Blog

  • Identity Politics Part 2: Let’s You and Him Fight!

    By Suthenboy

    A divided people are more easily conquered. The Imperialist European powers were well aware of this and commonly drew borders in their overseas colonies to encompass competing indigenous peoples so that those groups would fight with each other and not the conquering Europeans. Additionally they gained political capital by putting themselves in the position of arbiters of the disputes and alleviators of grievances for those indigenous people. The political left in the modern United States is also well aware of this strategy.

    Their most powerful weapon today is identity politics and the trump card in that deck is racial identity. They actively and deliberately fan the flames of racial animus and stoke grievances among minority populations. By playing the part of arbiters and alleviators they gain loyal voter support of minorities and by cobbling together a number of those minorities seek to gain a majority. They use the threat of labeling one a racist as a gag for those that disagree with them. The problem of course is that it is injurious to our society and culture to set a common people against themselves. Fortunately it appears to be a failing strategy of late yet they are doubling down on it.

    They have targeted every minority but the primary recipients have been Blacks. Until recently Black Americans were the largest minority in the United States. Constant reminders of the history of slavery, of real and imagined grievances, and relegating them to second-class citizenry have divided our country politically along racial lines. Over time and with great effort many of the rifts between Black America and the rest of the country had largely healed but they are intent on re-opening those wounds. Their post-racial America looks more like the mid-nineteenth century than the early twenty first.

    My own children belong to groups of friends that include mixed couples and members of all races, including a number of Blacks. In their direct experience those rifts don’t exist, but ask them about it and they can tell you all about the ignus fatuus that animates their politics.

    The left has actively and deliberately perpetrated resentment among the races for their own political gain successfully for decades. Many of them focus exclusively on that goal and profit handsomely from it. In order to do this they necessarily must cast away the very foundation of liberty – self-ownership. Self-ownership does not tolerate the assignment of collective guilt – that some are guilty of the sins of others. Personal responsibility is an anathema to those pushing to redistribute wealth from the descendants of slave holders to the descendants of slaves. No members of either group are victims or perpetrators and one of those groups barely exists at all.

    Their assignment of guilt is built on the absurd assertion that one is guilty of acts they neither performed or had any hand in deciding. The inevitable conclusion of the assertion that whites are guilty by mere virtue of their skin color, something they can cannot decide or change, refutes the agency of a large portion of the human race. Simply put it is the very dehumanizing bigotry that gave rise to slavery in the first place.

    How then to remedy this? What would be enough? If mere whiteness is guilt then nothing will ever be enough because we cannot change the past nor can anyone change their skin color. The repugnant answer to that question can only be total theft and extermination. Their answer is not to end oppression but to have the oppressed and oppressors exchange places. The morality of our society would decay to the primitive.

    The most grotesque aspect of this strategy is that the very premises of it are smoke. Racial differences are will-o-the wisps and focusing on them distracts us from solving real problems. It deprives all of us of the benefits of solidarity with our fellow countrymen. It wastes vast amounts of human potential. It creates unnecessary strife and poverty.

    The first step in solving this problem is to identify the problem. What if it turns out the problem is not a problem at all. That in a calculated way the left has manufactured straw giants and murky definitions which is a much bigger problem than race or class?

    See that Black dude over there? We have a common humanity. He isn’t a Black dude. His name is John and he is my countryman. So I ask you what does race mean?

  • UnCivil Doesn’t Like Anything : Low-Flow Toilets

    Once again a premature curmudgeon yells at clouds.  You have been warned.

    Always appropriate. -sloopy

    When I bought my house the toilet that came with it was too small, to the point of being uncomfortable, and prone to clogging.  So when I had a contractor fixing some exterior woodwork (I knew it would need to be done at the time of purchase, so this was not some shock) I inquired about people to replace the toilet.  (It was a general contractor, so they had plumbers either on staff or in their contact list).  The price quoted was cheap provided I got the actual replacement unit.  Fair enough, it would let me pick what I wanted in a replacement.

