Blog

  • What are we reading? May 2017

    It’s the last Friday of the Month, which means it’s time once again for Oprah’s The Glibs’ Book Club:

    SugarFree

    I’ve been reading the Rivers of London series by Ben Aaronovitch off of jesse’s recommendation. I’m through the fifth book and I am really enjoying it. It’s a deft mash-up of The Dresden Files and British police procedurals. I’m not sure how many books he is shooting for, but the formula is set-up for dozens and dozens if he felt like it. And the series is popular enough to have tie-in comics series. The most baffling part of reading them is that it hasn’t been made into a TV series yet. Aaronovitch started as a TV writer and he has the rhythms of serial television down pat.

    Speaking of The Dresden Files, I also read Jim Butcher’s Codex Alera series this month. I liked them quite a bit. They magnify both Butcher’s strengths and weaknesses as a writer. His battle and fight scene are superb; his character’s relationships with women range from baffled to mildly horrified. People are either really, really good or really, really bad; Butcher doesn’t care much for subtle. They are big books, widescreen epics that manage to pull-off the central conceit entertainingly, despite leaning on many of the most groan-worthy of fantasy conventions.

    jesse.in.mb

    Put a hustle on to finish the books from last month as this month’s What are we reading? approached, and have mostly succeeded (Luz Gabas writes better sex than Dan Simmons’ turgid descriptions of erections could hope to match). I’m lollygagging on picking the next read as Haruki Murakami’s 1Q84 has been staring at me (literally one eye is poking out from my shelf) for years, and I want to reread Gaiman’s American Gods before I watch the series or Call Me By Your Name by André Aciman before the movie comes out. Ultimately I’ll probably settle on Beach Lawyer by Avery Duff, part of the Kindle First early release program for novels (underrated Prime perk). As far as I can tell many of the novels they select are blander versions of The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo with heavy themes of violence against women. Zygmunt Miloszewski’s Rage was the most emblematic of this trend.

     

    JW

    He dead.

    Old Man With Candy

    I’m a bit embarrassed to admit that my reading this month, beyond technical stuff, has comprised re-reading. I have to get out more. Nonetheless, I’m rereading these because I think they’re damn good.

    Tom O’Bedlam is very underrated scifi written by Robert Silverberg, a very underrated writer. Ever since reading Stephen Vincent Benet’s “By the Waters of Babylon” when I was a kid, I’ve had a deep love for post-apocalyptic stories. And I also have a weakness for the sort of novel that develops several different storylines, then skillfully brings them together at the end. Combine that with hallucinogenic ecstasy and a deliciously ambiguous conclusion, this is my favorite Silverberg and a novel that seems almost tailor-made for my tastes in fiction. Chungira-he-will-come, he will come.

    My geeky side drew me to Uncertainty, a retelling of the early history of quantum mechanics. The book’s focus is much more on the personalities and dynamics of the theory’s origins than any explanation of the wonderful weirdness of the new physics, which was just fine for me- get your physics from Feynman. The author, David Lindley, transforms the names I only knew from various equations and theories into three dimensional human beings. As a bonus, he shares my scorn for the pomos and sociological types who, without any actual understanding of the uncertainty principle, love to invoke it to support their confused world-views.

    Riven:

    Still reading Dead Witch Walking… But I swear I’m actually going to start it this weekend. Pinky-promise.

    Brett L:

    I blew through the latest installment of Nathan Lowell’s Golden Age of the Solar Clipper series To Fire Called. Although the books have gotten a little darker, and certainly the universe a little deeper since Quarter Share, it remains the same fun kind of low-calorie high fun series you can inhale in short sittings, feel good about universes where they (mostly) live happily ever after, and capitalism works thanks to having to get a long way from habitable space before you can magically be somewhere else. I’m also slogging through Gaiman’s Norse Mythology.  As someone who liked a couple of his books but doesn’t think he’s THE towering literary figure of the 21st century that this is a labor of love where he has (thus far) failed to sway me to his love of the mythology. I remain entirely bored by the canon mythology. Stay tuned for June when I binge read Neal Stephenson’s attempt to jump into the (thus far British) “magic is real and there’s a government agency for that” genre. And I think in July I’ll be (based on the story arc as I understand it) hate reading Charlie Stross’s latest Laundry File like it was written by an ex-girlfriend I’m still not over.

