Category: Entertainment

  • Reviews You’ll Never Use: Zardoz

    ZARDOZ SPEAKS TO YOU, HIS CHOSEN ONES.

    He speaks to you of his wonderful, magical, infuriating, nonsensical, visually bounteous film.

    This review is the direct result of a number of comments noticed by Your Friendly Ruling Council of Eternals Admins which indicate that a disturbing number of you may not have seen this film. The original plan was to write the entire review as Zardoz, and post it using the Zardoz account. However, I tried it out for a paragraph, and trust me…as a reader, that gimmick has its limits.

    Image result for zardoz
    The Flying Stone Head of Zardoz

    The 1974 movie Zardoz is a passion project tossed as a bone to director, screenwriter, and producer John Boorman in appreciation of his wild success with the 1972 classic, Deliverance. If you haven’t yet seen that one, I’m afraid it’s a tad too conventional for Reviews You’ll Never Use. Deliverance is a completely mainstream film, and so will find no place in this column.

    Zardoz marks only the second post-Bond film of Sean Connery. The actor was apparently having some trouble with typecasting, and not only accepted the role, but became fast friends with Boorman. Our other leading thespian is the beautiful Charlotte Rampling, a prolific actress known for many roles over the years, but perhaps best remembered by trash cinema & horror fans from her turn in the 1977 Richard Harris vehicle Orca, a brutally unsubtle Jaws knock-off.

    Given carte blanche, Boorman oversaw every aspect of the film, from writing to post-production. In his director commentary it is obvious that he reflects on the film fondly but admits that he perhaps stretched too far. To which your humble author would reply, Ah, but a man’s reach should exceed his grasp, Or what’s a heaven for? Indeed what Mr. Boorman considers an ultimately flawed product, is still so delightful in myriad ways that I shudder to think what would have come about if he had succeeded in bringing the totality of his vision to the screen.

    Somehow I don't think this guy believes that the penis is evil.
    I wasn’t kidding about the drawn-on facial hair.

    Our film opens in the year 2293 with a floating head providing exposition (explained by Boorman to be an ultimately unsuccessful attempt tacked on in post-production to reduce audience confusion). Interestingly, this narrator is fully self-aware and refers to his understanding that he is a fictional construct of the writer/director. The head inexplicably has a thin drawn-on mustache and goatee. We cut to a giant flying head that vomits guns and commands the “Brutals” worshiping it to go forth and kill, because, “the penis is evil” and overbreeding brings about a plague of men.

    One particularly clever Brutal, our protagonist Zed, stows away in the flying head and is taken to a realm preserved out of time, where the enlightened scientific remnants of advanced humanity live eternal lives of unspeakable drudgery. Punishment in this society is conducted by forced aging, the senile being sent to live in what appears to be an endless New Year’s Eve party ala TGI McScratchy’s. Others simply give up caring about life, and become Apathetics, standing around catatonic and being given green bread on which to sustain themselves. The self-styled Eternals view themselves as the preservers of the past, collapsed civilization, and their Eden is run by a supercomputer known as the Tabernacle.

    Yep, you get to see dem titties, along with a wonderful assortment of others.
    Charlotte Rampling
    Hard pass.
    The famous costume that Sean Connery wore to his wedding, and still wears to all public functions to this very day.

    The Eternals capture Zed and decide to study him, to find out how the vulgar strain of humanity has changed over the last two hundred years. One thing leads to another, as things inevitably tend to do in a story, and ultimately the Eternals find the answer to their weary prison of never-ending life.

    This film feels like something that was going to be, supposed to be, could have been, a great artistic achievement. Boorman’s self-directed criticism is on solid ground; it’s all simply too much. The visuals are wonderful. The costumes, the colors, the backgrounds, are all rich and help to bring this very interesting world to life. The problem is that this world is so very rich, that it becomes simply impossible to do it justice while remaining focused on progressing the plot. Who cleans up the Apathetics and the prematurely aged Renegades? They’re all quite spotless. Where do these non-functioning individuals relieve themselves? How on earth do the Eternals plan to cope when, inevitably, everyone slips up and commits transgressions resulting in forced aging into senility? The psychological scenes, in particular, seem over-wrought, as one begins to slip the line of confusing complexity for its own sake and nonsensicality with an artistic statement.