    Except for a proper water volume.

    It is illegal to sell a new toilet that uses more than 1.6 gallons per flush.  The canned answer I get to the question “Why?” is always “to conserve water”.  This annoys me on three counts.

    Low flow toilets: scourge of ISIS

    Count one – If a toilet clogs I end up cycling it three to four times in the process of clearing.  Meaning 4.8 to 5.6 gallons go down the drain.  This ends up using more water anyway while wasting my time unclogging the system.

    Count two – I live in New York.  New York is a literal swamp.  Admittedly, one that was drained before the founding of the EPA.  It gets more precipitation per annum than Louisiana (one of the random facts I learned in our less than stellar public schools).  My house in particular is near the confluence of two rivers.  Millions of gallons of water flow past it towards the sea each minute undisturbed.  (The Mohawk spits an average of 5,900 cubic feet of water into the Hudson per second.  Or 2,651,694.5 gallons per minute.  Then add in what’s already in the Hudson from up north…)  We have water to spare.

    Count three – I get billed by the gallon for my water usage and that amount is doubled to cover sewerage.  I am paying for what I use.  I should be the arbiter of how much gets to be allocated to what purpose.  A rule that was written by econuts living in a desert with no idea how physics works just isn’t appropriate to my circumstance in a swamp.

    The only upside of the tale is that innovators will find a way to work around horrible rules until they literally fly in the face of the laws of physics *cough*automobile emissions*cough*.  So the new Kohler is actually fairly reliable.  But just because there are people smarter than the regulators out there is no excuse for stupid rules to be on the books for stupid excuses.

  • Tuesday Morning Links

    Come on, man. You’re the president, not a child. Anything past medium is an affront to God

    The week is off to a rousing start.  Well, it’s off to a start anyway.  Our very own Brett L’s kids kept him up most of the night, puking their guts up.  One of my kids dumped a kid’s potty full of piss on our bedroom floor. And Trump ordered a steak like a dick.  Also, some other things happened:

    • John Lewis is playing coy on whether or not he will attend President Trump’s first Capitol Hill speech.  Or he’s just keeping his name in the limelight.  You decide.
    • Police find time to participate in an elaborate wedding proposal.  Because nothing says “I love you” quite like using taxpayer money to have your girlfriend thrown in the back of a police cruiser with handcuffs on and terrify her.
      These men will not be participating in the next women’s march. Because the planner helped to kill them in a terrorist attack.

      “It’s the perfect love story for us,” Schrupp said. “Our whole family is in law enforcement. I wouldn’t expect anything less.” – paging Barfman.

    • The next women’s march is in the planning stage.  This one is gonna be more along the lines of a general strike though.  Oh, and don’t make the planner angry.  You wouldn’t like her when she’s angry
    • Bucknell University goes full retard. I don’t know what else to say that would be clever enough to capture the stupidity.  Click the link.  You’ll see.
    • DeBeers no longer has a death-grip on the global diamond market.

      DeBeers: no longer part of the conspiracy theory.

    That’s it.  That’s all you get.  Half of you are gonna ignore them anyway and I could have linked to nearly two and a half hours of the best Porky Pig cartoons of all time without anybody caring.  But we love you anyway and hope you enjoy yourselves in the comments.

  • Manly Monday

    When talking manliness our thoughts invariably wander to Clint Eastwood. He has been a paragon of Hollywood masculinity since well before I was born and has aged into a codgery reminder of bygone values of self-reliance and grim determination. What some of you might not know is that he has a son (one of several children with…several women), who wants to be a leading man, just like his father.

    Scott Eastwood has decidedly hitched his wagon to his father’s rugged good looks and manly charms. In 2013 he did a photo shoot for Town & Country, which had him perfectly coiffed and done up maximally preppy on a yacht off the coast of Newport, CA, channeling the very model of Ivy League elitism paired with the text

    People assumed that I would have everything handed to me, but that couldn’t be further from the truth. I was on my own just doing the grind.

