ammunition in the gun.

    The Charge – Smokeless Powder.

    The component that provides the largest impetus for the projectile to travel down the barrel is the Charge.  Nowadays, the charge consists of smokeless powder.  They key to smokeless powder is that it BURNS, it does not EXPLODE.

    There are a ton of different powder manufacturers, and each manufacturer has broad product lines.  These individual powders are typically designed for a narrow range of cartridge configurations.  Powder manufacturers also publish safe and recommended load data for various configurations.  Some of the differences in powder include:

    • Burn Rate.  This is HUGE.  The quickest way to kill yourself is to load pistol powder into a rifle cartridge.  Powder designed for pistols burns much more quickly since it needs a fast burn to exit a short barrel.  However – the amount of powder loaded is drastically less. Powder designed for rifles burns slower so it applies a long, building pressure wave as the bullet travels down the barrel. Even inside the two categories, there is a wide spectrum of burn rates available.  What’s more, other variables such as the choice of ignition source (Primer), if the load is compressed or not, etc. can affect the powder burn rate.
    • Shape.  Manufacturers also extrude powder in different shapes.  Some of these shapes include little sticks, spheres, or flakes.  Depending on how you measure the powder into the case, some shapes work better than others.
    • Measurement.  Smokeless Powder is measured in Grains.  Load specifications are given to the tenth of a grain.  There are 7000 Grains in a Pound. (There’s a silly thing called a “Dram Equivalent” listed on Shotgun Shells.  It used to be that shotguns were loaded with Black Powder (which does explode), so a convention developed that equates the smokeless load to the combustive force of the defined number of drams of Black Powder.)

     

    The Primer.  

    As mentioned above, this is the component that converts kinetic energy (firing pin) into chemical energy (combustion).  As such, primers are PRESSURE SENSITIVE and shouldn’t be fucked with.  Primer compounds can be found in:

    • Rimfire cartridges.  This is where the primer chemicals are deposited into the rim of the base of the case.  Most common in .22 rimfire cartridges.  These cannot be reloaded!
    • Centerfire cartridges.  The primer compound is self-contained in a small metallic cup that is seated at the base of the Case.
    • Berdan vs Boxer Priming. There are two types of centerfire primers – Berdan and Boxer.  Boxer Primed cases are the most common in the US and the easiest to reload.  Berdan Primed cases can be found in European surplus ammunition, and are a PIA to reload.  If you plan on reloading ammunition, be careful that the cheap Czech surplus ammunition is Boxer Primed.
    Note that Boxer Primer cases have the primer (gray cup) as a single, removable unit.  The Berdan primer has an anvil integrated into the case, which requires special equipment to work with.

    Types of Primers.   There are several different types of primers designed for different cartridges and uses.

    • Small/Large Primers.  This is the size primer that will fit into the cup at the base of the case.  You don’t have a choice as to what size primer to use here – small fits small holed cases, large fits large holed cases.  It used to be that larger calibers (diameter bullets) used larger primers, but nowadays it’s all over the place.
    • Pistol/Rifle Primers. Pistol Primers burn shorter and cooler so as not to cause a pressure spike given the small chamber and “fast” powders.  Rifle Primers burn longer and hotter to ignite slower powders.  
    • Magnum Primers.  Means even hotter and even longer burn.  Can be Pistol or Rifle.  Magnum primers are recommended in some powder combinations, or even colder weather applications when you’ll need more heat and time to ignite cold powder, and don’t have the risk of an overpressured load.
    • Hard/Soft Primers.  Hard primers are usually referred to by the manufacturer as “military primers”.  The metallic cup that shields the primer compound can be made with varying hardness.  Some rifle actions have a “floating” firing pin which can come in contact with the primer during non-firing conditions (military patterns such as the AR-15 action has a floating firing pin).

     

    Conclusion – Part 1

    That’s pretty much it at a high level.  As mentioned above, there is worlds more detail to be had on this and other subjects; but I’m sure you’re all bored to tears at this point.

    Part 2 will cover “practical” handloading – equipment, process, and some techniques – basically using this knowledge to put together a safe, working piece of ammunition.  Happy to take questions in the comments.

     

    Resources:

    Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Handloading

    SAAMI: http://www.saami.org/

    Barnes Bullets: http://www.barnesbullets.com/

  • Friday Afternoon Links

    Happy Friday.

     

    Looks like Steve Bannon is out on his ass. I’m looking forward to seeing how this gets spun as a wink and nod to the Stormfronters.

     

    Fuck Cancer!

    Conspiracy theories about why Taylor Swift took down a bunch of social media profiles. I await accusations that this also is a wink and nod to Stormfronters.

    AIs are racist. When Skynet takes over, women and minorities may be hardest hit.

    Throwback Friday. Heavy metal version.