    For all that, I cannot find it in my heart to say this is a bad film. Imperfect? Surely. Plot holes you could drive a reasonably-priced sedan through? Absolutely. But the film is so lovely, the acting so involved, the entire production handled with such obvious love and hope, that it wins you over. Boorman is a good enough director to take what in anyone else’s hands would have become a tangled mess, and turn it into a modern bizarro masterpiece. While it lacks the raw insanity of House, it is obviously the vision of a man who knows exactly what he wants to express, and how he wants to express it, and that vision is sublime. Unfortunately, due to the limitations of time, budget, technology, etc, it is up to you as an audience member to take a step forward and meet the film halfway by taking the parts of that vision which are offered and completing it with your own mind and soul.

    And yes, there are a fair number of titties.

    I award this film 10 Severed Feet out of a possible 13.

  • Millennial Hipster Clothing Site to join Jet.com and Walmart Family

    All that the light touches came from Modcloth

    You might be wondering why this is relevant–it’s because fully 90% of my wardrobe is from Modcloth, including the dress I  wore to our wedding. So it’s relevant to me and you all get to read about it. I can promise some delicious salty tears, but if that’s not enough, go ahead and skip down to the comments and we can discuss why there are no libertarian women.

    Modcloth announced on Friday via tweet and blog post that they “are joining the Jet.com and Walmart family.” What does this mean? According to the blog:

    This will give us the necessary resources and support that we need as a business to grow. Growth allows us to reach more women, grow our community, and amplify our message. Our mission to help our customers feel like the best version of themselves continues. And our commitment to inclusivity continues. Our amazing team continues. And we can open more stores — in your hometown! I hope you will continue to join us as well on this next phase of our journey together.

    Brought to you by Modcloth

    If you’re wondering how receptive Modcloth’s client base is, you need look no further than the replies to the tweet or the comments in the blog. There’s a lot of complaints about Walmart’s anti-union policies (oh nooooooo), their lack of respect for women (lolwut?), and how Walmart is just bad for ‘Murica (m’kay?). One person even goes so far as to say that this “marks the death of Modcloth.” Regardless of the specific complaint, the overarching message is the same–goodbye/unsubscribe/unfollow. I could not find one positive comment. I’d leave one myself, but I suspect I’d just get shouted down. At least no one found Jet.com offensive.

    I highly doubt I’ll ever see a brick-and-mortar store in my town, but I love shopping at Modcloth.com. While I find a lot of their products unnecessarily trendy–I can’t stand mustaches and manatees on everything–they also tend to offer clothing that I think could be described as timeless and/or classic. I’m looking forward to seeing how this new partnership (hopefully) improves what Modcloth can offer.

  • Belly Up to the Bar

    Cocktail of the Week: Dark and Stormy

    By RC Dean

    The Dark and Stormy, the classic cocktail from Bermuda. This is an easy one, but as ever when cocktailing, there is the opportunity to make it a little more elaborate. I actually have two versions of this, depending on what I have for ginger beer and/or what I’m in the mood for. I think dark rum is absolutely essential for this – I prefer Pusser’s, which gives a really nice deep molasses flavor; Mrs. Dean prefers Pyrat XO, which is a tad lighter. It’s the combo of molasses and a serious ginger flavor that makes this one work.

    3 oz dark rum (I use either Pyrat XO or Pusser’s)
    6 oz ginger beer (see below)
    Healthy splash of lime juice, w/optional lime garnish

    Dark and Stormy (bottled ginger beer):

    Pour ingredients over ice in a highball glass, give it quick stir, garnish. Pretty easy. The key is the right bottled ginger beer. Grocery store ginger ale (Schweppes or whatever), and even the Bermudan ginger beers are just too sweet and not gingery enough for me. I haven’t found anything in a bottle I like better than Maine Root’s Ginger Brew – it delivers the ginger. I get it at Whole Foods. If not available, I would probably fall back to Gosling’s.

    Dark and Stormy (ginger beer syrup):

    This is the one for impressing the ladies with your mixological mastery. I like the Pickett’s #1 Medium Spice Ginger Beer syrup – they make stronger #3 Hot ‘N Spicy also, but it’s a little overwhelming for me. BTW, these syrups can go into some very interesting meat glazes as well, if you like getting your meat all sticky and gingery.

    Additional gear for this one includes a 16 oz. cocktail measuring glass (with all the measurements marked on the side), and a soda siphon to make the drink fizzy. The classic soda siphon is the 1 liter with the metal mesh wrap on it that takes standard CO2 cartridges, but there are cheaper alternatives. I’ve taken to throwing a little salt and baking soda into mine when I fill it – its almost a club soda, but I think it helps draw out the flavors. As with much else, gearing up for the Dark and Stormy means you are now equipped for a whole range of other drinks or upgrades to standard drinks (once you have had “real” tonic water made from a good syrup, you’ll never go back).