    One wonders how true that is, considering one of his earliest credited roles was Gran Torino and profiles frequently (if not universally) refer to him as Clint Eastwood’s son. Since 2013 there has been a concerted effort to make Scott Eastwood happen. Movie and TV roles, modeling gigs, an Instagram account that gets linked by gossip rags whenever he shows up shirtless, and codgery co-interviews with Clint discussing the pussy generation (a fun brouhaha to read about), but while he inherited many of his father’s features, it remains to be seen if he can pull off his father’s gravitas or effortless machismo.

    To quote The Streets “Yeah yeah like I said you are really fit/But my gosh don’t you just know it.” Regardless, he’s handsome, a bit of a ham in a way that walks a fine line between adorably goofy and overly packaged, and I’d undeniably hit it like the fist of an angry god if I had the opportunity.

    https://www.instagram.com/p/dgibeoksjR/?hl=en

    https://www.instagram.com/p/BNTl7tGBxup/?hl=en

    Never say I’m not benevolent.

  • Monday Afternoon Links

    What a day.  And its just the first day of the work week for most of us.  But rather than bore you with the details of my day, let’s get right down to it, shall we?

    Libertarian squirrel? Or the most libertarian squirrel?

    Squirrels get hunted during squirrel season and sometimes to raise funds for charity.  Some people don’t like that and want it stopped. (Since when aren’t squirrels considered nuisance animals that can be shot at will?)

    Agatha Christie meet Mr Roboto.  Or something.  I didn’t read the piece but was told it was really interesting.  Hell, for all I know its cold fusion all over again.

    Not exactly what Rahm envisioned.

    Looks like Trump is about to draft an executive order that is at odds with the recent 4th Circuit decision regarding the Second Amendment.  Where do you libertarians fall when an executive order runs afoul of a bad liberty-robbing court decision?

    The Minnesota police officer that shot Philando Castille has pleaded not guilty.

    And in the latest (actually the first, but it might become a thing) “No Shit, Sherlock” News, Rahm Emanuel’s “people place” idea for open spaces is bereft of…people.

    Enjoy the rest of the day, my fine friends.

     

  • Monocle: A Guide for Users and Abusers

    The Young Swell, tobacco label, 1869.jpg
    His orphans tell him he’s a good boy

     

    I’ve been asked to write a post to be used as an information hub for Monocle. I’ll give a quick explanation of what features Monocle has, some wishlist feature that Monocle should have sometime in the future, and how to install Monocle.

    Basically, Monocle is a rough equivalent to Reasonable/fascr/greasonable on TSTSNBN. I wrote the initial code for myself as a learning experience, and greasonable hacked it up to get rid of all of my noob crap code and replaced it with quality, efficient code, some of which comes from his eponymous script. greasonable is pretty much the best, and he deserves many accolades for the work he has done so far.

    Currently, the source code for Monocle is stored on gitlab.com, so anybody who wishes to help out can reach out to us and we’ll get you plugged in. Development of the code is on more of a “do what you want when you want” cycle, so we’ll never make any promises for a release date unless the feature’s availability is imminent.

    Mobile Update! 2018/01/03 I have crafted a somewhat mobile friendly version of Monocle called Eyepiece. The only way I know to use it is to add tamper monkey to mobile Firefox and install Eyepiece by clicking the link.

    How do I install Monocle?

    Monocle only works on non-mobile versions of Firefox and Chrome; and now on mobile Firefox. Yes, it sucks that mobile is not supported. No, mobile support isn’t the highest priority right now. See update above! (SP edit)

    Firefox install

    1. Install Greasemonkey for Firefox
    2. Click this link to install Monocle
    3. Click “Install” on the popup

    Chrome install

    1. Install Tampermonkey for Chrome
    2. Click this link to install Monocle
    3. Click “Install” on the page that is loaded

    Update to latest

    1. Click this link
    2. Click “Install” or “Reinstall” in the appropriate place

    What Features are Currently Included?