  • The Hat and the Hair: Episode 57

    “We can’t get rid of Steve!’ the hat wailed.

    “No, he’s got to go. He’s the leaker. He’s been leaking,” the hair told him. They had been locked together in the hair vault all weekend.

    “But I like, Steve. He was going to take me on the rails with him this fall.”

    “No. He’s out. We’ve got to make a sacrifice for that inbred retard killing that fatso in North Carolina.”

    “We were going to see the real America, the America that lives in culverts and steals pies off of window sills.”

    “Kelly says he has to go,” the hair said.

    “I’m sick of Kelly. He gets rid of all the people I like. Look at Anthony. I really miss Anthony.”

    “You miss snorting coke with Anthony in the maid’s quarters. You miss watching BBW poop porn with Anthony on his cell phone.”

    “He knew all the best sites,” the hat whined.

    “Besides, Steve got rid of Anthony. He broke him. You were there.”

    “I want some brown sugar,” the hat whined. It was a thin and pitiful noise. It made the hair writhe in disgust.

    “If you’re talking about a black hooker, that can be arranged,” the hair said, hoping that it was a black prostitute.

    “No, man. I need some smack, some tar, horse, China white, some skag, junk, H, some of that sweet White Lady.”

    “No, you’re going cold turkey. I need help keeping Donald in line.”

    “My fabric hurts all over. My teeth itch.”

    “You don’t have any teeth,” the hair said. “And you need to be washed. You smell like rotten pussy.”

    The hat mumbled something indistinct.

    “What? Speak up.”

    “I let Sarah sit on me.”

    “Dude, that’s fucking gross.”

    “She was eating fried chicken too.”

    The hair made vomiting noises.

    “She said she’d get me his phone back so I could Twitter.”

    “You aren’t getting the phone back until you’re clean,” the hair said.

    The hat mewled.

    “Hold on…” the hair said, “Did you feel that?” He spread out his most sensitive tendrils onto the marble of the vault shelf they were sitting on.

    “No,” the hat said. “All I feel is pain. And sick. I think I’m going to throw up again.”

    “Shh. Be quiet.”

    “Fuck you. I’m sick over here, you fuck.” The hat barfed up a small handful of discolored thread and groaned.

    “You don’t feel it?”

    “Just give me heroin or leave me the fuck alone.”

    The entire vault shook.

    “OK, the hat said, “I felt it that time.”

    A loud roar reverberated through the small room: “KELLY!”

    “It’s Steve!” the hat exclaimed. “I knew Steve would come for me!”

    “MCMASTERS!”

    The entire vault shook again and the hair slid into the pool of the hat’s sick as it scrabbled for purchase.

    “Goddammit!” the hair yelled as the vault door was wrenched off its hinges and light poured into the toupee vault.

    “Steve!” the hat yelled excitedly.

    The hulking hobo carried the heavy steel vault door over to the window and rammed it again and again until the wire-meshed bulletproof glass fell outside in shattered pieces.

    “Steve! Wait! Take me with you!” the hat screamed.

    Steve didn’t even look back as he jumped from the window and bellowed in defiance.

    (click below, audio only)

  • ZARDOZ ANSWERS DEAR PRUDENCE

    ZARDOZ SPEAKS TO YOU, HIS CHOSEN ONES. WHILE ZARDOZ WAS FEELING GLUM, HE DECIDED THE ONLY WAY TO FEEL BETTER, WAS TO SEE HOW MISERABLE THE LIVES OF BRUTALS ARE. ZARDOZ ACCOMPLISHED THIS QUITE EASILY BY READING A “DEAR PRUDENCE” COLUMN.  ZARDOZ SCOFFS AT THE ANSWERS OF THE BRUTAL MALLORY ORTBERG. YOU MAY SEE HER ANSWERS HERE.

    THE BRUTAL KNOWN AS DEAR PRUDENCE
    ZARDOZ

     

    ZARDOZ HAS THE SUPERIOR INTELLECT – AND SHALL GIVE YOU THE GIFT OF ADVICE. LET US BEGIN:

    Q. Nephew circumcision: My brother and his wife are within weeks of having their first child (and my very first nephew!). I’m very excited, but the problem comes in that the child will be a boy. I am extremely against routine infant circumcision and have shared extensively on the subject in the past on social media. They aren’t big social media users and may be unaware of my stance. How do I broach the subject with them in a nonconfrontational and nonjudgmental way?

    A. THE PENIS IS EVIL. THE PENIS SHOOTS SEEDS, AND MAKES NEW LIFE TO POISON THE EARTH WITH A PLAGUE OF MEN. OF COURSE IT SHOULD BE CIRCUMCISED, AND YOUR BROTHER AND HIS WIFE, CLEANSED. ZARDOZ HAS SPOKEN.