    SP

    I tend to read several books at once, one of which is usually a mystery or spy thriller. While I’m waiting for the new Scot Harvath from Brad Thor (out on June 27), and the new Chief Inspector Gamache from Louise Penny (out on August 29), I’m reading through the V.I. Warshawski novels by Sara Paretsky. I’m currently on book 11, Blacklist. Set in Chicago and the western suburbs right after 9/11, the usually very lefty Vic is thrown into several puzzles involving events around the HUAC and complications from the Patriot Act. There is much to please a libertarian heart in this one, from diatribes against the gutting of the Bill of Rights to our heroine actively subverting the police. DO NOT read any of the reviews. They all seem to contain spoilers. (What’s up with that?!)

    Also in process: Daybook by Anne Truitt, a look into an artist’s  journals (recommended to me by an older artist I admire whom I was recently privileged to meet); and 3 Steps to Yes: The Gentle Art of Getting Your Way by Gene Bedell. It seems to be working. It’s been much easier to live with OMWC since I started this book.

    Banjos

    Banjos is currently reading Everybody Poops for the 127th time per her toddlers’ request. It is their most holy text.

    sloopyinca

    Sloop is reading The Neverending Story and will have an update when he’s done.

  • Friday Morning Links

    Did I call it, or did I call it? The basketball game last night was a predictable ass-kicking and the Celtics were rightfully humiliated by the Cavs.  And I mean hu-mil-i-a-ted. So now the NBA can get down to the playoff matchup everyone knew was coming and teams can sandbag more regular season games since playoff seeding and home court didn’t seem to matter to the two teams that were so much better than the rest of the league its laughable.

    And then…there was hockey. That sport that one minute has fans jumping off the couch in excitement and rips their heart the next. That was a hell of a game for the neutral fan. The refs let them play and the goalies both had pretty damn good games. Its just that somebody had to win. And to the chagrin of Canadians everywhere, not to mention fans of every other NHL team, that “somebody” had to be the Penguins that hoisted the Prince of Wales trophy after scoring in the second overtime. But I can sure tell you the people in the NHL offices breathed a sigh of relief.  An Ottawa-Nashville Stanley Cup final would have gotten less viewership than a best of seven matchup between Rosie O’Donnell and Nancy Pelosi striptease competition.

    Anyway, that’s all the sports news for today.  Sort of. The other, sports-related tale of misogyny and shitlording directed at a poor, widdle girl will follow shortly. Because its now time for…the links!

    Greg Gianforte wins MT Special Election

    Republican Congressional hopeful Greg Gianforte wins the special election a night after being charged with misdemeanor assault for allegedly body-slamming a reporter. He was way out in front and every media outlet in the nation has already called it. That reporter might as well give up and just start embracing political violence if this is how the world is gonna operate. No sense in getting just the facts. He, too, may as well embrace violence. What’s that you say? he apparently advocated for violence against political opponents 10 weeks ago? But that’s different, right? I mean, the violence he was advocating was against a 16 year old kid.

    I guess WaPo and the NYT have too many resources invested in the Trumputin “impeachment investigation”, as WaPo literally called it this week, to investigate the avalanche of criminality happening at the FBI and other spy agencies under the Obama administration. Seriously, this is the biggest story in years and they’re just sitting there with a thumb up their collective ass as they grind that axe on the non-existent Russian collusion bullshit.  It’s a bold strategy, Cotton. Let’s see if it pays off.

    Nice body…

    OK, now the story that is somewhat related to sports. Just read it yourself. I won’t go into any more detail than to say that its retarded as shit. Everybody involved is retarded as shit. And now I feel retarded as shit for having contributed to its spread.

    Um, why the hell is this news? “Hey, wanna see a dead guy?” might be in bad taste. It might even be a dubious plot device for a River Phoenix vehicle. But how is it disrespecting of remains? You want to disrespect the remains of Glenn? Then piss into his dead eye sockets, the big government piece of shit that he was. But just pulling open the tray his body is resting on doesn’t count, sorry. (Wait, why were my tax dollars being wasted to keep this guy on ice for four months anyway? Just so he could have a more showy funeral? Even in death, eh John?)

    Hey dumbass. Learn to read.

    You gotta have faith. No, its not that song. Give me more credit than that.