    Full width article/comments – if the author of a piece forgets to turn off the sidebar, Monocle removes that part of the webpage and expands the article and comments to full width of the screen.

    Local timestamp – the timestamps for the comments are in Central Time on the server. Monocle adjusts them to your local time zone.

    Condensed comments – The default view for comments has a large amount of space between consecutive comments. Monocle condenses them closer together.

    Next unread comment – The Monocle toolbar shows a count of the unread comments on the page. Clicking that button cycles through the unread comments.

    Show/Hide old threads – The Monocle toolbar includes a toggle for hiding all the comment threads that haven’t been commented on since your last refresh

    HTML tag buttons – There are buttons above the comment box that allow you to insert HTML tags for formatting your comment. If you highlight any text on the screen and then click a tag button, the text will be placed within the tag inside the comment.

    Current Known Bugs

    -The comments at the furthest right (without a reply button) are too close to one another

    -Hide old threads hides siblings of new threads

    -If you click a formatting button without previously typing something in the thread, the word COMMENT stays in the comment box

    As of version 1.15, there are no known bugs

    Wishlist

    -WYSIWYG commenting (you get to see, in real time, what your comment will look like as you type it)

    -Spellcheck

    -User Mute/Block

    -Theme/Word/Topic Mute/Block

    -Dynamic loading of new comments (so you don’t have to refresh the page to see new comments)

    -Alternate comment views (newest first, most popular first, etc.)

    -Options toolbar for toggling all of Monocle’s options

    -Automatic split of multiple links in order to avoid having to go through moderation (this feature will be subject to admin’s approval)

    -Allow images and Youtube vids to be displayed on the page (either automatically, or subject to clicking a “show” button)

    -“Replies to you” information/button to allow you to see the new comments that are in reply to yours

    -Mobile support

    How do I get help with my specific Monocle questions?

    Post a comment in this article. It’ll bug me and I’ll come check it out.

    How do I suggest a new feature, report a bug, or otherwise make general comments/questions about Monocle?

    Post a comment in this article. I’ll read it and reply to you.

    How do I know whether a feature would be good for Monocle or for glibertarians.com as a whole?

    If it’s something you’d prefer, but you think that other people might prefer it a different way, that’s the perfect feature for Monocle.  If it’s something that involves changing data on the server (like an edit button, two links in one comment, etc.), Monocle can’t do it. Generally, I’m not going to do anything that requires leaving “artifacts” in comments that Monocle then interprets and renders something different. That’s just mean to people who don’t use Monocle and can’t tell why the hell there’s some comment with computer code in it.

    How do I lodge a complaint about Monocle?

    Send all complaints to tour-scheduling@WartysDungeon.com

  • Identity Politics Part 1: If You Can’t See the Chains Does it Mean They Aren’t There?

    By Suthenboy

    Without modern mechanized methods of farming it is necessary that humans hands perform that labor. That doesn’t mean mass human labor is necessary to become wealthy; without sophisticated machinery, daylight to dark toil is necessary just to have enough to eat. This economic reality gave rise to forcibly capturing people and coercing labor from them. It goes by the common name of slavery and it was universally practiced by all cultures on earth at one time. It was seen as a normal practice and though everyone would object to becoming a slave, neither slave nor master objected to it as an institution. It was just considered the way things are. As technology advanced and our means for creating wealth became greater, the need to co-opt the labor of others lessened. With the spread of the ideas born of the Western Enlightenment slavery quickly became regarded as less the way things are and more the way things should not be. It is now rightly reviled by Western Civilization, but in many ways its shadow hangs over us. The cost of slavery was high in lives and in moral currency. Slavery debases not just those held but the slaver as well. Slaves are deprived of their freedom and the slaver of his humanity. The stone age indigenous peoples of the Americas could not be successfully enslaved. The kind of confinement and structure it required was so alien to them that they simply died when it was imposed on them. The solution was, of course, to replace them with Africans. The slave trade was as old as time in Africa and still thrives today. Europeans desperate for labor in their new colonies eagerly stepped into that market.