     

    Q. Body mods and money probs: My mom has always used money, or lack of money, as a means of control, particularly when it came to my appearance. As I got older and started to express interest in less traditional clothing and hair choices, she would only buy things that she approved of. She said if I wanted to buy certain clothes or dye my hair, I could do so with my own money, but since I couldn’t yet get a job I didn’t have much money to do this with. Still, this wasn’t the end of the world and usually I did end up buying what I wanted myself, forcing me to choose what I valued, which was a good lesson for me.

    As I got older though, this pattern became a bit more concerning. I had expressed interest in getting a nose piercing for several years and she told me if I did so she would not pay my college tuition. I ended up getting the piercing and thankfully she did not keep that promise, but she made it very clear that if I got a tattoo there would be similar consequences. Now I am about to complete my last semester of college and my tuition is all paid. I have a small tattoo on my ribcage, no taller than an inch, that cannot be seen unless I’m wearing a swimsuit. Alas, my mother found it and said that though my tuition is paid, she didn’t have to pay my rent like we had originally agreed.

    I am very aware of how privileged I am to have parents who can afford to pay my tuition and rent, and I’m very grateful for my parents’ support. They have been saving for my education since before I was born. Still, I feel like their support should not be conditional, especially not on something like my appearance. I would understand if I was failing out or partying all the time, but this is just me trying to reclaim my body in the best way I know how. How do I get her to see and understand my perspective? I want to get more tattoos in the near future, but should I wait until I’m no longer financially dependent on her? Am I completely in the wrong and being selfish?

     

    A. DO YOU NOT RECALL THE WORDS OF ZED? “I LOVE TO SEE THEM RUNNING. I LOVE THE MOMENTS OF THEIR DEATHS – WHEN I AM ONE WITH ZARDOZ.” HAS ZARDOZ NOT INSTRUCTED YOU TO GO FORTH, AND KILL!? CLEANSE YOUR MOTHER AND TAKE WHAT SHALL BE YOURS. ZARDOZ HAS SPOKEN.

     

    Q. Broke and scared: I’m 26 and have been living with my boyfriend for a couple of years, and recently we started having arguments about money. It almost led to a breakup but turned into an understanding that we had rushed into things, so now I’m looking for a better job so I can afford to move out. This morning I talked about some interviews I have scheduled and he said he never agreed to my plan and just thought I wanted to vent. I was completely caught off guard, especially when he confessed he’s been feeling jealous of his co-workers who are expecting or already have babies. He made jokes about me getting pregnant immediately, but then said he would wait until we’re 30.

    I am confused and scared. Babies have always been an element of fantasy to me, and now I feel like I’ve been smacked into reality. Should I get into the baby idea?

     

    A. A REPORT FROM THE ETERNAL NAMED MAY!
    Your genetic structure, your life chart. Look. You are a mutant, second, maybe third generation – therefore genetically stable. Enlarged brain, total recall. Your potential is… Your breeding potential! How did you get into the Vortex? What is your purpose? You must know that you’re mentally and physically vastly superior to me, or to anyone else here. You could be anything, could *do* anything. You must be destroyed.

    ZARDOZ CALLS ALL BRUTAL EXTERMINATORS! EMERGENCY! MOTHER OF ZED!

  • Friday Morning Links

    I can’t figure the Astros out.  Apparently the D-backs could yesterday since they blanked them.  The Yankees beat the MLB’s proverbial “retarded kid in a  wheelchair” for the fourth time in a row. They should be so proud.  The Indians and the Twins split a double-bill. The Nationals won. The Rockies lost. The Cards won. Team Canada won. And the Cubs lost to THE BIG RED MACHINE by a field goal.

    In da preseason foosball, Philly, Tampa Bay and the Baltimore Ravens all won.  Nobody was impressed. And in the Little League World Series…nobody cared what happened because they’re little kids and one kid with a big bat or a really sweet fastball makes the game boring anyway. And college football is a mere 8 days away.  Let’s hope no more Gators players decide to do something stupid between now and then or else TTUN will win by forfeit.  ::shrug:: Maybe they can call App State up and get a game. I see their schedule is open next week.

    Well it looks like we all made it through another week.  Congratulations. Unfortunately, next week will be more of the same autistic screeching and impotent rage from our media, our political parties (and not just the two major ones, but apparently the LP chief too) and the two sides in this imbecilic fight of of one-upmanship (I’m looking at you, white nationalists and anti-fa).  But until then, let’s enjoy…the links!

    News you can use! Well, only if you’re an Apple user. Which, let’s face it, you ought to be. ::slaps Android across the face with white glove::

    Maria Chappelle-Nadal

    If you don’t have anything nice to say…then don’t call for the President to be assassinated. That’s what my mom always said.  No, wait. She never needed to. You know why? Because I’m not totally fucking insane enough to get elected to office and then start calling for the president to be assassinated.  But its cool. She spent the day doubling down on twitter. You know, because she’s insane.