    Pour the rum, an ounce or maybe a little less of the ginger beer syrup, and the lime juice into the measuring glass, add around 6 oz. of fizzy water from the soda siphon, and pour over ice in a highball glass. Garnish if you feel like it.

    On a hot day, these go down fast and maybe a little too easy.

    Bonus Cocktail – Mexican Moose. If you’re a tequila fan, you can substitute tequila for rum to make a Mexican Moose (our name for it at the Casa Dean; it’s basically a variation on the Mexican Mule). We use silver tequila, but I’m thinking an anejo would be good, too.

     

    Derpetologist’s Spot the Not:

    Round One: Donald Trump

    1. Love him or hate him, Trump is a man who is certain about what he wants and sets out to get it, no holds barred. Women find his power almost as much of a turn-on as his money.

    2. I was never in this for the money. But it turns out that the money was an absolute necessity for me.

    3. The beauty of me is that I’m very rich.

    4. When we go in church and I drink the little wine, which is about the only wine I drink, and I eat the little cracker.

    5. Sorry losers and haters, but my I.Q. is one of the highest—and you all know it! Please don’t feel so stupid or insecure. It’s not your fault.

    6. My fingers are long and beautiful, as, it has been well been documented, are various other parts of my body.

     

    Round Two: Mistakes were made…

    All but 1 of the following are real quotes from American politicians.

    1. Mistakes were made. Then, other larger mistakes were made.

    2. Mistakes have been made, as all can see and I admit.

    3. Serious mistakes were made.

    4. It is quite possible that mistakes were made.

    5. Mistakes were made in terms of comments.

    6. Serious mistakes were made.

  • Reviews You’ll Never Use: House

    Oh boy, where to begin with this one. Forgive me for running long, but this film deserves the digital ink.

    Let us start with this: if I were to receive some moderate sum of money, and be given complete creative control, House is the film that I would make. Please note that I am not necessarily saying this is a good thing.

    This also gives you a pretty good idea about how this movie is going to go, i.e. FUCKING CRAZY.
    Promo Image

    House is unlike anything you’ve ever seen. It’s a big (by the standards of late 70s Japanese cinema) budget art-house experiment horror-but-maybe-not-kind-of-black-comedy. To properly understand this film, you must ingest consciousness-altering substances. Drop some acid, rip as much as you can out of a bong 10 times, eat some mushrooms, get drunk, whatever you have to do to open your mind to the higher mysteries – just do it.

    Looking wistfully across the sea at the success of Jaws, in 1975 director Nobuhiko Obayashi was approached by Toho Films (makers of my favorite franchise, Godzilla) to produce a treatment for a summer thriller blockbuster. While only being a director of commercials, he was known as a creative eccentric who had produced films on the art-house circuit years before. Working with his friend Chiho Katsura, they quickly turned in a script for a haunted house film.

    The gag was, Obayashi had gone to his 10-year-old daughter and asked her for ideas of what frightened her. So impressed by the creativeness of what scares a little girl, he decided to treat the entire picture as if it was from the perspective of a young girl. This meant the inclusion of nonsensical plot elements, shallow archetypes, purposefully hokey effects and animations, all tied together with traditional Japanese ghost story elements.

    Toho green-lit the project and shopped the script for two years, but no director would touch it because they all thought it would ruin their careers. That’s how off the wall this film already was. Fearing that it would never be produced, Obayashi asked the studio if he could at least announce that it had been green-lit. They agreed, and the wild-haired filmmaker began a two-year media blitz to promote the film. He shot promo pictures with the cast, commissioned and released the soundtrack, and even had the film novelized and performed as a radio drama, all for a film that didn’t exist yet!

    That's a weird glory hole.
    So…that just happened.

    Eventually bowing to public pressure in 1977, Toho agreed to allow Obayashi to direct the film himself, even though he had only helmed commercials as a professional, and he wasn’t under contract with the studio (a highly unusual move for a Japanese studio to take at that time). His cast primarily consisted of a gaggle of 17-year-old girls who had been in his commercials previously.