  • Reviews You’ll Never Use: Class of 1999

    Welcome once again fellow aficionados of the absurd to another round of your favorite thing on the Information Superhighway, REVIEWS YOU’LL NEVER USE! This week, we’ll do something a bit unusual, and review a sequel to a film instead of the original. Why? Because this movie came in one of those four-movie $10 DVD multipacks when I bought it several years ago, and I had no idea it was a freaking sequel until I was doing my preliminary research for this column, so fuck me I guess.

    To be fair, it’s only a sequel in the loosest sense of the word. The film is Class of 1999, by veteran action director Mark L. Lester. Middle name starts with an L, huh, and last name is Lester. I never liked that. I don’t like alliteration in names, or even using the same beginning letter. I don’t know why, it just rubs me the wrong way. I dislike it just like I dislike it when people have two first names, like Clippers roundball player Chris Paul. Chris Paul? FUCK…YOU, get a last name! Be Chris Paulson, or something like that. Anything, just don’t have two first names! I hate it SO MUCH! I hate you for not changing your name, I hate your parents for having that name, just fucking die!

    Stacy Keach, menacingly eating a banana. The crudely stereotyped gay jokes write themselves.

    Anyway enough about my hang-ups. Mark Lester directed such endearing childhood memories as Firestarter and Commando. Lately, however, his IMDB reads like the resume of a director only someone like me could love. Dragons of Camelot? Poseidon Rex? Dragon Wasps (the cover art is of a giant wasp breathing fire)? Sand Sharks? Yeti: Curse of the Snow Demon? Game of Swords? Holy shit man, I’ve hit the junk cinema jackpot. Oddly, he’s credited as a producer for all of these things on his IMDB page, but if you actually go to the links for the movies themselves, he’s the director. I wonder what that’s all about. Whatever’s wrong, I’m sure it’s the fault of a progressive.

    Our three killbots. For some reason one of the military robots was designed to look like an old professor, complete with smoking a pipe. FFS.

    Moving on, apparently in 1982 he directed a film called Class of 1984. I’ll not link it, in case I run across it and review it someday. By not linking directly from here, I have thereby prevented any of you from being able to access any information about this film on the World Wide Web on your own initiative. But the gist of it seems to be another one of those, “The kids aren’t alright” movies about an inner-city high school overrun by gangs, new teacher comes in and has to get shit done, yada yada yada.

    In 1990, still not satisfied that society wasn’t spiraling downward into an inevitable collapse, he trotted the idea back out and directed Class of 1999. Only now instead of an inner-city decay theme, he decided to make it an action movie about street gangs vs. killbots. It was the right, nay, only move. No shit, this movie stars Pam Grier, Stacy Keach, and Malcolm McDowell as The Principal! Well, they all have supporting roles, but significant screen time, even if the titular stars are the teenage gang-bangers (not people in gangs, but rather, people who regularly engage in gang-bangs).

    The film was produced by Vestron Pictures & released by Vestron Video, and had only a very limited theatrical release, but really, check out those links. I thought it sounded familiar, and I immediately saw why. Scroll down a bit and take a look at the gems this company produced back in the day. Great low-budget awesome crap like Street Trash (which I wouldn’t have seen without the recommendation of one of the original H&R schismatics, who unfortunately left prior to the website launch) and Chopping Mall, all the way up to Princess Bride and Dirty Dancing! I had completely forgotten about these guys, but reading through this company’s history brings back a lot of fond memories. Do check out both, as the films for the two branches of the company don’t entirely overlap.

    So our film opens with some lazy exposition detailing how by 1999, gangs had taken over the city cores of most major American urban centers and turned them into “free-fire zones” where cops were scared to enter (HA, if only! -ed). In response to the crisis not of apparently ceding sovereignty to gangs but of the fact that the damned gangs aren’t going to school, the gubbmint creates the Department of Education Defense. They’re like hyper-militarized truancy…divisions. One would think that it would be a better use of resources to regain control of the cities first and then run the schools like normal, rather than simply run military ops in no-man’s land for the sole purpose of getting kids to and from schools over which no adults exercise any control, but what would I know, I’m not the visionary director of Dragon Wasps.

    This is what upper-class white people thought gangs looked like. Shit, maybe in Seattle, it *is* what gangs look like.