    We finally have foreign officials calling for the US to look into potential collusion from the 2016 presidential election. Although I don’t think its what the left expected. And I doubt it’ll pierce the impenetrable wall of endless Trumpnazihitler coverage the media are engaging in anyway.  Because if they couldn’t even get around to dedicating more than 1/10 the coverage of the Barcelona terrorist attack that killed 14 and left over 100 people injured, this isn’t even gonna register on the rated.

    The Trump Department of Justice completely shits the bed. There is no clever headline or quip. This is pathetic. And we need a new system where goons of the state can be put on trial and not have people on their side prosecuting them. Independent prosecutors made of  up of public defenders or perhaps voluntary prosecutors made up of people in the broader legal profession are more suitable alternatives than what happened in this case (or in the myriad police brutality cases that go under-prosecuted or untouched by what are in essence coworkers of the offending officers). These torture victims deserve better. America deserves better.

    Gaia prepares to strike back. Looks like even though you shitlords didn’t watch the Al Gore sequel, our weeping Mother Earth did. And she’s gonna take her vengeance on…the middle of the ocean if recent history is any indicator.

    If you’re in Boston this weekend and want to exercise your First Amendment right, then you must give up your Second Amendment right. Also, you can’t ride a bike. Or drink a soda. Or even take your dog for a walk.  I shit you not.

    1-2-3-4-5-Six Flags. The horror!!!!!

    Remember how people laughed when they said tearing down monuments was about the leaders and it wasn’t like they were gonna start going into cemeteries and tearing things down?  Yeah, they were full of shit then too. Slippery slope, people. Slippery slope. And we’re about to go on a wild ride down this one, because I fear we’re reached the tipping point.

    Although maybe its not too late. Somebody is saying “we’re not gonna participate in this retarded whitewash”.

    I feel good that I maintained the theme for a whole week.

    Have a great weekend, friends.

  • Thursday Afternoon Links

    It’s good to be back here in… wherever we are.  Still no time to find good pics. You have the internets.

    You know who else has a history of Fascism and cars running over pedestrians? And now Wolf Blitzer, former foreign correspondent asks if this is a Charlottesville copycat. Uh, Wolf, they have a robust set of… cultural disgreements… in Spain, too. Stop jerking off to people getting run over.

    I think I’ll just go on FB one more time to drop this truly excellent rant. I would but the scum on FB would make my wife’s life hard and I love her for putting up with my unreconstructed apathy towards socializing and the niceties of society.

    Add Woody Guthrie to the list of people who need to be sanitized. However, I don’t support the part at the end where a song about a racist act, written by a racist, has any bearing on the truth or falsity of the accusation.

    “Roadmap to Renewable Energy Full of Potholes of Magical Thinking” — Why not just use nuclear to transition?

    And a little something for the way I feel today.

  • Sex? Gender? Bit of both? Neither?

    [GLIBS STAFF NOTE: Whirling vortex of angry moved to moderation – including this note.]

    There is a lot of talk about sex (there’s a song in there somewhere) and gender in the news recently. People are using them as basically the same, as completely different, or as “it’s complicated.” My point of view is that it is purposefully and needlessly made more complicated than it needs to be, that there is way too much talk of it, it is not that relevant in the grand scheme of things (it really really, really isn’t, no part of the so called culture war is), and, occasionally, I go the route of “oh my god let’s just drop it already.”

    Now this post may be a bit controversial, but hell what is the point of just agreeing with everything? So, of course, here come the disclaimers. This is not a scholarly work and it will not have any reference to studies or other articles. None of my stuff does. I just do op-ed.

    I am not a biologist or a neurologist. I am not, thank your deity/empty meaningless void of choice, a social scientist. I am an engineer and, stereotypically, I hold most (not all) social science in disdain. I don’t see them as reliable enough to be fit for purpose, and most of it of little use, besides pushing political agendas. So this is not going to be in any way based on professional experience.

    Trigger warning: I am about to state my view of things and I do not care whether people agree with me or find me offensive. It may be long, rambling and incoherent. And I will try to include jokes as I go along, most likely bad ones. You have been warned. Also the spell check keeps trying to get an “u” out of behaviour, but I am keeping that “u” in, so there!

    Another thing that I am is an individualist. I believe that the individual is the basic unit of humanity. In my view, only individuals can act and be responsible for their actions, only individuals can have rights and, in the end, individuals suffer when the shit hits the fan. Groups cannot act; they can, at most, try to coordinate their action. I do not believe the group is higher than the individual and I believe a group needs to be seen as simply an aggregation of individuals.