    Without giving away too many details of the plot, our heroines Fantasy, Gorgeous, Melody, Mac, Sweet, Prof, and Kung Fu are slowly consumed by the house, as personified by its evil avatar, a fluffy cat named Blanche. We have an attack by a severed head from a well, which bites one girl in the rear, then vomits blood and throws itself back down the well. We have attacks by chandeliers, attacks by flying log piles, attacks by mirrors, attacks by cannibalistic pianos, attacks by futons and linens, and attacks by telephones. By the end, the house has regenerated itself, showing shades of Burnt Offerings, which had come out in the United States the year before (if you get the chance to see it, Burnt Offerings is a passable haunted house film mostly notable for being mediocre despite a fantastic cast including Oliver Reed, Karen Black, Bette Davis, and even a few minutes of Burges Meredith playing, shockingly, a curmudgeonly old man).

    The plot, though, is not the point of this film. This film is entirely focused on the telling, rather than the tale. The Austin Chronicle perhaps said it best, “there’s surprisingly little to recommend House as a film. But as an experience, well, that’s a whole other story.” We have scenes in which one character tells the others a story, which is shown as a sepia-tone film reel which the other girls can see and comment on. One girl describes a mushroom cloud as looking like cotton candy. There are animations, matte paintings, animals that are clearly being thrown at the actors from off screen, a man who mysteriously turns into a pile of bananas, and several scenes involving 17-year-old girl titties…sometimes disembodied and floating around.

    Obayashi went on to a prolific film career, and eventually in 2009 earned the Order of the Badge of the Rising Sun for contributions to Japanese culture. However, he never managed to match the beautiful insanity of his first effort. The film was a hit in Japan, due to being a breath of fresh air in a completely stagnant industry (by this time, most Japanese directors were churning out Toro-san rip-offs or pinku eiga, which is softcore porn).

    And yes, you get to see some of their little girl titties
    Our intrepid band of potential victims

    The Criterion Collection DVD has several excellent bonus features, including Obayashi’s 1966 experimental film Emotion, a lengthy interview with the director, and a retrospective by Ti West, director of House of the Devil. I had quite liked that film, but Mr. West comes across as somewhat of a smug film-school student spouting platitudes about “challenging the audience”.

    To sum up, I cannot recommend this film highly enough – if you’re a person like me, who takes most of your personal philosophy concerning the nature of existence from the Joker. If you’re a Very Serious Person who likes to Seriously Discuss Very Serious Things, and have a silly hang-up by which you insist that your films follow a coherent narrative structure and conventional character arcs, then…have an adventure and watch it anyway. But get really fucking high or drunk first. It’s worth it.

    I rate this film 8 drug-using dogs out of 10.

    Image result for crazy Image result for crazy Image result for crazy Image result for crazy Image result for crazy Image result for crazy Image result for crazy Image result for crazy

  • Weird Wednesday: Canadian Music Edition

    In 1998, I did some ecstasy but forgot that I had to work the next morning. This was a mistake. You aren’t really hungover after a night of X, but you are very, very, very tired. I was working in a college bookstore, stocking the shelves before the fall semester started. My friend Artie had gotten me the job. I really loved Artie, but he was a hippie and everyone else working there was a hippie except for me and this older lady who was always trying to start fights about religion with everyone. I managed to make it into work on time the morning after the ecstasy, despite a deep weariness and a headache that felt like a rat running around in my skull.

    The Smashmouth of Canada

    Since the store was closed while we stocked, we were playing music over the sound system. Hippie music. I was getting by, hunched over in misery, until this hippie girl decided to play a Barenaked Ladies concert bootleg. It was pretty bad, but then most loud music would have been pretty bad in the circumstance. I wanted quiet and a bed and an aspirin the size of a Frisbee. But then it got to the BNL masterpiece “If I Had $1000000,” which–for those who are unfamiliar with the twenty-minute live jam version–involves the two singers alternately repeating “If I Had $1000000…” back and forth to each other over and over again.

    “If I Had $1000000…”
    “If I Had $1000000…”
    “If I Had $1000000…”
    “If I Had $1000000…”
    “If I Had $1000000…”

    And my headache got worse and the books I was moving got heavier.

    “If I Had $1000000…”
    “If I Had $1000000…”
    “If I Had $1000000…”
    “If I Had $1000000…”
    “If I Had $1000000…”

    And my headache got worse and the books I was moving got heavier and anger rose in me.