    The former gang-leader of the Blackhearts gang, “Cody” (because badass gang leaders are always named that), is let out of prison to resume school in his free-fire zone of Seattle as part of a pilot program. The Blackhearts, by the way, all have this dumbass little tattoo of a black heart on their cheeks to show their affiliation. It doesn’t make me afraid of them, it just makes me want to help them sign up for HIV screening. Cody acts like he wants to lay low to not violate his parole, but bizarrely insists on driving home through the turf of the Blackheart’s rivals, the Razorheads (this is what middle-aged white people actually thought gangs were named). A firefight ensues, and he makes it home only to find his friends, younger brother, and mother all living in decrepitude and addicted to drugs.

    Going to school, he meets the new principal’s goody two shoes daughter, Christie. They bond over his bad-boy image and not wanting to be in a gang anymore. We’re introduced to evil corporate CEO Stacy Keach’s trio of new teachers, two of which are people you’ve never heard of, and one of which is Pam Grier. They’re androids programmed to teach, and to be able to physically handle the violent students.

    Well of course since Stacy Keach is the head of a profit-making kkkorporation, it turns out he’s evil and only in it for the money, without caring about killing kids, because hey, what’s a few (dozen) dead kids when there’s a buck to be made? THAT’S HOW CAPITALISM WORKS. You see, the three android teachers are actually reprogrammed military robots, and this whole setup is a test run to see how they’ll work in urban combat environments. Unfortunately when Malcolm McDowell finally gets wise, he gets his throat punctured for his troubles.

    Robo-view camera angle. Notice there is a selection for unspecified, “Karate Moves”. That’s Grade A schlock for you, right there.

    So the androids first discreetly kill a few troublesome kids, then for some reason flip their shit and decide to spark a war between the Razorheads and Blackhearts. While this war of many people firing automatic and semi-automatic weapons at each other from like 10 meters apart with nobody hitting anything rages, the androids sneak behind the lines and go on a murder-spree. There is one rather delightful scene of a kid being pulled backwards through a small hole in the wall, snapping the kid’s torso in half. Afterward, they kidnap Christie and take her to the school, trying to lure the competing gangs into a trap to restart their earlier battle. The gangs figure out what’s up, heroically join forces to defeat the androids, and after a bloodbath battle in the school, literally only Cody & Christie remain alive at the end. At one point, Cody also hilariously accurately hurls a fire axe across a classroom. Seriously, like 50 kids are killed over the course of this movie – it’s like Total Recall only with teenagers.

    The effects are workable for being a low-budget grindjob. At the end, when the androids are showing more of their robot parts, it isn’t too hysterical. Also you get to see a fake Pam Grier titty after her chest rips open. There is a gratuitous enough amount of violence to satisfy most people watching this who went into it with eyes open for what they were getting. Unfortunately the writing and directing are where this falls short (the director of Commando not being particularly adept? Gasp!). It suffers from something all of the movies of this particular subgenre suffer from, in a wildly unrealistic depiction of gangs, how gang members interact with each other, what gangs are named, what symbolism they use, etc. It’s more like what worried parents imagined in their heads when the first Hot Topic opened in their lily-white suburban mall and they saw their kids with a Dead Kennedys CD, which, as you probably know, bears precisely zero resemblance to actual gang members and activities. Movies pull shit like that all the time though. What bothers me more is that the robots really go off the reservation, and begin making stupid, witty remarks. At one point, one of them with a drill-hand (which seems much less useful on the battlefield than the other robots’ flamethrower hand and rocket-launcher hand) is drilling into a kid’s head, and he says, “I love to mold young minds!” while grinning manically. They’re robots, dude. They don’t get a boner for killing and make puns. The stupid killbots even slaughter their own support staff. During an earlier chase scene when the robots are driving after Christie & Cody after the teenagers broke into the robot’s shared apartment looking for clues, as they’re flying off a dock into the ocean, one of them says he hates getting wet. I dunno, maybe it’s just me, but I really think the whole Terminator approach to killbots is preferable to the hokey-jokey variety you see here.

    Pam Grier finally shedding her limiting human outer shell to reveal the foxy killbot beneath. Notice the look of rapturous joy on her face? I don’t think Mark L. Lester knows what robots are.

    Also the guy who plays Cody sounds oddly like Corey Feldman. It was bugging me the whole time.