    I live in the deep south. The Antebellum plantations that pepper my state mostly operate as tourist attractions these days. A few are still profitable as farms but tractors perform the backbreaking work, not humans. If you drive the River Road between Natchitoches and New Orleans, braving the stifling heat and humidity to tour some of these vast forerunners of modern industrial agriculture, you will get an idea of what a monumental struggle it was to produce wealth in the wild and expansive Mississippi flood plain. If you have ever worked in agriculture, your experience will give you a better idea of the scale of the superhuman effort that required.

    Of the 12-13 million Africans brought to the Americas as chattel, only a small fraction, some 400,000, were transported to the United States. Right from the start, this practice was controversial. Western European culture was more enlightened than any on earth at the time. The idea of individual liberty blossoming here and the glaring conflict that holding men as property presented with liberty was…I won’t sugarcoat it… problematic to say the least. Charles Carroll, signer of the Declaration of Independence, summed up the prevailing opinion nicely when arguing against slavery “Why keep alive the question of slavery? It is admitted by all to be a great evil.”

    In the United States, the slave trade was somewhat unique in that it had strong racial overtones. Everywhere else, a person’s race had little to do with slavery. Historically, slavery was an equal opportunity employer. The slaves here, aside from those held by the indigenous people, were exclusively Africans. The feeble justification was that blacks were inherently inferior, that exposure to western civilization would improve them and advance their race.

    That evil practice was ended and not just by the advent of modern machinery and cheap energy or the dawning of a new morality. The intractability of those advocating for slavery eventually had to be overcome with powder and shot. The scale of that destructive war, both in lost property and blood, exceeded anything up to that time and every war after it until WWI. With that the barbarism of enslaving human beings was extinguished in the United States.

    Still, the ghost of slavery haunts us all. The advent of 1863 saw President Lincoln signing the Emancipation Proclamation, and after the war he attempted to repatriate those who had been enslaved by birthing the nation of Liberia on the west coast of Africa. Still, there are remnants of that ghastly practice with us. The gussied up corpses of those plantations are still here. Driving south from Alexandria on the old Baton Rouge highway, you will see cabins that housed slaves still standing, now housing renters. The fields and orchards are still here, worked by the relentless plodding of tractors.

    At the end of the Civil War, the vast majority of those that had failed to perpetuate a primitive and outdated economy gathered what they could in wealth and property, fleeing to lands more amenable to their culture. The war had brought to a head the animosity between the conflicting cultures of enlightenment with primitivism, so they slipped away from the wrath of the victors. They would have been fools to stay and dead ones, at that. Anyone curious enough can travel to remote towns in various Latin American countries and find bizarre places where Antebellum America still lives, places where those seeking to escape revenge found a refuge to perpetuate that way of life.

    Despite the reminders around us, are those ghosts really ours? There is not a person alive in the United States today who has been held in bondage, nor a person alive today who has held another in bondage. Though the struggle was great, every descendant of slaves today enjoys equal standing before the law, on paper anyway, to every other citizen. Those that care too often thrive on equal footing with every other ethnicity.

    The vast majority of the white population here does not even have ancestors who held slaves. I can trace my own family back to the late seventeenth century in the Americas, and not one of those individuals held slaves. On my mother’s side, there are only abolitionists, and on my father’s side, no one wealthy enough to afford the purchase of slaves. The majority of white Americans are descended from immigrants that arrived on these shores after slavery was abolished. This is the most common legacy of white Americans today.

    In history, the United States is remarkable in the social and cultural progress it has achieved. In less than 200 years, we progressed from a culture that more resembled the old world order, to one that is most unique, one that holds liberty and the sovereignty of the individual above all else. Our founding principles allow us to cast off the yoke of history and forge ahead to new, better cultural ground. In many ways we have dragged the rest of the world with us, though they still have some catching up to do.