    “If I Had $1000000…”
    “If I Had $1000000…”
    “If I Had $1000000…”
    “If I Had $1000000…”
    “If I Had $1000000…”

    And finally, I yelled, loud enough to drown out the music and for the entire store of employees to hear, “IF I HAD A MILLION DOLLARS I’D PAY TO HAVE THIS ENTIRE FUCKING BAND BEATEN TO DEATH WITH A HAMMER!”

    The bootleg tape clicked off and we worked the rest of the day in silence.

  • Derponomicon: Part 1

    My pimp hand is strong.
    Bastiat

    I compiled The Derponomicon a few years ago based on a dialogue I had with a prog who was by far the most infuriatingly stupid person I have ever known. I gave him a quote or a video and asked him what he thought about it. His responses are in italics. I did not correct his typos. Here are a few:

    A response to my favorite Bastiat quote:

    “If the natural tendencies of mankind are so bad that it is not safe to permit people to be free, how is it that the tendencies of these organizers are always good? Do not the legislators and their appointed agents also belong to the human race? Or do they believe that they themselves are made of a finer clay than the rest of mankind?”

    ― Frédéric Bastiat, The Law

    I was having that very discussion with my right leaning friend/employee the other day. Yes, humans tend to be selfish dicks that only look out for themselves. When it comes to groups of people, corporations, seeking only to maximize profits, that aspect of humanity is often exacerbated by the facelessness of a big corporation where the people in charge are insulated from the consequences of their decisions, whether it’s laying off 200 people the week before Christmas, or intentionally releasing a product that they KNOW will kill people but they calculate the profits outweighing the settlements and do it anyway. These are facts of life, and large groups of people acting as corporations are willing to take risks like that because they can always pass the blame off on some patsy and get away with their golden parachutes Scott free. So yes, these things need to be regulated, and unfortunately the regulators are also human, and therefor susceptible to the same corruption which is inevitable. Perhaps there needs to be an even higher regulatory power that keeps the regulators in check, like internal affairs in a police department. Or perhaps regulators need to be vetted and tested just like FBI agents and Secret Service hires are. Perhaps these regulatory agencies need to be held to a higher standard and simply hire only those who can be vetted and have a low risk of corruptability. One thing is for sure though, NO oversight or regulation whatsoever never reduced incidents and problems. Even a shifty substitute teacher is better than leaving a roomful of children to their own devices.

    So the solution to corrupt government is to have an even more powerful organization oversee it, because what could go wrong then? And adults are like disobedient children who need the supervision of the government in order to behave. And, of course, the possibility of reducing regulation is equated to anarchy. Derptacular.

    …………………..

    I asked him whether taxes were voluntary. He said:

    Not obeying a law is a choice and therfore voluntary. ….you might get away with it, you might have to suffer the consequences. Pretty simple logic.

    When I asked him whether a mugging is voluntary, he said:

    You could also turn and run. Any choice we make is voluntary.

    It’s one thing to deny coercion, but this guy acts like it doesn’t even exist.

    ……………………

     

    A response to this quote from Keynes:

    “If the Treasury were to fill old bottles with banknotes, bury them at suitable depths in disused coalmines which are then filled up to the surface with town rubbish, and leave it to private enterprise on well-tried principles of laissez faire to dig the notes up again . . . there need be no more unemployment. . . . It would indeed be more sensible to build houses and the like; but if there are political and practical difficulties in the way of this, the above would be better than nothing.”

    John Maynard Keynes, The General Theory, p. 129.

    SATAN!!11!

    So I am supposed to discuss the idea of burying bottles of money under garbage and putting people to work digging them up? Was this a serious idea, or just intentional hyberbole. The idea that the unemployment problem can be solved simply by employing people to do whatever menial busy work and whatever wage is kind of silly. It’s not just that people need jobs, people need good paying jobs that will actually allow them to be independent and be able to eat, pay bills, and rent. Simply removing the minimum wage, or manufacturing low level jobs for people to work isn’t solving the problem. Unemployment could be at zero, and it wouldn’t make a luck of difference is the same amount of people still qualified for food stamps and welfare. Removing food stamps and welfare, would just mean that people starve, or turn to crime and violence to provide for their families. The problem today is that no one is invested in America anymore. During WW2 it was a prosperous time, because everyone worked for the war effort (arguably the last legitimate war the US was ever in) building things, recycling scrap, buying war bonds, whatever it took. Every one was invested, everyone took part, everyone reaped the rewards. Nowadays all of that stuff is outsourced to no bid politically connected multi-national corporations that could give two shits about America, or Americans. Of the trillions pissed away on Afghanistan and Iraq, barely any of that money is ever coming back to the US. The US used to be a community, where everyone tried to help each other prosper…until Reagan changed all that. Now it’s every man for himself, fuck the greater good, and make as much profit as possible at whoever’s expense.