    So to sum up, if you’re not looking for much except a mildly amusing way to kill 90 minutes, it certainly isn’t that bad. Christ knows I’ve seen a lot worse. But don’t let the somewhat interesting premise trick you into thinking you’re getting anything particularly great here, some overlooked low-budget gem. Those movies exist, but this isn’t one of them. It’s one rung above a made-for-TV SyFy Channel Saturday Night Special, which is apparently what Mark L. Lester is churning out these days. The real waste is seeing three good-to-great actors slumming it here.

    And oh yes, lest I forget: there is a third film in this series. But that’s a tale for another time.

    I rate this film 4 psychotic killbots out of 10.

  • Afternoon Links

    Good Afternoon, Gentlemen…I am an H.A.L. 9000 computer…. Wait, no I am not. I am your humble purveyor of links. So without further ado, here they are, for your use and amusement.

    • NATO Cha-Ching time?
    • Chicago is a tiny bit less of a toddlin’ town.
    • Someone needs killin’ [update: Here]
    • Was he trying to look like a wizard? A Fremen?

    Bat ’em around like a cat does a frightened mouse. Or ignore and post your own. Your choice.

  • Take That For Data

    I’ve been mulling over a segment focusing on statistics and data for a while now. But since I suffer from (highly likely) ADHD and can’t seem to find time to properly give such a segment justice, I’ve sat on it. Aieee, sit on it, Potsie!

    With that sparkling opening introducing a new feature, enjoy these “Take that for data!”

    Ever wonder who the ‘drinkiest’ people in the world are?

    Worry no more. 

    What goes best with pizza? I know. Infographs!

    I did notice a foul habit in one of the graphs. 36% of Americans dip the crust in….ranch dressing?

    Two hours has passed since my last link. It seems I fainted and hit my head on the fall leaving me woozy after reading that stat.

    Sitting in a meeting about things relating to my business – I think. I forget – I wondered, who are the biggest producers of cured meats in the world? 

    Holland is 2nd? La-dee-daw.

    I’m not sure what contract I signed.

    Moving along. Here are countries with the highest self-employment rates. Please note, racists, graph is in White but text is in Italian.

    Greeks top the list. Us Nerf Americans languish at the bottom. Meh. How many entrepreneurs do you need, right Comrade Bernie?

    How many parasites do we need sucking off the productive classes, Grandpa Gulag? Eh? Hm?

    World’s healthiest countries. 

     

    And now for some sports.

    It’s been put forth the New England Patriots benefit from being in a weak AFC east. So I investigated. 

    Let’s start in the AFC north with the Steelers and Ravens. In the Belichick era: The Patriots are 6-3 against the Steelers in regular season play and 4-0 in the playoffs. They’re 5-1 against the Ravens but are 2-2 in the post-season facing them. Nonetheless, it’s a dominant edge for New England.

    Moving onto to the AFC south. The key team there are the Colts (who played in the AFC east for two seasons). Regardless, different team and division same result. New England is 12-5 against the Colts in the regular seasons and 5-1 in the playoffs. Again. Dominant.

    The only team to give them a run are the Broncos out in the AFC west. The Pats are 7-5 against them in the regular season but 1-3 in the playoffs.
     
    All-combined the Pats are 23-10 against those teams in the regular season and 12-6 in the playoffs. 35-16 overall.
     
    Not enough to weaken Graca’s argument you say?
     
    Check this out. Since 2000 the Patriots are:
     
    77-29 against all AFC east divisional teams – .726%
    70-26 against the AFC – .729%
    53-17 against the NFC – .757%
     
    That’s a .737% winning percentage for those of you scoring at home.
     
    That’s a lot of cheating, eh?
     
    Anyway. They won 74% of their games in the Brady/Belichick era. In addition, they’ve compiled a 25-9 record in the playoffs (.735%). In other words, they maintain their excellence in the playoffs.
     
    The New England Patriots would likely be just as successful no matter what division they played in. The only division that *could* conceivably halted the is the NFC east. It’s historically a ferociously competitive division with strong teams at different intervals. Alas, they’re not an NFC team. 
     
    They’re AFC.
     
    And they’re dominant.
  • Thursday Morning Links

    I don’t even think they had any meaningful sportsball yesterday. Except for there fact that Manure won the Europa League (which has existed for more than 20 years). And the Firstros lost a game, which I feel compelled to mention so as not to be accused of giving only good news involving them.  Anyway, the real big shit happens tonight at the Wales Conference reaches a crescendo and the Celtics have their season ended by the Cavs, which I feel comfortable reporting as a fact even 13 hours ahead of the game.