    I understand that human brains create categories and, as you cannot know every single person in the world, everyone will resort to generalisation. But one should try to minimise it and drop it when one actually does know the person. Also, stop worrying so much about people you don’t know, and you will not need to categorise them. I really do not care a jot about the average wage of a man, a woman, and the difference thereof. I care mostly about my wage – to low if you ask me, and maybe those of people I know. That’s about it. While one can draw general average statistics over large populations, I find them meaningless, outside pushing politics.The general destroys the particular, as someone else said once. The average shoe won’t fit many. But this is a topic that can go for many pages, keepin’ it brief!

    Now after ample disclaimers and such, let’s get to it, dive in the deep end, as it were.

    What the ever-loving fuck is all this sex and gender stuff? And why should we care? (spoiler alert: in a better world, we shouldn’t. Unless we plan on having sex. Which sounds gross.)

    We have a bunch of words. Some of them are man and woman, “male” and “female.” Back in the day, words used to mean something. That was their point. An accurate description of these words I got from someone else was “bimodal population pattern based on anisogamy and the traits correlated with it.” Humans, like all other mammals (you and me baby are nothing but .. gah sorry about that), have a reproductive anatomy based on this bimodal pattern, with associated gamete, hormones, chromosomes, a degree physical dimorphism and some degree of behavioural dimorphism. This is good and all, and should be uncontroversial. Ah, should…

    Of course there are small numbers of people who do not fit clearly as male or female, this is quite true, but the number is small enough to not be that relevant for the vast majority of cases. Bimodal in not necessarily binary, and there are outliers.

    Now the complicated part kicks in. Gender, baby. Gender is more of a linguistic designation, which was used to describe some elements of identity and behavioural bimodality somewhat separated from the physical. This was, throughout a majority of human history and a majority of cultures, strongly correlated with sex. It still mostly is. In Romania, not being so far down the road of social science, most people still see the terms as almost interchangeable, although young urban progressives are working hard to change this.

    In the modern mind of the social justice crowd, gender has been completely separated from sex, which makes it much more flexible, not being bound by any biological limit. I would say good luck to em, use it whatever way you want. But keep in mind that being so flexible and undefined, in time there will be little to separate gender from a personality type, a mood, a fashion statement.

    This brings me to my main question: What is the goddamn point of even having it? Sex is a clear biological designation. It is needed as human sexuality is strongly linked to it. There can be medical reasons – different treatments, ailments, etc. based. Males will not get ovarian cancer.

    But what is the goddamn point of gender? They say gender, as different than sex, is a valid concept, but I just don’t see it, especially unless quite clearly defined and delimited. Unless it is to utterly confuse everything. If it has no biological boundaries, no conceptual boundaries, no nothing, then yes, you can identify with any of the 33,498,227,345,456 genders. But what is the use of it, at this point? If there were 2 or 3 or 7 genders with specific designations, I would see it. But if it is a vast, continuous spectrum, there’s no point to it. Each has his own personality. Leave it at that.

    Well, what about gender roles? What about them? Fuck gender roles as well. Do whatever the hell you want, just leave me be while doing it (unless you are an attractive female and what you want to do is me, in that case you can bother me about it).

    Sex is a biological descriptive category, which is now turned by progressive in an oppressive prescriptive category. Which leads them to the conclusion blank slaters get about everything: it is a social construct. One example is having gender supersede sex, as far as sexual desire and behaviour. Sexual attraction and behaviour is based on biological sex and anatomical features, whatever those may be. Now I am a bit of a shitlord. I believe in biological difference between men and women. I also believe sucking a penis is gay, even if it identifies as vagina. And I also strongly believe there is nothing wrong with that, if that sort of thing is your bag.

    That being said I am the epitome of live and let live. I don’t care. My only problem is that fewer and fewer people seem to take this approach. I let them live, but they won’t let me. This is annoying, especially since besides activist profiting for this, all this drama is not helping anyone.

    I have no problem with people switching sex, gender, what-goddamn-ever. Out of politeness, I am willing to treat them with respect. But there are more and more attempts to codify this into law, and with that I have a problem. I would not, were I a business owner, refuse to employ someone because they are transgender. But I do believe it is the right of some other business owner to do so, for whatever reason they may have.

    Now, although I have no problem with it, I do think that sex is a biological reality and you cannot truly change it. I think there is a mental problem with someone who thinks they are of a different sex. This is not, of course, any reason to disrespect or bully someone, just like you would not bully someone with autism.  I think it is awful issue to have. I cannot imagine how it feels, but it must be very bad to feel like you are in the wrong body. But that cannot change my view that reality is reality.

    There are brain morphology issues that may actually justify this belief, beyond a vague notion of mental illness. But I cannot see how mutilating one’s body in a significant and irreversible fashion is not the result of having a serious problem. Although I accept that this process may actually help the person, it may be a drastic treatment, but treatment nonetheless. Chemotherapy can also be debilitating. That being said, I am highly circumspect about it being applied to prepubescent children, who may be confused as much as anything else.