    Note the lack of awareness for the rationing of most goods during WW2. And again we see the lie that people would turn to crime if not for food stamps and welfare. Finally, we have an obligatory shout-out to the great Satan Ronald Reagan.

  • Belly Up to the Bar

    Cocktail of the Week – The Monkey Gland

    By RC Dean

    This week – the Monkey Gland.  The key to this one is getting just the right amount of licorice flavor from the Pernod.  Yes, yet another liqueur you probably don’t have in your liquor cabinet.  Oh, yeah, you’ll need Grenadine, too.  I didn’t have either when this recipe first showed up.  If you’re serious about cocktailing, though, you are going to acquire a collection of liqueurs and mixers.  As I peruse the rotation at the Casa Dean, though, I note that most of the rest of the regulars don’t really call for exotic ingredients (although I will have an article on bitters, related mixers, and tools one of these weeks).

    The Monkey Gland

    The Monkey Gland:

     

    3 oz. gin (I like The Botanist)

    2 oz. orange juice

    1 tsp.  Grenadine

    2 ml Pernod (yup, those are milliliters – I use an eyedropper with an ml index on it)

     

    Add the Pernod to an empty cocktail shaker, and “rinse” (coat the sides of) the shaker with it.  Rinsing the shaker adds more of a licorice nose to the drink, but isn’t completely necessary.  Note: do not pour out the “excess” Pernod after you have prepped the shaker.  I tinkered with this recipe before I landed on 2 ml as being the right dose for me.  Pernod (originally, a faux absinthe after the real deal was banned) is powerfully licorice flavored – too much is way too much, but too little just takes away the character of a Monkey Gland.  I went to the eyedropper because it was the only way to be consistent, and you want to hit the sweet spot for the Pernod.

     

    Add ice, gin, orange juice, and grenadine to the shaker.  Shake (a proper shake is 10 – 15 seconds, in case you were wondering).   I pour mine over ice; I think the classic serving is straight up in a martini glass.  I like my drinks to stay cold – we’ve recently gone to the 1½ inch ice spheres (one per glass) to keep things cold without diluting too much.  Personally, I think a Monkey Gland with a big ball floating in it is the optimal presentation, anyway.

     

    This is an old cocktail recipe dating back to the 1920s or so.  It was inspired by a Dr. Serge Voronoff, who made a pile of money implanting slices of freshly-harvested monkey testicles into the scrota of old, rich, and stupid Europeans, for exactly the reason you think.  One can only imagine the complications and outcomes, but at least it inspired an excellent drink.

     

    Derpetologist’s Spot the Not: Pat Buchanan

    Pat Buchanan

    1. Parents have a right to insist that godless evolution not be taught to their children.

    2. Bill Clinton’s foreign policy experience stems mainly from having breakfast at the International House of Pancakes.

    3. No one has deputized America to play Wyatt Earp to the world.

    4. Terrorism is the price of empire. If we do not wish to pay it, we must give up the empire.

    5. The ultimate goal of the anti-religious elites is to transform America into a completely secular nation, a nation that is legally and culturally biased against Christianity.

    6. The War Between the States was about independence, about self-determination, about the right of a people to break free of a government to which they could no longer give allegiance.

  • Reviews You’ll Never Use: Dark House

    Hello, and welcome to (what may be) the first in an on-going series of film reviews. These will not be your ordinary film reviews, oh no sir, for your humble reviewer is no ordinary cis-gendered heteropatriarchal man. Much as our dear friend the Derpetologist plumbs the depths of the interwebz to bring you only the derpiest in modern derp, I, too, am an explorer in dangerous environs. My particular faculty, however, lies in obscure, campy, poorly made, misunderstood, niche horror and sci-fi films.

    Let us begin with the most recent horror film I have seen – Darin Scott’s Dark House. This appears at first glance to be a meaningless addition to the already rich canon of poorly acted, poorly written, cheap computer FX DTV (direct to video) horror library. However, as our parents should have taught us, looks can be deceiving.