    Anyway, blah, blah, blah. Other stuff and shit.  You guys want to get right into it. So here come…the links!

    Greg Gianforte

    Montana special election takes a turn toward the insane when the Republican hopeful decided to literally bodyslam a reporter that got in his face. When asked for a comment on the incident, the candidate was heard to say “oh yeah!” He was cited for misdemeanor assault, which would not prevent him from taking office and by law could not even be adjudicated until after he leaves his post, should he win.

    When DREAMing goes wrong. But hey, when you’re such a piece of shit that you’d illegally export arms to another country through drug cartels and you’d climb on top of a school full of dead children to call for gun control , I shouldn’t be surprised when you’d also let violent gang members in after they had been apprehended.

    Dirty little bastard. He’s lucky it wasn’t my kid otherwise his sentence would have included spending more than the next five years eternity on probation in a pine box.

    The offending clown

    Aw shit.  They’re baaaaaaaaack!

    I guess this guy never heard the phrase “quit while you’re ahead.” Dumbass.

    The title to this isn’t accurate. I know a lot more than just this one. Sometimes for better and sometimes for worse.

    Have a great day, friends! A freaking great day.

  • Teachers Are Underpaid

    Here in Illinois, it’s so painfully obvious. After all, only five of the top 10 Best Cities for K-12 Teachers are in Illinois, and the teachers in those cities are only making 68% more money than the overall local median salary. And they have to work for nine months every year!

    In this new report examining 689 cities, “Analysts ranked cities based on eight metrics that identify places that are affordable and pay teachers well, safe, have jobs available, have a populace that values education, and are nice places to live with abundant amenities.”

    So, if, inexplicably, you are a K-12 teacher reading this post on the Glibs, consider moving to one of these lovely Chicago suburbs.

    Bonus: You could live next door to OMWC and me. We’ll show you our favorite watering holes, and with your salary, you’re buying!

    Top 10 Cities for K-12 Teachers
  • Wondering Wednesday: A Question About Girl-Fronted Bands

    The question is quite simple: Which is the worst band with the hottest female lead?

    I’m going to limit the question to girl-fronted bands, not all-girl bands, not female singers with mostly anonymous session players backing them, or duos. Female lead singer, dudes in the rest of the band. And the question has a double axis: attractiveness of the lead singer and the general shittiness of the band as a whole, so a super-hot leader of a merely mediocre band doesn’t cut it. And I’m going to try judge both the girl and the band at what is generally considered their peak.

    Some contenders:

    Paramore / Hayley Williams

    It’s hard to define Paramore’s sound, such as it is. They occupy a strange interzone of emo and pop that is, thankfully, almost completely dead as a sub-genre.

    Pros: They seem fairly competent with their instruments, none of the boys feel the need to sing.

    Con: The sound of the band is homogenized like 1% milk, first signed as essentially a gimmick band because the lead singer was 13 and the drummer was 12.

    Least Believable Part of Their Wikipedia Page: “According to Williams, the name ‘Paramore’ came from the maiden name of the mother of one of their first bass players.”

    Hayley Williams

    She can actually sing, which is a relief from AutoTune. She’s a tiny little thing and flings herself around while the band plays. Her defining style is that she doesn’t really have one, going through hair colors and haircuts like the rest band does hair gel.

    Pros: Slim and fit, a spinner at 5′ 2″, married at 26 (so someone must be able to put up with her.)

    Cons: Practically boobless based on leaked nude, face gets less pretty the longer you look at it, wears thick makeup to hide Olmos-level bad skin, is straight edge and married to an older guy (also straight edge) who wouldn’t have passed the half-your-age+7 years test when they started dating.

    Band Name: Misspelled. This will come up again.

    BONUS OUTRAGE: Seems to be biting Poppy’s style lately!

     

    Evanescence / Amy Lee

    Formed at church camp, Amy Lee and Ben Moody’s Evanescence is frothy goth-pop for the Hot Topic set, with some very, very, very unfortunate nü-metal undertones.