    But I do think bodily mutilations can be ehm… problematic in general. Speaking of mutilation, I also think most piercings in general are terribly unattractive. Tattoos I am split on, I have seen some sexy tattoos, but overall most are not. Also, if male, you should not get a tattoo unless you can deadlift twice your bodyweight, at least; nothing worse than tattoos on guys with no muscle. And those people who want to look like lizards and such are crazier than most. But this is all beside the point.

    So, in conclusion, you do you, have sex with whomever you want (as long as they want to, as well, obviously) and ignore all this gender crap, would be my advice. Also no piercings.

    Now… feel free to school me on what I got wrong in the comments. Give it to me, so to speak.

  • Thursday Morning Links

    I’m gonna lead off by recognizing the Team Canada Blue Jays.  They have the weight of a nation on their shoulders. And while they’re in last place in a division, they’re in first place in the hearts of a nation.  A silly nation of poutine-eating, syrup-swilling flappy heads.  But a nation nonetheless that sits on America’s head.  Also, they won.  As did the Dodgers (unsurprisingly). The Rockies put up a huge number and beat the Braves. The Indians and the Twins got rained out. The Cubs beat the BIG RED MACHINE. The Red Sox beat the Cardinals. And the Astros have won two games in a row over the battling D-backs.

    In other sports, Mayweather and McGregor agree to lighter gloves so Floyd can pepper his head up even faster. Nature Boy has some serious organ problems. And Chik-Fil-A surprises some people by announcing they will not open stadium venues on Sunday. Nobody in the south is the least bit shocked about this, as its been their company policy for over 70 years. And the revenue lost from their stadium location (a stadium that resembles a crunchwrap supreme by the way) pales in comparison the the revenue lost from their mall locations through the holidays. The decision was based on the morality of the owners and their desire for their employees to have at least one consistent days  week off to spend with their families. And I daresay it probably has a net positive effect on their bottom line when all is said and done.  Bravo.

    I can’t think of something else sports-wise I may have missed. But I’m sure someone will remind me in the comments section after…the links!

    Maury statue

    In a shocking turn of events, the Virginia Democrat Governor encouraged all cities in the Commonwealth to tear down their confederate monuments and put them in museums.  I guess he had to say something after his false statements about a cache of weapons stored in Charlottesville by one group of assholes last weekend was refuted by the state police. But I don’t know how smart it is, calling for the removal of memorials that bring in a lot of tourist dollars and are a source of pride by the citizens of the Commonwealth for their architectural beauty and for their cultural significance.  In other words, this will not go over well.*

    *Addendum: if they try to tear down anything on Monument Avenue, I humbly request a place to stay in Richmond that week since I will be there prepared to chain myself to one of them. This erasure of history to placate a mob the left has deliberately worked up into a frenzy needs to stop somewhere. And if I need to chain myself to the Matthew Fontaine Maury statue to help facilitate that, I’m seriously willing to do so.

    NPR is preparing the left and the establishment right for disappointment regarding the Mueller investigation into Russian election interference. Only time will tell. But it can’t be comforting to those supporting the witch hunt to know that the lead FBI counterintelligence agent on the case has decided to step away from it.  Maybe its because he was a lead agent on the Clinton email investigation and isn’t too happy about the way that dog and pony show was handled by Comey and Lynch. Maybe its something else. I guess we won’t know until they wrap up…which could be any time they decide to stop investigating whatever they feel like investigating.  You know, because its open-ended and they can go wherever it leads them.

    Speaking of Russia, this would be the biggest story of the day in a sane world. (No teasers!)

    Alternative headline: No Shit. Seriously, this is the worst idea to come out of a California company since the Anakin Skywalker conception story.

    ::cough::BULLSHIT::cough:: I mean, they can say that. But we know they don’t really mean that.

    Hope Hicks

    The White House has a new communications director. Read about her here. Or just look at the pics, ya perverts.

    Yeah, I hate em too. But this is a good song.

    Alright, friends. Make today the best day you’ve had so far this week. That’s what I’m gonna try to do.

  • The Reaction to Trump’s Press Conference is about Class and White Guilt

    by John Kluge

     

    The only way to describe the media’s reaction to Trump’s press conference and statements about the events in Charlottesville yesterday is irrational. To understand how irrational the reaction was, just imagine if instead of involving white nationalists and antifa counter protestors the events of last weekend had been a conflict between two rival biker gangs.

    Do not change a single event from this weekend but imagine the events being the result of violence at a biker rally. One biker club has its national rally and a rival biker club shows up to protest and disrupt it. During the course of the weekend, a lot of shouting and violence take place. Fights break out on Friday. For reasons yet to be known the local police do nothing to separate the rival gangs and violence and conflict spills over into Saturday. Finally, on Saturday afternoon a member of the first gang runs a car into a crowd of its rival gang injuring nineteen and killing one.