    Some scant years ago, at a small private orphanage, a small gaggle of children are butchered by their insane caretaker, who then takes her own life in suitably gruesome fashion. Cutting to the present, a group of acting students at the local community college are approached by haunted house impresario Walston Rey to act as a skeleton crew for a press run of his new haunted attraction. The attraction is, of course, located in the previously seen massacre house, which over the years took on a “haunted” reputation in the local community. One of the students, Claire, is strangely eager to go. It turns out Claire had a terrifying experience there, and her shrink thinks spending time in the house would unlock her repressed trauma. Unable to go it alone, she believes this will be the perfect opportunity to revisit the house in a safe environment. Thankfully for us viewers, her supposition about the safety of said house turns out to be hideously wrong.

    https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BMTU3NDQxMTAxOV5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwOTE0Njg1Mw@@._V1_UY268_CR4,0,182,268_AL_.jpg
    Box cover. I swear, sweet 80s VHS box covers are a lost art. We will discuss this, AT LENGTH, in a future post.

    The film starts off in a very paint-by-numbers fashion (for low-budget horror) and is saved by the timely arrival of Walston, played by the always delightful Jeffrey Combs. Seriously, I would pay money to watch Jeffrey Combs read the Calcutta phone book. Many of you may know him from his recurring roles in various Star Trek series, notably both as the Vorta Weyoun and the Andorian Shran. True horror connoisseurs, though, will always think of him as Dr. Herbert West in the immortal and perfect in every way Re-Animator. Since Mr. Combs takes the stage (literally) while in a scene featuring the entire rest of the cast, the immediately noticeable gap between his talent, and that of the remainder, is almost jarring. It is here that we are introduced to Claire, played by Meghan Ory. This Canadian actress’s screen credits are ample, if mostly guest shots on TV shows. She plays the role of slightly nutsy Claire adequately, if not with any great enthusiasm. When the rest of her class expresses skepticism, she has some wonderful meta-lines about how many famous actors got their start in low-budget horror. For our readers who may not be aware, this is an actual fact, and will perhaps be the focus of a future post.

    Our intrepid team of would-be actors (and I do mean that in both an in-universe sense and in a real life sense) show up to learn their roles for the press opening of the haunted attraction. Something unnatural goes wrong with the computer controlling the effects and…well, if you’ve ever seen a horror movie in your life, you know where this is headed. Thankfully Mr. Combs is not the first to go, as so often happens in these sorts of films when they spend the money to trot out a fan favorite, but can’t really afford to give their character more than minimal screen time.

    It is at the ending that the film makes its first real attempt to separate itself from the pack. Without giving away too much, what appears to be the closing scene contains a plotting element that comes just…this…close to being interesting and at least a little different. That is something that many of you have no idea how hard it is to find in this genre of film: anything different.

    OH SHIT SON!!!
    Creative Commons image that comes up when you search, “horror”. That’s right, I’m lazy. Screw you.

    Unfortunately, the filmmaker then completely shits it all away with an extra few minutes that wake us violently from the beautiful dream of a low-budget horror film that doesn’t feel like one has wasted 90 minutes of one’s life in viewing, and plants us firmly back in the reality in which most low-budget horror films feel like you’ve just wasted 90 minutes of your life in viewing. A real shame, honestly. This was only director Darin Scott’s second film, so he may be forgiven for not having fully developed his instincts yet. That’s what a good editor is for. He later helmed several other horror films, which you can find on IMDB if you are so inclined, and also directed what I’m sure was an underrated classic, House Party: Tonight’s the Night. That’s right, a House Party sequel, in 2013. When I’m having a hard time slogging through a particularly bad horror movie, I can look back on that fact and remind myself that it could always be worse.

    I award Dark House two-and-a-half Naked Asian Batmen out of five. Image result for pixelated dicks  Image result for pixelated dicks Image result for pixelated dicks

  • Review: Horizon Zero Dawn

    Horizon Zero Dawn is a third-person action RPG developed by the same folks who put together the many, many Killzone games–none of which I have played.

    Mr. Riven and I had been following the news about this game since we saw the first trailer for it. As time went on, we both had concerns that it was going to be an Assassin’s Creed clone …but with a pre-historic feel and metal dinosaurs guise!!11! Thankfully, that doesn’t seem to be the case.

    Not that I didn't try, of course
    Too beautiful to kill

    The game doesn’t have much in the way of traditional tutorials other than some very brief scenes when you’re a child. I, personally, love that. A game that encourages you to learn by playing it takes me back to simpler times. That’s not to say that prompts won’t appear on screen to help you out–press triangle to gather herbs or loot downed enemies, etc.–but you also won’t have to go through 10-minutes of forced actions with a new weapon, either. (“OK, use this weapon to kill enemies this way, now that way, now this other way, congratulations on completing the mandatory tutorial!” I’m looking at you, Batman: Arkham Knight, even though I think you’re otherwise a fabulous game.)