    These days, my old bones are more comfortable at home. I prefer good food, a warm fire, and, most of all, the company of my wife; but this was not always the case. I have travelled to many places in the world, and one of the things that struck me was the racism and tribalism outside of the U.S. The perception of the U.S. by the rest of the world of America as a country eaten alive with racism, appears to me to be projection. Racism as it exists here in America is mild in comparison to the rabid, virulent racism almost everywhere else.

    Why, then, we still struggle so much with the question of race is an interesting and important question. Go ahead, give it your best shot.

  • Why President Trump Should Follow The Rule Of Law Like Bolivia

    By: The Fusionist

    One issue raised by drug warriors about the legalization of marijuana in various U.S. states involves the United Nations drug-control treaties, especially the 1961 Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs. This multilateral treaty requires the parties – including the United States – to ban a whole list of drugs, including cannabis. So the prohibitionists say that when Colorado, etc., legalize dope, this puts the United States in violation of the Convention.

    The Devil Weed

    The United States are (not “is”) a Union of states, so the question arises: How to reconcile compliance with the Convention with respect for federalism? The prohibitionists, including the bureaucrats at the International Narcotics Control Board, say that countries with a federal system must be held to observance of the Convention regardless of federalism considerations. Legalizers (including you-know-what magazine) say that the Convention allows for federalism and thus there’s no problem if Colorado, etc. choose to go their own way on marijuana.

    In fact, the Convention seems to face both ways on federalism. On the one hand, Article 4 says member countries must “give effect to and carry out the provisions of this Convention within their own territories” without any mention of federalism. On the other hand, Article 35, while requiring member countries to adopt penal measures against drugs (including marijuana.), says that each member country’s responsibility in this regard is “[s]ubject to its [the country’s] constitutional limitations.”

    The broad language of Article 4 does seem to militate against a country simply up and allowing legalization of any of the substances which are supposed to be banned. The federal government, with its responsibility for foreign affairs, would be in an awkward position explaining to the international community how our country remains committed to “carrying out” the cannabis ban “within [the United States’] own territories” even while many of the constituent parts of our federal Union are making it legal. This would be particularly awkward when the United States government was a leader in pressing for this drug Convention in the first place, rebuking other countries for their alleged softness in the prohibitionist cause.

    On the other hand, the answer to this problem is not for the federal government to trample on our Constitution in order to please the United Nations – either with a tortuous reading of the Commerce Clause or under the guise of passing enforcement legislation under the treaty power. Even if we make the dubious assumption that the Supreme Court was right about Congress’ power to override federalism in the name of enforcing treaties, it’s not clear that the Supreme Court’s decision allows the complete abrogation of federalism to enforce this particular treaty. Since the penal article of the treaty, at the very least, allows us to respect our own “constitutional limitations,” it seems a bit circular to say that Congress has to pass penal legislation to stay in compliance with this article.

    I’m sure President Trump stays awake nights contemplating this dilemma. So let me offer a suggestion – why not respect the rule of law like Bolivia did?

     

    If you want to hang out, you’ve gotta take her out

    The Bolivian government was a party to the UN Narcotic Convention, and faced a similar problem to ours. Out of respect for the rights of indigenous peoples (which is kind of like federalist principles, if you think about it), Bolivia legalized the chewing of coca leaves by these peoples, apparently a traditional practice. But the Convention apparently required coca-leaf chewing to be criminalized.

    Instead of doing fancy legal footwork to try and claim they were complying with the Convention, Bolivia pulled out of the Convention altogether, which Article 46 of the Convention allows. Then Bolivia re-ratified the Convention, but this time they attached a reservation that the indigenous practice of coca-leaf chewing could remain legal. Some countries, including the U.S., objected to this reservation, but there weren’t enough objections to make any legal difference, and Bolivia was accepted back into the Convention subject to its coca-leaf reservation.