    Sharp-eared fans of crap will recognize this as their original contribution to the Ben Affleck Daredevil soundtrack…

    Once again, it’s kind of a shame that Amy Lee can actually sing. The unresolved tension between (what one can assume) is Lee’s urge toward the operatic and the gothic and (what one can assume) is Moody’s desire to set the record straight about Fred Durst being an unheralded musical genius, has the unfortunate effect of making the band’s music into syphilitic ear mush.

    Pros: Lee’s singing. That’s it.

    Cons: see: syphilitic ear mush; favorite of Twilight fans everywhere

    Possible Disqualifying Factor: Evanescence maybe a duo, despite the rest of the band, which seems to change around often.

    Amy Lee

    Pros: Those eyes, those boobs, dresses like the day manager of a Hot Topic

    Cons: Weight seems to fluctuate often, married at 19 to a therapist who might have been 30 at the time (there are various birth years floating around the internet,) has a giant head, dresses like the day manager of a Hot Topic

    Band Name: Not misspelled, just an archaic word, but it makes the band sound like a brand of flavored sparkling water.

     

    The Pretty Reckless / Taylor Momsen

    Sub-feckless Sheryl Crowe? Joni Mitchell and Axl Rose’s secret abortion? VH1 implosion? I really don’t know how to describe this crap.

    A band that only exists because the lead singer was on a TV show, and got kicked off it for being a drunk mess at 15. She’s a Bret Easton Ellis short story come to life.

    Pros: It might keep the kids off the H for a few months.

    Cons: Listen to it.

    Break It Down For Me: Three creepy old guys start a band with a jailbait TV actress. Somehow they still exist 7 years later.

    Taylor Momsen

     

    Pros: Hotter than the fires of a thousand dying suns, would be the girl worth it to get herpes from

    Cons: Would definitely give you herpes, would require you to support her terrible music career, has more baggage than JFK at Christmas, probably stabby, inevitable relapse, will fuck your friends behind your back, possible suicide risk when she doesn’t get a call for the Gossip Girl Netflix reunion show

    Band Name: An ironic comment on the lead singer. I like it.

     

    Chvrches / Lauren Mayberry

    The Scottish synth-pop band that autocorrect loves to hate.

    Mayberry is not a very good singer and the music is the same sort of degraded synth-pop being pedaled since EMD invaded the clubs where white people dance.

    Pros: It doesn’t go out of its way to be actively horrible, except for when they had the misplaced temerity to cover Bauhaus.

    Cons: Pretty forgettable, like the soundtrack for a hip Danish airport terminal

    Lauren Mayberry

    Pros: Holy shit, she’s cute AF

    Cons: Vegan, might actually be a magical wood elf, vegan, sounds dumber than Wynona Ryder in interviews (no mean feat), vegan, occasionally does this shit to her face, vegan, police would question you if you were out with her in public, vegan, might uncomfortably remind some of their favorite 12-year-old niece, vegan, is annoyingly woke, vegan

    Bonus: Mention finding her hot to women in their 30s for an epic rant about the evils of “manic pixie dream girls.”

    Band Name: Spell shit right, people. It was never cute.

     

    Suggest more in the comments and please show your work.

  • Wednesday Afternoon Links

    Afternoon Links Special Report

    Dumbest Manchester Bombing Hot Takes (so far)

     

    You know who is exactly like Donald Trump?

    Why a gay celibate vegan pop singer, of course.

    Morrissey dares to attack the Queen? And the current government? And was right about the ideology behind the murders of citizens of his beloved hometown? Gasp. Gasp, I say.

    No one gives shallow fuckwittery like Salon.

     

    Hammer goes looking for a nail, finds one:

    The Bombing at a Manchester Ariana Grande Show Was an Attack on Girls and Women

    I’m not sure where Slate dug up someone more hotheaded and dumber than Mandy Marcotte, but they managed it. Posted just a few hours after the bombing, this is the hottest of hot takes. One wonders if Cauterucci has this already written in case of a bombing and just plugged in some details.

    Key line: “…Grande has advanced a renegade, self-reflexive sexuality that’s threatening to the established heteropatriarchal order.”

    Really? An attractive girl playing on a jailbait imagery and wearing black latex S&M bunny masks is a threat to “heteropatriarchal order?” Cauterucci is so vapid and desperate, one almost feels bad laughing at her. Almost.