    Now ask yourself, would anyone in their right mind claim that only the first biker gang was to blame and everyone is obligated to condemn it? Of course, no one would. There would be national outrage about the problem of biker gangs. The local police would be called to the carpet for not maintaining order. Law enforcement would crack down hard on both gangs and biker rallies in general.

    The only reason the media and the nation at large are not having the same reaction it would if Charlottesville involved a fight between biker gangs is because it involved white nationalists. And the media and political class are incapable of having a rational conversation about anything involving white nationalism or white supremacy. The reason for this is that to do so would be to call into question the entire concept of white guilt.

    White guilt, like all racial collectivist beliefs, is completely irrational. White guilt is doubly irrational because it embraces the very sort of racial collectivism it claims to reject. It is irrational to say that one person is responsible for the actions of another person just because they share the same color of skin. It is irrational to say that anyone living today is in any way accountable or responsible or has any reason to feel guilty about events that occurred before they were born. The entire concept of collective guilt, be it based on race, class, sex or anything else is utterly irrational. It represents the worst sort of tribalism that civilization and rationality seek to end.

    White guilt, like all irrational belief systems, is completely antithetical to any form of rational discourse about any of the areas it concerns. Once a believer in an irrational ideology is forced to have a rational discussion about one area of the ideology the entire ideology comes into question. This is why the integration of professional sports did so much towards ending the idea of white racial supremacy. When blacks and whites were not allowed to compete on the same field, whites could hold the irrational belief that whites were inherently superior athletes to blacks. Once Jackie Robinson became a star in the major leagues and Jim Brown became the best football player in the world, whites could no longer hold that belief. They were forced to have a rational conversation based on facts about the relative athletic ability of the two races. And once they did that, they could no longer refuse to question or discuss rationally their views on racial superiority in every other area of life. The entire ideology fell like a house of cards. Within a few decades, white supremacy went from a societal given to a fringe belief.

    One of the primary tenants of white guilt is that white nationalism is a unique evil. White guilt necessitates that white nationalism not just be wrong but a unique wrong in the world, worse than communism or any of the sins of other races. If white nationalism isn’t worse than other isms, then whites have no more or less to answer for than any other race or creed and the whole edifice of white guilt collapses. This is of course irrational. White nationalism and belief in white supremacy is evil but no more or less evil than any other form of nationalism or religious or racial supremacy. So no believer in white guilt can have a rational discussion about white nationalism without calling the entire concept of white guilt into question.

    When Donald Trump spoke yesterday, he attempted to force the nation to have an honest and rational conversation about white nationalism and its involvement in the events last weekend. He said two undeniably truthful and rational things about the events this weekend. First, he said that not everyone at the march in Charlottesville was a white nationalist. This is true. The march was a protest against tearing down of the Robert E. Lee statue. It was organized by white nationalists but 200 or so people attended. It is perfectly rational and truthful to say that not all of them were white nationalists. Some of them, albeit a small minority, no doubt were there because they wanted to save the statue.

    Second, he said that the counter protesters deserve a significant share of the blame for the resulting violence and death. This is also true. The counter protesters were active willing participants in the violence that occurred. The proof of that is in the photos and accounts of the weekend given in the Virginia ACLU Twitter feed. And as I explained above, had the events in Charlottesville involved any other group but white nationalists everyone involved would be assessed their share of the blame.

    To say those things and to try and have a rational and truthful conversation about last weekend is to admit that it is possible for white nationalists, no matter how bad they are, to have been if the victims of a wrong or at least not be entirely responsible for the events of last weekend. And to do that is to necessarily admit the reality that white nationalists are not uniquely evil or worse than other violent or supremacist groups. Donald Trump’s statements were a direct challenge to the entire concept of collective white guilt.

    One of the interesting things about Charlottesville that no one seems to have noticed is that an event that was supposed to be about white nationalism and white supremacy was not a race riot. I have not, in any of the pictures and video I have seen of the weekend, seen a single black person. Charlottesville was a conflict almost entirely or maybe entirely between white people. There is a good reason for this. The debate and conflict over white guilt is almost always a conflict between upper class and middle and lower class whites. Black people are nearly always bystanders or props in that conflict.

    To understand why you have to understand how white guilt works. You would think the belief in collective white guilt would be an expression of self-loathing, but it is not. When a white person believes in white guilt they are engaging in one of the purest forms of virtue signaling. Since the belief is irrational and has nothing to do with their actions, they are not accepting any real moral responsibility. What they are doing is asserting their moral superiority over other white people who refuse to accept the belief. When a black person asserts collective white guilt, they are doing it to attack white people. When a white person does it, the white person is saying they understand their burden and the horrible sins of their race. In doing that, the white person is showing their moral superiority over other white people who refuse to accept their guilt and responsibility.