    (Fun fact: “socially liberal” Sweden was one of the countries which unsuccessfully objected to Bolivia’s coca-leaf reservation, declaring that “the ambition expressed in the convention is the successive prohibition also of traditional uses of drugs.”)

    So let’s assume that President Trump’s drug-war zeal is stronger than his skepticism about multilateral treaties, and that he wants the U.S. to stay part of the UN Narcotic Drug Convention. All he needs to do is pull out of the Convention, and then ask the Senate to re-ratify with a reservation that lets us legalize marijuana.

    Now, in such a case, I’d be cheering for the Senate to reject the treaty as a violation of U.S. sovereignty, not to mention dubious policy, but in that case Trump’s hands would be clean, he would have made clear his drug war bona fides without going full retard about it.

     

    Citations:

    Catechism of the Catholic Church

    Fourth Commandment and Fifth Commandment

    The UN Drug Control Conventions: A Primer

    SINGLE C ONVENTION ON NARCOTIC DRUGS , 1961 As amended by the 1972 Protocol amending the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, 1961

    Bolivia Rejoins UN Drug Treaty, Sans Coca Ban

    Does Marijuana Legalization Violate International Law?

     

    Contribution of the International Narcotics Control Board to the high-level review of the implementation by Member States of the Political Declaration and Plan of Action on International Cooperation towards an Integrated and Balanced Strategy to Counter the World Drug Problem” (pp. 41-43),

    Missouri v. Holland

     

    Catholic disclaimer:

    “2211 The political community has a duty to honor the family, to assist it, and to ensure especially…

    “- the protection of security and health, especially with respect to dangers like drugs, pornography, alcoholism, etc….

    2291 The use of drugs inflicts very grave damage on human health and life. Their use, except on strictly therapeutic grounds, is a grave offense. Clandestine production of and trafficking in drugs are scandalous practices. They constitute direct co-operation in evil, since they encourage people to practices gravely contrary to the moral law.” (from the Catechism)

    As the great St. Thomas Aquinas showed, the state is not bound to forbid all sins, and until recently, Catholics have not been prohibitionists. As for protecting the family from drugs, I would say that the state should step in only in cases of clear harm, like when someone’s abuse leads them to neglect their family responsibilities, but that the Church should intervene pastorally even earlier than this, to keep Catholics (or non-Catholic beneficiaries of Catholic charity) on the straight and narrow.

  • Monday Morning Links

    Off to another beautiful week here in America.  And also in America, Jr, which according to Alexa, is where 2/3 of our viewership is coming from.  Thanks, all you poutine-munchers and VPN users.

    Anyway, without further ado, here we go…

    Oh shit!
    Oops. Um, I hate to say it, but can you leave?

    Some awards show happened last night.  And it didn’t go well for Warren Beatty and Faye Dunaway.  An envelope mixup led to them announcing the wrong winner for Best Picture.  A mixup that wasn’t realized until the wrong cast had assembled onstage.  Also, before that, there was a loooooooooot of social signaling.  Fortunately for me, I missed the circus.

    Don’t worry Dems.  Perez is going to unite you.  At least he says he is.

    In a scathing takedown of Obamacare, some uncomfortable truths for its defenders are told.

    Is there an alt-text I should have thought of? Tell me how I failed in the comments, because I'm drawing a blank.
    Dionne, after leaving his Washington Post office for the day.

    E.J. Dionne has gone completely off the rails.  And I don’t mean a little bit, I mean Casey Jones-style.  Without the cocaine.  Probably.  Maybe.  Who knows, its hard to tell anymore how much of his insanity is a drug-fueled fever dream and how much is innate paranoia.  Only time will tell.

    And finally, Mexicans in Mexico are psychologically traumatized because of Trump.  Why?  Because they are facing the decision on whether or not to respect our nation’s laws.

    Anyhow, have a great day out there, people.  Especially all of our Canadian readers. You guys really seem to grasp what this is all aboot.

    [Update: Alexa and Dionne links corrected]