     

    What’s sadder than Cauterucci’s dim bulb take? Ripping off her dim bulb take:

    Why Manchester Bomber Targeted Girl: As is so often the case, misogyny was woven into this act of violence

    This is from that bubbling cauldron of journalistic integrity, Rolling Stone.

    Cauterucci has a solid case for plagiarism, honestly. “They’s stole mah derp!”

    These girls and women weren’t just listening to any music, either – this was feminist music. Through her songs and public statements, Ariana Grande has taken a strong stand against sexism and the objectification of women, and she does so kindly, joyfully and without apology.

    Once again, this strange idea that schoolgirl-fetish doughnut-licker is some sort of towering feminist figure.

    Of course, at least Emily Crockett at Rolling Stone manages to mention that the bomber was a Muslim, unlike Cauterucci.

  • Selling liberty: Small government, good government

    When I wrote a while ago about the general wish for liberty, some of the comments reminded me of several difficulties in doing so. One of these, something often told to libertarians by the left-leaning, is government should be more efficient and better, not smaller. Better government versus smaller. I have yet to be convinced of the possibility of achieving this. This is not an in-depth post in any way, shape or form, just a quick thought, let us say.

    Personally, and as a libertarian, I think it is hardly possible to make big government efficient. Which I assume shocks no one. It is not even a given that it is desirable to have big efficient government, as Frank Herbert may have observed in a book or two. As for better, it is one of those things that do not have clear, universally accepted, definitions. Like common sense, it can mean whatever the speaker wants it to mean. I often get countered with accusations of being ideological and few clear, concrete measures to achieve this mythical good big government, besides boilerplate feel good nonsense like “if we all work together” blah blah blah.

    My argument is that it is not really possible to make government efficient in a significant without making it smaller because the size is often in itself the source of inefficiency: large numbers of regulations, large numbers of agencies with overlapping functions which not even the government can keep track of, complex bureaucratic organizations, and no inherent checks and balances, as one would find in a market. Man-made checks and balances are given as an alternative, but these are as flawed as the humans who design them, and equally as crooked. Experience does not show this to be a source of efficiency. I say in a significant way because, as inefficient as governments currently are, it should be possible I suppose to make them somewhat less inefficient.

    Now, I’m sure we can make this quite efficient

    In general, the larger and more complex a system is, the harder it is to manage. This is equally true of big corporations, which can become quite the bureaucratic nightmare and highly inefficient, but they are occasionally forced by the market situation to do something about it. This is rarely the case for government, and when it happens it is with much wailing and gnashing of teeth. It is even harder to do by bureaucrats with all sorts of agendas, with the incapacity of economic calculation, with little interest in efficiency and much interest in other things, and without any inherent constraints, as exists in the market.

    When the last financial crisis hit, the corporation I work for quickly found hundreds of millions of wasteful spending brought by the previous boom. It cut more than any government did. One of the problems with corporations – one that is increasing in frequency- is precisely the need of government to intervene when the market attempts to correct something.

    But, to get to the point of this post, for the sake of argument, we can give the left the benefit of the doubt. Let’s say they want good efficient big government. My problem is that they never show it. The standard should be: we believe government can be efficient and well prove it to you doubters. We will do everything in our power, leave no stone unturned, to achieve this!

    We will look at every expense thrice to make sure we don’t spend unnecessarily. We will review every law and regulation to make sure it is as simple and clear as possible. We will review all the laws and regulations to see they are not deprecated, overlapping, confusing. We will work tirelessly to spend money better and regulate better. This happens approximately once in a blue moon, give or take. For all the efficiency rhetoric, they are quick to advocate for any expense that they like, for any regulation no matter how dumb. The left wing should be always ready to criticize what government does wrong, but libertarian publications seem to do a much better job of this.

    Bureaucrats being a base of votes for the left, they seldom seek to make bureaucracy efficient. And this would be crucial in efficient government.  Get rid of any agency not needed or overlapping. Simplify bureaucratic procedures. Reduce the number of meaningless forms, analyze all processes in an agency. Hire external auditors and consultants and improve constantly. This happens once in a never.

    So where is this desire for efficient big government? Even if such a beast would be possible–which I say it is not–it is certainly nowhere to be seen outside empty rhetoric. Didn’t the old cliche use to go “actions speak louder than words?” If people demand good, efficient big government–not small government–we have to tell them that  “there ain’t no such thing.” And no one trying to achieve it.