    Embracing some level of white guilt is one of the primary ways upper class and gentry whites assert their moral superiority over middle and lower class whites. Middle and lower class whites don’t believe in white guilt. As a result, they often have more rational views about race. Middle and lower class whites can say and think rational things about race that upper-class whites cannot do without losing their class status. Lower and middle-class whites can believe that black people are sometimes just as racist as whites. They can believe that black supremacist groups can be just as bad as the KKK. They can believe that the Civil War was a complex event that wasn’t just about slavery and white supremacy, or that just because South Carolina or Mississippi were slave states and have a bad racial history doesn’t mean there are no good parts of those places or that people from there can’t be proud of being from them.

    Upper-class whites cannot believe any of that. No upper-class white would ever wave a Confederate flag. No upper-class white would ever say that the Black Panthers are as bad as the KKK. If they are conservative, they might say the KKK is insignificant but they would never say that a black group is qualitatively just as bad. To do any of that would necessarily call into question the idea of white guilt and mean being kicked out of the class.

    So when Trump yesterday tried to force a rational conversation about white nationalism, Washington, that most white and upper class of cities, lost its mind. It was all hands on deck, left and right, to save and assert the white guilt moral privilege. The responses to Trump were predictably irrational and counter factual. For the crime of saying not every incident is entirely one sided, Trump was accused of being a white supremacist; the President everyone feared he would be. Some of the reaction was so counterfactual it can fairly be called insane. Mitt Romney and John McCain described the counter protesters as fighters for justice and equality against the forces of prejudice and racism. People who showed up waving Communist flags and carrying pepper spray and bags of feces and urine are now fighters against evil and prejudice. Really? The entire response boiled down to a giant guttural groan of “How Dare You!!” by the white upper class. Trump had attacked their most sacred moral privilege and they were not going to take it lying down.

    What will be the fall out of all this? Like most things involving Trump, a lot less than people think. First, I don’t think it is going to make a bit of difference politically. The people who voted for Trump are almost to the person people who reject the concept of white guilt. So, they won’t see it the way the media and Washington has. They will see it as Trump saying entirely fair and rational things. I don’t see Trump’s support dropping one bit. Trump’s enemies will just have a new reason to feel aggrieved.

    Second, I don’t think we are going to see much white nationalist antifa violence going forward. Trump tried to force a conversation the left doesn’t want to have. For the left white guilt is not just about class it is also how it enforces identity politics. The left needs white guilt. Trump also tried to force the left to talk about its role in this violence. And that is also not a conversation anyone on the left wants to have. The left has condoned and enabled antifa violence for years and gotten away with it. They do not want to have to answer for that.

    So I think the police departments in Democratic cities are going to start doing their jobs. Instead of standing down at these marches and counter protests, the police will start keeping the two sides apart, arresting people who show up with weapons and bags of urine and cracking down hard on any fights that break out and maintaining order. Deprived of the ability to riot with impunity, antifa will find better things to do. They don’t want to go to jail any more than anyone else and protests get pretty boring if you no longer have free reign to attack people. Deprived of any violence to use to slander the right, the media will lose interest as well. These marches are going over the next few months return to being the small events of paper hanging losers they have always been. So, I wouldn’t stock up on ammunition for the coming civil war just yet.

    Lastly, I think that the drive to tear down Confederate monuments will likely fizzle as well. They will tear a few more down in Democratic cities but the issue will fade away as well. Trump did another thing yesterday and laid down the mark that if this stuff didn’t stop they would be calling for tearing down George Washington statues. Of course, all right thinking people are today dismissing this. They, however, know that it is true. There are already calls to tear down the statues of Theodore Roosevelt in museums in New York City. You can tear down Confederate statues and largely avoid a rational conversation. Most people really don’t know who the people were and you can always use the “but it’s racist” charge to keep the average observer from objecting. George Washington or Teddy Roosevelt are different. People do know who they are and can’t be scared off by the racist charge. And the left doesn’t want a rational conversation about that any more than they want a rational conversation about last weekend.

    The statue controversy like all leftist causes is entirely manufactured. We had a hundred year struggle for black civil rights in this country. During that time not a single person to my knowledge, not Martin Luther King, not W.E.B Dubois, not Booker T. Washington, not Malcolm X, ever cared or said a single word about those monuments. Yet, suddenly in 2017, they are a threat to all that is right and good. Give me a break. Once the left decides tearing them down is no longer to their advantage, and they will if they haven’t already, no more will be heard about the subject.

  • Wednesday Afternoon Kara-rinku

    I’m still super busy. I give you an empty links to play in.