    The world map looks small …until you start playing. Fast traveling costs resources, but I found that I preferred to hoof it from one place to another, anyway. The absolutely stunning world is populated with plenty of machines and wildlife, all of which you are free to kill as you please or not. I highly recommend killing everything that moves because I dislike being resource-starved. That said, as meticulously as I do hunt and gather, I haven’t out-paced the economy; there’s quite a few shinies for sale that encourage “saving up.”

    You could say he has a predilection
    “Mecha-raptor butt-hacking has never been so beautiful.” – Mr. Riven

    The skill point system and accompanying skill trees offer some decent customization options regarding gameplay. Consider yourself a brawler? There’s a tree for that. Prefer a stealthier style? There’s a tree for that. The last tree seems to be largely environmental: gather more resources from fewer sources, override machines for longer, that sort of thing. But it should be noted–so, y’know, note it–that you will certainly max out each of these trees by the end of the game, so it really comes down to what you want first. I’d also like to point out that Mr. Riven plays like Deadshot (lots of ranged combat), while I prefer more of a Deathstroke approach (up close melee combat). So, like I said earlier, options.

    Finally, the story is compelling and downright beautiful, and it shows you right away in the first thirty minutes (ish) of gameplay that the dialogue choices you make might come up again later. Not having played through the entire game, I can only hope that this continues to be the case. Mr. Riven is further along than I am, and there seem to be all kinds of tangled webs to unweave and mysteries to solve. I’m definitely looking forward to seeing how it unfolds, especially considering how gorgeous that unfolding has been so far. (Seriously, the main character’s hair [and hips] are mesmerizing.)

    9/10; will continue to bang.

    If you have questions, please feel free to leave them in the comments below, and I will do my best to address them in a spoiler-free manner…after I put this game down for two goddamn seconds.

  • Belly Up to the Bar

    Cocktail of the Week – The Panacea

    By RC Dean

    This week’s libation is the Panacea, which is one of my favorite cold-weather drinks and the one Mrs. Dean “requests” when she is feeling under the weather. It’s made with a honey/ginger/lemon syrup, so it’s quite effective on a scratchy throat. If the first one doesn’t cure what ails ya, the second one will ensure you stop caring. Trigger warning: what with the honey, this is a sweet drink.

    I know, I know, it’s one of those froofy artisanal drinks that you have to make the mixer yourself. Tough – the ingredients are universally available and it’s easy to make. I keep my Panacea syrup in an empty bourbon bottle, of which I am sure the Glibertariat will have an ample supply.

    Panacea Mixer/Syrup:

    Simmer in a small pot for 10 – 15 minutes (looking for a thickish syrup)

    1 cup honey

    1 cup water

    ½ cup minced or shredded ginger

    Strain through a fine sieve, toss the ginger solids left behind. Stir in:

    ¾ cup lemon juice

    Keep refrigerated. Pro-tip: put it in the fridge before your third refill to avoid unfortunate and very sticky accidents (no euphemism).

     

    The Panacea

    3 oz blended scotch (I like either Black Grouse or Dewar’s Scratched Cask)

    2 – 3 oz. of Panacea Mixer (I go 2 oz., Mrs. Dean prefers 3 oz.)

    Pour the blended scotch over rocks, add the Panacea Mixer, stir, and add a “lid” of smoky, smoky single malt (I’m an Islay guy for single malts). You can get a lid by angling a spoon upside down so the tip is just under the surface and slowly pouring a little of the single malt onto the back of the spoon so it floats on the drink itself. It gives the drink a smokier nose, and more of a scotch hit when you start guzzling. The lid is optional (Mrs. Dean prefers not).

    This is a favorite with non-scotch drinkers, especially without the lid – the honey/ginger/lemon syrup does an excellent job of cutting the scotch flavor for those unfortunates who don’t recognize it as the drink of the gods. When I take a bottle of the syrup with me on cold-weather outings, it never lasts long.

     

    Derpetologist’s Spot the Not: Translated Scientific Names

    1. potato buffalo flamingo

    2. the creature from the black lagoon

    3. giant deformed penis

    4. little chief nipple twister

    5. itty bitty thing

    6. Owen’s ninja turtle